pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.05290 · v1 · pith:US3JWXWTnew · submitted 2019-07-11 · 🧮 math.CA · math-ph· math.MP

Growth Equation of the General Fractional Calculus

Anatoly N. Kochubei , Yuri Kondratiev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 22:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CA math-phmath.MP
keywords general fractional calculusconvolutional derivativeMittag-Leffler functionCauchy problemasymptoticsgrowth equationkernel function
0
0 comments X

The pith

The solution to the Cauchy problem for the general convolutional derivative is a Mittag-Leffler generalization whose asymptotics as t to infinity are determined by the kernel.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the Cauchy problem in which the general convolutional derivative applied to a function u equals lambda times u, with initial value one. This setup produces a solution that reduces to the Mittag-Leffler function when the derivative specializes to the standard fractional case of order alpha between zero and one. The authors derive the long-time asymptotic behavior of this solution. A reader would care because the result supplies an explicit growth description for linear equations under a broader class of memory operators than previously available.

Core claim

The solution to the Cauchy problem (D_{(k)} u)(t) = lambda u(t), u(0)=1 is a generalization of the function t maps to E_alpha(lambda t^alpha) for 0 less than alpha less than 1, and the paper studies its asymptotics as t approaches infinity.

What carries the argument

The general convolutional derivative D_{(k)}, defined through convolution with a kernel function k that replaces the standard power-law kernel of fractional derivatives.

If this is right

  • The long-time growth or decay rate of the solution is controlled by the specific form of the kernel k.
  • When the kernel is chosen to match the standard fractional derivative, the solution and its asymptotics reduce exactly to those of the Mittag-Leffler function.
  • Linear equations driven by this derivative admit explicit asymptotic descriptions that extend the classical fractional calculus case.
  • The existence and uniqueness of the solution follow directly from the properties assumed for the convolutional operator.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kernel-based construction could be inserted into nonlinear or time-dependent-coefficient equations to obtain corresponding growth estimates.
  • Numerical approximation schemes for the solution might exploit the derived asymptotics to improve accuracy at large times.
  • Different kernels could be tested against experimental data to see which memory models best fit observed long-time behavior in applications.

Load-bearing premise

The general convolutional derivative is well-defined on a suitable function space and admits a unique solution to the Cauchy problem possessing the regularity required for asymptotic analysis.

What would settle it

For the kernel that recovers the Caputo derivative of order alpha, compute the explicit solution and check whether its large-t asymptotics coincide with the known decay or growth of the Mittag-Leffler function E_alpha(lambda t^alpha).

read the original abstract

We consider the Cauchy problem $(\mathbb D_{(k)} u)(t)=\lambda u(t)$, $u(0)=1$, where $\mathbb D_{(k)}$ is the general convolutional derivative introduced in the paper (A. N. Kochubei, Integral Equations Oper. Theory {\bf 71} (2011), 583--600), $\lambda >0$. The solution is a generalization of the function $t\mapsto E_\alpha (\lambda t^\alpha)$ where $0<\alpha <1$, $E_\alpha$ is the Mittag-Leffler function. The asymptotics of this solution, as $t\to \infty$, is studied.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers the Cauchy problem (D_{(k)} u)(t) = λ u(t) with u(0)=1, where D_{(k)} is the general convolutional derivative from Kochubei (2011). It claims that the solution generalizes the Mittag-Leffler function E_α(λ t^α) for 0<α<1 and studies the asymptotics of this solution as t→∞.

Significance. If the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of the solution are established and the asymptotic analysis is carried out rigorously, the work would provide a useful extension of fractional differential equations to a wider class of convolution kernels, with potential applications in modeling. The manuscript does not appear to supply machine-checked proofs or fully parameter-free derivations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the solution is a generalization' and that 'asymptotics ... are studied' presupposes that a unique solution exists in a function space where D_{(k)} is defined and where asymptotic techniques (e.g., Laplace transforms or Tauberian theorems) apply. No existence/uniqueness argument or regularity verification is indicated in the abstract, which is load-bearing for the entire asymptotic study.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the constructive observation regarding the abstract. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the solution is a generalization' and that 'asymptotics ... are studied' presupposes that a unique solution exists in a function space where D_{(k)} is defined and where asymptotic techniques (e.g., Laplace transforms or Tauberian theorems) apply. No existence/uniqueness argument or regularity verification is indicated in the abstract, which is load-bearing for the entire asymptotic study.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should explicitly reference the existence and uniqueness result that underpins the claims. The body of the manuscript establishes existence and uniqueness of the solution to the Cauchy problem in the appropriate function space (via the properties of the general convolutional derivative from Kochubei (2011) and a fixed-point argument or Laplace-transform inversion), together with the regularity needed for the asymptotic analysis. In the revised version we will modify the abstract to include a brief statement to this effect, e.g., “Existence and uniqueness of the solution are proved, and its asymptotics as t→∞ are derived.” This change will make the load-bearing assumptions visible at the abstract level without altering the technical content. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of derivative definition; asymptotic analysis remains independent

full rationale

The paper cites its own 2011 work solely to introduce the convolutional derivative D_(k) as the operator in the Cauchy problem. No step equates a claimed prediction or asymptotic result to a fitted parameter or prior self-result by construction. The study of large-t behavior proceeds from the integral equation or Laplace-transform representation without tautological reduction to the cited definition. This matches the expected minor self-citation case (score 2) rather than load-bearing circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the prior definition and properties of the convolutional derivative D_(k) together with standard existence theory for convolutional Volterra equations; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The general convolutional derivative D_(k) is well-defined and the Cauchy problem admits a unique solution possessing sufficient regularity for asymptotic analysis.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract; the 2011 reference supplies the definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5636 in / 1232 out tokens · 30925 ms · 2026-05-24T22:47:52.031356+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Allen, Macro-economic theory

    R.G.D. Allen, Macro-economic theory. A Mathematical Treatment . Macmillan, London, 1968

    work page 1968

  2. [2]

    Arendt, C

    W. Arendt, C. J. K. Batty, M. Hieber and F. Neubrander, Vector-Valued Laplace Trans- forms and Cauchy Problems , Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    R. N. Baillie, Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 73 (1996), 5–59

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Batty, R

    C. Batty, R. Chill and Yu. Tomilov, Fine scale of decay of operator semigroups, J. Euro- pean Math. Soc. 18 (2016), 853–929. 8

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Bazhlekova, Subordination principle for fractional evolution e quations, Frac

    E. Bazhlekova, Subordination principle for fractional evolution e quations, Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal. 3 (2000), 213–230

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Doetsch, Introduction to the Theory and Applications of the Laplace T ransformation, Springer, Berlin, 1974

    G. Doetsch, Introduction to the Theory and Applications of the Laplace T ransformation, Springer, Berlin, 1974

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    Gorenflo, A

    R. Gorenflo, A. A. Kilbas, F. Mainardi, and S. V. Rogosin, Mittag-Leffler Functions, Related Topics and Applications , Springer, Berlin, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Granger, The typical spectral shape of an economic varia ble

    C.W.J. Granger, The typical spectral shape of an economic varia ble. Econometrica 34, No. 1 (1966), 150–161

    work page 1966

  9. [9]

    A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations , Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    A. N. Kochubei, Distributed order calculus and equations of ultr aslow diffusion, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 340 (2008), 252–281

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    A. N. Kochubei, Distributed order derivatives and relaxation pa tterns. J. Phys. A 42 (2009), no. 31, 315203, 9 pp

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    A. N. Kochubei, General fractional calculus, evolution equatio ns, and renewal processes, Integral Equations Oper. Theory 71 (2011), 583–600

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    A. N. Kochubei and Yu. Kondratiev, Fractional kinetic hierarc hies and intermittency, Kinetic and Related Models 10 (2017), 725–740

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    A. N. Kochubei and Yu. Luchko (Eds), Handbook of Fractiona l Calculus with Applica- tions. Volume 1: Basic Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter 2019. 481 pages

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    A. N. Kochubei and Yu. Luchko (Eds), Handbook of Fractiona l Calculus with Applica- tions. Volume 2. Fractional Differential Equations. Berlin: De Gruyt er 2019. 519 pages

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Kondratiev, O

    Yu. Kondratiev, O. Kutoviy and R. Minlos, On non-equilibrium stoc hastic dynamics for interacting particle systems in continuum, J. Funct. Anal. 255 (2008), 200–227

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Kondratiev, O

    Yu. Kondratiev, O. Kutoviy and S. Pirogov, Correlation functio ns and invariant mea- sures in continuous contact model. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 11 (2008), 231–258

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Kondratiev and A

    Yu. Kondratiev and A. Skorokhod, On contact processes in co ntinuum. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 9 (2006), 187–198

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    A. W. Phillips, Stabilisation policy in a closed economy. Economic Journal , 64, No. 254 (1954), 290–323

    work page 1954

  20. [20]

    R. L. Schilling, R. Song, and Z. Vondra˘ cek,Bernstein Functions. Theory and Applications, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2010

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Chung-Sik Sin, Well-posedness of general Caputo-type fract ional differential equations, Frac. Calc. Appl. Anal. 21 (2018), 819–832. 9

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    V. E. Tarasov and V. V. Tarasova, Macroeconomic models with lo ng dynamic memory: Fractional calculus approach. Appl. Math. Comput. 338 (2018), 466–486

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Tenreiro Machado (Ed.) Handbook of Fractional Calculus wit h Applications

    J.A. Tenreiro Machado (Ed.) Handbook of Fractional Calculus wit h Applications. Vol- umes 3-8, Berlin: De Gruyter 2019. 10

    work page 2019