Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ADIFF: Explaining audio difference using natural language

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.04476 v1 pith:ULL4QEMJ submitted 2025-02-06 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords audiomodelexplanationsbaselinelanguagecaptioningdifferencedifferences
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding and explaining differences between audio recordings is crucial for fields like audio forensics, quality assessment, and audio generation. This involves identifying and describing audio events, acoustic scenes, signal characteristics, and their emotional impact on listeners. This paper stands out as the first work to comprehensively study the task of explaining audio differences and then propose benchmark, baselines for the task. First, we present two new datasets for audio difference explanation derived from the AudioCaps and Clotho audio captioning datasets. Using Large Language Models (LLMs), we generate three levels of difference explanations: (1) concise descriptions of audio events and objects, (2) brief sentences about audio events, acoustic scenes, and signal properties, and (3) comprehensive explanations that include semantics and listener emotions. For the baseline, we use prefix tuning where audio embeddings from two audio files are used to prompt a frozen language model. Our empirical analysis and ablation studies reveal that the naive baseline struggles to distinguish perceptually similar sounds and generate detailed tier 3 explanations. To address these limitations, we propose ADIFF, which introduces a cross-projection module, position captioning, and a three-step training process to enhance the model's ability to produce detailed explanations. We evaluate our model using objective metrics and human evaluation and show our model enhancements lead to significant improvements in performance over naive baseline and SoTA Audio-Language Model (ALM) Qwen Audio. Lastly, we conduct multiple ablation studies to study the effects of cross-projection, language model parameters, position captioning, third stage fine-tuning, and present our findings. Our benchmarks, findings, and strong baseline pave the way for nuanced and human-like explanations of audio differences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MixAssist: An Audio-Language Dataset for Co-Creative AI Assistance in Music Mixing

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MixAssist is the first audio-grounded, multi-turn conversational dataset for co-creative music mixing instruction, and fine-tuning Qwen-Audio on it yields human-comparable mixing advice.

  2. A Survey of Automatic Evaluation Methods on Text, Visual and Speech Generations

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified taxonomy and comparative meta-evaluation of automatic evaluation methods across text, vision, and speech generation, concluding that LLM-based evaluators dominate current practice.

  3. Breaking the Barriers of Text-Hungry and Audio-Deficient AI

    cs.SD 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proposed audio-native translation framework called MAST with fractional diffusion is described, but no evidence is given that it produces working translations.

Pith tools