REVIEW 2 cited by
Legal Summarisation through LLMs: The PRODIGIT Project
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present some initial results of a large-scale Italian project called PRODIGIT which aims to support tax judges and lawyers through digital technology, focusing on AI. We have focused on generation of summaries of judicial decisions and on the extraction of related information, such as the identification of legal issues and decision-making criteria, and the specification of keywords. To this end, we have deployed and evaluated different tools and approaches to extractive and abstractive summarisation. We have applied LLMs, and particularly on GPT4, which has enabled us to obtain results that proved satisfactory, according to an evaluation by expert tax judges and lawyers. On this basis, a prototype application is being built which will be made publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Judgments to Issues: Structured Extraction of Legal Reasoning with Citation-Hallucination Control
A cost-efficient DeepSeek-V3 pipeline extracts IRAC-grounded issue-level XML from ~330k Italian tax judgments and cuts citation hallucinations from 11.7% to 0.9% via Linkoln matching, validated by two tax-law PhDs on ...
-
When Large Language Models Meet Law: Dual-Lens Taxonomy, Technical Advances, and Ethical Governance
A literature review that classifies LLM-for-law research using a dual-lens taxonomy of Toulmin argumentation components and legal practitioner roles.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.