Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Automating the Search for Artificial Life with Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.17799 v2 pith:UV3AK3H7 submitted 2024-12-23 cs.AI cs.NE

classification cs.AIcs.NE
keywords lifesimulationsalifeartificialasalautomataboidscellular
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the recent Nobel Prize awarded for radical advances in protein discovery, foundation models (FMs) for exploring large combinatorial spaces promise to revolutionize many scientific fields. Artificial Life (ALife) has not yet integrated FMs, thus presenting a major opportunity for the field to alleviate the historical burden of relying chiefly on manual design and trial-and-error to discover the configurations of lifelike simulations. This paper presents, for the first time, a successful realization of this opportunity using vision-language FMs. The proposed approach, called Automated Search for Artificial Life (ASAL), (1) finds simulations that produce target phenomena, (2) discovers simulations that generate temporally open-ended novelty, and (3) illuminates an entire space of interestingly diverse simulations. Because of the generality of FMs, ASAL works effectively across a diverse range of ALife substrates including Boids, Particle Life, Game of Life, Lenia, and Neural Cellular Automata. A major result highlighting the potential of this technique is the discovery of previously unseen Lenia and Boids lifeforms, as well as cellular automata that are open-ended like Conway's Game of Life. Additionally, the use of FMs allows for the quantification of previously qualitative phenomena in a human-aligned way. This new paradigm promises to accelerate ALife research beyond what is possible through human ingenuity alone.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ZapGPT: Free-form Language Prompting for Simulated Cellular Control

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZapGPT evolves a prompt-to-intervention model against a vision-language evaluator and reports that single-prompt training generalizes to unseen free-form language prompts.

  2. AutomataGPT: Forecasting and Ruleset Inference for Two-Dimensional Cellular Automata

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A transformer pretrained on 100 cellular automaton rules forecasts unseen rules at 98.5% one-step accuracy and infers new rules with up to 96% functional accuracy.

  3. Participatory Evolution of Artificial Life Systems via Semantic Feedback

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A closed-loop system uses CLIP-based semantic similarity to evolve a swarm simulation toward natural-language prompts, with user ratings favoring it over manual tuning.

Pith tools