Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Demonstration of Adaptive Collaboration of Large Language Models for Medical Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00248 v2 pith:UHFGY2LY submitted 2024-10-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords medicalcollaborationdecision-makingadaptiveclinicianscomplexdatalanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical Decision-Making (MDM) is a multi-faceted process that requires clinicians to assess complex multi-modal patient data patient, often collaboratively. Large Language Models (LLMs) promise to streamline this process by synthesizing vast medical knowledge and multi-modal health data. However, single-agent are often ill-suited for nuanced medical contexts requiring adaptable, collaborative problem-solving. Our MDAgents addresses this need by dynamically assigning collaboration structures to LLMs based on task complexity, mimicking real-world clinical collaboration and decision-making. This framework improves diagnostic accuracy and supports adaptive responses in complex, real-world medical scenarios, making it a valuable tool for clinicians in various healthcare settings, and at the same time, being more efficient in terms of computing cost than static multi-agent decision making methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSyn: Enhancing Diagnostics with Human-AI Collaboration

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a simulation, an LLM "physician" that could only see the chief complaint produced better ICD-10 codes after chatting with an LLM "assistant" that had the full clinical note, compared to no interaction.

Pith tools