Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

DeepKriging: Spatially Dependent Deep Neural Networks for Spatial Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.11972 v4 pith:UHLH3K6R submitted 2020-07-23 stat.ML cs.LGstat.APstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.APstat.ME
keywords predictionspatialdatakrigingdependenceprovidesassociatedcovariance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In spatial statistics, a common objective is to predict values of a spatial process at unobserved locations by exploiting spatial dependence. Kriging provides the best linear unbiased predictor using covariance functions and is often associated with Gaussian processes. However, when considering non-linear prediction for non-Gaussian and categorical data, the Kriging prediction is no longer optimal, and the associated variance is often overly optimistic. Although deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used for general classification and prediction, they have not been studied thoroughly for data with spatial dependence. In this work, we propose a novel DNN structure for spatial prediction, where the spatial dependence is captured by adding an embedding layer of spatial coordinates with basis functions. We show in theory and simulation studies that the proposed DeepKriging method has a direct link to Kriging in the Gaussian case, and it has multiple advantages over Kriging for non-Gaussian and non-stationary data, i.e., it provides non-linear predictions and thus has smaller approximation errors, it does not require operations on covariance matrices and thus is scalable for large datasets, and with sufficiently many hidden neurons, it provides the optimal prediction in terms of model capacity. We further explore the possibility of quantifying prediction uncertainties based on density prediction without assuming any data distribution. Finally, we apply the method to predicting PM2.5 concentrations across the continental United States.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Summary Statistics of Large-scale Model Outputs for Observation-corrected Outputs

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sig-PCA combines path signatures, PCA, neural networks, and deep kriging to correct climate model outputs using sparse observations, improving distributional and spatial correlation match.

  2. A2 Copula-Driven Spatial Bayesian Neural Network For Modeling Non-Gaussian Dependence: A Simulation Study

    stat.ME 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The A2-SBNN, a neural network with copula-based weight initialization, is calibrated to a fixed synthetic spatial field and reports high correlation and low RMSE across tail-dependence levels, though without compariso...

Pith tools