Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Fractional Skyrmion Tubes in Chiral-Interfaced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Nanowires

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a 3D-printed cobalt double-helix nanowire with two regions of opposite chirality, a minor hysteresis loop creates a zero-field remanent state containing a fractional Bloch skyrmion tube with local topological charge up to about 0.8.

desk verdict A credible, well-illustrated demonstration of a new route to fractional skyrmion tubes via geometric chirality interfaces, with the main soft spot being the indirect, model-dependent experimental identification of the 3D spin texture. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14069 v1 pith:UR4QFLF2 submitted 2024-12-18 cond-mat.mes-hall

John Fullerton , Naëmi Leo , Jakub Jurczyk , Claire Donnelly , Dédalo Sanz-Hernández , Luka Skoric , Nicolas Mille , Stefan Stanescu
show 4 more authors
Donald A. MacLaren Rachid Belkhou Aurelio Hierro-Rodriguez Amalio Fernández-Pacheco
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fractionalskyrmionsskyrmiontubes3DmagneticnanowiresmagnetochiralitygeometricchiralityXMCDptychographymicromagneticsimulationzero-fieldremanentstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that fractional Bloch skyrmion tubes can be stabilized at room temperature and zero magnetic field by purely geometric means: 3D-printed cobalt double-helix nanowires that contain two regions of opposite geometric chirality. The authors show that when a minor hysteresis loop is applied to such a nanowire, the bottom region can settle into a spin texture whose magnetochirality opposes its geometric chirality, forming a fractional skyrmion tube with local topological charge $Q$ up to about 0.8. The result matters because it provides a route to topological spin textures without heavy-metal layers or Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions, using reconfigurable 3D nanostructures. It also demonstrates control between distinct zero-field states—pure vortex, skyrmion–vortex hybrids—suggesting a platform for 3D topological spintronics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the chirality-interfaced double-helix nanowire: a right-handed and a left-handed cobalt double helix joined by a chirality interface, with pitch 200 nm and strand separation 66 nm chosen so the vortex and anti-parallel states are nearly degenerate at zero field. The argument is carried by the vortex-tube analysis, in which each chiral region's magnetization is described by a circulation amplitude $C$ and a polarity amplitude $P$, with magnetochirality defined as $\chi_M = C \times P$, and by the topological charge $Q$ computed per $xy$ plane. The key mechanism is the minor hysteresis loop starting from a hybrid vortex/anti-parallel state: as the field is reduced, the chirality interface couples the regions so that the bottom AP domains evolve into a vortex-like state with a large axial magnetization, i.e. a Bloch skyrmion tube that opposes the geometric chirality. The higher $Q$ in the bottom region is directly attributed to the breaking of chirality coupling and the resulting larger solid angle covered by the magnetization.

What would settle it

Reconstruct the full three-dimensional magnetization of the nanowire at zero field after the minor loop using X-ray vector nanotomography; if the bottom region does not show a central core of one axial polarity surrounded by a shell of opposite polarity with a radial vortex-like circulation (a Bloch skyrmion tube), the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a zero-field remanent magnetic state in an interfaced chiral double-helix nanowire, in which the geometric–magnetic chirality coupling is locally broken: the top left-handed region retains its geometrically favoured vortex state ($\chi_M = \chi_G$), while the bottom right-handed region adopts a spin configuration with $\chi_M \neq \chi_G$, forming a Bloch-type skyrmion tube. The skyrmion state is fractional, with $Q$ values always below 1 and reaching $Q \approx 0.8$ close to switching fields, over a continuous range $0.4 < Q < 0.8$. The formation is driven by a hybrid vortex/anti-parallel state that appears during magnetic reversal: when the field is removed, one anti-parallel domain becomes the skyrmion core and the other becomes the circulating shell, minimizing magnetic surface charges. This mechanism is supported by X-ray magnetic circular dichroism ptychography and reproduced by micromagnetic simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental conclusion that the bottom region has the same magnetochirality as the top region at remanence assumes that the magnetization in each chiral region is well described by a two-parameter vortex-tube model (circulation and polarity) and that the nanowire's tilt is known to about 15–20 degrees; a spin texture deviating from that model would invalidate the inferred skyrmion tube.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature, zero-field fractional skyrmion tubes can be formed in 3D-printed ferromagnetic nanowires without heavy metals or Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions.
  • The zero-field state of an interfaced chiral nanowire is reconfigurable: pure vortex, hybrid vortex/anti-parallel, and vortex/skyrmion states can be selected by the field history.
  • Geometric chirality, through the pitch and strand separation, tunes whether vortex or anti-parallel states are favoured, providing a design parameter for topological state formation.
  • The coexistence of vortex and fractional skyrmion tubes in the same nanowire could serve as a building block for 3D spintronic devices and reservoir computing schemes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By analogy with the chirality interface, other 3D-printed geometries that force a competition between geometric and magnetic chirality—e.g., twisted ribbons or interlocked rings—might also host fractional skyrmion tubes, a hypothesis the paper does not test.
  • If the fractional charge $Q$ is truly set by the helical slope, then varying the local pitch along a single nanowire could create graded topological charge profiles, potentially enabling position-addressable skyrmionics; this is an extrapolation beyond the reported constant-pitch devices.
  • Direct three-dimensional magnetization tomography of the remanent skyrmion state would verify the vortex-tube assumption underlying the XMCD analysis and could reveal whether the fractional charge is robust to local geometric disorder.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the formation of room-temperature fractional Bloch skyrmion tubes in 3D-printed cobalt double-helix nanowires with two regions of opposite geometric chirality. Using X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) ptychography and micromagnetic simulations, the authors identify a remanent zero-field state in which the bottom (right-handed) chiral region acquires a magnetochirality opposite to its geometric chirality, resulting in a hybrid vortex/skyrmion texture. The interpretation is supported by line-profile analysis of XMCD images (interpreted as showing a uniform left-handed magnetochirality in both regions) and by simulations that compute local topological charge Q from 0.4 to 0.8. The paper also presents a phase diagram for vortex versus anti-parallel states and demonstrates field-driven reconfigurability between pure vortex and mixed skyrmion-vortex states.

Significance. If the experimental inference is correct, this work provides a new and potentially important mechanism for stabilizing fractional skyrmion tubes at room temperature in three-dimensional nanostructures without Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, using purely geometric chirality. The simulations use material parameters taken from prior FEBID cobalt literature and are not fitted to the XMCD data, which is a strength. The experimental images are of high quality and the qualitative agreement between experimental and simulated XMCD projections is compelling. The paper also contributes a useful phase diagram and a demonstration of field-driven reconfigurability, which are of interest to the 3D nanomagnetism community.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results, Fig. 3b and Supplemental Section 1] The central experimental claim that χ_M ≠ χ_G in the bottom region rests on the fitting of XMCD line profiles to a two-parameter vortex tube model (circulation C and polarity P per region). However, the state claimed to be a skyrmion tube (Fig. 3c, vii) is explicitly not a uniform vortex tube: micromagnetic simulations show a +M_z core surrounded by a shell with substantial −M_z. In the tilted imaging geometry (~15–20°), the axial M_z component of the shell projects onto the X-ray beam and contributes to the left-right asymmetry that the two-parameter model attributes to C and P. A model assuming a uniform polarity per region cannot represent an oppositely magnetized shell, so the extracted C and P for the bottom region may be biased. The authors should perform a synthetic forward-model test: take the simulated skyrmion texture, compute its XMCD projection under the experimental tilt, add realistic noise, and run the same fitting routine to verify that it recovers the known C and P (or, if it does not, quantify the bias). Alternatively, the experimental line profiles should be compared directly with full micromagnetic forward models of the skyrmion state, rather than through the two-parameter vortex fit. Without such a test, the experimental evidence for χ_M ≠ χ_G is model-dependent and the statement in the abstract that the formation of fractional skyrmion tubes is 'demonstrated' is not fully supported.
  2. [Results, Fig. 4f and Discussion] The statement that 'the skyrmion state observed is a fractional skyrmion, with Q values always smaller than 1' is based entirely on micromagnetic simulations; the experimental XMCD images do not directly measure the topological charge. The text should clarify that Q is a simulated quantity, not extracted from experiment, to avoid implying that the experimental data alone establish the fractional topological charge. If the authors wish to claim experimental demonstration of fractional skyrmions, they should either provide an observable proxy for Q or soften the language to 'simulations predict a fractional skyrmion with Q up to 0.8'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Reference [9] misspells 'Nagaosa' as 'Nagosa'; reference [39] has 'deicated' instead of 'dedicated'; reference [37] has 'ASC Appl. Nanomater' instead of 'ACS Appl. Nano Mater.'; reference [46] has 'effe5cts' instead of 'effects'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] In the caption for Fig. 2j, the color/line labels for LH and RH regions should be double-checked: the text says 'green: LH, black: RH' but the figure appears to show green and black lines with opposite signs; ensure the colors and symbols are clearly distinguishable in print.
  3. [Introduction, Eq. (1)] The topological charge formula should define the integration domain (an xy plane) and the notation for the magnetization unit vector; currently M is used for both the magnetization vector and its normalized version.
  4. [Results, Fig. 3a] In the caption, the minor loop sequence is described as '(iii, vii-x)' but the text in the main body refers to a second remanent state as 'vi'; please ensure the state numbering is consistent between the text and figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is a forward experiment/simulation comparison with no fitted-input predictions.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the experimental inference of magnetochirality rests on a forward model of XMCD contrast for vortex states (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Section 1), whose asymmetry convention (larger intensity on the left for left-handed magnetochirality) is an externally established imaging result (refs 44-46). The circulation and polarity values in Fig. 2j are fitted to this model, but the paper does not present those fits as predictions; they are compared with independently simulated hysteresis loops (Fig. 2k), and the key remanent state (Fig. 3a, vii) is identified from raw line-profile asymmetry, with matching simulated XMCD projections. The skyrmion designation and fractional topological-charge values are outputs of micromagnetic simulations initialized from uniform axial or vortex configurations (Methods), not from data fitted to a skyrmion ansatz; Q is computed from the magnetization cross-sections rather than imposed. References to the authors' prior work (ref 28) supply the vortex/anti-parallel-state vocabulary and typical FEBID cobalt parameters, but the current paper re-derives the geometric-magnetic chirality coupling experimentally in Fig. 2, so that self-citation is contextual, not load-bearing. No equation reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The skeptical concern that the two-parameter vortex fit cannot represent the skyrmion's oppositely magnetized shell is a model-validity question, not a circularity, and it is partially addressed by the agreement between simulated and experimental XMCD profiles.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on micromagnetic simulations with material parameters taken from prior FEBID cobalt literature and geometry parameters designed to sit near the vortex/AP degeneracy. The experimental interpretation uses a model-based decomposition of XMCD profiles. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Geometric parameters (pitch, separation, diameter) = pitch 200 nm, separation 66 nm, diameter 86 nm
    Chosen from the phase diagram in Fig. 1d to place the system near the vortex/AP degeneracy, a load-bearing design choice for forming the hybrid state that leads to the skyrmion tube.
  • Saturation magnetization Ms = 900 kA/m
    Input from prior FEBID cobalt literature (refs 28, 36, 37), used in all simulations; not fitted to this experiment.
  • Exchange stiffness A = 1e-11 J/m
    Input from prior FEBID cobalt literature; not fitted to this experiment.
  • Magnetocrystalline anisotropy = 0
    Assumed zero for FEBID cobalt in simulations; this is a domain assumption that affects the relative stability of vortex and AP states.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption FEBID cobalt has negligible intrinsic DMI and anisotropy, so magnetic chirality originates purely from the helical geometry.
    The simulations in Methods use only exchange and dipolar interactions with zero anisotropy; the entire mechanism relies on geometric chirality alone.
  • domain assumption In a helical nanowire, the vortex remanent state has magnetochirality χ_M = C × P and is dictated by the geometric handedness.
    Taken from the authors' prior work (ref 28) and used to interpret the XMCD asymmetry in Fig. 2i.
  • ad hoc to paper The XMCD line profile across the nanowire can be decomposed into independent circulation and polarity contributions with a two-parameter vortex model.
    Described in supplementary section 1; the extraction of χ_M from experiment in Fig. 2j and Fig. 3b depends on this model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractional Skyrmion Tubes in Chiral-Interfaced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Nanowires." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UR4QFLF2

@misc{pith2026241214069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractional Skyrmion Tubes in Chiral-Interfaced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Nanowires},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UR4QFLF2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14069}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic skyrmions are chiral spin textures with rich physics and great potential for unconventional computing. Typically, skyrmions form in bulk crystals with reduced symmetry or ultrathin film multilayers involving heavy metals. Here, we demonstrate the formation of fractional Bloch skyrmion tubes at room temperature by 3D printing ferromagnetic double-helix nanowires with two regions of opposite chirality. Using X-ray microscopy and micromagnetic simulations, we show that the coexistence of vortex and anti-parallel spin states induces the formation of fractional skyrmion tubes at zero magnetic fields, minimising the energy cost of breaking the coupling between geometric and magnetic chirality. We also demonstrate control over zero-field states, including pure vortex, or mixed skyrmion-vortex states, highlighting the magnetic reconfigurability of these 3D nanowires. This work shows how interfacing chiral geometries at the nanoscale can enable advanced forms of topological spintronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14069 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Geometric-magnetic chirality coupling in an interfaced chiral nanowire. (a) Ptychographic imaging set-up providing XMCD projections along the x-axis, while applying Bz magnetic fields along the nanowire axis, with a small transverse component. The inset shows an X-ray charge contrast image, reconstructed from diffraction patterns obtained by scanning the beam over the sample. (b, c) XMCD images of the nanowire at re… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Breaking of geometric-magnetic chirality coupling, leading to the formation of a skyrmion tube at remanence. (a) Selected XMCD images of the nanowire during a major (i-vi) and a minor (iii, vii-x) hysteresis loop. A second remanent state is formed during the minor loop sequence (vii), featuring the same magnetic circulation in both chiral regions. (b) Comparison between experimental (left) and simulated (right) XMCD… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A topological comparison between vortex and skyrmion states, at remanence and under applied fields. (a, b) 3D micromagnetic simulation and schematic of a vortex and a skyrmion tube, respectively, obtained in chiral nanowires due to 3D geometric effects. (c) Micromagnet…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chen, S., et al., All -electrical skyrmionics magnetic tunnel junction, Nature, 627, 522-527 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Nanotechnol., 8, 152-156 (2013)

    Fert, A., et al., Skyrmions on the track, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8, 152-156 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Klaus, R., et al., Brownian reservoir computing realized using geometrically confined skyrmion dynamics, Nat. Commun. , 13, 6982 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    M., et al., Skyrmion -based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing, Nat

    Song, K. M., et al., Skyrmion -based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing, Nat. Electron., 3, 148-155 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Adv., 8, 39 (2022)

    Yokouchi, T., et al., Pattern recognition with neuromorphic computing using magnetic field-induced dynamics of skyrmions, Sci. Adv., 8, 39 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Commun., 14, 3434 (2023)

    Sun, Y., et al., Experimental demonstration of a skyrmion -enhanced strain mediated physical reservoir computing system, Nat. Commun., 14, 3434 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    T., et al., Fast current -induced skyrmion motion in synthetic antiferromagnets, Science, 384, 307-312 (2024)

    Pham, V. T., et al., Fast current -induced skyrmion motion in synthetic antiferromagnets, Science, 384, 307-312 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    G., et al., Direct demonstration of topological stability of magnetic skyrmions via topology manipulation, ACS Nano , 14, 3251 - 3258 (2020)

    Je, S. G., et al., Direct demonstration of topological stability of magnetic skyrmions via topology manipulation, ACS Nano , 14, 3251 - 3258 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Nanotechnol., 8, 899-911 (2013)

    Nagosa, N., et al., Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8, 899-911 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Nanotehcnol., 14, 658 (2019)

    Zazvorka, J., et al., Thermal skyrmion diffusion used in a reshuffle device, Nat. Nanotehcnol., 14, 658 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Fert, A., et al., Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nat. Rev. Matter., 2, 17031 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Mühlbauer, S., et al., Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet, Science, 323, 915-919 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Rep., 8, 5702 (2018)

    McVitie, S., et al., A transmission electron microscope study of Néel skyrmion magnetic textures in multilayer thin film systems with large interfacial chiral interaction, Sci. Rep., 8, 5702 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Z., et al., Real-space observation of a two -dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature, 465, 901 (2010)

    Yu, X. Z., et al., Real-space observation of a two -dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature, 465, 901 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    McCray, A. R. C., et al., Thermal hysteresis and ordering behavior of magnetic skyrmion lattices, Nano Lett., 22, 7804-77810 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Nanotechnol., 16, 1086-1091 (2021)

    Tang, J., et al., Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current -driven dynamics, Nat. Nanotechnol., 16, 1086-1091 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Jiang, W., et al., Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles, Science, 349, 283 -286 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Commun., 15, 4860 (2024)

    Ran, K., et al., Bending skyrmion strings under two-dimensional thermal gradients, Nat. Commun., 15, 4860 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Commun., 11, 6365 (2020)

    Mandru, AO., et al., Coexistence of distinct skyrmion phases observed in hybrid ferromagnetic/ferrimagnetic multilayers, Nat. Commun., 11, 6365 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Nanotechnol., 13, 451-455 (2018)

    Zheng, F., et al., Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B20 -type FeGe, Nat. Nanotechnol., 13, 451-455 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Commun., 13, 6843 (2022)

    Grelier, M., et al., Three -dimensional skyrmionics cocoons in magnetic multilayers, Nat. Commun., 13, 6843 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Sutcliffe, P., Skyrmion knots in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 247203 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Commun., 12, 1562 (2021)

    Kent, N., et al., Creation and observation of Hopfions in magnetic multilayer systems, Nat. Commun., 12, 1562 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Zheng, F., et al., Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet, Nature, 623, 718-723 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Donnelly, C., et al., Three -dimensional magnetization structures revealed with X -ray vector nanotomography, Nature, 547, 328-331 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Phys., 6, 49 (2023)

    Hermosa, J., et al., Bloch points and topological dipoles observed by X -ray vector magnetic tomography in a ferromagnetic microstructure, Commun. Phys., 6, 49 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Eslami, S., et al., Chiral nanomagnets, ACS Photonics, 1, 1231-1236 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    D., et al., Artificial double-helix for geometrical control of magnetic chirality, ACS Nano, 14, 8084-8092 (2020)

    Sanz -Hernández. D., et al., Artificial double-helix for geometrical control of magnetic chirality, ACS Nano, 14, 8084-8092 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Nanotechnol., 17, 136-142 (2022)

    Donnelly, C., et al., Complex free -space magnetic field textures induced by three - dimensional magnetic nanostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol., 17, 136-142 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Nano Mater., 3, 6009-6016 (2020)

    Phatak, C., et al., Curved three - dimensional cobalt nanohelices for use in domain wall device applications, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 3, 6009-6016 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Fullerton, J., et al., Understanding the effect of curvature on the magnetization reversal of three -dimensional nanohelices, Nano Lett., 24, 2481-2487 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    V., et al., Curvature and torsion effects in spin -current driven domain wall motion, Phys

    Yershov, K. V., et al., Curvature and torsion effects in spin -current driven domain wall motion, Phys. Rev. B, 93, 094418 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Skoric, L., et al., Layer -by-Layer growth of complex -shaped three -dimensional 14 nanostructures with focused electron beams, Nano Lett., 20, 184-191 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Rep., 9, 7959 (2019)

    Beg, M., et al., Stable and manipulatable Bloch point, Sci. Rep., 9, 7959 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Raeliarijaona, A., et al., Boundary twists, instabilities, and creation of skyrmions and antiskyrmions, Phys. Rev. Mater. , 2 124401 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Fullerton, J., et al., Controlled evolution of three-dimensional magnetic states in strongly coupled cylindrical nanowire pairs, Nanotechnology, 34, 125301 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Nanomater, 1, 38 (2018)

    Pablo -Navarro, J., et al., Purified and crystalline three -dimensional electron -beam- induced-deposits: the successful case of cobalt for high-performance magnetic nanowires, ASC Appl. Nanomater, 1, 38 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Mater., 3, 8 (2022)

    Mille, N., et al., Ptychography at the carbon K-edge, Commun. Mater., 3, 8 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Synchrotron Radiat., 22, 968-979 (2015)

    Belkhou, R., et al., HERMES: a soft X-ray beamline deicated to X -ray microscopy, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 22, 968-979 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Photonics, 12, 9-17 (2018)

    Pfeiffer, F., X -ray ptychography, Nat. Photonics, 12, 9-17 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Donnelly, C., et al., High -resolution hard x-ray magnetic imaging with dichroic ptychography, Phys. Rev. B, 94, 064421 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Nanotechnol., 18, 227-232 (2023)

    Rana, A., et al., Three -dimensional topological magnetic monopoles and their interactions in a ferromagnetic meta -lattice, Nat. Nanotechnol., 18, 227-232 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    A., et al., Spatial magnetic imaging of non -axially symmetric vortex domains in cylindrical nanowire by transmission X-ray microscopy, Nanoscale, 14, 13661-13666 (2022)

    Fernandez -Roldan, J. A., et al., Spatial magnetic imaging of non -axially symmetric vortex domains in cylindrical nanowire by transmission X-ray microscopy, Nanoscale, 14, 13661-13666 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    T., et al., Emergent chirality in a polar meron to skyrmion phase transition, Nat

    Shao, Y. T., et al., Emergent chirality in a polar meron to skyrmion phase transition, Nat. Commun., 14, 1355 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Tikhonov, Y., et al., Controllable skyrmion chirality in ferroelectrics, Sci. Rep. , 10, 8657 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    McCray, A. R. C., et al., Direct observation of magnetic bubble lattices and magnetoelastic effe5cts in van der Waals Cr 2Ge2Te6, Adv. Func. Mater., 33, 2214203 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Rep., 895, 1 (2021)

    Göbel, B., et al., Beyond skyrmions: review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles, Phys. Rep., 895, 1 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    T., et al., Real-space imaging of confined magnetic skyrmion tubes, Nat

    Birch, M. T., et al., Real-space imaging of confined magnetic skyrmion tubes, Nat. Commun., 11, 1726 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Nanotechnol., 17, 250-255 (2022)

    Wolf, D., et al., Unveiling the three - dimensional magnetic textures of skyrmion tubes, Nat. Nanotechnol., 17, 250-255 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Commun., 13, 2348 (2022)

    Jena, J., et al., Observation of fractional spin textures in a Heusler material, Nat. Commun., 13, 2348 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Rep., 5, 17137 (2015)

    Beg, M., et al., Ground state search, hysteretic behaviour and reversal mechanism of skyrmionics textures in confined helimagnetic nanostructures, Sci. Rep., 5, 17137 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Rep., 5, 8787 (2015)

    Streubel, R., et al., Manipulating topological states by imprinting non -collinear spin textures, Sci. Rep., 5, 8787 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Rep., 12, 3426 (2022)

    Berganza, E., et al., 3D quasi-skyrmions in thick cylindrical and dome-shape soft nanodots, Sci. Rep., 12, 3426 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    B., et al., Three -dimensional skyrmions with arbitrary topological number in a ferromagnetic spin -1 Bose -Einstein condensate, Sci

    Luo, H. B., et al., Three -dimensional skyrmions with arbitrary topological number in a ferromagnetic spin -1 Bose -Einstein condensate, Sci. Rep., 9, 18804 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Nanotechnol

    Gu, K., et al., Three-dimensional racetrack memory devices designed from freestanding magnetic heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. , 17, 1065-1071 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Electron., 3, 360-370 (2020)

    Grollier, J., et al., Neuromorphic spintronics, Nat. Electron., 3, 360-370 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    C., et al., Reconfigurable magnonic mode -hybridisation and spectral control in a bicomponent artificial spin ice, Nat

    Gartside, J. C., et al., Reconfigurable magnonic mode -hybridisation and spectral control in a bicomponent artificial spin ice, Nat. Commun., 12, 2488 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Lee, O., et al., Task -adaptive physical reservoir computing, Nat. Mater. , 23, 79 -87 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Vansteenkiste, A., et al., The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Adv., 4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.