Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 56 references

SCOPE: Subspace Clustering with Online Per-Head Top-K Estimation for Sparse Video Attention

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SCOPE claims that a training-free sparse attention method can make video diffusion transformers run up to 1.99x faster end-to-end while staying closer to the dense-attention reference than existing training-free baselines.

desk verdict A legitimate, well-engineered sparse-attention method with a genuinely novel subspace-composition proxy; the core ranking assumption is under-validated and a missing top-p threshold blocks reproduction, but it deserves serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12780 v1 pith:UQKWB3U3 submitted 2026-08-13 cs.CV

Qi Zhao , Qirui Li , Hanlin Tang , Yiduo Li , Zhen Guo , Cuifeng Shen , Chao Xu , Zhaosheng Chi
show 5 more authors
Xiaojin Lu Kan Liu Tao Lan Lin Qu Xi Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords sparseattentionvideodiffusiontransformerstraining-freeaccelerationsubspaceclustering3Drotarypositionembeddingper-headTop-kestimationsparsity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to establish that a training-free sparse attention method can accelerate video diffusion transformers while preserving dense-attention fidelity better than existing training-free methods. It argues that two coupled fixes are needed: finer-grained key scoring via 3D-RoPE-aligned subspace clustering, and input-adaptive retained-key counts via online per-head Top-k estimation. If the claim is right, sparse video attention does not require retraining or offline dense calibration to be both fast and faithful. The evidence is six 720p text-to-video and image-to-video configurations across three video DiT families, with up to a 1.99x end-to-end speedup and 28.46 dB PSNR relative to dense attention on HunyuanVideo T2V.

What carries the argument

The central object is the compositional proxy logit $\tilde{s}_{c,j} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{d}} \sum_{m \in \{T,H,W\}} P^m[c, z^m_j]$, where each key's temporal, height, and width subspace assignment looks up one centroid dot product per subspace and the three are summed. This gives every key a distinct estimated importance at additive scoring cost while the product of the subspace codebooks provides a multiplicative representation space. The second mechanism is the online per-head Top-k estimate $k_{\text{head}} = \left\lceil \frac{\sum_c n_c b_c}{\sum_c n_c} \right\rceil$, which extends only query clusters whose initial hybrid Top-p/fixed Top-k count falls below the head-level average. The first mechanism recovers fine-grained key discrimination; the second makes the retention floor adapt per head and per input without offline calibration.

What would settle it

Compare the keys SCOPE retains against the oracle top-10% keys from dense attention on a held-out set of prompts. If, at matched oracle recall, the retained fraction is not substantially below full-dimensional cluster scoring, or if reducing the subspace codebook size to roughly 200 causes recall to collapse, the granularity claim fails. A second check is to run SCOPE on a video DiT without 3D RoPE or with permuted channel order; if the gains disappear, the method depends on that exact partition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that post-RoPE keys in video DiTs can be split along the temporal, height, and width channel ranges of 3D rotary position embeddings, clustered independently, and scored by summing centroid lookup-table entries, producing per-key proxy logits that rank keys much more finely than block-level or full-dimensional cluster-level proxies. The paper then adds a head-specific Top-k floor computed online as the query-size-weighted average of the initial hybrid Top-p/fixed Top-k retained counts, which corrects under-selection without offline dense profiling. Together these mechanisms yield the best measured fidelity and lowest measured latency among the evaluated training-free baselines, with the reported speedups of 1.67x to 1.99x and PSNR gains over baselines in every setting.

Load-bearing premise

The proxy logit obtained by summing per-subspace centroid dot products ranks keys in nearly the same order as true attention scores across all layers, heads, and denoising steps, which requires the 3D-RoPE channel ranges to segment keys into subspaces whose independent clustering preserves the distinctions that determine high-contribution keys.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If SCOPE is correct, the same sparse attention budget can be used more effectively: at matched attention density it achieves higher attention recall and PSNR than block-level and cluster-level proxy baselines.
  • Sparse attention can be applied to existing video DiTs without retraining or modifying model parameters, since all proxy quantities are used only for key selection and attention is computed with the original tokens.
  • The online per-head Top-k estimator removes the need for offline dense-attention profiling or stored head-wise schedules, so the method adapts to different heads and inputs at inference time.
  • The measured end-to-end speedups of 1.67x to 1.99x imply that the overhead of subspace clustering, proxy scoring, and online selection is consistently outweighed by the reduction in attention computation.
  • The 3D-RoPE-aligned partition is claimed to outperform random channel partitions and full-dimensional clustering at the same centroid budget, indicating that the alignment with the rope channel structure is load-bearing for fidelity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to apply the same subspace-composition scoring to other RoPE-based transformers outside video DiTs, such as long-context LLMs, where fine-grained per-key ranking could improve sparse attention or KV-cache eviction without training.
  • The online per-head Top-k estimator could be reused as a calibration-free fallback in any hybrid Top-p/Top-k selector, potentially combined with trainable policies that adjust the base counts instead of only the floor.
  • Because the paper reports overhead as a small share of end-to-end latency, another extension is to reuse or update subspace codebooks across adjacent denoising steps, which would cut K-means cost further while likely preserving most of the fidelity gain.
  • The claim that 3D-RoPE-aligned partitions outperform random partitions suggests a testable hypothesis: the gains should shrink on models whose RoPE channel ordering is rearranged, and grow when temporal, height, and width structures are more distinct.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SCOPE, a training-free sparse-attention method for video diffusion transformers. It partitions post-RoPE keys into temporal, height, and width channel subspaces, clusters each subspace independently, and scores each key through lookup tables of query-centroid/key-centroid dot products. A hybrid Top-p/fixed-Top-k selection per query cluster is followed by an online per-head Top-k estimate obtained as the query-size-weighted average of base retained counts. Sparse attention is then computed with the original selected keys and values. Experiments on six 720p text-to-video and image-to-video settings across Wan2.1, Wan2.2, and HunyuanVideo report higher PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS and lower latency than SpargeAttn, SVG2, and SVOO, with 1.67x-1.99x end-to-end speedups.

Significance. If validated, this is a useful contribution to training-free sparse attention for video DiTs. The compositional scoring identity in Eq. (27) is exact, so the key-side approximation is cleanly characterized as replacing each key by its product-code representative; the complexity analysis in Appendix B separates the additive scoring cost from the multiplicative code space. The online per-head Top-k is a simple and input-adaptive heuristic whose benefit is supported by the matched-density ablation in Figure 7. The evaluation is broad and consistent: six configurations across three model families, with matched-density evidence in Figure 2 and no sign of circularity, since fidelity is measured against dense attention and latency against end-to-end runtime. The main weakness is that the ranking fidelity of the proxy logit, which is the load-bearing component of the fidelity claim, is validated on only one representative query token, and key configuration details (the Top-p threshold and whether the dense-prefix schedule is shared by baselines) are not reported. These gaps make the central claim currently underevidenced, though all are fixable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (6); Appendix C, Figure 8] The central fidelity claim rests on the proxy logit of Eq. (6) ranking keys nearly as accurately as true attention scores, but the manuscript does not establish this. Eq. (27) shows that the proxy logit is exactly the inner product with the product-code representative, so the approximation error is <\bar q_c, k_j - \hat k_j>/sqrt(d); however, the centroids in Eq. (3) are chosen by k-means to minimize Euclidean reconstruction error per subspace, which is not the same objective as preserving the dot-product ordering that determines attention. Figure 8 analyzes a single representative query token at one layer/head/denoising step and reports mask granularity at matched oracle recall; it does not quantify how often high-contribution keys are mis-ranked across the six configurations, 129-frame sequences, heads, and denoising steps. Please provide either a bound on the induced ranking error or systematic recall/ranking-fidelity statistics over heads, layers, and denoising steps; without this, the fidelity gains in Tables 1-2 cannot be attributed to the proxy's ranking quality.
  2. [§4, Implementation details; Eq. (7)] The Top-p threshold ρ used in Eq. (7) is never reported. The implementation details specify Cq=300, CT=CH=CW=333, α=0.1, and the dense-prefix schedule, but not ρ; Figure 7 states that p was set separately for each variant to match realized attention density, again without giving values. Because the base counts b_c in Eq. (8) and hence the online k_head in Eq. (9) and the final r_c in Eq. (10) all depend directly on ρ, the reported PSNR and latency numbers cannot be reproduced, and it is unclear whether the operating point is a single fixed ρ or a per-model tuned value. Please report ρ for each of the six settings (or state that it is fixed) and report the realized attention density per method.
  3. [§4, Implementation details; Tables 1-2] The dense-prefix schedule (first attention layer dense at every denoising step; dense for the first 20% of steps on Wan2.1/Wan2.2 and 10% on HunyuanVideo) is described only for SCOPE. The baselines are stated to use official implementations and default configurations, so it is unclear whether SpargeAttn, SVG2, and SVOO receive the same dense-prefix treatment. If they do not, the fidelity advantage in Tables 1-2 may be partly attributable to the dense prefix rather than to subspace clustering and online Top-k. Please state explicitly whether the dense-prefix schedule applies uniformly to all methods, or add a comparison in which all methods use the same dense-prefix schedule.
  4. [Tables 1-2 and Figure 2] The claim that SCOPE uses the same sparse-attention budget more effectively is supported by Figure 2, but Tables 1 and 2 do not report attention density for each method. Since latency differences across methods are small in some settings (for example, 904s for SCOPE versus 907s for SVG2 in Table 1, HunyuanVideo T2V), a reader cannot tell whether the PSNR advantage comes from better key selection or from a higher retained-key count at the reported operating points. Please include retained-density values in the main tables or in a companion table, and state how the operating points were matched.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Figure 1] The abstract reports 'up to a 1.99x end-to-end speedup on 720p HunyuanVideo with 28.46 dB PSNR', while Figure 1 shows a per-run HunyuanVideo result of 2.00x speedup and 29.15 dB PSNR. Please clarify whether the abstract reports an average or maximum over runs and reconcile the 2.00x value.
  2. [Figure 4] The Figure 4 caption states Cvis = 10, whereas the implementation details use CT = CH = CW = 333. Please explain that the figure uses a small visualization codebook and clarify the relationship to the actual configuration.
  3. [Figure 7] The caption contains a typo: 'set p seperately' should read 'set p separately'.
  4. [Appendix B] The complexity analysis in Appendix B excludes the cost of the K-means clustering itself, covering only the table-construction and lookup stages after codebooks and assignments are available. Since Figure 6 reports clustering overhead as small, consider adding a short complexity statement for the clustering stage, or a note explaining why it is amortized or small.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fidelity and latency claims are empirical comparisons against dense-attention outputs and external baselines, not derivations from fitted constants.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from Eq. (1) through Eq. (11). The proxy logit Eq. (6) is an approximation built from k-means centroids and is explicitly justified as an approximation; the paper does not claim Eq. (6) entails the reported PSNR. Eqs. (9)-(10) define an online per-head floor as a weighted average of base counts; this is a heuristic selection rule, and its benefit is tested by ablation (Figure 7) against dense-attention PSNR, so no numerical result is forced by definition. Hyperparameters (Cq, Cm, alpha, dense-prefix fraction) are implementation choices; even the unreported rho is a reproducibility gap, not evidence that a target metric was fitted. The only overlapping-author references are [16] and [56], cited in related-work surveys; neither supplies a load-bearing theorem, ansatz, or baseline number. The main results are self-contained benchmarks against dense attention and external methods, so the paper scores 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on K-means clustering behavior, the semantic validity of the 3D-RoPE subspace split, the ranking quality of the compositional proxy scores, and the empirical effectiveness of the online Top-k heuristic. The free parameters (Cq, C, alpha, rho, dense prefix) are chosen by the authors and not fitted per input, but their values are not justified by sensitivity analysis. No new physical or model entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • query cluster count Cq = 300
    Number of K-means clusters for queries; global hyperparameter set in Implementation details, not fitted per input.
  • key codebook sizes CT=CH=CW = 333
    Number of centroids per RoPE subspace; global hyperparameter; larger values would improve scoring fidelity at higher cost.
  • fixed Top-k ratio alpha = 0.1
    Global floor for retained keys, applied to all heads and inputs; no sensitivity analysis is reported for this value.
  • Top-p threshold rho = not reported
    Used in Eq. (7) for hybrid selection; the paper never states its value in Implementation details, so exact reproduction is impossible.
  • dense prefix fraction = 20% (Wan2.1/2.2), 10% (HunyuanVideo)
    Fraction of denoising steps where attention remains dense; chosen by hand per model family and not ablated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption K-means converges to a useful local optimum for query and key clustering on video DiT activations.
    Algorithms 1-2 rely on K-means assignments for both queries and keys; the method inherits SVG2's K-means implementation.
  • domain assumption The temporal, height and width channel ranges of 3D-RoPE partition key vectors into semantically separable subspaces.
    Motivated by Figure 4; the entire subspace scoring of Eqs. (5)-(6) depends on this partition being informative.
  • domain assumption Proxy logits from subspace centroid lookups rank keys nearly identically to true attention scores for selection purposes.
    The paper's fidelity claims ultimately rest on this approximation being accurate enough; Appendix B shows it is exact only against the product-code representative.
  • ad hoc to paper The query-size-weighted average of base retained counts in Eq. (9) is a better per-head minimum than a fixed global Top-k.
    This is a heuristic validated only empirically in Figure 7; no derivation or guarantee is provided.
  • standard math Dot products across disjoint channel ranges are additive, so the three subspace scores can be summed without approximation error.
    Eq. (27) in Appendix B states this identity exactly; it holds by linearity of the inner product.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SCOPE: Subspace Clustering with Online Per-Head Top-K Estimation for Sparse Video Attention." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQKWB3U3

@misc{pith2026260812780,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SCOPE: Subspace Clustering with Online Per-Head Top-K Estimation for Sparse Video Attention},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQKWB3U3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12780}
}
abstract

Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) incur quadratic self-attention cost over spatiotemporal tokens. Existing training-free sparse attention methods often construct sparse masks from block-level or cluster-level proxy scores, which can obscure fine-grained differences among keys and miss high contribution keys under aggressive sparsity. Moreover, such proxy scores may yield overly concentrated softmax distributions, causing Top-$p$ to retain too few keys for some query clusters. Although a fixed Top-$k$ minimum alleviates this failure mode, a shared value cannot adapt to variations across heads and inputs. To address both limitations, we propose SCOPE, a training-free sparse attention framework that combines 3D-RoPE-aligned key subspace clustering with online per-head Top-$k$ estimation for efficient video-DiT inference. SCOPE partitions post-RoPE keys into temporal, height, and width subspaces, clusters them independently, and aggregates the corresponding centroid scores through lookup tables to obtain per key proxy scores for each query cluster. Building on existing hybrid Top-$p$/fixed Top-$k$ selection, SCOPE derives a head-specific Top-$k$ value online by averaging the initial retained key counts within each head, weighted by query cluster size, and selects additional keys only for query clusters whose initial retained key counts fall below this value. Sparse attention is then computed over the selected original keys and values. Across six model--task configurations, SCOPE consistently outperforms existing training-free baselines in both fidelity and latency, achieving up to a $1.99\times$ end-to-end speedup on 720p HunyuanVideo with $28.46$ dB PSNR relative to dense attention.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Rainfusion: Adaptive video generation acceleration via multi-dimensional visual redundancy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21036, 2025

    Aiyue Chen, Bin Dong, Jingru Li, Jing Lin, Kun Tian, Yiwu Yao, and Gongyi Wang. Rainfusion: Adaptive video generation acceleration via multi-dimensional visual redundancy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21036, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Rainfusion2.0: Temporal-spatial awareness and hardware-efficient block-wise sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24086, 2025

    Aiyue Chen, Yaofu Liu, Junjian Huang, Guang Lian, Yiwu Yao, Wangli Lan, Jing Lin, Zhixin Ma, and Tingting Zhou. Rainfusion2.0: Temporal-spatial awareness and hardware-efficient block-wise sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24086, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Sparse-vdit: Unleashing the power of sparse attention to accelerate video diffusion transformers

    Pengtao Chen, Xianfang Zeng, Maosen Zhao, Mingzhu Shen, Wei Cheng, Gang Yu, and Tao Chen. Sparse-vdit: Unleashing the power of sparse attention to accelerate video diffusion transformers. InProc. AAAI, volume 40, pages 2957–2965, 2026. 9

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Re-ttention: Ultra sparse visual generation via attention statistical reshape.Proc

    Ruichen Chen, Keith Mills, Liyao Jiang, Chao Gao, and Di Niu. Re-ttention: Ultra sparse visual generation via attention statistical reshape.Proc. NeurIPS, 38:58029–58055, 2026

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Quantsparse: Comprehensively compressing video diffusion transformer with model quantization and attention sparsification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23681, 2025

    Weilun Feng, Chuanguang Yang, Haotong Qin, Mingqiang Wu, Yuqi Li, Xiangqi Li, Zhulin An, Libo Huang, Yulun Zhang, Michele Magno, et al. Quantsparse: Comprehensively compressing video diffusion transformer with model quantization and attention sparsification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.23681, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    LVSA: Training-Free Sparse Attention for Long Video Diffusion

    Gael Glorian, Ioannis Lamprou, Zhen Zhang, Yujie Yuan, and Hongsheng Liu. Lvsa: Training-free sparse attention for long video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.31057, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Generalized neighborhood attention: Multi-dimensional sparse attention at the speed of light

    Ali Hassani, Fengzhe Zhou, Aditya Kane, Jiannan Huang, Chieh-Yun Chen, Min Shi, Steven Walton, Markus Hoehnerbach, Vijay Thakkar, Mikhail Isaev, et al. Generalized neighborhood attention: Multi-dimensional sparse attention at the speed of light. InProc. CVPR, pages 3009–3018, 2026

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    DFSAttn: Dynamic Fine-grained Sparse Attention for Efficient Video Generation

    Jie Hu, Zixiang Gao, Yutong He, and Kun Yuan. Dfsattn: Dynamic fine-grained sparse attention for efficient video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.23445, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Fan Zhang, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, Yuanhan Zhang, Tianxing Wu, Qingyang Jin, Nattapol Chanpaisit, et al. Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models. InProc. CVPR, pages 21807–21818, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Vbench++: Comprehensive and versatile benchmark suite for video generative models

    Ziqi Huang, Fan Zhang, Xiaojie Xu, Yinan He, Jiashuo Yu, Ziyue Dong, Qianli Ma, Nattapol Chanpaisit, Chenyang Si, Yuming Jiang, et al. Vbench++: Comprehensive and versatile benchmark suite for video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13503, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Product quantization for nearest neighbor search.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(1):117–128, 2010

    Herve Jegou, Matthijs Douze, and Cordelia Schmid. Product quantization for nearest neighbor search.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(1):117–128, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Lookat: Lookup-optimized key-attention for memory-efficient transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10155, 2026

    Aryan Karmore. Lookat: Lookup-optimized key-attention for memory-efficient transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10155, 2026

    2026

  5. [13]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hypervattention: Efficient sparse attention with spatio-temporal clustering for video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.03012, 2026

    Dongyeun Lee, Amir Zandieh, Vahab Mirrokni, Junmo Kim, and Insu Han. Hypervattention: Efficient sparse attention with spatio-temporal clustering for video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.03012, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pisa: Piecewise sparse attention is wiser for efficient diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.01077, 2026

    Haopeng Li, Shitong Shao, Wenliang Zhong, Zikai Zhou, Lichen Bai, Hui Xiong, and Zeke Xie. Pisa: Piecewise sparse attention is wiser for efficient diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.01077, 2026

    2026

  8. [16]

    Compact attention: Exploiting structured spatio-temporal sparsity for fast video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.12969, 2025

    Qirui Li, Guangcong Zheng, Qi Zhao, Jie Li, Bin Dong, Yiwu Yao, and Xi Li. Compact attention: Exploiting structured spatio-temporal sparsity for fast video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.12969, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Radial attention:O(nlogn )sparse attention with energy decay for long video generation

    Xingyang Li, Muyang Li, Tianle Cai, Haocheng Xi, Shuo Yang, Yujun Lin, Lvmin Zhang, Songlin Yang, Jinbo Hu, Kelly Peng, et al. Radial attention:O(nlogn )sparse attention with energy decay for long video generation. Proc. NeurIPS, 38:16822–16852, 2026

    2026

  10. [18]

    Astraea: A token-wise acceleration framework for video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05096, 2025

    Haosong Liu, Yuge Cheng, Wenxuan Miao, Zihan Liu, Aiyue Chen, Jing Lin, Yiwu Yao, Chen Chen, Jingwen Leng, Yu Feng, et al. Astraea: A token-wise acceleration framework for video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.05096, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Rectified spaattn: Revisiting attention sparsity for efficient video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19835, 2025

    Xuewen Liu, Zhikai Li, Jing Zhang, Mengjuan Chen, and Qingyi Gu. Rectified spaattn: Revisiting attention sparsity for efficient video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19835, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Mixture of distributions matters: Dynamic sparse attention for efficient video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11641, 2026

    Yuxi Liu, Yipeng Hu, Zekun Zhang, Kunze Jiang, and Kun Yuan. Mixture of distributions matters: Dynamic sparse attention for efficient video diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11641, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ropeslr: 3d rope-driven sparse-lowrank attention for efficient diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20659, 2026

    Yuxi Liu, Zekun Zhang, Yixiang Cai, Renjia Deng, Yutong He, and Kun Yuan. Ropeslr: 3d rope-driven sparse-lowrank attention for efficient diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20659, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dynamicrad: Content-adaptive sparse attention for long video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.20470, 2026

    Yongji Long, Shijun Liang, Jintao Li, and Yun Li. Dynamicrad: Content-adaptive sparse attention for long video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.20470, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Jiayi Luo, Jiayu Chen, Jiankun Wang, Cong Wang, Hanxin Zhu, Qingyun Sun, Chen Gao, Zhibo Chen, and Jianxin Li. Attention sparsity is input-stable: Training-free sparse attention for video generation via offline sparsity profiling and online qk co-clustering.arXiv preprint arXi...

    2026 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Latte: Latent diffusion transformer for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03048, 2024

    Xin Ma, Yaohui Wang, Xinyuan Chen, Gengyun Jia, Ziwei Liu, Yuan-Fang Li, Cunjian Chen, and Yu Qiao. Latte: Latent diffusion transformer for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03048, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProc. ICCV, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Flashomni: A unified sparse attention engine for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25401, 2025

    Liang Qiao, Yue Dai, Yeqi Huang, Hongyu Kan, Jun Shi, and Hong An. Flashomni: A unified sparse attention engine for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.25401, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Grouping first, attending smartly: Training-free acceleration for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14687, 2025

    Sucheng Ren, Qihang Yu, Ju He, Alan Yuille, and Liang-Chieh Chen. Grouping first, attending smartly: Training-free acceleration for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14687, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Draftattention: Fast video diffusion via low-resolution attention guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14708, 2025

    Xuan Shen, Chenxia Han, Yufa Zhou, Yanyue Xie, Yifan Gong, Quanyi Wang, Yiwei Wang, Yanzhi Wang, Pu Zhao, and Jiuxiang Gu. Draftattention: Fast video diffusion via low-resolution attention guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14708, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Liteattention: A temporal sparse attention for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11062, 2025

    Dor Shmilovich, Tony Wu, Aviad Dahan, and Yuval Domb. Liteattention: A temporal sparse attention for diffusion transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11062, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Csattention: Centroid-scoring attention for accelerating llm inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08584, 2026

    Chuxu Song, Zhencan Peng, Jiuqi Wei, and Chuanhui Yang. Csattention: Centroid-scoring attention for accelerating llm inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08584, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Vorta: Efficient video diffusion via routing sparse attention.Proc

    Wenhao Sun, Rong-Cheng Tu, Yifu Ding, Jingyi Liao, Zhao Jin, Shunyu Liu, and Dacheng Tao. Vorta: Efficient video diffusion via routing sparse attention.Proc. NeurIPS, 38:7837–7863, 2026

    2026

  25. [33]

    Adacluster: Adaptive query-key clustering for sparse attention in video generation

    Haoyue Tan, Shengnan Wang, Yulin Qiao, Juncheng Zhang, Youhui Bai, Ping Gong, Zewen Jin, and Cheng Li. Adacluster: Adaptive query-key clustering for sparse attention in video generation. InProc. CVPR, pages 43249–43259, 2026

    2026

  26. [34]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianx- iao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Fasa: Frequency-aware sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03152, 2026

    Yifei Wang, Yueqi Wang, Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Yong Wang, Ismini Lourentzou, Zhengzhong Tu, Xiangxiang Chu, and Julian McAuley. Fasa: Frequency-aware sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03152, 2026

    2026

  28. [36]

    Videorope: What makes for good video rotary position embedding?arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05173, 2025

    Xilin Wei, Xiaoran Liu, Yuhang Zang, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Cao, Jian Tong, Haodong Duan, Qipeng Guo, Jiaqi Wang, et al. Videorope: What makes for good video rotary position embedding?arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05173, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Vmoba: Mixture-of-block attention for video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23858, 2025

    Jianzong Wu, Liang Hou, Haotian Yang, Xin Tao, Ye Tian, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, and Yunhai Tong. Vmoba: Mixture-of-block attention for video diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23858, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Sparse video-gen: Accelerating video diffusion transformers with spatial-temporal sparsity

    Haocheng Xi, Shuo Yang, Yilong Zhao, Chenfeng Xu, Muyang Li, Xiuyu Li, Yujun Lin, Han Cai, Jintao Zhang, Dacheng Li, et al. Sparse video-gen: Accelerating video diffusion transformers with spatial-temporal sparsity. In Proc. ICML, pages 68208–68224, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Training-free and adaptive sparse attention for efficient long video generation

    Yifei Xia, Suhan Ling, Fangcheng Fu, Yujie Wang, Huixia Li, Xuefeng Xiao, and Bin Cui. Training-free and adaptive sparse attention for efficient long video generation. InProc. ICCV, pages 15982–15993, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Xattention: Block sparse attention with antidiagonal scoring

    Ruyi Xu, Guangxuan Xiao, Haofeng Huang, Junxian Guo, and Song Han. Xattention: Block sparse attention with antidiagonal scoring. InProc. ICML, pages 69819–69831, 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    Sparse videogen2: Accelerate video generation with sparse attention via semantic-aware permutation.Proc

    Shuo Yang, Haocheng Xi, Yilong Zhao, Muyang Li, Jintao Zhang, Han Cai, Yujun Lin, Xiuyu Li, Chenfeng Xu, Kelly Peng, et al. Sparse videogen2: Accelerate video generation with sparse attention via semantic-aware permutation.Proc. NeurIPS, 38:96965–96991, 2026

    2026

  34. [42]

    Self-indexing kvcache: Predicting sparse attention from compressed keys

    Xu Yang, Jiapeng Zhang, Dongyang Zhao, Guo Chen, and Zhuo Tang. Self-indexing kvcache: Predicting sparse attention from compressed keys. InProc. AAAI, volume 40, pages 27675–27683, 2026

    2026

  35. [43]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. In Proc. ICLR, volume 2025, pages 83048–83077, 2025. 11

    2025

  36. [44]

    Accelerating text-to-video generation with calibrated sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05503, 2026

    Shai Yehezkel, Shahar Yadin, Noam Elata, Yaron Ostrovsky-Berman, and Bahjat Kawar. Accelerating text-to-video generation with calibrated sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05503, 2026

    2026

  37. [45]

    Pqcache: Product quantization-based kvcache for long context llm inference.Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 3(3):1–30, 2025

    Hailin Zhang, Xiaodong Ji, Yilin Chen, Fangcheng Fu, Xupeng Miao, Xiaonan Nie, Weipeng Chen, and Bin Cui. Pqcache: Product quantization-based kvcache for long context llm inference.Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, 3(3):1–30, 2025

    2025

  38. [46]

    Spargeattention: Accurate and training-free sparse attention accelerating any model inference

    Jintao Zhang, Chendong Xiang, Haofeng Huang, Jia Wei, Haocheng Xi, Jun Zhu, and Jianfei Chen. Spargeattention: Accurate and training-free sparse attention accelerating any model inference. InProc. ICML, pages 76397–76413, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Spargeattention2: Trainable sparse attention via hybrid top-k+ top-p masking and distillation fine-tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13515, 2026

    Jintao Zhang, Kai Jiang, Chendong Xiang, Weiqi Feng, Yuezhou Hu, Haocheng Xi, Jianfei Chen, and Jun Zhu. Spargeattention2: Trainable sparse attention via hybrid top-k+ top-p masking and distillation fine-tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13515, 2026

    2026

  40. [48]

    Fast video generation with sliding tile attention

    Peiyuan Zhang, Yongqi Chen, Runlong Su, Hangliang Ding, Ion Stoica, Zhengzhong Liu, and Hao Zhang. Fast video generation with sliding tile attention. InProc. ICML, pages 74714–74731, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    Faster video diffusion with trainable sparse attention.Proc

    Peiyuan Zhang, Yongqi Chen, Haofeng Huang, Will Lin, Zhengzhong Liu, Ion Stoica, Eric Xing, and Hao Zhang. Faster video diffusion with trainable sparse attention.Proc. NeurIPS, 38:152509–152534, 2026

    2026

  42. [50]

    Nomad-attention: Efficient llm inference on cpus through multiply-add-free attention.Proc

    Tianyi Zhang, Jonah Yi, Bowen Yao, Zhaozhuo Xu, and Anshumali Shrivastava. Nomad-attention: Efficient llm inference on cpus through multiply-add-free attention.Proc. NeurIPS, 37:112706–112730, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Ride the wave: Precision-allocated sparse attention for smooth video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.12219, 2026

    Wentai Zhang, Ronghui Xi, Shiyao Peng, Jiayu Huang, Haoran Luo, Zichen Tang, et al. Ride the wave: Precision-allocated sparse attention for smooth video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.12219, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Paroattention: Pattern-aware reordering for efficient sparse and quantized attention in visual generation models.Proc

    Tianchen Zhao, Ke Hong, Xinhao Yang, Xuefeng Xiao, Huixia Li, Feng Ling, Ruiqi Xie, Siqi Chen, Hongyu Zhu, Zhang Yichong, et al. Paroattention: Pattern-aware reordering for efficient sparse and quantized attention in visual generation models.Proc. NeurIPS, 38:126484–126511, 2026

    2026

  45. [53]

    Haste: Training-free video diffusion acceleration via head-wise adaptive sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.14513, 2026

    Xuzhe Zheng, Yuexiao Ma, Jing Xu, Xiawu Zheng, Rongrong Ji, and Fei Chao. Haste: Training-free video diffusion acceleration via head-wise adaptive sparse attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.14513, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Scalingattention: Discovering intrinsic sparse attention topology for video diffusion transformers

    Ruiliang Zhou, Xuecheng Wu, Kang He, Guangyun Han, Bin Liu, Qinqin Chen, Wende Xu, Qingjie Zhao, and Chengru Song. Scalingattention: Discovering intrinsic sparse attention topology for video diffusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.23019, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Svg-ear: Parameter-free linear compensation for sparse video generation via error-aware routing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08982, 2026

    Xuanyi Zhou, Qiuyang Mang, Shuo Yang, Haocheng Xi, Jintao Zhang, Huanzhi Mao, Joseph E Gonzalez, Kurt Keutzer, Ion Stoica, and Alvin Cheung. Svg-ear: Parameter-free linear compensation for sparse video generation via error-aware routing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08982, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Full attention strikes back: Transferring full attention into sparse within hundred training steps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.16928, 2026

    Yanke Zhou, Yiduo Li, Hanlin Tang, Maohua Li, Kan Liu, Tao Lan, Lin Qu, Yuan Yao, and Xiaoxing Ma. Full attention strikes back: Transferring full attention into sparse within hundred training steps.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.16928, 2026. 12 Appendix A Algorithmic Details We pro...

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.