Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Magnetic devil's staircase in UAgBi$_{2}$

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Layered UAgBi2 hosts a cascade of at least seven nearly degenerate magnetic states that form a magnetic devil's staircase, a rare realization among 5f-electron materials.

desk verdict Solid experimental discovery of a new 5f MDS platform; the cascade and fractional plateaus are real, with the main soft spot already flagged by the authors themselves. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09003 v1 pith:UYZNJYYU submitted 2026-07-10 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

G. S. Freitas , K. Kirchner , C. Girod , D. R. Yahne , W. Simeth , C. S. T. Kengle , F. B. Carneiro , P. G. Pagliuso
show 5 more authors
J.D. Thompson M. Janoschek O. Zaharko S.M. Thomas P. F. S. Rosa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magneticdevil'sstaircaseANNNImodelUAgBi25felectronssquare-wavestructureseasy-axisanisotropycompetingexchangephasediagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the newly grown layered uranium compound UAgBi2 undergoes a cascade of magnetic transitions with temperature and magnetic field. Specific heat, thermal expansion, magnetostriction, and neutron diffraction map a phase diagram containing at least seven nearly degenerate ordered states. The multi-step magnetization process is accounted for by square-wave spin arrangements with distinct propagation vectors k = (0, 0, k) under strong easy-axis anisotropy that pins the uranium moments along the c axis. These observations match the classic axial next-nearest-neighbor Ising (ANNNI) description of a magnetic devil's staircase. A sympathetic reader cares because such staircases are well known in 3d and 4f systems yet scarce in uranium-based materials; UAgBi2 therefore supplies a concrete 5f platform in which competing interlayer exchange and low-lying crystal-field levels keep many periodic states nearly degenerate.

What carries the argument

The axial next-nearest-neighbor Ising (ANNNI) model—a layered Ising Hamiltonian with ferromagnetic in-plane coupling and competing ferro- and antiferromagnetic interactions between nearest and next-nearest layers along one unique axis. It supplies the sequence of commensurate square-wave stackings (for example ↓↓↓↑, ↑↑↓↓, ↑↑↑↓) that neutron diffraction and fractional magnetization plateaus identify across the measured phases.

What would settle it

A complete reciprocal-space neutron scan of the high-field phase that finds magnetic reflections inconsistent with a pure k = 0 polarized state or with the integer square-wave sequences assigned to the fractional plateaus, or magnetization steps that cannot be matched to any stacking of up and down planes along c.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

UAgBi2 displays a cascade of field- and temperature-induced magnetic transitions that produce at least seven nearly degenerate magnetic states. The multi-step magnetization is explained by square-wave structures carrying distinct propagation vectors k = (0, 0, k) in the presence of strong easy-axis anisotropy that confines the moments along the c axis. The resulting phase diagram is consistent with a magnetic devil's staircase of the ANNNI type and places UAgBi2 as a rare realization of that phenomenon in a 5f-electron system.

Load-bearing premise

That the limited set of observed magnetic Bragg peaks plus the fractional magnetization plateaus uniquely fix the proposed square-wave stacking sequence for every phase, including the high-field state whose full reciprocal space has not yet been mapped.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • UAgBi2 becomes a tunable 5f platform in which the intercalated Ag layer sets the c-axis exchange that stabilizes the devil's staircase.
  • Reduced magnetic anisotropy and low-lying crystal-field levels relative to UAuBi2 are the ingredients that keep multiple configurations nearly degenerate.
  • The same non-monotonic chemistry already seen across CeMBi2 and UMBi2 series implies that 4d transition-metal layers systematically enhance magnetic complexity.
  • Fractional magnetization plateaus (1/2, 2/5, 4/9, 1/3, 4/15) can be assigned to concrete square-wave stacking sequences along the c axis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Full reciprocal-space mapping of high-field phase VI may still reveal extra incommensurate or multi-k reflections beyond a simple polarized state.
  • Chemical substitution on the Ag site or hydrostatic pressure should continuously tune the ANNNI J1/J2 ratio and expand or collapse the staircase.
  • The same intercalation strategy may stabilize devil's staircases in other actinide 112 compounds that presently show only simple A-type order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of layered UAgBi2 and maps a complex magnetic phase diagram containing at least seven nearly degenerate ordered states as a function of temperature and c-axis field. Using specific heat, susceptibility, magnetization, thermal expansion, magnetostriction, and single-crystal neutron diffraction, the authors show multi-step magnetization plateaus and the coexistence of commensurate propagation vectors k=(0,0,1/2) and k=(0,0,1/4) at low T. They interpret the cascade as square-wave stacking sequences of Ising-like U moments along c, consistent with a magnetic devil’s staircase of the ANNNI type, and argue that reduced CEF anisotropy and tuned interlayer exchange relative to UCuBi2 and UAuBi2 make UAgBi2 a rare 5f realization of this phenomenology.

Significance. If the multi-phase cascade and its square-wave interpretation hold, the work supplies a clear experimental platform for devil’s-staircase physics in a 5f system, where such behavior has been scarce. Strengths include the convergence of several independent thermodynamic probes on the same phase boundaries, direct neutron intensity tracking of two commensurate k vectors through zero-field transitions, and an explicit history-dependent fractional magnetization sequence (1/2, 2/5, 4/9, 1/3, 4/15 of the high-field moment). The comparison to the UMBi2 and CeMBi2 series and the CEF/B20 estimates give a chemically grounded rationale for why Ag (4d) intercalation is special. These elements make the paper a solid contribution to frustrated and modulated magnetism in actinides, even though the ANNNI link remains qualitative.

major comments (2)
  1. [Figs. 3c–d, Fig. 4, and text after Fig. 3d] The central claim that the multi-step process “can be understood by square-wave structures with distinct k=(0,0,k)” rests on a limited set of Bragg peaks—(0,1,1/2), (0,1,3/4), and (0,1,1)—plus fractional M plateaus (Figs. 3c–d and 4). The text after Fig. 3d correctly notes that additional reflections in phase VI (and, by implication, intermediate-field phases) cannot be ruled out. Because the unique assignment of ↓↓↓↑, ↑↑↓↓, ↑↑↑↓, etc., for every labeled phase is load-bearing for the ANNNI/staircase interpretation, the manuscript should either (i) report broader reciprocal-space surveys at representative points in phases V–VI or (ii) systematically soften the language so that those stacking sequences are presented as the simplest Ising-consistent models consistent with the measured intensities and plateaus, not as uniquely determined structures.
  2. [Fig. 4 and paragraph discussing M_VI] Phase VI is treated as the fully polarized reference (M_VI = 1.86 μB) used to normalize all fractional plateaus in Fig. 4, yet the same paragraph states that a fully polarized state cannot be ascertained. If residual modulated intensity or multi-k components remain above 3 T, the quoted fractions (1/2, 2/5, 4/9, …) shift and the proposed spin arrangements lose their quantitative anchor. A short consistency check—e.g., whether M continues to rise above 4–7 T, or whether nuclear-peak intensity saturates—should be added, or the fractions should be quoted relative to the measured high-field moment without asserting full polarization.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] Fig. 2 caption: “Zero-feld-cooled” → “Zero-field-cooled”.
  2. [paragraph discussing Fig. 1(b)] Main text near Fig. 1(b): “wheres only Tm5” → “whereas only Tm5”.
  3. [Fig. 3] Phase labels in Figs. 3(a)–(b) and the neutron panels should be cross-checked for consistent Roman-numeral assignment (II–VI) across upsweep/downsweep panels; a single legend would help the reader.
  4. [Discussion paragraphs on ANNNI] The ANNNI discussion is qualitative; a brief statement that no microscopic exchange parameters are extracted (and that mean-field ANNNI phase diagrams are only a guide) would prevent over-reading of the model claim.
  5. [Table I / Crystal structure refinement] Table I and the growth description are clear; consider adding the refined residual factors (R1/wR2) for the single-crystal XRD refinement so occupancy claims can be judged quantitatively.
  6. [CEF discussion and Ref. [37]] Reference [37] (“In preparation”) is cited for the full CEF analysis; if that work is not yet public, a short supplemental CEF level scheme or fit parameters would make the “smallest overall CEF splitting” claim self-contained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental multi-phase data and neutron intensities are interpreted qualitatively as ANNNI-consistent square-wave stackings without fitted parameters or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental discovery report. Phase boundaries and the cascade of transitions are measured directly from specific heat, thermal expansion/magnetostriction, magnetization loops, and neutron Bragg intensities at (0,1,1/2), (0,1,3/4) and (0,1,1). The multi-step M(H) plateaus and the two zero-field commensurate vectors are raw observations; the square-wave assignments (↓↓↓↑, ↑↑↓↓, ↑↑↑↓, …) are post-hoc interpretations that match the measured fractional magnetizations under the independently established easy-axis anisotropy, not quantities derived by construction from an input model. The ANNNI model is invoked only as a qualitative consistency check (“consistent with a magnetic devil’s staircase described by the ANNNI model”) with no free parameters adjusted to force the staircase. Self-citations to related 112 compounds supply comparative context (anisotropy, CEF scales, stacking) but do not define or uniquely force the present result. The acknowledged incompleteness of reciprocal-space coverage for phase VI is a limitation of evidence, not circularity. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental interpretation of thermodynamic anomalies and magnetic Bragg peaks plus the domain assumption that strong easy-axis anisotropy plus competing interlayer exchanges place the system in the ANNNI regime. No new particles or forces are invented; free parameters are ordinary material constants extracted from data, not tuned to produce the staircase.

free parameters (3)
  • Sommerfeld coefficient γ = 40.5(5) mJ mol^{-1} K^{-2}
    Linear fit to Cp/T vs T^{2} at low T; used only to argue localization, not to construct the phase diagram.
  • Curie-Weiss temperatures heta_CW = θ∥ = 68.0(5) K, θ⊥ = -3.4(3) K
    High-T susceptibility fits that motivate the sign of exchange anisotropy; not used to fit the staircase steps.
  • Leading CEF parameter B_{2}^{0} = -2.5 K
    Estimated from Weiss-temperature anisotropy via the high-T expansion formula; supports the claim of reduced overall CEF splitting relative to UAuBi2.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Strong easy-axis anisotropy confines uranium moments strictly along the crystallographic c axis, allowing an effective Ising description.
    Invoked throughout the interpretation of magnetization steps and square-wave structures; supported by χ∥ ≫ χ⊥ but not proven absolute.
  • domain assumption The observed magnetic Bragg peaks at (0,1,1/2) and (0,1,3/4) correspond to simple collinear square-wave stackings ↑↑↓↓ and ↓↓↓↑ of ferromagnetic planes.
    Standard neutron interpretation for uniaxial systems; multi-domain or non-collinear alternatives are not fully excluded by the limited reciprocal-space coverage.
  • domain assumption The ANNNI model (competing nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interlayer exchanges) qualitatively accounts for the sequence of commensurate phases.
    Used as the theoretical framework linking the multi-step magnetization to a devil's staircase; no quantitative fit of J1/J2 is performed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic devil's staircase in UAgBi$_{2}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UYZNJYYU

@misc{pith2026260709003,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic devil's staircase in UAgBi$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UYZNJYYU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09003}
}
abstract

Materials characterized by competing interactions often exhibit a large number of nearly degenerate periodic states. Here we show that layered UAgBi$_2$ hosts a cascade of field- and temperature-induced magnetic transitions. Based on specific heat, thermal expansion, and neutron diffraction, we construct a phase diagram that reveals at least seven nearly degenerate magnetic states in UAgBi$_2$. The observed multi-step magnetization process can be understood by square-wave structures with distinct propagation vectors $\mathbf{k}$=(0, 0, \textit{k}) in the presence of strong easy-axis anisotropy that confines the moments along the \textit{c} axis. Our findings are consistent with a magnetic devil's staircase described by the axial next-nearest neighbor Ising (ANNNI) model and place UAgBi$_2$ as a rare realization of the devil's staircase in a 5\textit{f}-electron system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09003 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) shows the temperature dependence of the specific heat, cp(T), measured on warming, wherein five transitions (Tm) are clearly observed at Tm1 = 67 K, Tm2 = 64 K, Tm3 = 36 K, Tm4 = 27 K, and Tm5 = 24 K. To extract the electronic Sommerfeld coefficient (γ), we perform a linear fit to cp(T) vs T2 at low tem￾peratures. As shown in the inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Zero-feld-cooled magnetization as a function of temperature under different applied magnetic fields along the c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Proposed phase diagram of UAgBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Zoom-in of the magnetization at 1.8 K as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) and b) Magnetic field dependence of the linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Figure 3(c) shows the temperature dependence of the integrated intensities of the magnetic Bragg peaks at (0,1, 1

    andk 2 = (0,0, 1 4). Figure 3(c) shows the temperature dependence of the integrated intensities of the magnetic Bragg peaks at (0,1, 1

  2. [2]

    Clear anomalies atT m5,T m4,T m3, andT m2/Tm1 in the intensity mark the transitions into phases IV, III, and II

    upon warming. Clear anomalies atT m5,T m4,T m3, andT m2/Tm1 in the intensity mark the transitions into phases IV, III, and II. These phases are highlighted using the same color scheme as in Figure 3(a). Phase II, characterized solely byk 2, can be assigned to a commensurate↓↓↓↑magnetic structure, where↑(↓) denotes spin-up (spin-down) plane. At phase III b...

  3. [3]

    At lower temperatures, in phase IV, a sharp en- hancement of the magnetic Bragg peak associated with the propagation vectork 1 is observed, suggesting a↑↑↓↓ type magnetic structure

    posi- tion increases, signaling the enhancement of thek 2 mod- ulation. At lower temperatures, in phase IV, a sharp en- hancement of the magnetic Bragg peak associated with the propagation vectork 1 is observed, suggesting a↑↑↓↓ type magnetic structure. Notably, the↓↓↓↑and↑↑↓↓ magnetic reflections coexist over a finite temperature range, identified as pha...

  4. [4]

    phases vanish, while intensity of measured k = (0, 0, 0) reflections increases. 4 0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 002004006008000 1 2 3 4 020040060080001 02 03 04 05 06 07 001234567T (K)µ 0H (T) Thermal Expansion MagnetostricitonS weeping UPVIIVIVIVI III II ( a)0 1 02 03 04 05 06 07 001234µ0H (T)T (K) Thermal Expansion MagnetostricitonS weeping DownVIV IIVIVI III I...

  5. [5]

    Quantum Fluctuations in Narrow Band Systems

    and (0,1, 3 4). (d) Field dependence at 1.8 K of the magnetic Bragg peaks integrated intensity at (0,1, 1 2), (0,1, 3 4), and (0,1,1). We note, however, that we cannot rule out the presence of additional reflections within phase VI that are beyond our current reciprocal space scans. Therefore, we cannot ascertain whether phase VI is a fully polarized phas...

    2017

  6. [6]

    Seul and D

    M. Seul and D. Andelman, Domain Shapes and Patterns: The Phenomenology of Modulated Phases, Science267, 476 (1995), publisher: American Association for the Ad- vancement of Science

    1995

  7. [7]

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, S. H. Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E.-A. Kim, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Fujita, J. Lee, and J. C. S. Davis, Detec- tion of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Nature532, 343 (2016), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2016

  8. [8]

    L. Kong, M. Papaj, H. Kim, Y. Zhang, E. Baum, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Gu, P. A. Lee, and S. Nadj-Perge, Cooper-pair density modulation state in an iron-based superconductor, Nature640, 55 (2025), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Castets, E

    V. Castets, E. Dulos, J. Boissonade, and P. De Kepper, Experimental evidence of a sustained standing Turing- type nonequilibrium chemical pattern, Physical Review Letters64, 2953 (1990), publisher: American Physical Society

    1990

  2. [10]

    Ouyang and H

    Q. Ouyang and H. L. Swinney, Transition from a uniform state to hexagonal and striped Turing patterns, Nature 352, 610 (1991), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    1991

  3. [11]

    Schmidt and P

    B. Schmidt and P. Thalmeier, Frustrated two dimen- sional quantum magnets, Physics Reports703, 1 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Lacroix, Frustrated Metallic Systems: A Review of Some Peculiar Behavior, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan79, 011008 (2010)

    C. Lacroix, Frustrated Metallic Systems: A Review of Some Peculiar Behavior, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan79, 011008 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    H. T. Diep, ed.,Frustrated spin systems, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Lacroix, P

    C. Lacroix, P. Mendels, and F. Mila, eds.,Introduction to Frustrated Magnetism: Materials, Experiments, Theory, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 164 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    Broholm, R

    C. Broholm, R. J. Cava, S. A. Kivelson, D. G. Nocera, M. R. Norman, and T. Senthil, Quantum spin liquids, Science367, eaay0668 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Bak and J

    P. Bak and J. Von Boehm, Ising model with solitons, phasons, and ”the devil’s staircase”, Physical Review B 21, 5297 (1980)

    1980

  9. [17]

    Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics 45, 587 (1982)

    P. Bak, Commensurate phases, incommensurate phases and the devil’s staircase, Reports on Progress in Physics 45, 587 (1982)

    1982

  10. [18]

    Bak, The Devil’s Staircase, Physics Today39, 38 (1986)

    P. Bak, The Devil’s Staircase, Physics Today39, 38 (1986)

    1986

  11. [19]

    Kuroda, Y

    K. Kuroda, Y. Arai, N. Rezaei, S. Kunisada, S. Sakuragi, M. Alaei, Y. Kinoshita, C. Bareille, R. Noguchi, M. Nakayama, S. Akebi, M. Sakano, K. Kawaguchi, M. Arita, S. Ideta, K. Tanaka, H. Kitazawa, K. Okazaki, M. Tokunaga, Y. Haga, S. Shin, H. S. Suzuki, R. Arita, and T. Kondo...

    2020

  12. [20]

    K.-W. Chen, Y. Lai, Y.-C. Chiu, S. Steven, T. Besara, D. Graf, T. Siegrist, T. E. Albrecht-Schmitt, L. Bali- cas, and R. E. Baumbach, Possible devil’s staircase in the Kondo lattice CeSbSe, Physical Review B96, 014421 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    A. P. Pikul, D. Kaczorowski, Z. Gajek, J. Stepie´ n- Damm, A. ´Slebarski, M. Werwi´ nski, and A. Szajek, Giant crystal-electric-field effect and complex magnetic behav- 8 ior in single-crystalline CeRh3Si2, Physical Review B81, 174408 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Islam, C

    Z. Islam, C. Detlefs, A. I. Goldman, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, J. P. Hill, D. Gibbs, T. Vogt, and A. Zhe- ludev, Neutron diffraction and x-ray resonant exchange- scattering studies of the zero-field magnetic structures of TbNi2Ge2, Physical Review B58, 8522 (1998)

    1998

  15. [23]

    Shigeoka, H

    T. Shigeoka, H. Fujii, M. Nishi, Y. Uwatoko, T. Tak- abatake, I. Oguro, K. Motoya, N. Iwata, and Y. Ito, Metamagnetism in TbNi 2Si2 Single Crystal, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan61, 4559 (1992)

    1992

  16. [24]

    Matsuda, S

    T. Matsuda, S. Partzsch, T. Tsuyama, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, J. Geck, T. Saito, S. Ishiwata, Y. Tokura, and H. Wadati, Observation of a Devil’s Staircase in the Novel Spin-Valve System SrCo6O11, Physical Review Letters114, 236403 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Takigawa, M

    M. Takigawa, M. Horvati´ c, T. Waki, S. Kr¨ amer, C. Berthier, F. L´ evy-Bertrand, I. Sheikin, H. Kageyama, Y. Ueda, and F. Mila, Incomplete Devil’s Staircase in the Magnetization Curve of SrCu 2(BO3)2, Physical Review Letters110, 067210 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    D. M. Fobes, S. Zhang, S.-Z. Lin, P. Das, N. J. Ghimire, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, L. W. Harriger, G. Ehlers, A. Podlesnyak, R. I. Bewley, A. Sazonov, V. Hutanu, F. Ronning, C. D. Batista, and M. Janoschek, Tunable emergent heterostructures in a prototypical correlated meta...

    2018

  19. [27]

    Lander and P

    G. Lander and P. Burlet, On the magnetic structure of ac- tinide monopnictides, Physica B: Condensed Matter215, 7 (1995)

    1995

  20. [28]

    Burlet, S

    P. Burlet, S. Quezel, J. Rossat-Mignod, J. C. Spirlet, J. Rebizant, W. M¨ uller, and O. Vogt, Neutron-diffraction study of PuAs and PuSb, Physical Review B30, 6660 (1984)

    1984

  21. [29]

    Langridge, W

    S. Langridge, W. G. Stirling, G. H. Lander, and J. Re- bizant, Resonant magnetic x-ray-scattering studies of NpAs. I. Magnetic and lattice structure, Physical Review B49, 12010 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    D. M. Fobes, S.-Z. Lin, N. J. Ghimire, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, M. Bleuel, L. M. DeBeer-Schmitt, and M. Janoschek, Realization of the axial next-nearest- neighbor Ising model in U 3Al2Ge3, Physical Review B 96, 174413 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Kawarazaki, Y

    S. Kawarazaki, Y. Kobashi, T. Taniguchi, Y. Miyako, and H. Amitsuka, Frozen-In Devil’s Staircase in U(Ru1-xRhx)2Si2 Mixed Compound System as Stud- ied by Neutron Diffraction, Journal of the Phys- ical Society of Japan63, 716 (1994), eprint: https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.63.716

    1994 doi

  24. [32]

    Kaczorowski, Structural and magnetic properties of some new uranium ternary pnictides: UTX 2 (T = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu; X = P, As, Sb, Bi), Journal of Alloys and Compounds186, 333 (1992)

    D. Kaczorowski, Structural and magnetic properties of some new uranium ternary pnictides: UTX 2 (T = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu; X = P, As, Sb, Bi), Journal of Alloys and Compounds186, 333 (1992)

    1992

  25. [33]

    P. F. S. Rosa, Y. Luo, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, P. G. Pagliuso, and Z. Fisk, Ferromagnetic Kondo behavior in UAuBi2 single crystals, Physical Review B92, 104425 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    H. A. Long, D. Duong, J. Blawat, G. Morrison, Y. Wu, H. Cao, N. Pokhrel, D. S. Parker, J. Singleton, R. Jin, and V. V. Klepov, Magnetic Properties Tuning via Broad Range Site Deficiency in Square Net Material UCux Bi2, Journal of the American Chemical Society147, 15157 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    S. M. Thomas, P. F. S. Rosa, S. B. Lee, S. A. Parameswaran, Z. Fisk, and J. Xia, Hall effect anomaly and low-temperature metamagnetism in the Kondo com- pound CeAgBi 2, Physical Review B93, 075149 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Adriano, P

    C. Adriano, P. F. S. Rosa, C. B. R. Jesus, J. R. L. Marde- gan, T. M. Garitezi, T. Grant, Z. Fisk, D. J. Garcia, A. P. Reyes, P. L. Kuhns, R. R. Urbano, C. Giles, and P. G. Pagliuso, Physical properties and magnetic structure of the intermetallic CeCuBi2 compound, Physical Rev...

    2014

  29. [37]

    M. M. Piva, R. Tartaglia, G. S. Freitas, J. C. Souza, D. S. Christovam, S. M. Thomas, J. B. Le˜ ao, W. Rat- cliff, J. W. Lynn, C. Lane, J.-X. Zhu, J. D. Thomp- son, P. F. S. Rosa, C. Adriano, E. Granado, and P. G. Pagliuso, Electronic and magnetic properties of stoichio- metri...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Leciejewicz, R

    J. Leciejewicz, R. Tro´ c, A. Murasik, and A. Zyg- munt, Neutron-Diffraction Study of Antiferromagnetism in USb 2 and UBi 2, physica status solidi (b)22, 517 (1967)

    1967

  31. [39]

    J. Xu, F. Wu, J.-K. Bao, F. Han, Z.-L. Xiao, I. Mar- tin, Y.-Y. Lyu, Y.-L. Wang, D. Y. Chung, M. Li, W. Zhang, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jiang, M. G. Kanatzidis, and W.-K. Kwok, Orbital-flop Induced Magnetoresis- tance Anisotropy in Rare Earth Monopnictide CeSb, Na- ture Communicat...

    2019

  32. [40]

    H. Heer, A. Furrer, W. Halg, and O. Vogt, Neutron spec- troscopy in the cerium monopnictides, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics12, 5207 (1979)

    1979

  33. [41]

    Kioussis, B

    N. Kioussis, B. R. Cooper, and A. Banerjea, Mechanism for the occurrence of paramagnetic planes within mag- netically ordered cerium systems, Physical Review B38, 9132 (1988)

    1988

  34. [42]

    G. S. Freitaset al., In preparation

  35. [43]

    Hutchings, Point-Charge Calculations of Energy Lev- els of Magnetic Ions in Crystalline Electric Fields, inSolid State Physics, Vol

    M. Hutchings, Point-Charge Calculations of Energy Lev- els of Magnetic Ions in Crystalline Electric Fields, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 16 (Elsevier, 1964) pp. 227–273

    1964

  36. [44]

    Wang, Crystal-field effects of paramagnetic Curie temperature, Physics Letters A35, 383 (1971)

    Y.-L. Wang, Crystal-field effects of paramagnetic Curie temperature, Physics Letters A35, 383 (1971)

    1971

  37. [45]

    Petrovic, P

    C. Petrovic, P. G. Pagliuso, M. F. Hundley, R. Movshovich, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, and P. Monthoux, Heavy-fermion superconductivity in CeCoIn 5 at 2.3 K, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter13, L337 (2001)

    2001

  38. [46]

    Petrovic, R

    C. Petrovic, R. Movshovich, M. Jaime, P. G. Pagliuso, M. F. Hundley, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thomp- son, A new heavy-fermion superconductor CeIrIn 5 : A relative of the cuprates?, Europhysics Letters (EPL)53, 354 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    W. Bao, P. G. Pagliuso, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, J. W. Lynn, and R. W. Erwin, Incommensurate magnetic structure of CeRhIn 5, Physical Review B62, R14621 (2000)

    2000

  40. [48]

    Hegger, C

    H. Hegger, C. Petrovic, E. G. Moshopoulou, M. F. Hund- ley, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thompson, Pressure- Induced Superconductivity in Quasi-2D CeRhIn 5, Phys- ical Review Letters84, 4986 (2000)

    2000

  41. [49]

    Haule, C.-H

    K. Haule, C.-H. Yee, and K. Kim, Dynamical mean- field theory within the full-potential methods: Electronic structure of CeIrIn 5, CeCoIn 5, and CeRhIn 5, Physical Review B81, 195107 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.