Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Quasiclassical theory of nonlinear response in d-wave superconductors

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In clean d-wave superconductors the photo-induced change to the order parameter vanishes near Tc to leading order in the gap at every drive frequency.

desk verdict The paper's core claim is that the Eliashberg correction vanishes to leading order near Tc in clean d-wave but not s-wave, with particle-hole channel dominating third-harmonic generation due to nodal quasiparticles. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.26909 v1 pith:UYG3KIFU submitted 2026-06-25 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Aidan Steineman , Samuel Awelewa , Maxim Dzero This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords d-waveorderdeltasuperconductorscasechannelcleancorrection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a clean d-wave superconductor exhibits no Eliashberg enhancement of the gap near the critical temperature to leading order in Δ, in contrast to the s-wave case. The quasiparticle-redistribution channel responsible for gap enhancement in s-wave materials is suppressed by one extra power of Δ because of the nodal structure. For third-harmonic generation the charge-density-fluctuation channel from nodal quasiparticles dominates the amplitude-mode contribution over a wide frequency range and becomes comparable only near the resonance ω ≈ 2√2 Δ when the normal-state diamagnetic current is omitted. The response remains sensitive to the orientation of the driving field because nonequilibrium nodal quasiparticle dynamics must be kept explicit.

What carries the argument

Systematic perturbative solution of the out-of-equilibrium Eilenberger equation for the Keldysh propagator in the Keldysh–Nambu quasiclassical theory.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of a nonzero photo-induced static correction to the gap in a clean d-wave sample at temperatures very close to Tc under varying drive frequencies would falsify the vanishing result at this order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At temperatures close to the critical temperature and to leading order in the gap magnitude Δ, the photo-induced change of the order parameter is zero at all drive frequencies: in contrast to s-wave superconductors, a clean d-wave superconductor exhibits no Eliashberg enhancement at this order. The gap-enhancing quasiparticle-redistribution channel that drives the effect in the s-wave case is suppressed by an additional power of Δ in the d-wave case. For third-harmonic generation the charge-density-fluctuation (particle–hole) channel significantly dominates the Schmid–Higgs amplitude-mode contribution over a broad frequency range, the two becoming comparable only in a narrow window near the

Load-bearing premise

The clean-limit quasiclassical approximation together with a perturbative expansion to leading order in Δ near Tc fully captures the dominant nonlinear response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Eliashberg gap-enhancement effect is absent in d-wave superconductors at leading order near Tc.
  • The particle-hole channel dominates third-harmonic generation over most frequencies.
  • The two channels become comparable only near ω≈2√2Δ when diamagnetic contributions are dropped.
  • The nonlinear response depends on the orientation of the driving electric field.
  • Nonequilibrium nodal quasiparticle dynamics must be kept explicit in the calculation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The absence of leading-order Eliashberg enhancement may reduce certain nonlinear optical signals in nodal superconductors relative to fully gapped ones.
  • Orientation dependence implies that single-crystal experiments can map the nodal directions through the nonlinear response.
  • The dominance of the particle-hole channel could alter how THz third-harmonic data are interpreted in cuprate films.
  • The extra power of Δ suppression suggests that higher-order terms in the gap may become observable only farther from Tc.
  • keywords:[
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a self-consistent Keldysh-Nambu quasiclassical theory for nonlinear response in clean d-wave superconductors. It reports a systematic perturbative solution of the out-of-equilibrium Eilenberger equation for the Keldysh propagator, yielding two main results: (i) near Tc and to leading order in the gap Δ, the photo-induced static correction to the order parameter (Eliashberg effect) vanishes at all drive frequencies because d-wave symmetry suppresses the gap-enhancing quasiparticle-redistribution channel by an extra power of Δ (in contrast to s-wave); (ii) in third-harmonic generation the charge-density-fluctuation (particle-hole) channel dominates the Schmid-Higgs amplitude-mode contribution over a broad frequency range, becoming comparable only near ω≈2√2 Δ when the diamagnetic current is neglected, owing to the explicit dynamics of nodal quasiparticles and their sensitivity to drive orientation.

Significance. If the perturbative results hold, the work establishes a symmetry-protected distinction between d-wave and s-wave nonequilibrium superconductivity at leading order near Tc, with direct implications for photo-induced order-parameter dynamics and nonlinear optics in unconventional superconductors. The clean-limit quasiclassical framework and explicit retention of nodal quasiparticles are standard tools that here produce falsifiable, parameter-free predictions for the vanishing Eliashberg correction and the dominance of the particle-hole channel.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3 (perturbative solution)] The central claims rest on an explicit perturbative expansion of the Keldysh propagator to O(Δ) near Tc; the manuscript states that this expansion has been performed systematically but does not display the intermediate steps, the form of the distribution function, or the cancellation that produces the extra power of Δ in the redistribution channel. Without these details the suppression cannot be verified independently.
  2. [THG section (near Eq. for current response)] For third-harmonic generation the claim that the particle-hole channel dominates except in a narrow window near resonance assumes the diamagnetic contribution can be neglected in the normal state; the manuscript should quantify the size of this term relative to the paramagnetic response across the frequency range considered.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the Keldysh components and the definition of the drive frequency should be introduced once and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the abstract.
  2. [THG results] The statement that the two channels become comparable 'only in a narrow window' would benefit from an explicit plot or numerical estimate of their ratio versus frequency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3 (perturbative solution)] The central claims rest on an explicit perturbative expansion of the Keldysh propagator to O(Δ) near Tc; the manuscript states that this expansion has been performed systematically but does not display the intermediate steps, the form of the distribution function, or the cancellation that produces the extra power of Δ in the redistribution channel. Without these details the suppression cannot be verified independently.

    Authors: We agree that the intermediate steps of the perturbative expansion are not shown explicitly in the current version. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix that presents the systematic expansion of the Keldysh propagator to O(Δ) near Tc. This appendix will include the explicit form of the nonequilibrium distribution function obtained from the Eilenberger equation and the detailed cancellation in the quasiparticle-redistribution channel that produces the additional power of Δ for d-wave symmetry. These additions will allow independent verification of the vanishing Eliashberg correction at this order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [THG section (near Eq. for current response)] For third-harmonic generation the claim that the particle-hole channel dominates except in a narrow window near resonance assumes the diamagnetic contribution can be neglected in the normal state; the manuscript should quantify the size of this term relative to the paramagnetic response across the frequency range considered.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly states that the reported dominance holds when the diamagnetic contribution is neglected in the normal state. To address the request for quantification, the revised manuscript will include a supplementary discussion (or short subsection) that estimates the relative magnitude of the diamagnetic term compared with the paramagnetic response over the frequency window of interest. This will clarify the validity of the approximation and the conditions under which the particle-hole channel remains dominant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation self-contained from standard Eilenberger/Keldysh formalism

full rationale

The central result—that the photo-induced order-parameter correction vanishes to leading order in Δ near Tc for clean d-wave superconductors—follows directly from the structure of the perturbative expansion of the Keldysh propagator in the Eilenberger equation. d-wave symmetry introduces an extra nodal suppression factor that eliminates the quasiparticle-redistribution channel present in the s-wave case; this is an algebraic consequence of the gap symmetry and the clean-limit quasiclassical equations, not a fit or a self-citation reduction. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to an input parameter or to a prior result by the same authors. The third-harmonic-generation analysis likewise traces to explicit retention of nodal quasiparticle dynamics within the same framework. The derivation is therefore independent of the patterns that would produce circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on the validity of the quasiclassical approximation for clean systems and the perturbative treatment near Tc; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The quasiclassical approximation and Keldysh-Nambu formalism apply to clean d-wave superconductors
    Invoked to obtain the Eilenberger equation whose perturbative solution yields the stated results
  • domain assumption Expansion to leading order in the gap magnitude Δ is sufficient near Tc
    Used to conclude that the photo-induced correction vanishes and that the gap-enhancing channel is suppressed by an extra power of Δ

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasiclassical theory of nonlinear response in d-wave superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UYG3KIFU

@misc{pith2026260626909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasiclassical theory of nonlinear response in d-wave superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UYG3KIFU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.26909}
}
abstract

We use a self-consistent Keldysh--Nambu quasiclassical theory to study two related nonlinear phenomena in clean d-wave superconductors: the photo-induced static correction to the order parameter -- the Eliashberg effect -- and third-harmonic generation. Both follow from a systematic perturbative solution of the out-of-equilibrium Eilenberger equation for the Keldysh propagator. For the steady-state correction to the pairing amplitude we find that at temperatures close to the critical temperature and to leading order in the gap magnitude $\Delta$, the photo-induced change of the order parameter is zero at all drive frequencies: in contrast to s-wave superconductors, a clean d-wave superconductor exhibits no Eliashberg enhancement at this order. The gap-enhancing quasiparticle-redistribution channel that drives the effect in the s-wave case is suppressed by an additional power of $\Delta$ in the d-wave case. For third-harmonic generation we find that the charge-density-fluctuation (particle--hole) channel significantly dominates the Schmid--Higgs amplitude-mode contribution over a broad frequency range, the two becoming comparable only in a narrow window near the resonance frequency $\omega\approx 2\sqrt{2}\,\Delta$ if one neglects the diamagnetic part of the current in the normal state. We trace this to the nonequilibrium dynamics of nodal quasiparticles, which must be retained explicitly and which also makes the response sensitive to the orientation of the driving field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26909 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Frequency dependence of the function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Real (dashed) and imaginary (solid) parts of the func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Frequency dependence of the function Φ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coherent driving of displacive Higgs fluctuations in superconductors

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Terahertz pulses can excite the Higgs mode in superconductors by statically shifting the order parameter—a displacive mechanism that explains the nonlinear first-harmonic enhancement and its measured phase in NbN.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The reason is that ˆ∆n = ˆ∆Yn withn=p F /pF is which is a function of momentum

    First order correction: retarded and advanced components Given (5) we will look for ˆg1(nϵ;rt) in the form ˆg1(nϵ;rt) = ˆg1(nϵ;kω)e i(kr−ωt).(A1) Equation which determines the first order correction to the retarded and advanced components of ˆg 1(nϵ;kω) is [εˆτ3 + ˆ∆n,ˆg1] + 1 2 {ωˆτ3 −v F (nk)ˆτ0,ˆg1}= evF iω (nE) ˆgnϵ+ω/2ˆτ3 −ˆτ3ˆgnϵ−ω/2 (A2) Note that ...

  2. [2]

    First order correction: Keldysh component Formally, the Keldysh component of ˇg1 satisfies the same equation as its retarded and advanced components: [εˆτ3 + ˆ∆n,ˆgK 1 ] + 1 2 ωˆτ3 −v F (nk)ˆτ0,ˆgK 1 = evF iω (nE) h ˆgK nϵ+ω/2ˆτ3 −ˆτ3ˆgK nϵ−ω/2 i (A10) and function ˆgK 1 satisfies the following normalization condition ˆgR 0 ◦ˆgK 1 + ˆgK 0 ◦ˆgA 1 + ˆgR 1 ◦...

  3. [3]

    Expansion nearT c: regular term Similar, for the contribution from the regular term (i.e. the last two terms in (B9)) we have 2 evF ω 2 2πZ 0 dϕn 2π Yn|nE|2X s=± Z f R nϵBR n (ϵ, ϵ+sω) (ηRnϵ +η R nϵ+sω)2 − f A nϵBA n (ϵ, ϵ+sω) (ηAnϵ +η A nϵ+sω)2 + gR nϵC R n (ϵ, ϵ+sω) ηRnϵ(ηRnϵ +η R nϵ+sω) − gA nϵC A n (ϵ, ϵ+sω) ηAnϵ(ηAnϵ +η A nϵ+sω) tϵdϵ≈2 evF ω 2 2πZ 0 ...

  4. [4]

    Expansion nearT c: anomalous term It will suffice to analyze equation (B13) in the limit whenTis close toT c, (T c −T)/T c ≪1. In this limit we will approximate ηR(A) nϵ ≈ ±sign(ϵ)|ϵ|, f R(A) nϵ = ∆n ηR(A) nϵ ≈ ± ∆n ϵ , g R(A) nϵ ≈ ±1.(B19) Here we implicitly assumed thatϵis complex with infinitesimally small imaginary part. Let us start with the anomalou...

  5. [5]

    We need to compute the third order correction to the retarded, advanced and Keldysh functions

    Retarded and advanced componentsˆg R(A) 3 . We need to compute the third order correction to the retarded, advanced and Keldysh functions. We start with retarded and advanced components. For the calculation of the third harmonic generation we need to consider the case when: ˆgR(A) 3 (nϵ;rt) = ˆgR(A) 3 (nϵ;kω)e 3i(kr−ωt),(C3) Expressions for ˆgR(A) 3 liste...

  6. [6]

    Keldysh functionδˆg K 3 . Lastly, the equation for the functionδˆg K 3 reads ηR nϵ+ 3ω 2 ˆgR nϵ+ 3ω 2 δˆgK 3 −η A nϵ− 3ω 2 δˆgK 3 ˆgA nϵ− 3ω 2 = ˆgR 1 (nϵ+ω;kω)δ ˆ∆L n(tϵ+ ω 2 −t ϵ− 3ω 2 ) + evF iω (nE)ˆgR 2 (nϵ+ ω 2 ;kω)ˆτ3(tϵ− ω 2 −t ϵ− 3ω 2 ) +δ ˆ∆L nˆgA 1 (nϵ−ω;kω)(t ϵ− ω 2 −t ϵ+ 3ω 2 ) + evF iω (nE)ˆτ3ˆgA 2 (nϵ− ω 2 ;kω)(t ϵ+ ω 2 −t ϵ+ 3ω 2 ). (C9) T...

  7. [7]

    Second order correction: Keldysh component Equation for the ˆgK 2 is of course the same as (B1): [ϵˆτ3 + ˆ∆n,ˆgK 2 ] +ω ˆτ3,ˆgK 2 −2v F (nk)ˆgK 2 =− h δ ˆ∆L n ◦,ˆgK 0 i + evF iω (nE) ˆgK 1 (nϵ+ω/2;kω)ˆτ 3 −ˆτ3ˆgK 1 (nϵ−ω/2;kω) . (D11) The solution for ˆgK 2 is different from ˆgR(A) 2 because it satisfies the different normalization condition: ˆgR ϵ+ωˆgK 2...

  8. [8]

    Furthermore mainly for simplicity we will compute the electric field terms by neglecting their momentum dependence, i.e

    Contributions from the electric field terms Now in the expressions for ˆgR(A) 2 and ˆgK 2 we setδ∆ L kω to zero. Furthermore mainly for simplicity we will compute the electric field terms by neglecting their momentum dependence, i.e. the resulting momentum dependence of the functionδ∆ kω will be primarily determined by the momentum dependence of the funct...

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Schmid, The approach to equilibrium in a pure su- perconductor the relaxation of the cooper pair density, Physik der kondensierten Materie8, 129 (1968)

    A. Schmid, The approach to equilibrium in a pure su- perconductor the relaxation of the cooper pair density, Physik der kondensierten Materie8, 129 (1968)

    1968

  2. [10]

    Sooryakumar and M

    R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 660 (1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Gauge-invariant the- ory of the dynamical interaction of charge density waves and superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 811 (1981)

    1981

  4. [12]

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves, Phys. Rev. B26, 4883 (1982)

    1982

  5. [13]

    M´ easson, Y

    M.-A. M´ easson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodi` ere, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, Amplitude higgs mode in the 2h-nbse 2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B89, 060503 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    P. W. Anderson, Higgs, anderson and all that, Nature Physics11, 93 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Shimano and N

    R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, Higgs mode in superconduc- tors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 103 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov, Higgs bosons in par- ticle physics and in condensed matter, Journal of Low Temperature Physics175, 486 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Pekker and C

    D. Pekker and C. M. Varma, Amplitude/higgs modes in condensed matter physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 269 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    R. V. Carlson and A. M. Goldman, Superconducting order-parameter fluctuations belowT c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 880 (1973)

    1973

  11. [19]

    S. N. Artemenko and A. F. Volkov, Collective excitations with a sound spectrum in superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP42, 896 (1975)

    1975

  12. [20]

    S. N. Artemenko and A. F. Volkov, Electric fields and collective oscillations in superconductors, Sov. Phys. Usp. 22, 295 (1979)

    1979

  13. [21]

    Schmid and G

    A. Schmid and G. Sch¨ on, Collective oscillations in a dirty superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 941 (1975)

    1975

  14. [22]

    Schmid and G

    A. Schmid and G. Sch¨ on, Linearized kinetic equations and relaxation processes of a superconductor neart c,, J. Low Temp. Phys.20, 1747 (1979)

    1979

  15. [23]

    I. O. Kulik, O. Entin-Wohlman, and R. Orbach, Pair susceptibility and mode propagation in superconductors: 20 A microscopic approach, Journal of Low Temperature Physics43, 591 (1981)

    1981

  16. [24]

    A. F. Volkov and S. M. Kogan, Collisionless relaxation of the energy gap in superconductors, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 65, 2038 (1974), English translation: Sov. Phys. JETP, 38, 1018 (1974)

  17. [25]

    R. A. Barankov, L. S. Levitov, and B. Z. Spivak, Soli- tons and rabi oscillations in a time-dependent bcs pairing problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 160401 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, V. B. Kuznetsov, and V. Z. Enolskii, Solution for the dynamics of the bcs and central spin problems, J. Phys. A38, 7831 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, B. L. Altshuler, V. B. Kuznetsov, and V. Z. Enolskii, Nonequilibrium cooper pairing in the nonadiabatic regime, Phys. Rev. B72, 220503(R) (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    R. A. Barankov and L. S. Levitov, Dynamical selection in developing fermionic pairing, Phys. Rev. A73, 033614 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, O. Tsyplyatyev, and B. L. Altshuler, Relaxation and persistent oscillations of the order param- eter in the non-stationary bcs theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 097005 (2006), erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 179905 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, Normal and anomalous solitons in the theory of dynamical cooper pairing, Phys. Rev. B78, 184507 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    E. A. Yuzbashyan, M. Dzero, V. Gurarie, and M. S. Fos- ter, Quantum quench phase diagrams of ans-wave bcs- bec condensate, Phys. Rev. A91, 033628 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Silaev, Nonlinear electromagnetic response and higgs- mode excitation in bcs superconductors with impurities, Phys

    M. Silaev, Nonlinear electromagnetic response and higgs- mode excitation in bcs superconductors with impurities, Phys. Rev. B99, 224511 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    A. Moor, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Amplitude higgs mode and admittance in superconductors with a moving condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 047001 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Schwarz, B

    L. Schwarz, B. Fauseweh, N. Tsuji, N. Cheng, N. Bit- tner, H. Krull, M. Berciu, G. S. Uhrig, A. P. Schnyder, S. Kaiser, and D. Manske, Classification and characteri- zation of nonequilibrium higgs modes in unconventional superconductors, Nat. Commun.11, 287 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Tsuji and H

    N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, Theory of anderson pseudospin res- onance with higgs mode in superconductors, Phys. Rev. B92, 064508 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    T. Cea, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, Nonlinear op- tical effects and third-harmonic generation in supercon- ductors: Cooper pairs versus higgs mode contribution, Phys. Rev. B93, 180507 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Light-induced collective pseu- dospin precession resonating with higgs mode in a superconductor, Science345, 1145 (2014), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sci...

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    Matsunaga, N

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, K. Makise, H. Terai, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, Polarization-resolved terahertz third- harmonic generation in a single-crystal superconductor nbn: Dominance of the higgs mode beyond the bcs ap- proximation, Phys. Rev. B96, 020505(R) (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Matsunaga, Y

    R. Matsunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, Higgs amplitude mode in the bcs superconductors nb 1-xtixNinduced by terahertz pulse excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 057002 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    J. Yuan, L. Shi, L. Yue, B. Li, Z. Wang, S. Xu, T. Xu, Y. Wang, Z. Gan, F. Chen, Z. Lin, X. Wang, K. Jin, X. Wang, J. Luo, S. Zhang, Q. Wu, Q. Liu, T. Hu, R. Li, X. Zhou, D. Wu, T. Dong, and N. Wang, Dynamical interplay between superconductivity and pseudogap in cuprates as re...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    K. R. Islam, S. Awelewa, A. V. Chubukov, and M. Dzero, Spatially resolved collective modes ind-wave supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B113, 144514 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Schwarz and D

    L. Schwarz and D. Manske, Theory of driven higgs oscil- lations and third-harmonic generation in unconventional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B101, 184519 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Seibold, M

    G. Seibold, M. Udina, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, Third harmonic generation from collective modes in dis- ordered superconductors, Phys. Rev. B103, 014512 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    H. Wang, J. Yuan, H. Shi, H. Li, X. Jia, X. Song, L. Shi, T. Wu, L. Yue, Y. Li, K. Jin, D. Wu, J. Luo, X. Wang, T. Dong, and N.-L. Wang, Anomalous terahertz non- linearity in disordereds-wave superconductor close to the superconductor-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136...

    2026

  37. [45]

    G. M. Eliashberg, Film superconductivity stimulated by a high-frequency field, Sov. Phys. - JETP Lett.11, 114 (1970)

    1970

  38. [46]

    B. I. Ivlev and G. M. Eliashberg, Influence of nonequi- librium excitations on the properties of superconducting films in a high-frequency field, Sov. Phys. - JETP Lett. 13, 333 (1971)

    1971

  39. [47]

    Tikhonov, A

    K. Tikhonov, A. Semenov, I. Devyatov, and M. Skvortsov, Microwave response of a superconductor beyond the eliashberg theory, Annals of Physics417, 168101 (2020), eliashberg theory at 60: Strong-coupling superconductivity and beyond

    2020

  40. [48]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity quantum eliashberg enhance- ment of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Arora, J

    A. Arora, J. B. Curtis, and P. Narang, Quantum geom- etry induced microwave enhancement of superconduct- ing order in flat bands, Communications Physics8, 327 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    J. W. Serene and D. Rainer, The quasiclassical approach to superfluid 3he, Phys. Rep.101, 221 (1983)

    1983

  43. [51]

    N. B. Kopnin,Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductiv- ity, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol. 110 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    2001

  44. [52]

    Eilenberger, Transformation of gorkov’s equation for type ii superconductors into transport-like equations, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei214, 195 (1968)

    G. Eilenberger, Transformation of gorkov’s equation for type ii superconductors into transport-like equations, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A Hadrons and nuclei214, 195 (1968)

    1968

  45. [53]

    A. I. Larkin, Quasiclassical method in the theory of su- perconductivity, Sov. Phys. - JETP20, 208 (1965)

    1965

  46. [54]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Nonlinear effects during the motion of vortices in superconductors, Sov. Phys. - JETP46, 155 (1977)

    1977

  47. [55]

    Belzig, F

    W. Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, G. Sch¨ on, and A. D. Zaikin, Quasiclassical green’s function approach to mesoscopic superconductivity, Superlattices and Mi- crostructures25, 1251 (1999)

    1999

  48. [56]

    A. H. Dayem and J. J. Wiegand, Behavior of thin-film superconducting bridges in a microwave field, Phys. Rev. 155, 419 (1967). 21

    1967

  49. [57]

    A. F. G. Wyatt, V. M. Dmitriev, W. S. Moore, and F. W. Sheard, Microwave-enhanced critical supercurrents in constricted tin films, Phys. Rev. Lett.16, 1166 (1966)

    1966

  50. [58]

    Derendorf, A

    P. Derendorf, A. F. Volkov, and I. M. Eremin, Nonlinear response of diffusive superconductors to ac electromag- netic fields, Phys. Rev. B109, 024510 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Klapwijk and P

    T. Klapwijk and P. de Visser, The discovery, disappear- ance and re-emergence of radiation-stimulated supercon- ductivity, Annals of Physics417, 168104 (2020), eliash- berg theory at 60: Strong-coupling superconductivity and beyond

    2020

  52. [60]

    Katsumi, N

    K. Katsumi, N. Tsuji, Y. I. Hamada, R. Matsunaga, J. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, G. D. Gu, H. Aoki, Y. Gal- lais, and R. Shimano, Higgs mode in thed-wave super- conductor bi2sr2cacu2o8+x driven by an intense terahertz pulse, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 117001 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Chu, M.-J

    H. Chu, M.-J. Kim, K. Katsumi, S. Kovalev, et al., Phase-resolved higgs response in superconducting cuprates, Nat. Commun.11, 1793 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Katsumiet al., Dynamical interplay between super- conductivity and pseudogap in cuprates as revealed by terahertz third-harmonic generation spectroscopy, Sci

    K. Katsumiet al., Dynamical interplay between super- conductivity and pseudogap in cuprates as revealed by terahertz third-harmonic generation spectroscopy, Sci. Adv.9, eadg9211 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.