REVIEW 2 cited by
OnPair: Short Strings Compression for Fast Random Access
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
OnPair: Short Strings Compression for Fast Random Access
read the original abstract
We present OnPair, a dictionary-based compression algorithm designed to meet the needs of in-memory database systems that require both high compression and fast random access. Existing methods either achieve strong compression ratios at significant computational and memory cost (e.g., BPE) or prioritize speed at the expense of compression quality (e.g., FSST). OnPair bridges this gap by employing a cache-friendly dictionary construction technique that incrementally merges frequent adjacent substrings in a single sequential pass over a data sample. This enables fast, memory-efficient training without tracking global pair positions, as required by traditional BPE. We also introduce OnPair16, a variant that limits dictionary entries to 16 bytes, enabling faster parsing via optimized longest prefix matching. Both variants compress strings independently, supporting fine-grained random access without block-level overhead. Experiments on real-world datasets show that OnPair and OnPair16 achieve compression ratios comparable to BPE while significantly improving compression speed and memory usage.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
OptFSST: Optimized FSST String Compression
OptFSST and OptFSST12 raise FSST/FSST12 compression factors by 7.3%/17.0% on average via DP encoding and better symbol-table heuristics, while preserving random-access decompression.
-
OptFSST: Optimized FSST String Compression
OptFSST lifts FSST's average compression factor by 7.3% and FSST12's by 17.0% across 92 string columns using DP encoding, triple counting, and pruning; it also proves the symbol-table selection problem is NP-hard when...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.