pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31634 · v1 · pith:UWQ6PJCInew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Effects of confinement in a Brownian gas with simultaneous stochastic resetting and dynamically emergent correlations

Gabriele de Mauro , Satya N. Majumdar , Gregory Schehr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Brownian particlesstochastic resettingconfinementdynamically emergent correlationsextreme value statisticsharmonic potentialbox potentialgap statistics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Confinement changes how common resets induce correlations in Brownian particles, with box walls causing non-monotonic overshoot while harmonic potentials yield monotonic growth.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that N non-interacting Brownian particles subject to simultaneous stochastic resetting to the origin develop dynamically emergent correlations even without direct interactions. When an external potential V(x) = κ |x|^α is added, the stationary state is governed by the ratio of the confinement length scale to the resetting length scale. For box confinement (α → ∞) the normalized correlation coefficient is non-monotonic in the resetting rate and exceeds the unconfined value; for harmonic confinement (α = 2) it rises monotonically toward the unconfined limit. The transition occurs at a critical exponent α_c = 1 + √5. Extreme-value and gap statistics also split into three universality classes depending on α.

Core claim

In the stationary state the joint distribution remains exactly solvable because resets are common to all particles. The normalized correlation coefficient is non-monotonic and overshoots the free value under box confinement because hard walls suppress decorrelating trajectories, while under harmonic confinement it increases monotonically. For general α the monotonicity holds only when 0 < α < 1 + √5. The largest particle position scales as √(ln N) with bounded support under harmonic confinement but sits O(1/N) from the wall with power-law tails under box confinement; the first gap shows correspondingly smaller typical size but stronger anomalous fluctuations in the box case. These behaviors

What carries the argument

Competition between confinement length scale and resetting length scale, which controls the exact stationary joint distribution and thereby sets the sign and magnitude of dynamically emergent correlations.

If this is right

  • Edge observables (maximum position, first gap) split into qualitatively different scaling and fluctuation classes for harmonic versus box confinement.
  • The monotonicity switch at α_c = 1 + √5 separates two regimes of correlation response for any power-law potential.
  • The three universality classes for extreme-value statistics persist across the full range of α.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Tuning the potential exponent around α_c could serve as a switch for correlation strength in experimental reset systems.
  • The same length-scale competition may govern correlation patterns in other common-reset models such as run-and-tumble particles.
  • Numerical checks of the α → ∞ class could be performed by simulating increasingly steep power-law walls.

Load-bearing premise

Particles interact only through shared resets, so the stationary joint distribution factors exactly and is controlled solely by the two length scales.

What would settle it

Plot the normalized correlation coefficient versus resetting rate for a single pair of particles in a hard-wall box and check whether the curve rises above the unconfined value before returning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31634 by Gabriele de Mauro, Gregory Schehr, Satya N. Majumdar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the confined resetting gas. The left column shows harmonic confinement (HC), where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison between the scaling functions of the stationary density in the HC (left), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plot of the two functions F H 1 (νH) (left) and F H 2 (νH) (right) given respectively in (67) and (68). The function F H 2 (νH) has a maximum at a value ν ∗ H = p√ 5 − 1 = 1.1118 . . . . ⟨x 2 i (τ )⟩ (B) 0 = L 2 12 + L 2 π 2 X∞ n=1 (−1)n n2 exp − 4π 2Dn2 L2 τ  . (65) and ⟨x 4 i (τ )⟩ (B) 0 = L 4 80 + L 4 2π 2 X∞ n=1 (−1)n n2 exp − 4π 2Dn2 L2 τ  − 3L 4 π 4 X∞ n=1 (−1)n n4 exp − 4π 2Dn2 L2 τ  . (66) By… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of the two functions F B 1 (νB) (left) and F B 2 (νB) (right) given respectively in (69) and (70). The function F B 2 (νB) has a maximum at a value ν ∗ B ≈ 2.3007 . . . which was determined numerically. while F H 2 (νH) ≈    ν 2 H 16 , νH → 0, 1 ν 4 H , νH → ∞, and F B 2 (νB) ≈    c ν2 B, νB → 0, 1 4ν 4 B , νB → ∞, (73) where c = 31 30240 + S2 2π 4 , S2 = 1 π X∞ m=1 (−1)m m5 sinh(πm) + X∞ … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plots of the normalized correlation coefficient in the HC (left) and in the BC (right), along with numerical simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized correlation coefficient Aα(να) for the confining potential V (x) = κ|x| α . Symbols correspond to numerical simulations for different values of α. The solid curves show the theoretical predictions for the harmonic case, α = 2 (see Eq. (80)), and for the hard wall limit, α → ∞ (see Eq. (82)). The red dots correspond to the critical value α = αc = 1 + √ 5. The numerical results in [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot of the correlation coefficient A (d) B (νB) in dimension d = 1, d = 2 and d = 3. The corresponding expressions are given, respectively, in (82), (B49) and (B73). pair correlations in higher dimensions, we generalize Eqs. (58) and (60) and define A (d) B (νB) = C (d) 2 (νB) C (d) 1 (νB) = ⟨|xi | 2 |xj | 2 ⟩ − ⟨|xi | 2 ⟩⟨|xj | 2 ⟩ ⟨|xi | 4⟩ − ⟨|xi | 2⟩ 2 , (94) where |x| 2 = x 2 1 + · · · + x 2 d . In A… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: EVS in the HC (left) and in the BC (right). Crosses show numerical simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic representation of the EVS in the BC case, summarized in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plot of the scaling functions S2(z) and S3(z), given in Eqs. (179) and (177), respectively. They describe the intermediate crossover and large-deviation regimes of the EVS in the BC case. δ = 1 2 − m L , (171) this corresponds to atypically large values of δ. We now study the large deviations of this variable. The origin of this regime can be traced back to the small-time regime of the integral in Eq. (11… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Gap statistics in the HC (left) and in the BC (right). Crosses show numerical simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Schematic representation of the gap statistics in the BC case, summarized in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Plot of the scaling functions h2(z) and h3(z), given in Eqs. (200) and (201), respectively. They describe the intermediate crossover and large-deviation regimes of the gap statistics in the BC case. See also Eq. (199). on the complementary interval [0, Tc(N)], which is responsible for anomalously large values of the first gap. In this regime, from Eq. (207) we know that the local edge density ϱB(T) = N p(… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Numerical simulations for the confining potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: EVS for the potential V (x) = κ p |x|. Crosses show numerical simulations for κ = 1, N = 105 and two values of the resetting rate, r = 1 and r = 10. The horizontal axis is the rescaled maximum z = M1/ p (4D/r) ln N, while the solid black line corresponds to the scaling function S(z) = 2ze−z 2 . The two empirical distributions collapse onto each other when expressed in terms of z, even though r is varied b… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study $N$ non-interacting Brownian particles in an external potential under simultaneous stochastic resetting to the origin. Although they do not interact directly, common resets generate strong dynamically emergent correlations (DEC). We analyze how confinement modifies these correlations and the nonequilibrium stationary state for $V(x)=\kappa |x|^\alpha$, $\alpha\geq0$, focusing mainly on two analytically tractable cases: harmonic confinement (HC), $\alpha=2$, and box confinement (BC), $\alpha\to\infty$. In both cases the stationary state is controlled by the competition between confinement and resetting lengths. We derive exact results for the stationary joint distribution, density, correlations, extreme value statistics (EVS), and gap statistics. While the density behaves similarly in HC and BC, the normalized correlation coefficient differs sharply. In BC it is non-monotonic and overshoots the unconfined value, as hard walls suppress decorrelating trajectories. In HC it instead increases monotonically toward the unconfined limit. For general $\alpha$, the behavior is monotonic for $0<\alpha<\alpha_c=1+\sqrt{5}$ and non-monotonic for $\alpha>\alpha_c$. The difference between HC and BC is also visible in edge observables. In HC, the maximum scales as $M_1=O(\sqrt{\ln N})$ and has a limiting distribution with bounded support and a shape transition controlled by the ratio of the two length scales. In BC, the maximum is at distance $O(1/N)$ from the boundary, as in equilibrium, but its fluctuations have a broad power-law tail with logarithmic corrections. The first gap shows a similar contrast: BC gives a smaller typical gap but stronger anomalous fluctuations than HC. Finally, we extend the EVS analysis to general $\alpha$ and identify, via simulations and scaling arguments, three universality classes: $0\leq\alpha\leq1$, $1<\alpha<\infty$, and the singular limit $\alpha\to\infty$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies N non-interacting Brownian particles subject to simultaneous stochastic resetting in the potential V(x)=κ|x|^α (α≥0). It derives exact expressions for the stationary joint distribution, density, normalized correlation coefficient, extreme-value statistics, and gap statistics in the analytically tractable limits of harmonic confinement (α=2) and box confinement (α→∞), showing that the stationary state is controlled by the competition between confinement and resetting length scales. For general α the normalized correlation coefficient is monotonic for 0<α<α_c=1+√5 and non-monotonic for α>α_c; extreme-value statistics fall into three universality classes (0≤α≤1, 1<α<∞, α→∞) identified by scaling arguments and simulations.

Significance. If the exact derivations hold, the work provides a clear, parameter-free account of how confinement alters resetting-induced correlations and edge observables. The exact solvability for the HC and BC cases, the identification of the critical exponent α_c, and the classification of EVS into three universality classes constitute genuine advances in the statistical mechanics of resetting processes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript, positive assessment of its contributions, and recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations start from model equations

full rationale

The paper states that it derives exact results for the stationary joint distribution, density, correlations, and EVS directly from the Fokker-Planck dynamics of non-interacting particles subject to common resets and the potential V(x)=κ|x|^α. The normalized correlation coefficient distinctions (monotonic vs non-monotonic, α_c=1+√5) and the three EVS universality classes follow from this exact solvability and scaling arguments without any parameter fitting, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claims to their own inputs. The derivation chain is self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Model rests on standard Brownian motion plus simultaneous resetting; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Particles are non-interacting Brownian motions subject to simultaneous Poissonian resetting to the origin.
    Core model definition stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The nonequilibrium stationary state exists and is governed by the ratio of confinement and resetting length scales.
    Used to classify behavior for V(x)=kappa |x|^alpha.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5902 in / 1287 out tokens · 62640 ms · 2026-07-01T02:56:56.270782+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    blocking argument

    Box confinement (BC) We now turn to the distribution of the first gapd1 in the BC geometry. As for the EVS, in this confinement geometry we study not only the typical regime, but also the intermediate and large deviation regimes, since the typical scaling function has a very broad tail. The distribution ofd1 reads Prob{d1 =g}=    N L SB g...

  2. [2]

    More explicitly, J1(j1,n) = 0, k n = j1,n LB = 2j1,n L , n≥1.(B24) We now determine the coefficients of the spectral expansion

    Dimensiond= 2 In two dimensions, one has η= 0, L B = L 2 , V 2(LB) =πL 2 B = πL2 4 .(B22) The radial eigenfunctions are therefore Φn(x) =J 0(knx),(B23) 49 and the reflecting boundary condition selects the positive zeros ofJ1. More explicitly, J1(j1,n) = 0, k n = j1,n LB = 2j1,n L , n≥1.(B24) We now determine the coefficients of the spectral expansion. We ...

  3. [3]

    Dimensiond= 3 In three dimensions, one has η= 1 2 , L B = L 2 , V 3(LB) = 4πL3 B 3 = πL3 6 .(B50) The regular radial eigenfunctions are proportional tox−1/2J1/2(knx). Using the identityJ 1/2(x) = q 2 πx sinx[95], we can equivalently write eigenfunctions as Φn(x) = sin(knx) x .(B51) The reflecting boundary condition selects the positive zeros ofJ3/2. Equiv...

  4. [4]

    Thus, in terms of yN(T)we sety N(T) = 1 2 −ε, whereε≪1, in (C4). We can now write sin 2πn 1 2 −ε = sin(πn−2πnε) = (−1) n+1 sin(2πnε),(C11) and, by expanding for smallε, we obtain ε− ∞X n=1 (−1)n+1 πn (2πnε)e −(πn)2T ≈ 1 N .(C12) We then recall the definition in Eq. (159) of the functionϑ(T), namely ϑ(T) = 1−2 ∞X n=1 (−1)n+1e−(πn)2T = 1 + 2 ∞X n=1 (−1)ne−(...

  5. [5]

    Brown,XXVII

    R. Brown,XXVII. A brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies, Philos. Mag. Ser. 24, 161–173 (1828)

  6. [6]

    Einstein,Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Ann

    A. Einstein,Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen, Ann. Phys.17, 549–560 (1905)

    1905

  7. [7]

    C. W. Gardiner,Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences, 4th ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, 2nd ed

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1996)

    1996

  9. [9]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with Stochastic Resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 160601 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with optimal resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.44, 435001 (2011)

    2011

  11. [11]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with resetting in arbitrary spatial dimension, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 285001 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    Reuveni,Optimal stochastic restart renders fluctuations in first passage times universal, Phys

    S. Reuveni,Optimal stochastic restart renders fluctuations in first passage times universal, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 170601 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    U. Bhat, C. De Bacco, S. Redner,Stochastic search with Poisson and deterministic resetting, J. Stat. Mech. 083401 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Nagar, S

    A. Nagar, S. Gupta,Diffusion with stochastic resetting at power-law times, Phys. Rev. E93, 060102(R) (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    A. Pal, S. Reuveni,First passage under restart, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030603 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    Chechkin, I

    A. Chechkin, I. M. Sokolov,Random search with resetting: A unified renewal approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 050601 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    A. Pal, Ł. Kuśmierz, S. Reuveni,Time-dependent density of diffusion with stochastic resetting is invariant to return speed, Phys. Rev. E100, 040101(R) (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Durang, S

    X. Durang, S. Lee, L. Lizana, J.-H. Jeon,First-passage statistics under stochastic resetting in bounded domains, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 224001 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Gupta, C

    D. Gupta, C. A. Plata, A. Pal,Work fluctuations and Jarzynski equality in stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110608 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Stochastic resetting and applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 193001 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    P. C. Bressloff,Search processes with stochastic resetting and multiple targets, Phys. Rev. E102, 022115 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    P. C. Bressloff,Queueing theory of search processes with stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E102, 032109 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    P. C. Bressloff,Accumulation time of stochastic processes with resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 354001 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Sandev, V

    T. Sandev, V. Domazetoski, L. Kocarev, R. Metzler, A. Chechkin,Heterogeneous diffusion with stochastic resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 074003 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    A. Pal, S. Kostinski, S. Reuveni,The inspection paradox in stochastic resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 021001 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Gupta, A

    S. Gupta, A. M. Jayannavar,Stochastic resetting: A (very) brief review, Front. Phys.10, 789097 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Nagar, S

    A. Nagar, S. Gupta,Stochastic resetting in interacting particle systems: a review, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 283001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    A. K. Hartmann, S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with stochastic resetting on a lattice, Phys. Rev. E112, 034102 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Gupta, S

    S. Gupta, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Fluctuating Interfaces Subject to Stochastic Resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 220601 (2014)

    2014

  30. [30]

    U. Basu, A. Kundu, A. Pal,Symmetric exclusion process under stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E100, 032136 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Magoni, S

    M. Magoni, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Ising model with stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033182 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Patel, A

    M. Patel, A. Shee,Controlling inertial active Brownian motion via stochastic resetting, arXiv:2602.21134 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Santra, D

    I. Santra, D. Das,Resetting in a viscoelastic bath: the bath remembers, arXiv:2603.17027 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Besga, A

    B. Besga, A. Bovon, A. Petrosyan, S. N. Majumdar, and S. Ciliberto,Optimal mean first-passage time for a Brownian searcher subjected to resetting: Experimental and theoretical results, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 032029(R) (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Tal-Friedman, A

    O. Tal-Friedman, A. Pal, A. Sekhon, S. Reuveni, and Y. Roichman,Experimental realization of diffusion with stochastic resetting, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 7350–7355 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Ginot and C

    F. Ginot and C. Bechinger,Experimental investigation of stochastic resetting in a non-Markovian environment, New J. Phys.28, 015001 (2026)

    2026

  37. [37]

    Faisant, B

    F. Faisant, B. Besga, A. Petrosyan, S. Ciliberto, and S. N. Majumdar,Optimal mean first-passage time of a Brownian searcher with resetting in one and two dimensions: experiments, theory and numerical tests, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 113203 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Boyer, C

    D. Boyer, C. Solis-Salas,Random walks with preferential relocations to places visited in the past and their application to biology, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 240601 (2014)

    2014

  39. [39]

    Boyer, J

    D. Boyer, J. C. R. Romo-Cruz,Solvable random-walk model with memory and its relations with Markovian models of anomalous diffusion, Phys. Rev. E90, 042136 (2014). 66

    2014

  40. [40]

    Boyer, M

    D. Boyer, M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar,Long time scaling behaviour for diffusion with resetting and memory, J. Stat. Mech.2017, 023208 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Boyer, S

    D. Boyer, S. N. Majumdar,Power-law relaxation of a confined diffusing particle subject to resetting with memory, J. Stat. Mech.2024, 073206 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Boyer, M

    D. Boyer, M. R. Evans, S. N. Majumdar,Diffusion with preferential relocation in a confining potential, J. Stat. Mech. 2025, 013209 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Boyer, S

    D. Boyer, S. N. Majumdar,Emerging correlations between diffusing particles evolving via simultaneous resetting with memory, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.59, 125001 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    Biroli, H

    M. Biroli, H. Larralde, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr,Extreme statistics and spacing distribution in a Brownian gas correlated by resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 207101 (2023)

    2023

  45. [45]

    S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Dynamically Emergent Correlations, EPL155, 11001 (2026)

    2026

  46. [46]

    Biroli, H

    M. Biroli, H. Larralde, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Exact extreme, order, and sum statistics in a class of strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. E109, 014101 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    de Mauro, M

    G. de Mauro, M. Biroli, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr,Dynamically emergent correlations in Brownian particles subject to simultaneous non-Poissonian resetting protocols, Phys. Rev. E113, 014120 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Biroli, S

    M. Biroli, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,First-passage resetting gas, EPL153, 31002 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Biroli, S

    M. Biroli, S. N. Majumdar, G. Schehr,Resetting Dyson Brownian motion, Phys. Rev. E112, 014101 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    de Mauro, S

    G. de Mauro, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr,Tuning the strength of emergent correlations in a Brownian gas via batch resetting, arXiv:2601.20077 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Magoni, F

    M. Magoni, F. Carollo, G. Perfetto, I. Lesanovsky,Emergent quantum correlations and collective behavior in noninteracting quantum systems subject to stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. A106, 052210 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Kulkarni, S

    M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, S. Sabhapandit,Dynamically emergent correlations in bosons via quantum resetting, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58, 105003 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Soldner, I

    D. Soldner, I. Lesanovsky, G. Perfetto,Nonanaliticities and ergodicity breaking in noninteracting many-body dynamics via stochastic resetting and global measurements, arXiv:2510.11450 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Galla,A diffusion approximation for systems with frequent weak resetting, arXiv:2602.21635

    T. Galla,A diffusion approximation for systems with frequent weak resetting, arXiv:2602.21635 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    K. S. Olsen,Information-fluctuation inequalities for collective response, arXiv:2603.01852 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Biroli, M

    M. Biroli, M. Kulkarni, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr,Dynamically emergent correlations between particles in a switching harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. E109, L032106 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    Theor.57, 335003 (2024)

    S.Sabhapandit, S.N.Majumdar,Noninteracting particles in a harmonic trap with a stochastically driven center, J.Phys.A: Math. Theor.57, 335003 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Mesquita, S

    N. Mesquita, S. N. Majumdar, S. Sabhapandit,Dynamically emergent correlations in a Brownian gas with diffusing diffusivity, J. Stat. Mech.2025, 103207 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    O. Vilk, M. Assaf, and B. Meerson,Fluctuations and first-passage properties of systems of Brownian particles with reset, Phys. Rev. E106, 024117 (2022)

    2022

  60. [60]

    Meerson and O

    B. Meerson and O. Vilk,Age-structured hydrodynamics of ensembles of anomalously diffusing particles with renewal reset- ting, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023103 (2026)

    2026

  61. [61]

    Vilk,Macroscopic localization and collective memory in Poisson renewal resetting, Phys

    O. Vilk,Macroscopic localization and collective memory in Poisson renewal resetting, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023305 (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    Majumder, R

    R. Majumder, R. Chattopadhyay, S. Gupta,Kuramoto model subject to subsystem resetting: How resetting a part of the system may synchronize the whole of it, Phys. Rev. E109, 064137 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    Acharya, R

    A. Acharya, R. Majumder, S. Gupta,Manipulating Phases in Many-Body Interacting Systems with Subsystem Resetting, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 127103 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    Analytical approach to subsystem resetting in generalized Kuramoto models

    R. Majumder, A. Acharya, S. Gupta,Analytical approach to subsystem resetting in generalized Kuramoto models, arXiv:2604.04769 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Pal,Diffusion in a potential landscape with stochastic resetting, Phys

    A. Pal,Diffusion in a potential landscape with stochastic resetting, Phys. Rev. E91, 012113 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    Christou, A

    C. Christou, A. Schadschneider,Diffusion with resetting in bounded domains, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.48, 285003 (2015)

    2015

  67. [67]

    É.Roldán, S.Gupta,Path-integral formalism for stochastic resetting: Exactly solved examples and shortcuts to confinement, Phys. Rev. E96, 022130 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    A. Pal, V. V. Prasad,First passage under stochastic resetting in an interval, Phys. Rev. E99, 032123 (2019)

    2019

  69. [69]

    Ahmad, I

    S. Ahmad, I. Nayak, A. Bansal, A. Nandi, D. Das,First passage of a particle in a potential under stochastic resetting: A vanishing transition of optimal resetting rate, Phys. Rev. E99, 022130 (2019)

    2019

  70. [70]

    R. K. Singh, R. Metzler, T. Sandev,Resetting dynamics in a confining potential, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 505003 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    Gupta, C

    D. Gupta, C. A. Plata, A. Kundu, A. Pal,Stochastic resetting with stochastic returns using external trap, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54, 025003 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    Gupta, A

    D. Gupta, A. Pal, A. Kundu,Resetting with stochastic return through linear confining potential, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 043202 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    E. J. Gumbel,Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press, New York (1958)

    1958

  74. [74]

    M. R. Leadbetter, G. Lindgren, and H. Rootzén,Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer-Verlag, New York (1983)

    1983

  75. [75]

    J. Y. Fortin and M. Clusel,Applications of extreme value statistics in physics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.48, 183001 (2015)

    2015

  76. [76]

    H. A. David and H. N. Nagaraja,Order Statistics, 3rd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2003)

    2003

  77. [77]

    B. C. Arnold, N. Balakrishnan, and H. N. Nagaraja,A First Course in Order Statistics, Wiley, New York (1992)

    1992

  78. [78]

    S. N. Majumdar, A. Pal, and G. Schehr,Extreme value statistics of correlated random variables: A pedagogical review, 67 Phys. Rep.840, 1–32 (2020)

    2020

  79. [79]

    S. N. Majumdar and G. Schehr,Statistics of Extremes and Records in Random Sequences, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Vatash and Y

    R. Vatash and Y. Roichman,Many-body colloidal dynamics under stochastic resetting: Competing effects of particle inter- actions on the steady-state distribution, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L032020 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.