Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 2 cited by

Perturbiner methods in scattering amplitude

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Classical multi-particle solutions of the field equations encode the complete set of tree-level scattering amplitudes, with multi-particle coefficients identical to Berends–Giele currents.

desk verdict Solid pedagogical review that also writes down several previously tacit recursions (cubic NLSM, AdS democratic gauge, one-loop sewing); useful reference, not a paradigm shift. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06661 v1 pith:ULRESSSI submitted 2026-07-07 hep-th

Renann Lipinski Jusinskas This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords perturbinerBerends–Gielecurrentstree-levelamplitudesclassicalmulti-particlesolutionscolor-strippedrecursiongravitationalAdScorrelatorsone-loopintegrands
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that tree-level scattering data in a wide class of field theories can be organized as classical multi-particle solutions of the equations of motion—the perturbiner. Substituting a formal plane-wave expansion into the nonlinear equations yields recursive coefficients that are precisely the Berends–Giele currents, from which amplitudes follow by attaching one more on-shell leg and canceling its propagator. The same machinery is shown to work for colored theories, nonlinear sigma models, gravity coupled to matter, theories with a boundary, anti-de Sitter space, and (after careful off-shell sewing) one-loop integrands. The pedagogical claim is that one classical construction unifies these settings and makes several previously tacit community results explicit, including a new cubic recursion for the nonlinear sigma model and a democratic gauge for AdS polarizations.

What carries the argument

The perturbiner: a formal multi-particle plane-wave expansion of the classical fields whose coefficients are fixed recursively by the equations of motion; those coefficients are the multi-particle currents (Berends–Giele currents when color-stripped).

What would settle it

Compute a known tree amplitude (for example four-gluon or three-graviton) both from the multi-particle recursion given in the paper and from ordinary Feynman rules; any mismatch after fixing overall normalization would falsify the claim that the currents encode the amplitudes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the complete set of tree-level scattering amplitudes of a theory is encoded in formal classical multi-particle solutions of its equations of motion: once single-particle polarizations are taken nilpotent and the multi-particle ansatz is substituted into the field equations, the resulting recursive coefficients are the Berends–Giele currents, and amplitudes are recovered by the standard on-shell attachment formula. The same recursive organization extends, with stated modifications, to gravity, matter couplings, curved backgrounds with residual translation invariance, and one-loop integrands obtained by sewing an extra off-shell leg.

Load-bearing premise

Single-particle polarizations are forced to be nilpotent so that external legs stay distinguishable and the multi-particle series truncates; without that algebraic device the recursion does not close in the way the construction needs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tree amplitudes in gauge theory, gravity, NLSM, and mixed matter systems can be generated from a single recursive classical expansion without enumerating Feynman diagrams.
  • Color-ordered partial amplitudes and Kleiss–Kuijf relations follow immediately from shuffle identities of the color-stripped currents.
  • With an extra off-shell leg and combinatorial overcounting factors, the same currents produce one-loop integrands for scalars and pure gravity (including ghosts).
  • In flat space with a boundary and in AdS, the multi-particle currents yield boundary correlators that decompose into flat-space amplitudes with concatenated polarizations.
  • A cubic recursion for the group-valued NLSM exists without auxiliary fields, simplifying double-copy statements at the level of currents.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same recursive logic should apply to de Sitter after Wick rotation of the radial coordinate, turning AdS bulk-to-boundary data into in-in cosmological correlators once horizon subtleties are controlled.
  • Because the construction works off shell for one extra leg, a systematic two-loop sewing (two extra legs with appropriate symmetry factors) is a natural next algebraic target.
  • The nilpotency device is formally identical to treating external labels as Grassmann or as distinct formal symbols; any alternative that enforces label distinguishability without nilpotency would keep the recursion while removing the most artificial premise.
  • Democratic AdS gauges that put polarization directions on equal footing may simplify double-copy checks of AdS graviton correlators against products of gluon correlators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review presents the perturbiner method as a first-principles construction of classical multi-particle solutions to field equations that encode tree-level scattering data (and, after sewing, one-loop integrands). Multi-particle coefficients obtained by substituting a plane-wave (or bulk-to-boundary) ansatz into the equations of motion are identified with Berends–Giele currents; on-shell limits then yield amplitudes or boundary correlators. The manuscript systematically develops the construction for scalars, spinors, gauge vectors, Yang–Mills (color-dressed and color-stripped), bi-adjoint scalars, N=4 SYM, the NLSM (coordinate- and group-valued, including a new cubic recursion without auxiliaries), pure gravity and gravity coupled to matter (metric and vielbein), flat space with a boundary, AdS, and one-loop integrands via algebraic sewing with combinatorial overcounting factors. Several unpublished results and community tacit knowledge are included.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the review supplies a self-contained, pedagogical reference that unifies Berends–Giele recursions across a wide range of models and geometries, and makes several previously unpublished constructions (NLSM cubic recursion without auxiliaries, democratic AdS gauge, explicit one-loop overcounting coefficients for gravity including ghosts) available in print. The method is derived directly from classical (or gauge-fixed) equations of motion with residual gauge invariance, shuffle identities and soft limits verified explicitly; the one-loop combinatorial factors are fixed by matching known symmetry factors. This is a genuine service to the amplitude community and a natural home for double-copy and EFT explorations at the level of currents.

minor comments (6)
  1. The abstract and title use “scattering amplitude” (singular) while the body consistently treats amplitudes (plural) and correlators; a uniform plural would better match the scope.
  2. Section 2 (after Eq. (2.2)): the nilpotency of single-particle polarizations is introduced as an algebraic device. A short explicit remark that it is a bookkeeping truncation (and that physical amplitudes are recovered after restoring polarizations and symmetry factors) would help readers who encounter the construction for the first time.
  3. Section 4.2, Eq. (4.48): the new cubic NLSM recursion is a clear novelty; flagging it more prominently in the introduction or abstract would aid discoverability.
  4. Section 6.2.3: the democratic gauge choice for AdS gravitons is useful; a one-sentence comparison with the axial/boundary-transverse gauges used in the literature would orient the reader.
  5. Section 7.2: the BV-BRST gauge fixing is assumed; a brief pointer to a standard reference (already cited) at the first appearance of the ghost action would lower the entry barrier.
  6. Occasional typographical inconsistencies (e.g., “aboutadecadeago”, missing spaces in compound words) remain in the front matter and should be cleaned in production.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: multi-particle currents are derived from classical EOM plus an explicit algebraic ansatz, then shown to reproduce known Berends–Giele recursions and amplitudes; self-citations supply prior independent derivations, not definitions of the central claim.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins with free plane-wave solutions, the multi-particle ansatz (2.8)/(3.28)/(5.21) etc., and the classical equations of motion; substitution yields recursive multi-particle coefficients (e.g. (2.13), (3.32), (5.33)). Tree amplitudes are then defined by the on-shell limit that cancels the remaining propagator (2.51), (3.41), (5.36). These steps are self-contained and match Feynman rules / known Berends–Giele currents by direct comparison, not by construction from the target amplitudes. Nilpotency of single-particle polarizations is an explicit modeling device that truncates the series and enforces leg distinguishability; it is not fitted to data nor defined from the amplitudes themselves. Occasional self-citations (author’s earlier papers on gravity, AdS, loops) point to already-published independent calculations and do not close a definitional loop for the review’s pedagogical core. No fitted parameters, no uniqueness theorem imported solely from the author, and no renaming of an empirical pattern as a first-principles result. Score 1 only for the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations typical of a specialist review.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard classical field theory, Lie-algebra identities, and the existence of free plane-wave (or bulk-to-boundary) solutions. The only non-standard modeling choice is the nilpotency of single-particle polarizations, introduced to make the multi-particle series terminate. No free parameters are fitted; all coupling constants and metrics are taken from the underlying Lagrangian.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Single-particle polarizations are nilpotent (distinct external legs remain distinguishable even when quantum numbers coincide).
    Stated explicitly after Eq. (2.2); required for the multi-particle series to close and for the recursive definition of the currents.
  • domain assumption Classical equations of motion (or their gauge-fixed versions) encode all tree-level scattering data via multi-particle expansions.
    Standard folklore since the 1960s; used throughout Sections 2–7 as the starting point of every recursion.
  • standard math Lie-algebra generators and structure constants satisfy the usual commutation relations and Jacobi identities.
    Used for color-dressed and color-stripped constructions (Section 3).
  • domain assumption Free solutions in AdS are bulk-to-boundary propagators that factor into boundary plane waves times radial functions of definite weight ν.
    Appendix A and Section 6.2; required for the multi-particle ansatz in curved space.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbiner methods in scattering amplitude." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULRESSSI

@misc{pith2026260706661,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbiner methods in scattering amplitude},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULRESSSI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06661}
}
read the original abstract

Berends--Giele currents have recently attracted renewed attention across the amplitude community, appearing in new contexts ranging from gravitational amplitudes to cosmological correlators and string theory. They can be derived from first principles using the perturbiner method, a thirty-year-old framework that organizes tree-level scattering data in the form of classical multi-particle solutions to field theory equations of motion. After its rediscovery about a decade ago, it has been systematically studied and applied in many different contexts. This review aims to provide a pedagogical introduction to the method, covering its basic formulation across a broad (but certainly not exhaustive) range of models and progressing to some of the most recent findings in the literature. This includes several unpublished results, many of which represent tacit knowledge of the community that has not previously appeared in print.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06661 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphic depiction of the scalar two-particle current. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphic depiction of one of the terms in the scalar three-particle current. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A field-inspired derivation of open string amplitudes

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A perturbiner-like recursion with a weak associativity condition generates multi-parametric series representations of open string tree amplitudes without moduli integration.

  2. Color-factor symmetry using perturbiner methods for tree-level amplitudes of Yang-Mills theory coupled to matter

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Perturbiner recursion proves color-factor symmetry (hence BCJ relations) for all tree-level YM+matter amplitudes with at least one gluon.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering

    Stephen J. Parke and T. R. Taylor. “An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.56 (1986), p. 2459.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2459

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.2459 1986

  2. [2]

    Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons

    Frits A. Berends and W. T. Giele. “Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons.” In:Nucl. Phys. B306 (1988), pp. 759–808.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90442-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90442-7 1988

  3. [4]

    Multi-Parton Amplitudes in Gauge Theories

    Michelangelo L. Mangano and Stephen J. Parke. “Multiparton Amplitudes in Gauge The- ories.” In:Phys. Rept.200 (1991), pp. 301–367.doi:10.1016/0370- 1573(91)90091- Y. arXiv:hep-th/0509223

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/0370- 1991

  4. [5]

    Calculating Scattering Amplitudes Efficiently

    Lance J. Dixon. “Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently.” In:Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI 95): QCD and Beyond. Jan. 1996, pp. 539–584. arXiv:hep-ph/9601359

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  5. [6]

    What we think about multiparticle amplitudes

    A. A. Rosly and K. G. Selivanov. “What we think about multiparticle amplitudes.” In: (Oct. 1996). arXiv:hep-th/9610070

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  6. [7]

    On amplitudes in self-dual sector of Yang-Mills theory

    A. A. Rosly and K. G. Selivanov. “On amplitudes in selfdual sector of Yang-Mills theory.” In:Phys. Lett. B399 (1997), pp. 135–140.doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00268-2. arXiv: hep-th/9611101

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00268-2 1997

  7. [8]

    Gravitational SD Perturbiner

    A. A. Rosly and K. G. Selivanov. “Gravitational SD perturbiner.” In: (Oct. 1997). arXiv: hep-th/9710196

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  8. [9]

    Multigluon Tree Amplitudes and Self-Duality Equation

    K. G. Selivanov. “Multi - gluon tree amplitudes and selfduality equation.” In: (Apr. 1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9604206. 109

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

Show all 87 references
  1. [10]

    On tree form-factors in (supersymmetric) Yang-Mills theory

    K. G. Selivanov. “On tree form-factors in (supersymmetric) Yang-Mills theory.” In:Com- mun. Math. Phys.208 (2000), pp. 671–687.doi:10.1007/s002200050006. arXiv:hep- th/9809046

    2000 doi

  2. [11]

    Tree Graphs and Classical Fields

    David G. Boulware and Lowell S. Brown. “Tree Graphs and Classical Fields.” In:Phys. Rev.172 (1968), pp. 1628–1631.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.1628

    1968 doi

  3. [12]

    Selfdual Yang-Mills theory, integrability and multiparton ampli- tudes

    William A. Bardeen. “Selfdual Yang-Mills theory, integrability and multiparton ampli- tudes.” In:Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.123 (1996). Ed. by M. Bando, K. Inoue, and T. Kugo, pp. 1–8.doi:10.1143/PTPS.123.1

    1996 doi

  4. [13]

    Selfdual Yang-Mills theory and one loop like - helicity QCD multi - gluon amplitudes

    Daniel Cangemi. “Selfdual Yang-Mills theory and one loop like - helicity QCD multi - gluon amplitudes.” In:Nucl. Phys. B484 (1997), pp. 521–537.doi:10 . 1016 / S0550 - 3213(96)00586-X. arXiv:hep-th/9605208

    1997 arXiv

  5. [14]

    New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons

    Ruth Britto, Freddy Cachazo, and Bo Feng. “New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons.” In:Nucl. Phys. B715 (2005), pp. 499–522.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005. 02.030. arXiv:hep-th/0412308

    2005 doi arXiv

  6. [15]

    Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory

    Ruth Britto et al. “Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory.” In: Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005), p. 181602.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 94 . 181602. arXiv: hep-th/0501052

    2005 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Scattering equations and Kawai-Lewellen- Tye orthogonality

    Freddy Cachazo, Song He, and Ellis Ye Yuan. “Scattering equations and Kawai-Lewellen- Tye orthogonality.” In:Phys. Rev. D90.6 (2014), p. 065001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90. 065001. arXiv:1306.6575 [hep-th]

    2014 doi arXiv

  8. [18]

    New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson. “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes.” In:Phys. Rev. D78 (2008), p. 085011.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.085011. arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]

    2008 doi arXiv

  9. [19]

    Perturbative Quantum Grav- ity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory

    Zvi Bern, John Joseph M. Carrasco, and Henrik Johansson. “Perturbative Quantum Grav- ity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (2010), p. 061602.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.061602. arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]

    2010 doi arXiv

  10. [21]

    The Amplituhedron

    Nima Arkani-Hamed and Jaroslav Trnka. “The Amplituhedron.” In:JHEP10 (2014), p. 030.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)030. arXiv:1312.2007 [hep-th]

    2014 doi arXiv

  11. [22]

    Combinatorics and Topology of Kawai-Lewellen-Tye Relations

    Sebastian Mizera. “Combinatorics and Topology of Kawai-Lewellen-Tye Relations.” In: JHEP08 (2017), p. 097.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)097. arXiv:1706.08527 [hep-th]. 110

    2017 doi arXiv

  12. [23]

    Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet

    Nima Arkani-Hamed et al. “Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet.” In:JHEP05 (2018), p. 096.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)096. arXiv:1711.09102 [hep-th]

    2018 doi arXiv

  13. [24]

    Berends-Giele recursions and the BCJ duality in superspace and components

    Carlos R. Mafra and Oliver Schlotterer. “Berends-Giele recursions and the BCJ duality in superspace and components.” In:JHEP03 (2016), p. 097.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)097. arXiv:1510.08846 [hep-th]

    2016 doi arXiv

  14. [25]

    Non-abelianZ-theory: Berends-Giele recursion for theα ′-expansion of disk integrals

    Carlos R. Mafra and Oliver Schlotterer. “Non-abelianZ-theory: Berends-Giele recursion for theα ′-expansion of disk integrals.” In:JHEP01 (2017), p. 031.doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP01(2017)031. arXiv:1609.07078 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [26]

    Non-linear gauge transformations inD= 10SYM theory and the BCJ duality

    Seungjin Lee, Carlos R. Mafra, and Oliver Schlotterer. “Non-linear gauge transformations inD= 10SYM theory and the BCJ duality.” In:JHEP03 (2016), p. 090.doi:10.1007/ JHEP03(2016)090. arXiv:1510.08843 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [27]

    Berends-Giele recursion for double-color-ordered amplitudes

    Carlos R. Mafra. “Berends-Giele recursion for double-color-ordered amplitudes.” In:JHEP 07 (2016), p. 080.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)080. arXiv:1603.09731 [hep-th]

    2016 doi arXiv

  17. [28]

    Perturbiner Methods for Effective Field Theories andtheDoubleCopy

    Sebastian Mizera and Barbara Skrzypek. “Perturbiner Methods for Effective Field Theories andtheDoubleCopy.” In:JHEP10(2018),p.018.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)018.arXiv: 1809.02096 [hep-th]

    2018 doi arXiv

  18. [29]

    Ho- motopy double copy and the Kawai–Lewellen–Tye relations for the non-abelian and tensor Navier–Stokes equations

    Valentina Guarin Escudero, Cristhiam Lopez-Arcos, and Alexander Quintero Velez. “Ho- motopy double copy and the Kawai–Lewellen–Tye relations for the non-abelian and tensor Navier–Stokes equations.” In:J. Math. Phys.64.3 (2023), p. 032304.doi:10 . 1063 / 5 . 0119508. arXiv:2201...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [30]

    Tree- and one-loop-leveldoublecopyforthe(anti)self-dualsectorsofYang-Millsandgravitytheories

    Daniel Herrera Correa, Cristhiam Lopez-Arcos, and Alexander Quintero Velez. “Tree- and one-loop-leveldoublecopyforthe(anti)self-dualsectorsofYang-Millsandgravitytheories.” In:Phys. Rev. D111.6 (2025), p. 065001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.065001. arXiv: 2412.07498 [hep-th]

    2025 doi arXiv

  20. [31]

    Berends-Giele currents in Bern-Carrasco-JohanssongaugeforF 3-andF 4-deformedYang-Millsamplitudes

    Lucia M. Garozzo, Leonel Queimada, and Oliver Schlotterer. “Berends-Giele currents in Bern-Carrasco-JohanssongaugeforF 3-andF 4-deformedYang-Millsamplitudes.” In:JHEP 02 (2019), p. 078.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)078. arXiv:1809.08103 [hep-th]

    2019 doi arXiv

  21. [32]

    Color-kinematics and double-copy relations for self-dual solutions

    Joris Raeymaekers. “Color-kinematics and double-copy relations for self-dual solutions.” In:Phys. Rev. D111.12 (2025), p. 126007.doi:10.1103/9v1z-56hp. arXiv:2503.15662 [hep-th]

    2025 doi arXiv

  22. [33]

    L∞-algebras and the perturbiner expansion

    Cristhiam Lopez-Arcos and Alexander Quintero Vélez. “L∞-algebras and the perturbiner expansion.” In:JHEP11 (2019), p. 010.doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)010. arXiv:1907. 12154 [hep-th]

    2019 doi

  23. [34]

    TheL∞ structure of gauge theories with matter

    Humberto Gomez et al. “TheL∞ structure of gauge theories with matter.” In:JHEP02 (2021), p. 093.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)093. arXiv:2011.09528 [hep-th]. 111

    2021 doi arXiv

  24. [35]

    10D super-Yang-Mills scattering amplitudes from its pure spinor action

    Maor Ben-Shahar and Max Guillen. “10D super-Yang-Mills scattering amplitudes from its pure spinor action.” In:JHEP12 (2021), p. 014.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)014. arXiv: 2108.11708 [hep-th]

    2021 doi arXiv

  25. [36]

    Manifest colour-kinematics duality and double-copy in the string- based formalism

    Naser Ahmadiniaz et al. “Manifest colour-kinematics duality and double-copy in the string- based formalism.” In:Nucl. Phys. B975 (2022), p. 115690.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb. 2022.115690. arXiv:2110.04853 [hep-th]

    2022 doi

  26. [38]

    The off-shell recursion for gravity and the classical double copy for currents

    Kyoungho Cho, Kwangeon Kim, and Kanghoon Lee. “The off-shell recursion for gravity and the classical double copy for currents.” In:JHEP01 (2022), p. 186.doi:10.1007/ JHEP01(2022)186. arXiv:2109.06392 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [39]

    Scattering Massive String Resonances through Field-Theory Methods

    Max Guillen et al. “Scattering Massive String Resonances through Field-Theory Methods.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.127.5 (2021), p. 051601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.051601. arXiv:2104.03314 [hep-th]

    2021 doi arXiv

  28. [41]

    Effective interactions of the open bosonic string via field theory

    Lucia M. Garozzo and Alfredo Guevara. “Effective interactions of the open bosonic string via field theory.” In:JHEP07 (2024), p. 002.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)002. arXiv: 2402.19430 [hep-th]

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [42]

    New recursion relations for tree-level correlators in anti–de Sitter spacetime

    Connor Armstrong et al. “New recursion relations for tree-level correlators in anti–de Sitter spacetime.” In:Phys. Rev. D106.12 (2022), p. L121701.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106. L121701. arXiv:2209.02709 [hep-th]

    2022 doi arXiv

  30. [43]

    On the amplitude expansion of gluon correlators in AdS4

    Humberto Gomez et al. “On the amplitude expansion of gluon correlators in AdS4.” In: (June 2026). arXiv:2606.23776 [hep-th]

    2026 arXiv

  31. [44]

    One-Loop Off-Shell Amplitudes from Classical Equations of Mo- tion

    Humberto Gomez et al. “One-Loop Off-Shell Amplitudes from Classical Equations of Mo- tion.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.130.8 (2023), p. 081601.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 130 . 081601. arXiv:2208.02831 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [45]

    One-Loop N-Point Correlators in Pure Gravity

    Humberto Gomez et al. “One-Loop N-Point Correlators in Pure Gravity.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.134.11 (2025), p. 111602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.111602. arXiv:2411. 07939 [hep-th]

    2025 doi

  33. [46]

    Quantum off-shell recursion relation

    Kanghoon Lee. “Quantum off-shell recursion relation.” In:JHEP05 (2022), p. 051.doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2022)051. arXiv:2202.08133 [hep-th]

    2022 doi arXiv

  34. [47]

    Dual Amplitudes and Multi - Gluon Processes

    Michelangelo L. Mangano, Stephen J. Parke, and Zhan Xu. “Dual Amplitudes and Multi - Gluon Processes.” In:1st Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d’Aoste: Results and Perspectives in Particle Physics. Mar. 1987. 112

    1987

  35. [50]

    Tree-level amplitudes from the pure spinor super- string

    Carlos R. Mafra and Oliver Schlotterer. “Tree-level amplitudes from the pure spinor super- string.” In:Phys. Rept.1020 (2023), pp. 1–162.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.04.001. arXiv:2210.14241 [hep-th]

    2023 doi arXiv

  36. [51]

    Global Aspects of Current Algebra

    Edward Witten. “Global Aspects of Current Algebra.” In:Nucl. Phys. B223 (1983), pp. 422–432.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90063-9

    1983 doi

  37. [52]

    Pions and Generalized Cohomology

    Daniel S. Freed. “Pions and Generalized Cohomology.” In:J. Diff. Geom.80.1 (2008), pp. 45–77. arXiv:hep-th/0607134

    2008 arXiv

  38. [53]

    Note on off-shell relations in nonlinear sigma model

    Gang Chen et al. “Note on off-shell relations in nonlinear sigma model.” In:JHEP03 (2015), p. 156.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2015)156. arXiv:1412.3722 [hep-th]

    2015 doi arXiv

  39. [54]

    Symmetry for Flavor-Kinematics Duality from an Action

    Clifford Cheung and Chia-Hsien Shen. “Symmetry for Flavor-Kinematics Duality from an Action.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.118.12 (2017), p. 121601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118. 121601. arXiv:1612.00868 [hep-th]

    2017 doi arXiv

  40. [55]

    Amplitude Relations in Non-linear Sigma Model

    Gang Chen and Yi-Jian Du. “Amplitude Relations in Non-linear Sigma Model.” In:JHEP 01 (2014), p. 061.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)061. arXiv:1311.1133 [hep-th]

    2014 doi arXiv

  41. [56]

    Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM

    Freddy Cachazo, Song He, and Ellis Ye Yuan. “Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM.” In:JHEP07 (2015), p. 149.doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2015)149. arXiv:1412.3479 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  42. [57]

    Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes

    Clifford Cheung et al. “Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.114.22 (2015), p. 221602.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221602. arXiv:1412.4095 [hep-th]

    2015 doi arXiv

  43. [58]

    Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits

    Freddy Cachazo, Peter Cha, and Sebastian Mizera. “Extensions of Theories from Soft Limits.” In:JHEP06 (2016), p. 170.doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)170. arXiv:1604.03893 [hep-th]

    2016 doi arXiv

  44. [59]

    A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories

    Clifford Cheung et al. “A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories.” In:JHEP02 (2017), p. 020.doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)020. arXiv:1611.03137 [hep-th]

    2017 doi arXiv

  45. [60]

    Hidden Simplicity of the Gravity Action

    Clifford Cheung and Grant N. Remmen. “Hidden Simplicity of the Gravity Action.” In: JHEP09 (2017), p. 002.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)002. arXiv:1705.00626 [hep-th]

    2017 doi arXiv

  46. [61]

    Lev Davidovich Landau and Evgeny Mikhailovich Lifshitz.The Classical Theory of Fields. 4th. Vol. 2. Course of Theoretical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1975.isbn: 978-0-08- 018176-9. 113

    1975

  47. [62]

    Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Con- servation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass

    Steven Weinberg. “Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Con- servation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass.” In:Phys. Rev.135 (1964), B1049–B1056.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.135.B1049

    1964 doi

  48. [63]

    Infrared photons and gravitons

    Steven Weinberg. “Infrared photons and gravitons.” In:Phys. Rev.140 (1965), B516–B524. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.140.B516

    1965 doi

  49. [64]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem

    Freddy Cachazo and Andrew Strominger. “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem.” In: (Apr. 2014). arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [65]

    Subleading Soft Theorem for Multiple Soft Gravitons

    Subhroneel Chakrabarti et al. “Subleading Soft Theorem for Multiple Soft Gravitons.” In: JHEP12 (2017), p. 150.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)150. arXiv:1707.06803 [hep-th]

    2017 doi arXiv

  51. [66]

    Testing Subleading Multiple Soft Graviton Theorem for CHY Prescription

    Subhroneel Chakrabarti et al. “Testing Subleading Multiple Soft Graviton Theorem for CHY Prescription.” In:JHEP01 (2018), p. 090.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)090. arXiv: 1709.07883 [hep-th]

    2018 doi arXiv

  52. [67]

    A Recursion relation for gravity amplitudes

    James Bedford et al. “A Recursion relation for gravity amplitudes.” In:Nucl. Phys. B721 (2005), pp. 98–110.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.016. arXiv:hep-th/0502146

    2005 doi arXiv

  53. [68]

    Tree level recursion relations in general relativity

    Freddy Cachazo and Peter Svrcek. “Tree level recursion relations in general relativity.” In: (Feb. 2005). arXiv:hep-th/0502160

    2005 arXiv

  54. [69]

    Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations

    Freddy Cachazo, Song He, and Ellis Ye Yuan. “Einstein-Yang-Mills Scattering Amplitudes From Scattering Equations.” In:JHEP01 (2015), p. 121.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)121. arXiv:1409.8256 [hep-th]

    2015 doi arXiv

  55. [70]

    On Tree Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Grav- ity

    Nima Arkani-Hamed and Jared Kaplan. “On Tree Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Grav- ity.” In:JHEP04 (2008), p. 076.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/076. arXiv:0801. 2385 [hep-th]

    2008 doi

  56. [71]

    Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Ampli- tudes

    Henrik Johansson and Alexander Ochirov. “Color-Kinematics Duality for QCD Ampli- tudes.” In:JHEP01 (2016), p. 170.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)170. arXiv:1507.00332 [hep-ph]

    2016 doi arXiv

  57. [72]

    Doublecopyformassivequantumparticleswith spin

    HenrikJohanssonandAlexanderOchirov.“Doublecopyformassivequantumparticleswith spin.” In:JHEP09 (2019), p. 040.doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)040. arXiv:1906.12292 [hep-th]

    2019 doi arXiv

  58. [73]

    The Holographic Weyl anomaly

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis. “The Holographic Weyl anomaly.” In:JHEP07 (1998), p. 023.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023. arXiv:hep-th/9806087

    1998 doi arXiv

  59. [74]

    Holographic reconstruc- tion of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence

    Sebastian de Haro, Sergey N. Solodukhin, and Kostas Skenderis. “Holographic reconstruc- tion of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence.” In:Commun. Math. Phys.217 (2001), pp. 595–622.doi:10 . 1007 / s002200100381. arXiv:hep - th / 0002230

    2001

  60. [75]

    De Sitter Representations

    Kurt Hinterbichler. “De Sitter Representations.” In: (June 2026). arXiv:2606 . 26221 [hep-th]. 114

    2026

  61. [76]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    Juan Martin Maldacena. “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models.” In:JHEP05 (2003), p. 013.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013. arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

    2003 doi arXiv

  62. [77]

    Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations

    Steven Weinberg. “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations.” In:Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005), p. 043514.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043514. arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    2005 doi arXiv

  63. [78]

    BRST quantization: A Short review

    A. Fuster, Marc Henneaux, and Axel Maas. “BRST quantization: A Short review.” In:Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.2 (2005), pp. 939–964.doi:10.1142/S0219887805000892. arXiv:hep-th/0506098

    2005 doi arXiv

  64. [79]

    Calculation of the graviton self- energy using dimensional regularization

    D. M. Capper, G. Leibbrandt, and M. Ramon Medrano. “Calculation of the graviton self- energy using dimensional regularization.” In:Phys. Rev. D8 (1973), pp. 4320–4331.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.4320

    1973 doi

  65. [80]

    The Three graviton vertex function in thermal quan- tumgravity

    Fernando T. Brandt and J. Frenkel. “The Three graviton vertex function in thermal quan- tumgravity.” In:Phys. Rev. D47(1993),pp.4688–4697.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4688. arXiv:hep-ph/9209265

    1993 doi arXiv

  66. [81]

    Perturbative unitarity calls for an action

    Subhroneel Chakrabarti and Renann Lipinski Jusinskas. “Perturbative unitarity calls for an action.” In:Phys. Rev. D111.12 (2025), p. L121901.doi:10.1103/pktc-9rfv. arXiv: 2412.07864 [hep-th]

    2025 doi

  67. [82]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Navier-Stokes Equa- tion

    Clifford Cheung and James Mangan. “Scattering Amplitudes and the Navier-Stokes Equa- tion.” In: (Oct. 2020). arXiv:2010.15970 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [83]

    Third Way to Interacting p- Form Theories

    Matteo Broccoli, Nihat Sadik Deger, and Stefan Theisen. “Third Way to Interacting p- Form Theories.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.127.9 (2021), p. 091603.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 127.091603. arXiv:2103.13243 [hep-th]

    2021 doi arXiv

  69. [84]

    Antisymmetric Tensor Gauge Theories and Nonlinear Sigma Models

    Daniel Z. Freedman and P. K. Townsend. “Antisymmetric Tensor Gauge Theories and Nonlinear Sigma Models.” In:Nucl. Phys. B177 (1981), pp. 282–296.doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(81)90392-8

    1981 doi

  70. [85]

    Amplitudesforleft-handedstrings

    W.Siegel.“Amplitudesforleft-handedstrings.” In:(Dec.2015).arXiv:1512.02569 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [86]

    Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations

    Lionel Mason and David Skinner. “Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations.” In: JHEP07 (2014), p. 048.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)048. arXiv:1311.2564 [hep-th]

    2014 doi arXiv

  72. [87]

    Schwarzschild Black Hole from Perturbation Theory to All Orders

    Poul H. Damgaard and Kanghoon Lee. “Schwarzschild Black Hole from Perturbation Theory to All Orders.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.132.25 (2024), p. 251603.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett.132.251603. arXiv:2403.13216 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [88]

    Field Theory Expansions of String Theory Ampli- tudes

    Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha. “Field Theory Expansions of String Theory Ampli- tudes.” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.132.22 (2024), p. 221601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132. 221601. arXiv:2401.05733 [hep-th]

    2024 doi arXiv

  74. [89]

    A field the- ory derivation of string amplitudes

    Humberto Gomez, Renann Lipinski Jusinskas, and Sitender Pratap Kashyap. “A field the- ory derivation of string amplitudes.” In: (2026). To appear. 115

    2026

  75. [90]

    Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Back- grounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity

    Peter Breitenlohner and Daniel Z. Freedman. “Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Back- grounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity.” In:Phys. Lett. B115 (1982), pp. 197–201. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90643-8

    1982 doi

  76. [91]

    StabilityinGaugedExtendedSupergravity

    PeterBreitenlohnerandDanielZ.Freedman.“StabilityinGaugedExtendedSupergravity.” In:Annals Phys.144 (1982), p. 249.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(82)90116-6

    1982 doi

  77. [92]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography

    Edward Witten. “Anti de Sitter space and holography.” In:Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998), pp. 253–291.doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2. arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 doi arXiv

  78. [93]

    Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes and scalar fields with a logarithmic branch

    Marc Henneaux et al. “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes and scalar fields with a logarithmic branch.” In:Phys. Rev. D70 (2004), p. 044034.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70. 044034. arXiv:hep-th/0404236. [94]NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Re...

    2004 doi arXiv

  79. [94]

    Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspon- dence

    Daniel Z. Freedman et al. “Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspon- dence.” In:Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999), pp. 96–118.doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00053-X. arXiv:hep-th/9804058. A Appendix: Free solutions in anti-de Sitter In this appendix we will discuss the free s...

    1999 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.