pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24305 · v1 · pith:UJZOXHOUnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Proximity-Induced Spin Reorientation in Monolayer CrI₃ on Hexagonal WTe₂

D\'aniel Tibor Pozs\'ar , Marcell Bal\'azs S\'ipos , Amador Garc\'ia-Fuente , P\'eter Nemes-Incze , Viktor Iv\'ady , Efr\'en Navarro-Moratalla , Jaime Ferrer , L\'aszl\'o Szunyogh
show 2 more authors
L\'aszl\'o Oroszl\'any Zolt\'an Tajkov
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords proximity effectspin reorientationCrI3WTe2magnetic anisotropyvan der Waals heterostructurespin Hamiltonianfirst-principles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Placing monolayer CrI₃ on WTe₂ reorients its magnetization from out-of-plane to in-plane.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how a hexagonal WTe₂ substrate affects monolayer CrI₃ magnetism using first-principles calculations mapped to spin Hamiltonians. It finds that the substrate switches the preferred magnetization direction to in-plane and increases the magnetic ordering scale. This switch occurs because the substrate alters the relative strength of symmetric anisotropic exchange compared with onsite anisotropy. The authors link the electronic structure directly to finite-temperature behavior through the extracted models. They present the approach as a transferable workflow for proximity effects in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures.

Core claim

WTe₂ reorients the CrI₃ magnetization from out-of-plane to in-plane and substantially enhances the magnetic ordering scale within the extracted spin models. The reorientation is driven by a substrate-induced change in the balance between symmetric anisotropic exchange and onsite anisotropy, as obtained from relativistic spin-Hamiltonian mapping of first-principles electronic structure calculations.

What carries the argument

Relativistic spin-Hamiltonian mapping that extracts magnetic interactions from first-principles electronic structure calculations and connects them to finite-temperature magnetic behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The relativistic spin-Hamiltonian mapping extracted from first-principles calculations accurately represents the proximity-induced modifications to magnetic interactions without dominant errors from exchange-correlation approximations or finite-size effects.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the CrI₃/WTe₂ heterostructure and finds the magnetization remains out-of-plane or the ordering temperature stays unchanged would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24305 by Amador Garc\'ia-Fuente, D\'aniel Tibor Pozs\'ar, Efr\'en Navarro-Moratalla, Jaime Ferrer, L\'aszl\'o Oroszl\'any, L\'aszl\'o Szunyogh, Marcell Bal\'azs S\'ipos, P\'eter Nemes-Incze, Viktor Iv\'ady, Zolt\'an Tajkov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proximity-controlled magnetism and multiscale computational workflow. a,b) Top and side views of the CrI3/WTe2 van der Waals heterostructure, showing the atomic registry and the two-monolayer geometry. c) In the absence of the WTe2 proximity effect, mono￾layer CrI3 retains an out-of-plane magnetic orientation. d) In the CrI3/WTe2 heterostructure, the WTe2 substrate reorients the CrI3 magnetization into an … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: DFT-level magnetic anisotropy reversal and layer-resolved band character. a) Spin-orbit DFT energy difference ∆E = EIP − EOOP for isolated CrI3 and CrI3/WTe2. The energy difference is defined separately for each system by comparing self-consistent calculations with different magnetic orientations for the same structural model; the bars therefore indicate the preferred spin orientation within each system. P… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distance dependence of isotropic and anisotropic exchange interactions. a) Shell-averaged isotropic exchange interactions, J iso ij , extracted with GROGU as a function of Cr–Cr distance for isolated CrI3, CrI3/WTe2 with an out-of-plane reference configuration, and CrI3/WTe2 with an in-plane reference configuration. Negative values favor ferromagnetic alignment in the Hamiltonian convention used here. The … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Finite-temperature magnetic order from VAMPIRE simulations. a) Normal￾ized magnetic order parameter, m = |M|/M0, as a function of temperature for isolated CrI3 and CrI3/WTe2 spin-Hamiltonian models. b) Magnetic susceptibility χm near the transition region. Stars and vertical dotted lines mark the susceptibility maxima used to estimate the ordering tem￾peratures. c) Extracted ordering temperatures. The isol… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic anisotropy controls the orientation and thermal stability of two-dimensional magnetic order. Predicting proximity-induced changes in anisotropy requires linking the electronic structure to microscopic magnetic interactions and finite-temperature behavior. Here we study monolayer CrI$_3$ on hexagonal WTe$_2$ using a first-principles-to-finite-temperature workflow centered on relativistic spin-Hamiltonian mapping. We find that WTe$_2$ reorients the CrI$_3$ magnetization from out-of-plane to in-plane and substantially enhances the magnetic ordering scale within the extracted spin models. Analysis of the extracted spin Hamiltonians shows that the reorientation is driven by a substrate-induced change in the balance between symmetric anisotropic exchange and onsite anisotropy. We establish a transferable workflow for proximity-controlled magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a first-principles workflow that maps the electronic structure of monolayer CrI₃ on hexagonal WTe₂ to a relativistic spin Hamiltonian and then analyzes finite-temperature behavior. It reports that the WTe₂ substrate reorients the CrI₃ magnetization from out-of-plane to in-plane while substantially increasing the magnetic ordering scale, with the reorientation arising from a substrate-induced shift in the relative strength of symmetric anisotropic exchange versus onsite anisotropy.

Significance. If the spin-Hamiltonian mapping is reliable, the work supplies a concrete, transferable protocol for predicting proximity-induced anisotropy changes in 2D van der Waals heterostructures. The combination of relativistic first-principles mapping with finite-temperature modeling is a methodological strength that could be applied to other material pairs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spin-Hamiltonian mapping section] The central claim that the reorientation is driven by a change in the balance between symmetric anisotropic exchange and onsite anisotropy is load-bearing; the manuscript must therefore tabulate the extracted values of these terms (with uncertainties) for both freestanding CrI₃ and the heterostructure so that the shift can be verified quantitatively.
  2. [Computational methods] Anisotropy energies are typically only a few meV; the manuscript should therefore include explicit tests of convergence with supercell size and choice of exchange-correlation functional, as these are the dominant sources of uncertainty in the weakest assumption identified for the mapping procedure.
minor comments (1)
  1. Ensure that all symbols appearing in the extracted Hamiltonian (e.g., the precise definition of the symmetric anisotropic exchange tensor) are defined in a single, early section or table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spin-Hamiltonian mapping section] The central claim that the reorientation is driven by a change in the balance between symmetric anisotropic exchange and onsite anisotropy is load-bearing; the manuscript must therefore tabulate the extracted values of these terms (with uncertainties) for both freestanding CrI₃ and the heterostructure so that the shift can be verified quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tabulation strengthens the central claim. The revised manuscript will include a new table (or expanded Table in the Spin-Hamiltonian mapping section) listing the symmetric anisotropic exchange and onsite anisotropy parameters extracted for both freestanding monolayer CrI₃ and the CrI₃/WTe₂ heterostructure, together with the estimated uncertainties arising from the mapping procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Computational methods] Anisotropy energies are typically only a few meV; the manuscript should therefore include explicit tests of convergence with supercell size and choice of exchange-correlation functional, as these are the dominant sources of uncertainty in the weakest assumption identified for the mapping procedure.

    Authors: We accept the recommendation. The revised manuscript will add explicit convergence tests with respect to supercell size and exchange-correlation functional choice in the Computational Methods section (or a dedicated supplementary note), quantifying their effect on the extracted anisotropy parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes a standard first-principles electronic structure calculation mapped to a relativistic spin-Hamiltonian, followed by analysis of anisotropy terms and finite-temperature behavior. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. The reorientation claim follows directly from comparing extracted onsite anisotropy and symmetric anisotropic exchange terms between isolated CrI3 and the heterostructure, without self-referential definitions or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. The workflow is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; ledger populated from stated workflow assumptions only.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption First-principles electronic structure calculations combined with spin-Hamiltonian mapping accurately capture proximity effects on magnetic anisotropy.
    Invoked as the basis of the entire workflow in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5740 in / 1246 out tokens · 34181 ms · 2026-06-25T23:07:03.974086+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Nature546, 265–269 (2017)

    Gong, C.et al.Discoveryofintrinsicferromagnetismintwo-dimensionalvanderwaalscrystals. Nature546, 265–269 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Huang, B.et al.Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der waals crystal down to the monolayer limit.Nature546, 270–273 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    S., Mandrus, D

    Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der waals materials.Nature563, 47–52 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Gibertini, M., Koperski, M., Morpurgo, A. F. & Novoselov, K. S. Magnetic 2d materials and heterostructures.Nature Nanotechnology14, 408–419 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Lado, J. L. & Fernández-Rossier, J. On the origin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI3.2D Materials4, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    L., Sorée, B

    Tiwari, S., Van de Put, M. L., Sorée, B. & Vandenberghe, W. G. Critical behavior of the ferromagnets CrI3, CrBr3, and CrGeTe3 and the antiferromagnet FeCl2: A detailed first- principles study.Physical Review B103, 014432 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    R., Skovhus, T

    Pavizhakumari, V. R., Skovhus, T. & Olsen, T. Beyond the random phase approximation for calculating curie temperatures in ferromagnets: application to Fe, Ni, Co and monolayer CrI3.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 115806 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    V., Mazurenko, V

    Kashin, I. V., Mazurenko, V. V., Katsnelson, M. I. & Rudenko, A. N. Orbitally-resolved ferromagnetism of monolayer CrI3.2D Materials7, 025036 (2020). 18

    2020

  9. [9]

    & Núñez, A

    Jaeschke-Ubiergo, R., Suárez Morell, E. & Núñez, A. S. Theory of magnetism in the van der waals magnet CrI3.Physical Review B103, 174410 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Krindges, A., Vaz de Morais Junior, C. A. & Piotrowski, M. J. Role of electronic correlations on exchange interactions and curie temperature in monolayer CrI3.ACS Omega11(2026). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6c02634

    doi:10.1021/acsomega.6c02634 2026

  11. [11]

    & Yan, J.-A

    Webster, L. & Yan, J.-A. Strain-tunable magnetic anisotropy in monolayer CrCl3, CrBr3, and CrI3.Physical Review B98, 144411 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    I., Torbatian, Z., Qaiumzadeh, A

    Vishkayi, S. I., Torbatian, Z., Qaiumzadeh, A. & Asgari, R. Strain and electric-field control of spin-spin interactions in monolayer CrI3.Physical Review Materials4, 094004 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    & Yuan, S

    Wu, Z., Yu, J. & Yuan, S. Strain-tunable magnetic and electronic properties of monolayer CrI3.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics21, 7750–7755 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    & Yazyev, O

    Pizzochero, M. & Yazyev, O. V. Inducing magnetic phase transitions in monolayer CrI3 via lattice deformations.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C124, 7585–7590 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    & Sanyal, B

    Wang, D. & Sanyal, B. Systematic study of monolayer to trilayer CrI3: Stacking sequence dependence of electronic structure and magnetism.The Journal of Physical Chemistry C125, 18467–18473 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Dolui, K.et al.Proximity spin–orbit torque on a two-dimensional magnet within van der waals heterostructure: Current-driven antiferromagnet-to-ferromagnet reversible nonequilib- rium phase transition in bilayer CrI3.Nano Letters20, 2288–2295 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    Zollner, K., Faria Junior, P. E. & Fabian, J. Proximity exchange effects in MoSe2 and WSe2 heterostructures with CrI3: Twist angle, layer, and gate dependence.Physical Review B100, 085128 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Zollner, K., Faria Junior, P. E. & Fabian, J. Strong manipulation of the valley splitting upon twisting and gating in MoSe2/CrI3 and WSe2/CrI3 van der waals heterostructures.Physical Review B107, 035112 (2023). 19

    2023

  19. [19]

    Zhao, W.et al.Magnetic proximity and nonreciprocal current switching in a monolayer WTe2 helical edge.Nature Materials19, 503–507 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    & Ganesh, P

    Staros, D., Rubenstein, B. & Ganesh, P. A first-principles study of bilayer 1t’-WTe2/CrI3: a candidate topological spin filter.npj Spintronics2, 4 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Zhou, S.et al.Field-free and efficient nanosecond spin–orbit torque switching in optimized WTe2/Fe3GaTe2 heterostructures.Applied Physics Letters128, 192403 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Zhang, X.et al.Imaging of a van der waals spin-orbit torque system using spin ensembles in hbn.Nature Communications(2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    L.et al.Efficient spin transfer in WTe 2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure enabled by direct interlayer p-orbital hybridization (2024).2412.02966

    Ning, H. L.et al.Efficient spin transfer in WTe 2/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterostructure enabled by direct interlayer p-orbital hybridization (2024).2412.02966

    arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Herling, F.et al.Strain-mediated lattice reconstruction enhances ferromagnetism in Cr2Ge2Te6/WTe2 van der Waals heterobilayers.Nano Letters26, 5434–5442 (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Li, J.et al.Proximity-magnetized quantum spin hall insulator: monolayer 1t ′- WTe2/Cr2Ge2Te6.Nature Communications13, 5134 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Henríquez-Guerra, E.et al.Strain engineering of magnetoresistance and magnetic anisotropy in CrSBr.Advanced Materialse2506695 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Cheng, G.et al.Emergence of electric-field-tunable interfacial ferromagnetism in 2d antifer- romagnet heterostructures.Nature Communications13, 7348 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Eom, J.et al.Voltage control of magnetism in Fe3−xGeTe2/In2Se3 van der waals ferromag- netic/ferroelectric heterostructures.Nature Communications14, 5605 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Bacaksiz, C., Šabani, D., Menezes, R. M. & Milošević, M. V. Distinctive magnetic properties of CrI3 and CrBr3 monolayers caused by spin-orbit coupling.Physical Review B103, 125418 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    & Milošević, M

    Šabani, D., Bacaksız, C. & Milošević, M. V. Beyond orbitally resolved magnetic exchange in CrI3 and NiI2.Physical Review Letters135, 036704 (2025). 20

    2025

  31. [31]

    T.et al.grogupy: v0.4.0 (2025)

    Pozsár, D. T.et al.grogupy: v0.4.0 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 15449541

    doi:10.5281/zenodo 2025

  32. [32]

    I., Katsnelson, M

    Liechtenstein, A. I., Katsnelson, M. I., Antropov, V. P. & Gubanov, V. A. Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials67, 65–74 (1987)

    1987

  33. [33]

    Martínez-Carracedo, G.et al.Relativistic magnetic interactions from nonorthogonal basis sets.Physical Review B108, 214418 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    & Heine, T

    Ma, Y., Kou, L., Li, X., Dai, Y. & Heine, T. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides with a hexagonal lattice: Room-temperature quantum spin hall insulators.Physical Review B93, 035442 (2016)

    2016

  35. [35]

    & Sato, T

    Ando, R., Sugawara, K., Kawakami, T., Takahashi, T. & Sato, T. Selective fabrication of monolayer 1h- and 1t’-WTe2.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan93, 085002 (2024). 2501.17527

    arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    & Weinberger, P

    Udvardi, L., Szunyogh, L., Palotás, K. & Weinberger, P. First-principles relativistic study of spin waves in thin magnetic films.Physical Review B68, 104436 (2003)

    2003

  37. [37]

    M.et al.The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, 2745–2779 (2002)

    Soler, J. M.et al.The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, 2745–2779 (2002)

    2002

  38. [38]

    García, A.et al.Siesta: Recent developments and applications.The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 204108 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  40. [40]

    Evans, R. F. L.et al.Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter26, 103202 (2014). 21

    2014