Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Light Interaction With a Space-Time-Modulated Josephson Junction Array and Application to Angular-Frequency Beam Multiplexing

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A space-time-modulated Josephson junction array can act as a single compact device that transmits an incident beam at its original frequency while sending an up-converted copy out at a different angle.

desk verdict The paper's core analytic derivation is algebraically wrong, and the FDTD demonstration is under-reported; the device concept is new but unsupported as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01842 v1 pith:UUCD7U34 submitted 2025-01-03 cond-mat.supr-con physics.optics

Sajjad Taravati This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-conphysics.optics PACS 74.50.+r85.25.Cp42.25.Bs
keywords Josephsonjunctionarrayspace-timemodulationFloquet-Blochharmonicsangular-frequencybeammultiplexingfrequencyconversionsplittingsuperconductingmetamaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that an array of Josephson junctions—superconducting tunnel elements whose current is a sinusoidal function of their quantum phase—can be driven by a traveling-wave modulation so that the whole array acts like a space-time-modulated slab with effective permeability proportional to the secant of the modulated phase. It develops a Floquet-Bloch harmonic description of waves in that slab, derives a dispersion relation from a determinant condition, and obtains a closed-form transmission angle for each harmonic. The key demonstrated effect is angular-frequency beam multiplexing: an incident beam at frequency $\omega_0$ passes through, while an up-converted beam at $\omega_0+\omega_s$ leaves at the angle $\theta_T^1=\sin^{-1}(\cos\theta_i/(1+\omega_s/\omega_0))$. If correct, this packs frequency conversion and beam splitting into one compact, all-superconducting component suitable for millikelvin-temperature systems.

What carries the argument

The central object is the space-time-modulated permeability $\mu_s(z,t)=G_\mu^{-1}\sec[\tilde{\Phi}_{dc}+\tilde{\Phi}_{rf}\sin(\kappa_s z-\omega_s t+\phi)]$ of Eq. (2), obtained from the Josephson inductance and the integrated flux phase. The argument proceeds by expanding $g(z,t)=1/\mu_s(z,t)$ in Floquet-Bloch harmonics with coefficients $g_m$ (Eqs. 3a-3e), then building the matrix $[U]$ whose off-diagonal entries couple field harmonics $H_n$ through those coefficients and whose diagonal contains $c_n=\tilde\mu_0-(k_x^2+\kappa_n^2)/k_n^2$. The nontrivial-solution condition $\det[U]=0$ is the dispersion relation behind Figs. 4-6, and the transmission angle $\theta_T^n=\sin^{-1}(\cos\theta_i/(1+n\omega_s/\omega_0))$ follows from transverse wavevector conservation, $k_0\cos\theta_i=k_n\cos\theta_T^n$ with $k_n=\omega_n/c$.

What would settle it

Numerically Fourier-transform the exact permeability $\mu_s(z,t)=\sec[\tilde{\Phi}_{dc}+\tilde{\Phi}_{rf}\sin(\kappa_s z-\omega_s t)]/G_\mu$, solve the wave equation with those exact coefficients rather than $1/g_m$, and compare the $n=1$ dispersion branch and the transmission angle from Eq. (11b); a material difference would pinpoint Eq. (5c) as the step that carries the multiplexing claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the modulated Josephson junction array realizes four-dimensional wave manipulation in a single layer. The junction phase is $\rho(z,t)=(2\pi/\Phi_0)[tV_{dc}+(V_{rf}/\omega)\sin(\kappa_s z-\omega_s t+\phi)]$, which turns the Josephson inductance into $L_S(z,t)=\Phi_0/(2\pi I_0\cos[\tilde{\Phi}_{dc}+\tilde{\Phi}_{rf}\sin(\kappa_s z-\omega_s t+\phi)])$ and the effective permeability into $\mu_s(z,t)\propto\sec[\tilde{\Phi}_{dc}+\tilde{\Phi}_{rf}\sin(\kappa_s z-\omega_s t+\phi)]$. Expanding the reciprocal permeability in space-time harmonics and inserting a TM field expansion with $\kappa_n=\kappa_0+n\kappa_s$, $\omega_n=\omega_0+n\omega_s$ into the wave equation yields the matrix condition $\det[U]=0$ that produces the paper's dispersion and isofrequency diagrams. Conservation of the transverse wavevector then gives the harmonic transmission angles $\theta_T^n=\sin^{-1}(\cos\theta_i/(1+n\omega_s/\omega_0))$. The FDTD simulation in Fig. 7 shows an incident beam at $\omega_0$ continuing straight through and a beam at $\omega_0+\omega_s$ leaving at a different angle; the paper calls this angular-frequency beam multiplexing and argues that the nonlinearity of the junctions makes it efficient in a compact, millikelvin-compatible device.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the permeability's Fourier coefficients can be inverted one by one: the paper takes the m-th harmonic coefficient of $\mu_s(z,t)$ to be $1/g_m$, where $g_m$ is the m-th coefficient of $1/\mu_s$, and every dispersion diagram and the predicted beam angle inherit that step.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One array can perform frequency up-conversion and beam separation simultaneously, replacing a cascade of a frequency converter and a beam splitter with a single layer.
  • The steering angle of the up-converted beam is set by the modulation frequency ratio $\omega_s/\omega_0$, so the output direction can be tuned electronically by changing the pump frequency.
  • Because the platform is a superconducting Josephson array, the device is compatible with millikelvin operation, unlike varactor- or diode-based modulators.
  • The off-diagonal couplings in $[U]$ extend beyond nearest-neighbor harmonics, which the paper argues enables efficient higher-order harmonic generation even when the modulation frequency is comparable to or larger than the signal frequency.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper shows field snapshots but does not report the power splitting ratio between the $\omega_0$ and $\omega_0+\omega_s$ beams; extracting $|T_1|^2/|T_0|^2$ from a similar full-wave run would quantify the multiplexing efficiency.
  • The continuous-permeability model homogenizes discrete junctions; a lumped-element circuit simulation of a finite array would show how many junctions per modulation wavelength are required for the predicted angle to hold.
  • At single-photon power levels, the same structure would be a natural candidate for quantum frequency conversion of microwave photons, but whether photon statistics survive the up-conversion is not addressed by the classical FDTD treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theory of wave interaction with a space-time-modulated Josephson junction array, modeling the array as a continuous medium with effective permeability μ_s(z,t) = 1/[G_μ cos(eΦ_dc + eΦ_rf sin(κ_s z − ω_s t + φ))]. It applies a Floquet-Bloch decomposition to derive a dispersion relation and transmission angles, and claims that a TM beam incident at ω_0 exits partly at ω_0 and partly at the up-converted frequency ω_0 + ω_s with an angle given by sin^{-1}(cos θ_i/(1+ω_s/ω_0)) (Eq. 11b), thereby realizing angular-frequency beam multiplexing. The claim is illustrated with dispersion diagrams, isofrequency contours, and a qualitative FDTD field map (Figs. 5–7).

Significance. The idea of using Josephson-junction arrays for simultaneous frequency conversion and beam steering is attractive for superconducting quantum systems. If the derivation were correct, the paper would propose a compact cryogenic platform for microwave frequency-angular multiplexing. The paper does clearly state the target effect and gives a simple momentum-conservation prediction, Eq. (11b). However, the load-bearing algebraic step equating the Floquet coefficients of μ_s with the reciprocals of the coefficients of 1/μ_s is invalid, so the derived dispersion and isofrequency diagrams are unsupported. The FDTD simulation, presented without quantitative parameters or comparison to Eq. (11b), cannot compensate for this. The up-conversion and exit angle follow kinematically from the assumed Floquet ansatz and transverse-momentum conservation, rather than from the specific Josephson array dynamics.

major comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (5c)] The transition from Eq. (5b) to Eq. (5c) sets the Floquet coefficients of μ_s(z,t) to \tilde μ_m = 1/g_m, where g_m are the coefficients of g = 1/μ_s in Eq. (3a). This is algebraically incorrect: for a nontrivial function, the Fourier coefficients of the reciprocal are not the reciprocals of the Fourier coefficients of the original function. For the specific μ_s(ψ) = 1/[G_μ cos(eΦ_dc + eΦ_rf sin ψ)], the exact coefficient is \tilde μ_m = (1/2π)∫_0^{2π} μ_s(ψ) e^{jmψ} dψ, which is not 1/g_m. Since Eq. (6b) constructs the matrix [U] from these \tilde μ_m and Eq. (6e) yields all dispersion and isofrequency diagrams in Figs. 5 and 6, this error invalidates the analytic core of the paper.
  2. [Eqs. (6b) and (6c)] The matrix definition in Eq. (6b) sets U_{nm} = -\tilde μ_{m+n} for n ≠ m, whereas the displayed matrix (6c) is Toeplitz with entries \tilde μ_{m-n}; for example, the superdiagonals are \tilde μ_1, \tilde μ_2, ... and the subdiagonals are \tilde μ_{-1}, \tilde μ_{-2}, .... The two definitions are incompatible, and the correct reduction of the coupling term \sum_m \tilde μ_m H_{m+n} in Eq. (5c) would produce a matrix with entries \tilde μ_{j-n}, not \tilde μ_{n+m}. It is therefore unclear which matrix was actually used to compute the dispersion and isofrequency plots.
  3. [Appendix A, Eqs. (15c) and (16b)] The appendix repeats the same reciprocal-coefficient error: Eq. (15c) expands μ_s with coefficients \tilde μ_m, but Eq. (16b) substitutes the g_m coefficients of 1/μ_s, again conflating the two expansions. Consequently, the condition in Eq. (17b) is not derived and does not follow from the preceding equations.
  4. [Fig. 7 and Section IV] The FDTD simulation presented as the numerical demonstration of angular-frequency beam multiplexing reports no array geometry, junction parameters, incident or transmitted power, conversion efficiency, or quantitative comparison with the predicted angle θ_T1 = sin^{-1}(cos θ_i/(1+ω_s/ω_0)) in Eq. (11b). Without such data, Fig. 7 cannot validate the theory or establish that the predicted multiplexing occurs in a physical Josephson array.
  5. [Eqs. (1g)-(1h) and (2)] The homogenization from the discrete junction array to the effective permeability is asserted without a derivation from a discrete circuit model. In particular, the phase ρ(z,t) in Eq. (1g) contains a term linear in time, tV_dc, which would imply a perpetually growing phase unless V_dc = 0; Eq. (1h) replaces this term with the constant eΦ_dc, which is inconsistent for nonzero V_dc and unexplained for V_dc = 0. The mapping also neglects the back-action of the incident wave on the junction phase dynamics. These unaddressed physical assumptions undermine the validity of the effective-medium model.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II.B] The first paragraph contains a typo: 'aking into account' should be 'Taking into account'.
  2. [Eq. (9c)] Equation (9c) is printed as H_0 = H_0 2η_1 sin(θ_i)/(η_1 sin θ_i + η_2 sin θ_0), which is circular; the left-hand side presumably denotes the harmonic amplitude at n = 0, but as written the equation is a tautology.
  3. [Eq. (4b)] The electric-field expression for the n-th harmonic uses cos θ_i for the z-component while defining sin θ_n = κ_n/k_n; consistency would require cos θ_n rather than cos θ_i.
  4. [Figs. 5 and 6] The axis labels in the text read 'ω_n/ω_s', but the plot annotations appear to show 'n/ω_s' (e.g., 'n/ s' in Fig. 5), which is ambiguous and should be corrected.
  5. [Notation, Eq. (1h)] The symbol eΦ_dc denotes a phase, not a magnetic flux; a notation such as φ_dc and φ_rf would be clearer and would distinguish phase from the flux Φ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the multiplexing angle is kinematic and the questionable 1/g_m coefficient step is an algebraic-correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claimed prediction—angular-frequency beam multiplexing, i.e., a transmitted harmonic at ω0+ωs at angle θT_1 = sin^-1(cos θi/(1+ωs/ω0))—is obtained in Eqs. (10)-(11) from transverse wave-vector conservation and the Floquet ansatz of Eq. (4a). This is a kinematic consequence of the assumed space-time periodicity; it is not fitted to the Josephson parameters and does not feed back into the definition of the permeability. The dispersion and isofrequency diagrams are generated from det[U]=0 with the coefficient matrix defined in Eqs. (5c)-(6e), using the paper's own expansion coefficients g_m of 1/μs from Eq. (3e). Whether the replacement \tilde μm = 1/g_m is a correct Fourier representation of μs is a mathematical question, not a circularity: the outputs (bandgaps, harmonic slopes) are not used as inputs to fix those coefficients, and no parameter is fitted to the quantity being 'predicted.' The self-citations are background/prior art, not load-bearing: no uniqueness theorem or prior derivation is invoked to force Eq. (11b) or the matrix form. The FDTD figure is a consistency simulation of the same assumed model rather than an independent benchmark, which weakens the evidence but does not make the derivation circular. Therefore no step satisfies the hard criterion of equating an output to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four chosen operating parameters (eΦdc, eΦrf, Gμ and the geometry, and the ω0/ωs ratio), one false algebraic premise (coefficient-wise reciprocals, Eq. 5c), and three physical modeling assumptions (externally imposed junction phase with no back-action, homogenized continuous medium, εr = 1). No parameter is fitted to experimental data, which limits the circularity burden, but the chosen values are not independently justified, and the figures cannot be reproduced without the unstated Gμ and geometry. The space-time-modulated permeability is an effective-medium description of a real array, not an invented entity: no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • eΦdc (static phase offset) = 0.2 and 0.7 in the figures
    Chosen by hand to set the average permeability level and bandgap width in Eqs. (3e) and Figs. 5-6; no independent justification is given.
  • eΦrf (modulation amplitude) = 0.1, 0.35, 0.7, 0.9 in the figures
    Chosen by hand to set harmonic coupling strength and higher-harmonic amplitudes; the FDTD run in Fig. 7 uses 0.7.
  • Gμ and array geometry (I0, A, l) = unspecified
    Gμ = 2π μ0 I0 A/(Φ0 l) sets the absolute scale of all permeability harmonics; without its value the analytic dispersion figures cannot be reproduced quantitatively.
  • ω0/ωs operating ratio = 3 GHz / 9.4 GHz (about 0.319)
    Operating point chosen for the demonstration in Figs. 6-7; the isofrequency plots and the FDTD run use this ratio.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The gauge-invariant phase across each junction is externally imposed as δ = eΦdc + eΦrf sin(κs z − ωs t + φ), neglecting back-action of the propagating wave.
    Eqs. (1g)-(1h) convert the junction into a prescribed cos-modulated inductance; a dc voltage term t Vdc in (1g) would instead produce a linear-in-time phase and is silently dropped.
  • domain assumption The discrete junction array is homogenized into a continuous effective medium with relative permeability μs = l LS/(μ0 A).
    Eq. (2) and Fig. 2: validity at the operating wavelength and with adjacent junctions uncoupled is not established; junction capacitance is neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The Fourier coefficients of μs(z,t) are the coefficient-wise reciprocals of the coefficients of 1/μs(z,t).
    Eq. (5c) ('μ̃m = 1/gm'): false for any modulation with more than one harmonic; invalidates matrix [U] and the analytic dispersion results.
  • standard math The harmonic expansion is truncated to 2N+1 terms (N = 7 or 11), with convergence assumed throughout the modulation parameter range.
    Eq. (6a) and figure headers; Appendix A claims a breakdown interval near the sonic regime but no convergence study is shown for the figures.
  • domain assumption The wave equation uses vacuum c and sets the relative permittivity of all dielectrics to unity.
    Eq. (5a): substrate, tunnel barrier, and superconductor permittivity are dropped; this affects the dispersion relation at the displayed frequencies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Light Interaction With a Space-Time-Modulated Josephson Junction Array and Application to Angular-Frequency Beam Multiplexing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UUCD7U34

@misc{pith2026250101842,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Light Interaction With a Space-Time-Modulated Josephson Junction Array and Application to Angular-Frequency Beam Multiplexing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UUCD7U34}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01842}
}
read the original abstract

Josephson junctions, as pivotal components of modern technologies such as superconducting quantum computing, owe their prominence to their unique nonlinear properties at low temperatures. Despite their extensive use in static configurations, the study of dynamic Josephson junctions, particularly under space-time modulation, remains largely unexplored. This study investigates the interaction and transmission of electromagnetic waves through arrays of space-time-modulated Josephson junctions. A comprehensive mathematical framework is presented to model the propagation of electric and magnetic fields within and beyond these structures. We demonstrate how such dynamic arrays enable groundbreaking four-dimensional light manipulation, achieving angular-frequency beam multiplexing through a seamless integration of frequency conversion and beam-splitting functionalities. These advancements open new horizons for electromagnetic field engineering, with far-reaching implications for superconducting quantum technologies, next-generation wireless communications, biomedical sensing, and radar systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01842 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light interaction with an array of space-time modulated Josephson junctions leading to angular-frequency beam multiplexing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wave scattering from a space-time superconducting surface. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Experimental prototype design of a space-time-modulated Josephson [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three-dimensional dispersion diagram of space-time-periodic Joseph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dispersion diagrams for different operation regimes of the space-time-modulated Josephson junction array. (a) eeeeeeee [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Isofrequency diagrams for different operation regimes of the space-time-modulated Josephson junction array at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FDTD numerical simulation results for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Space-Time-Coupled Qubits for Enhanced Superconducting Quantum Computing

    quant-ph 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper proposes a space-time-modulated Josephson metasurface for multi-frequency coupling of superconducting qubits, claiming all-to-all connectivity and improved coherence without experimental evidence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices,

    Y . Makhlin, G. Sch ¨on, and A. Shnirman, “Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 73, no. 2, p. 357, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Space- time crystalline order of a high-critical-temperature superconductor with intrinsic Josephson junctions,

    R. Kleiner, X. Zhou, E. Dorsch, X. Zhang, D. Koelle, and D. Jin, “Space- time crystalline order of a high-critical-temperature superconductor with intrinsic Josephson junctions,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 12, no. 1, p. 6038, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Spatiotemporal photon blockade for nonreciprocal quantum absorption,

    S. Taravati, “Spatiotemporal photon blockade for nonreciprocal quantum absorption,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08137 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Efficient nonreciprocal frequency conversion with space-time josephson junction metasurfaces,

    ——, “Efficient nonreciprocal frequency conversion with space-time josephson junction metasurfaces,” in 2024 54th European Microwave Conference (EuMC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 600–603

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    One-way absorption and isolation in space-time-periodic super- conducting metasurfaces,

    ——, “One-way absorption and isolation in space-time-periodic super- conducting metasurfaces,” in 2024 Eighteenth International Congress on Artificial Materials for Novel Wave Phenomena (Metamaterials). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–3

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions,

    Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions,” Nat. Photonics , vol. 3, pp. 91 – 94, Jan. 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Dynamic modulation yields one-way beam splitting,

    S. Taravati and A. A. Kishk, “Dynamic modulation yields one-way beam splitting,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 99, no. 7, p. 075101, Jan. 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Giant linear nonreciprocity, zero reflection, and zero band gap in equilibrated space-time-varying media,

    S. Taravati, “Giant linear nonreciprocity, zero reflection, and zero band gap in equilibrated space-time-varying media,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 9, no. 6, p. 064012, Jun. 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Space-time modulation: Principles and applications,

    S. Taravati and A. A. Kishk, “Space-time modulation: Principles and applications,” IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 30–56, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Imaging properties of nonperiodic time-varying active frequency selective surface,

    J. Wang, D. Feng, Y . Kong, S. Quan, and S. Xing, “Imaging properties of nonperiodic time-varying active frequency selective surface,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 5884– 5891, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    A time-modulated polarization-rotating frequency-selective surface,

    M. Saikia and K. V . Srivastava, “A time-modulated polarization-rotating frequency-selective surface,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Prop- agation, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1506–1515, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Advanced wave engineering via obliquely illuminated space-time-modulated slab,

    S. Taravati and A. A. Kishk, “Advanced wave engineering via obliquely illuminated space-time-modulated slab,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propa- gat., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 270–281, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Full-duplex nonreciprocal beam steering by time-modulated phase-gradient metasurfaces,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Full-duplex nonreciprocal beam steering by time-modulated phase-gradient metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 014027, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Functional analysis of the polarization response in linear time-varying media: A generalization of the kramers- kronig relations,

    D. M. Sol ´ıs and N. Engheta, “Functional analysis of the polarization response in linear time-varying media: A generalization of the kramers- kronig relations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, no. 14, p. 144303, 2021. 11

    2021

  7. [15]

    Temporal equivalent of the brewster angle,

    V . Pacheco-Pe ˜na and N. Engheta, “Temporal equivalent of the brewster angle,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 104, no. 21, p. 214308, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Finite-difference time- domain simulation of wave transmission through space-time-varying media,

    S. Taravati, A. A. Kishk, and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Finite-difference time- domain simulation of wave transmission through space-time-varying media,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19923 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Space–time metasurfaces for power combining of waves,

    X. Wang, V . S. Asadchy, S. Fan, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Space–time metasurfaces for power combining of waves,” ACS Photonics , vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 3034–3041, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Nonreciprocal sound propagation via cascaded time-modulated slab resonators,

    S. Wan, L. Cao, Y . Zhu, M. Oudich, and B. Assouar, “Nonreciprocal sound propagation via cascaded time-modulated slab resonators,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 16, no. 6, p. 064061, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    4D wave transformations enabled by space-time metasurfaces: Foundations and illustrative examples,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “4D wave transformations enabled by space-time metasurfaces: Foundations and illustrative examples,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. , vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 61–74, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Linear-frequency conversion with time-varying metasurfaces,

    C. Amra, A. Passian, P. Tchamitchian, M. Ettorre, A. Alwakil, J. A. Zapien, P. Rouquette, Y . Abautret, and M. Zerrad, “Linear-frequency conversion with time-varying metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Res. , vol. 6, no. 1, p. 013002, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Full-duplex reflective beamsteer- ing metasurface featuring magnetless nonreciprocal amplification,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Full-duplex reflective beamsteer- ing metasurface featuring magnetless nonreciprocal amplification,” Nat. Commun., vol. 14, p. 4414, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Analytical formulation of spatiotemporal modulated graphene-based waveguides using floquet- bloch theory,

    M. Valizadeh, L. Yousefi, and M. Miri, “Analytical formulation of spatiotemporal modulated graphene-based waveguides using floquet- bloch theory,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7332, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Frequency-shifted reflection of electromagnetic waves using a time-modulated active tunable frequency-selective surface,

    M. Saikia, K. V . Srivastava, and S. A. Ramakrishna, “Frequency-shifted reflection of electromagnetic waves using a time-modulated active tunable frequency-selective surface,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. , vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 2937–2944, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Microwave space-time-modulated metasurfaces,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Microwave space-time-modulated metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 305–318, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Multi- functional metasurface as a transmissive/reflective fss and an on-air frequency mixer,

    A. Kumar, S. Kongari, Y . Chandrakapure, and D. Sarkar, “Multi- functional metasurface as a transmissive/reflective fss and an on-air frequency mixer,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 13874, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Time-modulated conducting oxide metasurfaces for adaptive multiple access optical communication,

    M. M. Salary and H. Mosallaei, “Time-modulated conducting oxide metasurfaces for adaptive multiple access optical communication,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1628–1642, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Broadband continuous beam- steering with time-modulated metasurfaces in the near-infrared spectral regime,

    R. Sabri, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Broadband continuous beam- steering with time-modulated metasurfaces in the near-infrared spectral regime,” APL Photonics, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 086109, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Electrically tunable space–time metasurfaces at optical frequencies,

    J. Sisler, P. Thureja, M. Y . Grajower, R. Sokhoyan, I. Huang, and H. A. Atwater, “Electrically tunable space–time metasurfaces at optical frequencies,” Nat. Nanotechnol, pp. 1–8, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Surface-wave-assisted nonreciprocity in spatio-temporally modulated metasurfaces,

    A. E. Cardin, S. R. Silva, S. R. Vardeny, W. J. Padilla, A. Saxena, A. J. Taylor, W. J. Kort-Kamp, H.-T. Chen, D. A. Dalvit, and A. K. Azad, “Surface-wave-assisted nonreciprocity in spatio-temporally modulated metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1469, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Pseudorandom noise sequence time- modulated reflective metasurfaces for target recognition,

    X. Wang, M. S. Tong, and L. Zhao, “Pseudorandom noise sequence time- modulated reflective metasurfaces for target recognition,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3446–3454, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip,

    H. Lira, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and M. Lipson, “Electrically driven nonreciprocity induced by interband photonic transition on a silicon chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, no. 3, p. 033901, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Self-biased broadband magnet-free linear isolator based on one-way space-time coherency,

    S. Taravati, “Self-biased broadband magnet-free linear isolator based on one-way space-time coherency,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, no. 23, p. 235150, Dec. 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    Lightweight low-noise linear isolator integrating phase-and amplitude-engineered temporal loops,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Lightweight low-noise linear isolator integrating phase-and amplitude-engineered temporal loops,” Adv. Mater. Technol, p. 2100674, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Temporal aiming,

    V . Pacheco-Pe ˜na and N. Engheta, “Temporal aiming,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 129, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Pure and linear frequency- conversion temporal metasurface,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Pure and linear frequency- conversion temporal metasurface,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 15, no. 6, p. 064011, 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    Aperiodic space-time modulation for pure frequency mix- ing,

    S. Taravati, “Aperiodic space-time modulation for pure frequency mix- ing,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, no. 11, p. 115131, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Static-to- dynamic field conversion with time-varying media,

    M. J. Mencagli, D. L. Sounas, M. Fink, and N. Engheta, “Static-to- dynamic field conversion with time-varying media,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 105, no. 14, p. 144301, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    A millimeter-wave non- magnetic passive soi cmos circulator based on spatio-temporal conduc- tivity modulation,

    T. Dinc, A. Nagulu, and H. Krishnaswamy, “A millimeter-wave non- magnetic passive soi cmos circulator based on spatio-temporal conduc- tivity modulation,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits , vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3276–3292, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Magnetic-free non- reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled- resonator loops,

    N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Al `u, “Magnetic-free non- reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled- resonator loops,” Nat. Phys., vol. 10, pp. 923–927, Nov. 2014

    2014

  32. [40]

    Tunable unidirectional compact acoustic amplifier via space-time modulated membranes,

    X. Zhu, J. Li, C. Shen, G. Zhang, S. A. Cummer, and L. Li, “Tunable unidirectional compact acoustic amplifier via space-time modulated membranes,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 102, no. 2, p. 024309, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    A new mechanism for gain in time dependent media,

    J. Pendry, E. Galiffi, and P. Huidobro, “A new mechanism for gain in time dependent media,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.12077 , 2020

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Generalized space-time periodic diffraction gratings: Theory and applications,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Generalized space-time periodic diffraction gratings: Theory and applications,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 024026, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    Active multiple access secure communication enabled by graphene-based time-modulated meta- surfaces,

    H. B. Sedeh, M. M. Salary, and H. Mosallaei, “Active multiple access secure communication enabled by graphene-based time-modulated meta- surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 664–679, 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Nonreciprocal phased-array antennas,

    J. Zang, A. Alvarez-Melcon, and J. G ´omez-Diaz, “Nonreciprocal phased-array antennas,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 12, no. 5, p. 054008, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Space-time medium functions as a perfect antenna-mixer-amplifier transceiver,

    S. Taravati and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Space-time medium functions as a perfect antenna-mixer-amplifier transceiver,” Phys. Rev. Appl. , vol. 14, no. 5, p. 054017, 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    Theory and design of multifunctional space-time metasurfaces,

    X. Wang, A. Diaz-Rubio, H. Li, S. A. Tretyakov, and A. Al `u, “Theory and design of multifunctional space-time metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 044040, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    A waveguide frequency converter connecting rubidium-based quantum memories to the telecom c-band,

    B. Albrecht, P. Farrera, X. Fernandez-Gonzalvo, M. Cristiani, and H. De Riedmatten, “A waveguide frequency converter connecting rubidium-based quantum memories to the telecom c-band,” Nat. Com- mun., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 3376, 2014

    2014

  40. [48]

    High-fidelity entanglement between a trapped ion and a telecom photon via quantum frequency conversion,

    M. Bock, P. Eich, S. Kucera, M. Kreis, A. Lenhard, C. Becher, and J. Eschner, “High-fidelity entanglement between a trapped ion and a telecom photon via quantum frequency conversion,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1998, 2018

    1998

  41. [49]

    Quantum frequency conversion of memory-compatible single photons from 606 nm to the telecom c-band,

    N. Maring, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Lenhard, G. Heinze, and H. de Ried- matten, “Quantum frequency conversion of memory-compatible single photons from 606 nm to the telecom c-band,” Optica, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 507–513, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion,

    X. Han, W. Fu, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, “Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion,” Optica, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1050–1064, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,

    T. Santiago-Cruz, S. D. Gennaro, O. Mitrofanov, S. Addamane, J. Reno, I. Brener, and M. V . Chekhova, “Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states,” Science, vol. 377, no. 6609, pp. 991–995, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Metasurfaces: physics and applications in wireless communications,

    V . G. Ataloglou, S. Taravati, and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Metasurfaces: physics and applications in wireless communications,” National Science Review, vol. 10, no. 8, p. nwad164, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Low-noise short- wavelength pumped frequency downconversion for quantum frequency converters,

    J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, S. Nyga, A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, E. J. van Zwet, C. Haefner, R. Hanson, and B. Jungbluth, “Low-noise short- wavelength pumped frequency downconversion for quantum frequency converters,” Optica Quantum, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 189–195, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system,

    J. M. Gambetta, J. M. Chow, and M. Steffen, “Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system,” npj quantum infor- mation, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2, 2017

    2017

  47. [55]

    Control system of superconducting quantum computers,

    Y . He, J. Liu, C. Zhao, R. Huang, G. Dai, and W. Chen, “Control system of superconducting quantum computers,” Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 11–31, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Axion dark matter detection by superconducting resonant frequency conversion,

    A. Berlin, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. Ellis, C. Nantista, J. Neilson, P. Schus- ter, S. Tantawi, N. Toro, and K. Zhou, “Axion dark matter detection by superconducting resonant frequency conversion,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, no. 7, pp. 1–42, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit,

    A. V . Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, “Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 14, p. 141302, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    Quantum sensing for particle physics,

    S. D. Bass and M. Doser, “Quantum sensing for particle physics,” Nat. Rev. Phys., pp. 1–11, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    A mimo-ofdm prototype for next-generation wireless wans,

    C. Dubuc, D. Starks, T. Creasy, and Y . Hou, “A mimo-ofdm prototype for next-generation wireless wans,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 82–87, 2004

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.