REVIEW 1 cited by
Algorithms and Hardness for Estimating Statistical Similarity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Algorithms and Hardness for Estimating Statistical Similarity
read the original abstract
We introduce and study the computational problem of determining statistical similarity between probability distributions. For distributions $P$ and $Q$ over a finite sample space, their statistical similarity is defined as $S_{\mathrm{stat}}(P, Q) := \sum_x \min(P(x), Q(x))$. Despite its fundamental nature as a measure of similarity between distributions, capturing essential concepts such as Bayes error in prediction and hypothesis testing, this computational problem has not been previously explored. Recent work on computing statistical distance has established that, somewhat surprisingly, even for the simple class of product distributions, exactly computing statistical similarity is $\#\mathsf{P}$-hard. This motivates the question of designing approximation algorithms for statistical similarity. Our first contribution is a Fully Polynomial-Time deterministic Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) for estimating statistical similarity between two product distributions. Furthermore, we also establish a complementary hardness result. In particular, we show that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to estimate statistical similarity when $P$ and $Q$ are Bayes net distributions of in-degree $2$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Computing Total Variation Distance Between Mixtures of Product Distributions
A randomized (1±ε)-approximation algorithm for TV distance between k-mixtures of product distributions runs in poly((nq)^k, 1/ε) time, with exact poly(n, 2^{O(k)}) deterministic algorithm for Boolean subcubes and #P-h...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.