pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06321 · v2 · pith:UQXEVBEHnew · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Astrophysical Sources: Theory, Detection, and Applications

Zhiwei Chen , Youjun Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 23:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesgravitational lensingcosmologydark matterHubble constantwave opticsgeometric opticsastrophysical sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational waves from merging black holes can be lensed by galaxies or stars to produce multiple images or frequency-modulated waveforms that serve as cosmological probes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper lays out how gravitational waves traveling from distant compact binary mergers can pass through intervening mass and experience lensing. Depending on whether the wave length is much smaller or comparable to the lens size, the effect appears either as distinct images separated by time delays and magnifications or as characteristic frequency-dependent changes to the waveform shape. The authors describe how such lensed events would be recognized in data by matching parameters across candidate pairs or by spotting the unique modulations, and they outline how the expected rates depend on the distributions of sources and lenses. If detections occur at the predicted levels, the same signals become tools for measuring the Hubble constant, mapping dark matter structures, and testing other cosmological parameters.

Core claim

Gravitational waves emitted by inspiralling and merging stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, or supermassive black-hole binaries can be gravitationally lensed by stars, primordial black holes, galaxies, or clusters. When the wavelength is short compared with the lens scale, geometric optics produces multiple images that arrive with measurable time delays and different magnifications. When the wavelength is comparable to the lens scale, wave optics produces frequency-dependent modulations of the waveform amplitude and phase. These lensed signals are distinguished from ordinary events either by near-identical intrinsic parameters between paired detections or by the specific frequency-dependent im,

What carries the argument

The split between geometric-optics and wave-optics regimes for gravitational-wave lensing, set by comparing the gravitational-wave wavelength to the characteristic scale of the lens.

Load-bearing premise

The redshift and mass distributions of sources and lenses produce detectable lensing rates, and the geometric and wave-optics regimes remain cleanly separable without significant overlap or unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

Future detectors such as the Einstein Telescope or LISA observe far fewer lensed events than the rates calculated from current models of source and lens populations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06321 by Youjun Lu, Zhiwei Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic diagram to illustrate the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves in the view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A schematic diagram to illustrate the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves in the wave view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The amplification factor F(f) (left: absolute value; right: complex phase) for a source located at y = 1.1 diffractively lensed by a lens with mass of 3 × 103M⊙ assuming the Singular Isothermal Spherical (SIS) profile. can contribute to the amplification and phase adjustments. In the geometric regime, this partial differen￾tial equation reduces to the standard lens equation (see Eq. 26), which embodies the… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The cosmic merger rate density evolution view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Estimates for the Detection rate of strongly lensed CBC and MBBH systems by different GW view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The redshift evolution of the lensing optical depth for galaxies (red dashed) and galaxy clusters view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The differential detection rate of sBBH mergers diffractively lensed by minihalos with LIGO A+ view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Steps for precise cosmological inference via the strongly lensed gravitational wave signals. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) from distant sources such as inspiralling and merging stellar-mass compact binaries, intermediate-mass and supermassive-binary-black-hole can be gravitationally lensed by intervening objects, ranging from stars and primordial black holes to galaxies and clusters. Depending on the GW wavelength relative to the lens scale, lensing occurs in two regimes: geometric optics, producing multiple images with time delays and magnifications, and wave optics, resulting in frequency-dependent waveform modulations. Lensed signals are identified via parameter overlap between event pairs or characteristic frequency-dependent modulations that distinguish them from unlensed signals. Detection rates depend on the redshift and mass distributions of sources and lenses, with promising prospects for future observatories. Once confirmed, lensed GWs will be powerful probes of fundamental physics and cosmology: they can constrain dark matter, lensing structures, the Hubble constant, and other cosmological parameters. In this review, we provide a concise overview of GW lensing, covering the theoretical framework, predicted detection rates, search strategies, and applications. We conclude with prospects and future directions for observing and exploiting lensed astrophysical GW events.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This review paper summarizes the theory of gravitational lensing of gravitational waves (GWs) from astrophysical sources including stellar-mass binaries, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black hole binaries. It distinguishes geometric optics (multiple images with time delays and magnifications) from wave optics (frequency-dependent modulations) regimes based on the ratio of GW wavelength to lens scale, describes identification via event-pair parameter overlap or characteristic modulations, reviews predicted detection rates tied to source and lens redshift/mass distributions, outlines search strategies, and discusses applications to constraining dark matter, lensing structures, the Hubble constant, and other cosmological parameters. The paper concludes with prospects for future observatories.

Significance. As a concise synthesis of existing literature on an emerging topic, the review could serve as a useful entry point for the community if it balances coverage of theoretical frameworks, rate estimates, and applications without major omissions. The central claim that confirmed lensed GWs offer probes of fundamental physics and cosmology is standard in the field and would be strengthened by explicit discussion of robustness to distribution uncertainties and regime overlaps.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'promising prospects for future observatories' and downstream applications to cosmology rests on redshift and mass distributions of sources and lenses, yet the review summarizes rather than quantifies sensitivity to steeper or narrower distributions; without explicit ranges or alternative models, the statistical power for constraining H0 or dark matter remains difficult to assess.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and theory section: The clean separation of geometric vs. wave optics regimes by wavelength relative to lens scale is presented without addressing potential intermediate regimes that could produce hybrid signatures mimicking unlensed waveforms; this assumption is load-bearing for unambiguous identification and thus for the claimed cosmological applications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that lensed signals are identified via 'parameter overlap between event pairs or characteristic frequency-dependent modulations' but does not clarify how overlaps with unlensed parameter degeneracies are mitigated in practice.
  2. Notation for time delays and magnifications in the geometric regime could be cross-referenced to standard lensing equations from cited prior work for consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful comments on our review. We have addressed each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be incorporated to improve the manuscript's clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of 'promising prospects for future observatories' and downstream applications to cosmology rests on redshift and mass distributions of sources and lenses, yet the review summarizes rather than quantifies sensitivity to steeper or narrower distributions; without explicit ranges or alternative models, the statistical power for constraining H0 or dark matter remains difficult to assess.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of sensitivity to variations in source and lens distributions would strengthen the assessment of statistical power for cosmological constraints. While the review synthesizes results from the literature that employ a range of distribution models, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the applications section. This addition will summarize how steeper or narrower distributions affect detection rates and the resulting precision on H0 and dark matter constraints, drawing on specific sensitivity analyses from cited works to provide indicative ranges. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and theory section: The clean separation of geometric vs. wave optics regimes by wavelength relative to lens scale is presented without addressing potential intermediate regimes that could produce hybrid signatures mimicking unlensed waveforms; this assumption is load-bearing for unambiguous identification and thus for the claimed cosmological applications.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that intermediate regimes between geometric and wave optics can produce hybrid signatures. The manuscript emphasizes the two primary regimes because they dominate for the majority of relevant astrophysical source-lens configurations. To address this, we will expand the theory section with a short discussion of transitional cases, noting their potential to mimic unlensed waveforms and the implications for identification strategies. We will include references to recent studies on these hybrid effects to support the robustness of the claimed applications. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; review summarizes external literature without internal reductions

full rationale

This is a review paper that overviews existing theory, rates, and applications drawn from cited prior work rather than presenting new derivations or first-principles predictions. No equations or claims within the manuscript reduce by construction to parameters fitted inside the paper itself, nor do any load-bearing steps rely on self-citations that are unverified or tautological. Detection-rate estimates and regime separations are explicitly tied to external redshift/mass distributions and prior studies, keeping the content self-contained against independent benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the central content rests on standard assumptions from general relativity and astrophysics literature rather than introducing new free parameters or entities. Detection rate estimates depend on external redshift and mass distribution models from prior studies.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gravitational lensing of waves occurs in distinct geometric optics or wave optics regimes depending on wavelength relative to lens scale.
    Invoked in the abstract to separate multiple-image time-delay effects from frequency-dependent modulations.
  • domain assumption Lensed signals can be identified via parameter overlap or characteristic modulations distinguishable from unlensed signals.
    Stated as the basis for detection strategies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5733 in / 1482 out tokens · 41443 ms · 2026-05-20T23:36:25.616534+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

262 extracted references · 262 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 131102, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.1311022, 7 —. 2016b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 241102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.2411024 —. 2017a, ApJ, 848, L12, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c92 —. 2017b, ApJ, 848, L13, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c2 —. 2017c, Nature, 551, 85, doi:10.1038/natu...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.2411024 2041

  2. [2]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 191, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 32, 33, 34

    Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 191, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 32, 33, 34

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 2024

  3. [3]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2010.14527.https:// arxiv.org/abs/2010.145272 —. 2021, ApJ, 923, 14, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db32, 33, 34

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db32 2010

  4. [4]

    T., Gosenca, M., & Hotchkiss, S

    Adamek, J., Byrnes, C. T., Gosenca, M., & Hotchkiss, S. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 023506, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.100.02350621

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    X., Arai, K., Brooks, A

    Adhikari, R. X., Arai, K., Brooks, A. F., et al. 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37, 165003, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab91432

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab91432 2020

  6. [6]

    M., et al

    Agazie, G., Anumarlapudi, A., Archibald, A. M., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 951, L8, doi:10.3847/ 2041-8213/acdac62, 7 —. 2023b, Astrophys J, 951, L50, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a16

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a16 2041

  7. [7]

    2008, Phys

    Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y ., et al. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 104017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77. 1040175

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77 2008

  8. [8]

    A., Alves, D., et al

    Alcock, C., Allsman, R. A., Alves, D., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 697, doi:10.1086/30453520

    work page doi:10.1086/30453520 1997

  9. [9]

    R., Freitag, M., et al

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Gair, J. R., Freitag, M., et al. 2007, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24, R113, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/R012

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/r012 2007

  10. [10]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.00786, doi:10. 48550/arXiv.1702.007862, 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2, doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3

    Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., et al. 2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2, doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3 2023

  12. [12]

    2015a, ApJ, 806, L8, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L8 17 —

    Antonini, F., Barausse, E., & Silk, J. 2015a, ApJ, 806, L8, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L8 17 —. 2015b, ApJ, 812, 72, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/7217

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/l8 2041

  13. [13]

    Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., & Misner, C. W. 2008, General Relativity and Gravitation, 40, 1997, doi:10. 1007/s10714-008-0661-15

    work page 2008

  14. [15]

    2017, Phys

    Babak, S., Gair, J., Sesana, A., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 103012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95. 1030122

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95 2017

  15. [16]

    N., & Wolf, R

    Bahcall, J. N., & Wolf, R. A. 1976, ApJ, 209, 214, doi:10.1086/15471121

    work page doi:10.1086/15471121 1976

  16. [17]

    M., Howell, E

    Barausse, E. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2533, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21057.x17

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21057.x17 2012

  17. [18]

    2020, ApJ, 904, 16, doi:10

    Barausse, E., Dvorkin, I., Tremmel, M., V olonteri, M., & Bonetti, M. 2020, ApJ, 904, 16, doi:10. 3847/1538-4357/abba7f17

    work page 2020

  18. [19]

    2025a, ApJ, 980, 258, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adae1033 Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves 37

    Barsode, A., Goyal, S., & Ajith, P. 2025a, ApJ, 980, 258, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adae1033 Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves 37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adae1033

  19. [20]

    J., & Ajith, P

    Barsode, A., Kapadia, S. J., & Ajith, P. 2024, ApJ, 975, 48, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c429

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c429 2024

  20. [21]

    N., & Ajith, P

    Barsode, A., Maity, K. N., & Ajith, P. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.23238, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2510.2323826

    work page arXiv

  21. [23]

    2022, ApJ, 926, L28, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4dfa 29

    Basak, S., Ganguly, A., Haris, K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, L28, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4dfa 29

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac4dfa 2022

  22. [24]

    W., & Shapiro, S

    Baumgarte, T. W., & Shapiro, S. L. 2010, Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer 5

    work page 2010

  23. [25]

    P., Fouqu´e, P., et al

    Beaulieu, J.-P., Bennett, D. P., Fouqu´e, P., et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437, doi:10.1038/nature04441 20

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04441 2006

  24. [26]

    E., et al

    Belczynski, K., Repetto, S., Holz, D. E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 108, doi:10.3847/0004-637X/ 819/2/10814

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/ 2016

  25. [27]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 4702, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1759 24

    Belczynski, K., Ryu, T., Perna, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4702, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1759 24

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1759 2017

  26. [28]

    E., Kalogera, V ., Rasio, F

    Belczynski, K., Taam, R. E., Kalogera, V ., Rasio, F. A., & Bulik, T. 2007, ApJ, 662, 504, doi:10. 1086/51356214

    work page 2007

  27. [30]

    1985, ApJS, 58, 39, doi:10.1086/19102821

    Bertschinger, E. 1985, ApJS, 58, 39, doi:10.1086/19102821

    work page doi:10.1086/19102821 1985

  28. [31]

    Biesiada, M., Ding, X., Pi ´orkowska, A., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 080, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/08018

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/08018 2014

  29. [32]

    2018, Physics of the Dark Universe, 22, 189, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018

    Birrer, S., & Amara, A. 2018, Physics of the Dark Universe, 22, 189, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018. 11.00210

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018 2018

  30. [33]

    Nagarajan, K

    Biwer, C. M., Capano, C. D., De, S., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 024503, doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ aaef0b5

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ 2019

  31. [34]

    2014, Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 2, doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24

    Blanchet, L. 2014, Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 2, doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24

    work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24 2014

  32. [35]

    1960, Nature, 186, 535, doi:10.1038/186535a03

    Bondi, H. 1960, Nature, 186, 535, doi:10.1038/186535a03

    work page doi:10.1038/186535a03 1960

  33. [36]

    Bondi, H., van der Burg, M. G. J., & Metzner, A. W. K. 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 269, 21, doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.01613

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.01613 1962

  34. [38]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 4044, doi:10

    Bonetti, M., Sesana, A., Haardt, F., Barausse, E., & Colpi, M. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4044, doi:10. 1093/mnras/stz90317

    work page 2019

  35. [39]

    1990, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 289, 518, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-G7

    Bradaschia, C., Del Fabbro, R., Di Virgilio, A., et al. 1990, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 289, 518, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-G7

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-g7 1990

  36. [40]

    I., Grillmair, C

    Byun, Y . I., Grillmair, C. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1889, doi:10.1086/11792719

    work page doi:10.1086/11792719 1996

  37. [41]

    Cai, R.-G., Chen, T., Wang, S.-J., & Yang, X.-Y . 2023, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2023, 043, doi:10. 1088/1475-7516/2023/03/04321

    work page 2023

  38. [42]

    B., Suyu, S

    Caminha, G. B., Suyu, S. H., Grillo, C., & Rosati, P. 2022, A&A, 657, A83, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20214199419

    work page 2022

  39. [43]

    Canevarolo, S., & Chisari, N. E. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 36, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae171317

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae171317 2024

  40. [44]

    2020.https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.050823

    Cannon, K., et al. 2020.https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.050823

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [45]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 4997, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713, 24

    Cao, L., Lu, Y ., & Zhao, Y . 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4997, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713, 24

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713 2018

  42. [46]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, L16, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529

    Cao, S., Qi, J., Biesiada, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, L16, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529 2021

  43. [47]

    2022, A&A, 659, L5, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429

    Cao, S., Qi, J., Cao, Z., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, L5, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429 2022

  44. [48]

    2025, MNRAS, 540, 3121, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 —

    Cao, X., Li, R., Li, N., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 3121, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 —. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1960, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae186518 C ¸ alıs ¸kan, M., Ezquiaga, J. M., Hannuksela, O. A., & Holz, D. E. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 063023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.06302325, 26, 33 C ¸ alıs, kan, M., Anil Kumar, N., Ji, L., et al. 2023a, Phys. Rev. D, 10...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 2025

  45. [49]

    Chan, J. C. L., Dyson, C., Garcia, M., Redondo-Yuste, J., & Vujeva, L. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 064009, doi:10.1103/6h6r-46cd10

    work page doi:10.1103/6h6r-46cd10 2025

  46. [50]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 206, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14

    Chen, K., & Dai, Z.-G. 2024, ApJ, 961, 206, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14 2024

  47. [51]

    2022a, ApJ, 924, 49, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18

    Chen, S., Wen, X., Gao, H., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 924, 49, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18

  48. [52]

    2020, ApJ, 897, 86, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416, 17 —

    Chen, Y ., Yu, Q., & Lu, Y . 2020, ApJ, 897, 86, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416, 17 —. 2023, ApJ, 955, 132, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace59f17 —. 2024a, ApJ, 974, 261, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75822

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416 2020

  49. [54]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 36, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523, 24, 26, 29

    Chen, Z. 2023, ApJ, 953, 36, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523, 24, 26, 29

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523 2023

  50. [55]

    2024b, ApJ, 962, 3, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329

    Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Chen, Y . 2024b, ApJ, 962, 3, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329

  51. [56]

    2024c, ApJ, 973, 159, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013

    Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., Wang, J., et al. 2024c, ApJ, 973, 159, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013

  52. [57]

    2025, To be submitted 30, 31

    Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Zeng, C. 2025, To be submitted 30, 31

    work page 2025

  53. [58]

    2022b, ApJ, 940, 17, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73, 14, 29

    Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Zhao, Y . 2022b, ApJ, 940, 17, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73, 14, 29

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73

  54. [59]

    2024d, ApJ, 977, 64, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419, 24

    Chen, Z., Xie, Y ., Lu, Y ., et al. 2024d, ApJ, 977, 64, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419, 24

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419

  55. [61]

    2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14397, doi:10

    Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Lu, Y ., Liu, J., & Zeng, C. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14397, doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2508.1439713, 14

    work page arXiv

  56. [62]

    H.-Y ., Ng, K

    Cheung, M. H.-Y ., Ng, K. K. Y ., Zumalac´arregui, M., & Berti, E. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 124020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.12402022, 29

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.12402022 2024

  57. [63]

    G., Jung, S., Lu, P., & Takhistov, V

    Choi, H. G., Jung, S., Lu, P., & Takhistov, V . 2024, Phys. Rev. Lett., 133, 101002, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.10100227

    work page 2024

  58. [64]

    Choi, Y .-Y ., Park, C., & V ogeley, M. S. 2007, ApJ, 658, 884, doi:10.1086/51106018

    work page doi:10.1086/51106018 2007

  59. [65]

    2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412

    Chu, Q., Lu, Y ., & Yu, S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15464, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412. 1546414

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412 2024

  60. [66]

    2022, MNRAS, 509, 1557, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213, 14, 24

    Chu, Q., Yu, S., & Lu, Y . 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1557, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213, 14, 24

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213 2022

  61. [67]

    K.-W., & Li, T

    Chung, A. K.-W., & Li, T. G. F. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 124060, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104. 12406029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104 2021

  62. [68]

    Hutter, G

    Collett, T. E., & Bacon, D. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 091101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 118.09110129

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2017

  63. [69]

    W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B., & Metzger, B

    Coughlin, M. W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B., & Metzger, B. D. 2019, MNRAS, 489, L91, doi:10. 1093/mnrasl/slz1332

    work page 2019

  64. [70]

    A., Foley, R

    Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1556, doi:10.1126/ science.aap98112

    work page 2017

  65. [72]

    2018, Phys

    Dai, L., Li, S.-S., Zackay, B., Mao, S., & Lu, Y . 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 104029, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.10402923

    work page 2018

  66. [73]

    2000, Phys

    Damour, T., Jaranowski, P., & Sch ¨afer, G. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084011, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.62.0840114

    work page 2000

  67. [74]

    M., et al

    De, S., Finstad, D., Lattimer, J. M., et al. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 091102, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.0911022 de Mink, S. E., & Belczynski, K. 2015, ApJ, 814, 58, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/5813

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/5813 2018

  68. [75]

    J., Shaikh, M

    Deka, U., Chakraborty, S., Kapadia, S. J., Shaikh, M. A., & Ajith, P. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 064028, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.06402821

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.06402821 2025

  69. [76]

    2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115019, doi:10

    Diao, J., Pan, Y ., & Xu, W. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115019, doi:10. 1088/1674-4527/ac977f18

    work page 2022

  70. [77]

    Diego, J. M. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 101, 123512, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.12351229 Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves 39

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.12351229 2020

  71. [78]

    M., Broadhurst, T., & Smoot, G

    Diego, J. M., Broadhurst, T., & Smoot, G. F. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 103529, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.10352932

    work page 2021

  72. [80]

    Ding, X., Biesiada, M., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 006, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2015/12/00623, 24

    work page 2015

  73. [82]

    2012, ApJ, 759, 52, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/ 1/5213, 14 —

    Dominik, M., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 52, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/ 1/5213, 14 —. 2013, ApJ, 779, 72, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/7213, 14, 24

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/ 2012

  74. [84]

    2024, Phys

    Ellis, J., Fairbairn, M., Franciolini, G., et al. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 023522, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.0235227

    work page 2024

  75. [85]

    2026.https://arxiv.org/abs/2603

    Ephremidze, N., Kamionkowski, M., & Dvorkin, C. 2026.https://arxiv.org/abs/2603. 1233312 EPTA Collaboration, InPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A50, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/2023468442, 7 EPTA Collaboration, E., Collaboration, I., Antoniadis, J., et al. 2024, Astron Astrophys, 690, A118, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20234856816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20234856816 2026

  76. [86]

    2019, A&A, 631, A175, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20193537520

    Erfanianfar, G., Finoguenov, A., Furnell, K., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A175, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20193537520

    work page 2019

  77. [87]

    Eroshenko, Y . N. 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 347, doi:10.1134/S106377371606001321 Euclid Collaboration, Leuzzi, L., Meneghetti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A68, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20234724418

    work page doi:10.1134/s106377371606001321 2016

  78. [88]

    M., Holz, D

    Ezquiaga, J. M., Holz, D. E., Hu, W., Lagos, M., & Wald, R. M. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 064047, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.06404712

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.06404712 2021

  79. [89]

    Fairbairn, M., Urrutia, J., & Vaskonen, V . 2023, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2023, 007, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2023/07/0073, 27

    work page 2023

  80. [90]

    2020, Chin

    Fan, X. 2020, Chin. Sci. Bull., 66, 2516, doi:10.1360/TB-2020-11703

    work page doi:10.1360/tb-2020-11703 2020

Showing first 80 references.