Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Dijet resonance search with weak supervision using sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp collisions in the ATLAS detector

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.02983 v2 pith:UIEHQRHU submitted 2020-05-06 hep-ex

Dijet resonance search with weak supervision using $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions in the ATLAS detector

classification hep-ex
keywords searchdijetjetsmassesusedanalysisatlasdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

This Letter describes a search for narrowly resonant new physics using a machine-learning anomaly detection procedure that does not rely on a signal simulations for developing the analysis selection. Weakly supervised learning is used to train classifiers directly on data to enhance potential signals. The targeted topology is dijet events and the features used for machine learning are the masses of the two jets. The resulting analysis is essentially a three-dimensional search $A\rightarrow BC$, for $m_A\sim\mathcal{O}(\text{TeV})$, $m_B,m_C\sim\mathcal{O}(100\text{ GeV})$ and $B,C$ are reconstructed as large-radius jets, without paying a penalty associated with a large trials factor in the scan of the masses of the two jets. The full Run 2 $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collision data set of 139 fb$^{-1}$ recorded by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider is used for the search. There is no significant evidence of a localized excess in the dijet invariant mass spectrum between 1.8 and 8.2 TeV. Cross-section limits for narrow-width $A$, $B$, and $C$ particles vary with $m_A$, $m_B$, and $m_C$. For example, when $m_A=3$ TeV and $m_B\gtrsim 200$ GeV, a production cross section between 1 and 5 fb is excluded at 95% confidence level, depending on $m_C$. For certain masses, these limits are up to 10 times more sensitive than those obtained by the inclusive dijet search. These results are complementary to the dedicated searches for the case that $B$ and $C$ are Standard Model bosons.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning Standard Model structure from LHC data with Riemannian flow matching

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    ShellFlow, a Riemannian flow-matching transformer fed only on-shell and invariant-mass priors and ~8×10^8 recorded ATLAS events, reproduces the SM's dilepton resonances, Weinberg angle, and top/W mass peaks in a singl...

  2. Classical Hardware Acceleration of Quantum Autoencoders for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Collider Experiments

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Quantum and hybrid quantum-classical autoencoders for LHC trigger anomaly detection are quantized and synthesized onto a single FPGA SLR with claimed sub-microsecond-to-few-microsecond latency at stated parity with cl...

  3. Look everywhere effects in anomaly detection

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Weakly supervised anomaly detectors that train and test on the same data produce badly miscalibrated p-values; independent test sets are calibrated but insensitive, while k-fold cross-validation is a workable middle ground.

  4. Kitchen Sink Anomaly Detection

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A combined kitchen sink observable set of Energy Flow Polynomials and subjettiness variables outperforms standard baselines in sensitivity to a wide range of resonant signals, with new public benchmarks released and a...