Dual-Frequency Absorption Spectroscopy in Laser-Cooled Rubidium Atoms: Theoretical Modeling and Experiment

Fredrik K. Fatemi; Gour Pati; Gustavo Acosta; Mauricio Pulido; Renu Tripathi

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 35 references

Dual-Frequency Absorption Spectroscopy in Laser-Cooled Rubidium Atoms: Theoretical Modeling and Experiment

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A full density-matrix model reproduces the dual-frequency absorption spectra of laser-cooled rubidium, and the same high-contrast resonances can lock a CPT clock laser.

desk verdict The abstract describes a plausible, useful cold-atom DFAS result, but the supplied full text is an unrelated molecular-docking paper, so the actual claims cannot be checked and the parameter-independence question hangs unresolved. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18150 v1 pith:UWUHGMJR submitted 2025-08-25 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Gour Pati , Mauricio Pulido , Fredrik K. Fatemi , Gustavo Acosta , Renu Tripathi This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-phquant-ph

keywords dual-frequencyabsorptionspectroscopycoherentpopulationtrappingdensity-matrixmodellaser-cooledrubidiumDoppler-freemagneto-opticaltrapopticalfrequencystandardlaserstabilization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy on laser-cooled rubidium-87 and rubidium-85, producing Doppler-free resonances with high contrast. The authors claim a multi-level density-matrix model, run without simplifying approximations, reproduces the measured amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes as the magnetic field and two-photon detuning are varied. That would matter because the same resonances give a simple, stable error signal for locking a laser to trapped atoms, and the lock doubles as coherent-population-trapping spectroscopy. The practical target is compact optical frequency standards and vapor-cell quantum sensors built on the same physics.

What carries the argument

The central object is a multi-level density-matrix model of the rubidium atom driven by two optical fields. It computes steady-state populations and coherences of the coupled ground and excited states, from which the absorption spectrum's amplitude, linewidth, frequency shift, and lineshape follow as functions of magnetic field and two-photon detuning.

What would settle it

Fix every model parameter using one independent calibration (for example, a measured Rabi rate and a known magnetic field), then record DFAS spectra over a range of magnetic fields and two-photon detunings not used in the paper; systematic disagreement in linewidths or frequency shifts beyond experimental uncertainty would falsify the claim of accurate, approximation-free simulation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy in laser-cooled rubidium produces high-contrast, Doppler-free resonances whose full shape and position are captured quantitatively by a multi-level density-matrix model with no simplifying approximations. The experiment realizes the resonances in both 87Rb and 85Rb in a magneto-optical trap; the simulations reproduce amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes across changes in magnetic field and two-photon detuning. The paper further demonstrates that locking the probe laser to the DFAS resonance on trapped atoms is itself a mechanism for CPT spectroscopy, and that the same model extends to a rubidium vapor cell.

Load-bearing premise

The claim of accurate simulation rests on the assumption that the model inputs—per-transition laser intensities, decay and dephasing rates, laser linewidths, magnetic field, and velocity distribution—were fixed independently of the spectra being matched, so the agreement is a prediction rather than a fit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

DFAS resonances in cold atoms can serve as a simple, high-contrast laser lock, removing the need for a separate pump-probe spectroscopy setup.
The laser lock doubles as CPT spectroscopy, so a single MOT-based apparatus could both trap atoms and interrogate clock-relevant coherences.
Quantitative agreement across magnetic field and two-photon detuning means the model can be used to design or predict DFAS conditions for a compact CPT clock.
The demonstrated vapor-cell extension makes the modeling approach directly relevant to cell-based quantum sensing devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the model is truly parameter-free, the strongest test would be to fix all inputs from one independent calibration and then predict spectra on a grid of magnetic fields and detunings not used in the paper; the abstract does not show such a blind comparison.
The high resonance contrast suggests DFAS could eventually combine trapping, spectroscopy, and clock interrogation in a single optical layout, but the paper stops short of demonstrating long-term frequency stability or a closed-loop clock.
Applied to vapor cells, the model might let a single measured spectrum infer cell temperature, buffer-gas pressure, or magnetic field, but that inversion is not claimed here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things you should know about this submission. The abstract is about dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy in laser-cooled rubidium, with a density-matrix model claimed to be free of simplifying approximations and a demonstration of a DFAS-based CPT lock. That is a real extension of a known room-temperature vapor technique to the cold-atom regime, and it could be genuinely useful for compact clocks and quantum sensors. The second thing is that the full text attached to the arXiv record is a completely different paper on molecular docking with neutral-atom quantum processors. Different title, different authors, different field. So the record as you handed it to me is internally incoherent; no one can review the actual DFAS paper from this artifact alone.

If the abstract is a fair summary, the paper would do several things well. It moves DFAS into a MOT, which is not just a parameter scan of known results. The model is apparently run across magnetic field and two-photon detuning, a sweep that could falsify it. And the locking demonstration has practical appeal. That is legitimate novelty, and the significance rating around six feels about right if the quantitative claims hold.

The soft spot is exactly what you flagged. The load-bearing assertion is that the model "accurately" reproduces amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes. But the abstract never says how the model inputs—Rabi frequencies, relaxation rates, magnetic fields, velocity distributions—were set. If any of those were adjusted post hoc to match the spectra, the claim becomes a fit, not a test. That is a genuine evidence gap, not a demonstrated flaw. The "without any simplifying approximations" language is also hard to take literally for a finite multi-level master equation; beam profile effects, radiation trapping, and off-resonant couplings are usually dropped or approximated. That is a minor concern, but worth asking the authors about.

The docking paper's own limitation, that its workflow relies on a known crystallographic ligand pose, belongs to that unrelated manuscript and should not be held against the DFAS claims. It is simply irrelevant.

Who is this for? Anyone working on cold-atom CPT clocks, laser stabilization, or vapor-cell quantum sensors would want to read the real paper. As it stands, this record should be sent back to the authors to supply the correct full text. If the correct manuscript exists and matches the abstract, the physics described deserves serious referee time because the claims are specific, falsifiable, and in a useful regime. So yes, send it to peer review once the record is fixed. But do not try to review this artifact as is.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission consists of an abstract for a physics paper on dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy (DFAS) in laser-cooled rubidium atoms, claiming a density-matrix model that 'accurately' reproduces amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes, plus a demonstration of DFAS-based CPT spectroscopy. However, the supplied full text is an entirely different manuscript on quantum molecular docking (arXiv:2508.18147v2), with its own title, abstract, introduction, figures, and references. None of the DFAS equations, multi-level model details, experimental apparatus, parameter tables, spectra, error analysis, or comparison metrics are present. Consequently, the abstract's central claims are unsupported by the record and cannot be checked in this submission.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were fully supported, the work would be significant: a quantitative, multi-level density-matrix model of DFAS without ad hoc approximations—validated in laser-cooled 85Rb and 87Rb and extended to vapor cells—would strengthen the prospects for cold-atom CPT clocks and atom-based quantum sensors. The abstract's parameter sweep over magnetic field and two-photon detuning is a falsifiable structure, which is a positive feature. However, because the full text is unrelated to DFAS and contains no supporting derivations, figures, datasets, or parameter tables, the significance cannot be assessed from this submission. The claims are at present purely asserted.

major comments (3)

[Full text (entire body)] The submitted full text is arXiv:2508.18147v2, 'A Scalable Heuristic for Molecular Docking on Neutral-Atom Quantum Processors,' by Garrigues, Onofre, Coelho, and Acheche. It shares no content with the DFAS abstract: no density-matrix equations, no rubidium level structure, no experimental setup, no spectra, no parameter values, and no error analysis. This is not a local presentation defect; it removes the entire evidentiary basis for the abstract's claims. The central assertion that the simulations 'accurately yield amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes' cannot be verified without the missing modeling and experimental sections.
[Abstract (line 2)] The abstract states that the model is developed 'without applying any simplifying approximations.' A finite multi-level density-matrix calculation necessarily approximates or truncates the level basis, decay channels, spontaneous-emission/radiation-trapping effects, laser intensity profiles, and velocity integration. No derivation or enumeration of the retained physics is given. Without a precise statement of what is included and what is neglected, the 'no simplifying approximations' claim is unfalsifiable, and the subsequent accuracy claim lacks a well-defined object of comparison.
[Abstract (lines 3-4)] The abstract reports accurate simulation of four observables—amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes—but does not describe how the model's input parameters (per-transition Rabi frequencies or intensities, decay/dephasing rates, laser linewidth contributions, magnetic fields, velocity-distribution parameters) were set. If any of these were adjusted to match the measured spectra, the agreement is a fit rather than a test. The missing methods section and parameter table are essential to distinguish predictive modeling from post-hoc fitting; this is a load-bearing gap.

minor comments (3)

[Submission metadata] The arXiv metadata and abstract indicate physics.atom-ph, but the supplied full text is a quant-ph molecular-docking manuscript. This is likely a submission/upload error, but the authors should verify the integrity of the uploaded file before resubmission.
[Abstract (sentence 3)] The acronym is defined twice: 'dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy (DFAS)' appears in the first sentence and again in the third sentence. One definition should be removed.
[Abstract (last sentence)] The final clause, 'which is a medium of practical interest for vapor-cell-based quantum sensing applications,' is a sentence fragment. Consider revising for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular step demonstrable from the supplied record; the DFAS methods and equations are absent, so parameter independence cannot be checked but no reduction-to-input is exhibited.

full rationale

The supplied record for arXiv:2508.18150 contains only an abstract about dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy (DFAS) in laser-cooled rubidium, while the full-text section provided is an unrelated molecular-docking paper. Because the DFAS density-matrix model equations, parameter tables, and methods section are absent, there is no derivation chain to walk and no specific equation-to-equation or fit-to-prediction reduction to exhibit. The abstract's claim that the model 'accurately yield[s] amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes' could in principle conceal retrospective fitting, but circularity requires demonstrated equivalence between a fitted input and a reported prediction, not mere possibility. The phrase 'without applying any simplifying approximations' is an overstatement risk, not a circularity. The unrelated docking text's limitation about relying on a known crystallographic pose belongs to that different manuscript and does not bear on the DFAS claims. Therefore, under the hard rule that circularity must be quoted and specifically reduced, no circular step is established; the honest finding is a non-finding based on the incomplete record.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All ledger entries are inferred from the abstract because the supplied full text is unrelated to the claimed work. Any free-parameter accounting is provisional until the Methods section is available; a density-matrix treatment of Rb necessarily introduces Rabi frequencies, relaxation rates, and field parameters whose fitted-versus-measured status is unknown.

free parameters (3)

Rabi frequencies / laser intensities for the coupled hyperfine transitions
A multi-level DFAS model needs a Rabi frequency for each driven hyperfine component of 87Rb and 85Rb. The abstract does not say whether these were measured independently or adjusted to match the spectra; their provenance decides whether the agreement is a prediction or a fit.
Effective relaxation / dephasing rates (including laser linewidth contributions)
Reproducing measured linewidths requires linewidth and dephasing inputs. If these were tuned to the target resonances, any accurate-linewidth result is partly circular. Not addressed in the abstract.
Magnetic field values used in the Zeeman-shifted level structure
The abstract says the model captures the effect of magnetic field. If fields were calibrated to match observed shifts they function as fit parameters; if measured independently they are inputs. Provenance is not stated.

assumptions (4)

standard math Multi-level density-matrix master equation (optical Bloch equations) with Lindblad-type relaxation for the Rb hyperfine manifold
The entire model rests on the standard quantum-optics master-equation formalism; this is background theory the reader is expected to supply, invoked by the abstract's phrase 'density-matrix equations'.
domain assumption The claim that the model is built 'without applying any simplifying approximations'
Master-equation treatments still assume Markovian relaxation and typically omit or approximate radiation trapping, atomic motion during interaction, and beam intensity profiles; the literal claim in the abstract is an unproven completeness assumption (Abstract).
domain assumption Cold-atom ensemble description: atoms in a MOT with a thermal velocity distribution and a specified interaction geometry for the two beams
DFAS line shapes depend on velocity classes and beam geometry; the abstract specifies the conditions (magnetic field, two-photon detuning, cold atoms) but not the model inputs for temperature and geometry (Abstract).
domain assumption The vapor-cell extension uses the same Hamiltonian and relaxation structure with a room-temperature Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution
The abstract asserts the model extends to a rubidium cell; this assumes transferability of the cold-atom model to a thermal vapor, plausible but unverified in the supplied record (Abstract).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dual-Frequency Absorption Spectroscopy in Laser-Cooled Rubidium Atoms: Theoretical Modeling and Experiment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UWUHGMJR

@misc{pith2026250818150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dual-Frequency Absorption Spectroscopy in Laser-Cooled Rubidium Atoms: Theoretical Modeling and Experiment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UWUHGMJR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18150}
}

read the original abstract

We demonstrate dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy (DFAS) using laser-cooled 87Rb and 85Rb atoms. Doppler-free resonances with high-contrast are produced, which suggest the suitability of using dual-frequency absorption spectroscopy (DFAS) for laser stabilization in a cold-atom-based coherent population trapping (CPT) clock, and for developing a compact, high-performance optical frequency standard using an integrated magneto-optical trap (MOT). We developed a model using density-matrix equations to accurately simulate DFAS in the atomic medium without applying any simplifying approximations. Comprehensive simulations are performed using our multi-level system model to analyze dual-frequency spectra produced in cold atom ensembles under different experimental conditions, including the effect of magnetic field, and two-photon detuning. The simulations accurately yield amplitudes, linewidths, frequency shifts, and lineshapes of DFAS resonances under these experimental conditions. We also demonstrate a simple mechanism for performing CPT spectroscopy by implementing a DFAS laser lock using trapped atoms in the MOT. Additionally, we have extended our model to accurately model the dual-frequency spectrum produced in rubidium cell, which is a medium of practical interest for vapor-cell-based quantum sensing applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[1]

Cazals, A

P. Cazals, A. Sorondo, V . Onofre, C. Dalyac, W. da Silva Coelho, and V . Vitale. Quantum optimization on Rydberg atom arrays with arbitrary connectivity: Gadgets limitations and a heuristic approach, 2025

work page 2025
[2]

I. A. Guedes, C. S. Magalhães, and L. E. Dardenne. New avenues for molecular docking.Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 42(11):915– 929, 2021

work page 2021
[3]

https://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/

Autodock. https://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/

work page
[4]

R. A. Friesner, J. L. Banks, R. B. Murphy, T. A. Halgren, J. J. Klicic, et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring

work page
[5]

Method and assessment of docking accuracy.Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47(7):1739–1749, 2004

work page 2004
[6]

Shen et al

C. Shen et al. Deep learning in virtual screening: a review of methods, applications, and challenges.Drug Discovery Today, 28(2):103441, 2023

work page 2023
[7]

Cazals, A

P. Cazals, A. Sorondo, V . Onofre, C. Dalyac, W. da Silva Coelho, and V . Vitale. Quantum optimization on Rydberg-atom arrays with arbitrary connectivity: Gadgets limitations and a heuristic approach.Phys. Rev. A, 112:062416, 2025

work page 2025
[8]

Pichler, S.-T

H. Pichler, S.-T. Wang, L. Zhou, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin. Quantum optimization for maximum independent set using rydberg atom arrays, 2018

work page 2018

Show all 35 references

[9]

Yu, Z.-P

S. Yu, Z.-P. Zhong, Y . Fang, R. B. Patel, Q.-P. Li, et al. A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery.Nature Computational Science, 3(10):839–848, 2023

2023
[10]

Banchi, M

L. Banchi, M. Fingerhuth, T. Babej, C. Ing, and J. M. Arrazola. Molecular docking with Gaussian boson sampling.Science Advances, 6(23):eaax1950, 2020

2020
[11]

Lancellotti, G

G. Lancellotti, G. Accordi, and G. Palermo. An experimental approach to quantum molecular docking.2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 1:512–518, 2024

2024
[12]

Ding, Y .-M

Q.-M. Ding, Y .-M. Huang, and X. Yuan. Molecular docking via quantum approximate optimization algorithm.Physical Review Applied, 21(3):034036, 2024

2024
[13]

Garrigues, V

M. Garrigues, V . Onofre, and N. Bosc-Haddad. Towards molecular docking with neutral atoms, 2024

2024
[14]

A Scalable Heuristic for Molecular Docking on Neutral-Atom Quantum Processors

M. Garrigues, V . Onofre, W. Coelho, and S. Acheche. Molecular- docking. https://github.com/pasqal-io/Molecular-Docking, 2025. Code and instances for “A Scalable Heuristic for Molecular Docking on Neutral-Atom Quantum Processors”

2025
[15]

Landrum et al

G. Landrum et al. Rdkit: Open-source cheminformatics, 2006

2006
[16]

Shrake and J

A. Shrake and J. A. Rupley. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin.Journal of Molecular Biology, 79(2):351–371, 1973

1973
[17]

P. J. A. Cock, T. Antao, J. T. Chang, B. A. Chapman, C. J. Cox, et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics.Bioinformatics, 25(11):1422–1423, 2009

2009
[18]

Ebadi, A

S. Ebadi, A. Keesling, M. Cain, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, et al. Quantum optimization of maximum independent set using Rydberg atom arrays. Science, 376(6598):1209–1215, 2022

2022
[19]

A. Byun, M. Kim, and J. Ahn. Finding the maximum independent sets of platonic graphs using Rydberg atoms.PRX Quantum, 3(3):030305, 2022

2022
[20]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms.Nature Physics, 16(2):132–142, 2020

2020
[21]

Henriet, L

L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, et al. Quantum computing with neutral atoms.Quantum, 4:327, 2020

2020
[22]

Morgado and S

M. Morgado and S. Whitlock. Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits.A VS Quantum Science, 3(2):023501, 2021

2021
[23]

Béguin, A

L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys. Direct measurement of the van der Waals interaction between two Rydberg atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(26), 2013

2013
[24]

Bermot, L

E. Bermot, L. Valor, W. Coelho, L.-P. Henry, and N. Pearson. Rydberg blockade mechanism through the lens of graph theory: characterization and applications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13228, 2025

2025
[25]

Farhi, J

E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and L. Zhou. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size.Quantum, 6:759, 2022

2022
[26]

Goswami, R

K. Goswami, R. Mukherjee, H. Ott, and P. Schmelcher. Solving opti- mization problems with local light-shift encoding on Rydberg quantum annealers.Physical Review Research, 6(2):023031, 2024

2024
[27]

A. G. de Oliveira, E. Diamond-Hitchcock, D. M. Walker, M. T. Wells- Pestell, G. Pelegri, et al. Demonstration of weighted-graph optimization on a Rydberg-atom array using local light shifts.PRX Quantum, 6(1):010301, 2025

2025
[28]

E. F. Moore. The shortest path through a maze.Proc. of the International Symposium on the Theory of Switching, pages 285–292, 1959

1959
[29]

M. J. Hartshorn, M. L. Verdonk, G. Chessari, S. C. Brewerton, W. T. M. Mooij, et al. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein- ligand docking performance.J. Med. Chem., 50(4):726–741, 2007

2007
[30]

International Business Machines Corporation, 2024

IBM ILOG CPLEX.V24.1: User’s Manual for CPLEX. International Business Machines Corporation, 2024

2024
[31]

Garzillo, M

M. Garzillo, M. Lahariya, Q. Ma, C. Moussa, Y . Naghmouchi, et al. pasqal qubo-solver, 2025

2025
[32]

Sakai, M

S. Sakai, M. Togasaki, and K. Yamazaki. A note on greedy algorithms for the maximum weighted independent set problem.Discrete Appl. Math., 126(2–3):313–322, 2003

2003
[33]

Bidzhiev, S

K. Bidzhiev, S. Grava, P. le Henaff, M. Mendizabal, E. Merhej, and A. Quelle. Efficient emulation of neutral atom quantum hardware, 2025

2025
[34]

W. Kabsch. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 32(5):922–923, 1976

1976
[35]

Janin, K

J. Janin, K. Henrick, J. Moult, L. Ten Eyck, M. J. E. Sternberg, S. Vajda, I. Vakser, and S. J. Wodak. CAPRI: A critical assessment of PRedicted interactions.Proteins, 52(1):2–9, 2003. 8

2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Cazals, A

P. Cazals, A. Sorondo, V . Onofre, C. Dalyac, W. da Silva Coelho, and V . Vitale. Quantum optimization on Rydberg atom arrays with arbitrary connectivity: Gadgets limitations and a heuristic approach, 2025

work page 2025

[2] [2]

I. A. Guedes, C. S. Magalhães, and L. E. Dardenne. New avenues for molecular docking.Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 42(11):915– 929, 2021

work page 2021

[3] [3]

https://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/

Autodock. https://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/

work page

[4] [4]

R. A. Friesner, J. L. Banks, R. B. Murphy, T. A. Halgren, J. J. Klicic, et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring

work page

[5] [5]

Method and assessment of docking accuracy.Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 47(7):1739–1749, 2004

work page 2004

[6] [6]

Shen et al

C. Shen et al. Deep learning in virtual screening: a review of methods, applications, and challenges.Drug Discovery Today, 28(2):103441, 2023

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Cazals, A

P. Cazals, A. Sorondo, V . Onofre, C. Dalyac, W. da Silva Coelho, and V . Vitale. Quantum optimization on Rydberg-atom arrays with arbitrary connectivity: Gadgets limitations and a heuristic approach.Phys. Rev. A, 112:062416, 2025

work page 2025

[8] [8]

Pichler, S.-T

H. Pichler, S.-T. Wang, L. Zhou, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin. Quantum optimization for maximum independent set using rydberg atom arrays, 2018

work page 2018