REVIEW 4 cited by
Dijet resonance search with weak supervision using sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp collisions in the ATLAS detector
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Dijet resonance search with weak supervision using sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp collisions in the ATLAS detector
read the original abstract
This Letter describes a search for narrowly resonant new physics using a machine-learning anomaly detection procedure that does not rely on a signal simulations for developing the analysis selection. Weakly supervised learning is used to train classifiers directly on data to enhance potential signals. The targeted topology is dijet events and the features used for machine learning are the masses of the two jets. The resulting analysis is essentially a three-dimensional search $A\rightarrow BC$, for $m_A\sim\mathcal{O}(\text{TeV})$, $m_B,m_C\sim\mathcal{O}(100\text{ GeV})$ and $B,C$ are reconstructed as large-radius jets, without paying a penalty associated with a large trials factor in the scan of the masses of the two jets. The full Run 2 $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data set of 139 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider is used for the search. There is no significant evidence of a localized excess in the dijet invariant mass spectrum between 1.8 and 8.2 TeV. Cross-section limits for narrow-width $A$, $B$, and $C$ particles vary with $m_A$, $m_B$, and $m_C$. For example, when $m_A=3$ TeV and $m_B\gtrsim 200$ GeV, a production cross section between 1 and 5 fb is excluded at 95% confidence level, depending on $m_C$. For certain masses, these limits are up to 10 times more sensitive than those obtained by the inclusive dijet search. These results are complementary to the dedicated searches for the case that $B$ and $C$ are Standard Model bosons.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Learning Standard Model structure from LHC data with Riemannian flow matching
ShellFlow, a Riemannian flow-matching transformer fed only on-shell and invariant-mass priors and ~8×10^8 recorded ATLAS events, reproduces the SM's dilepton resonances, Weinberg angle, and top/W mass peaks in a singl...
-
Classical Hardware Acceleration of Quantum Autoencoders for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Collider Experiments
Quantum and hybrid quantum-classical autoencoders for LHC trigger anomaly detection are quantized and synthesized onto a single FPGA SLR with claimed sub-microsecond-to-few-microsecond latency at stated parity with cl...
-
Look everywhere effects in anomaly detection
Weakly supervised anomaly detectors that train and test on the same data produce badly miscalibrated p-values; independent test sets are calibrated but insensitive, while k-fold cross-validation is a workable middle ground.
-
Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection
A combined kitchen sink observable set of Energy Flow Polynomials and subjettiness variables outperforms standard baselines in sensitivity to a wide range of resonant signals, with new public benchmarks released and a...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.