Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Causality-oriented robustness: exploiting general noise interventions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10299 v2 pith:UL77CQBC submitted 2023-07-18 stat.ME cs.LGstat.ML

classification stat.MEcs.LGstat.ML
keywords robustpredictionrobustnessinterventionsmodelspredictionsshiftscausal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since distribution shifts are common in real-world applications, there is a pressing need to develop prediction models that are robust against such shifts. Existing frameworks, such as empirical risk minimization or distributionally robust optimization, either lack generalizability for unseen distributions or rely on postulated distance measures. Alternatively, causality offers a data-driven and structural perspective to robust predictions. However, the assumptions necessary for causal inference can be overly stringent, and the robustness offered by such causal models often lacks flexibility. In this paper, we focus on causality-oriented robustness and propose Distributional Robustness via Invariant Gradients (DRIG), a method that exploits general noise interventions in training data for robust predictions against unseen interventions, and naturally interpolates between in-distribution prediction and causality. In a linear setting, we prove that DRIG yields predictions that are robust among a data-dependent class of distribution shifts. Furthermore, we show that our framework includes anchor regression as a special case, and that it yields prediction models that protect against more diverse perturbations. We establish finite-sample results and extend our approach to semi-supervised domain adaptation to further improve prediction performance. Finally, we empirically validate our methods on synthetic simulations and on single-cell and intensive health care datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Treatment effect estimation by comparing observed and predicted outcomes: conditions for valid inference and practical illustration

    stat.ME 2025-11 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Valid estimation of the ATT by comparing observed outcomes under a new treatment with model-based predicted outcomes under standard treatment requires transportability, conditional ignorability, consistency, positivit...

Pith tools