Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Investigating the Performance of Adaptive Optics on Different Bases of Spatial Modes in Turbulent Channels

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read With adaptive optics on, measured error rates for OAM, MUB, and SIC-POVM encodings drop below QKD security thresholds in every tested dimension, with the OAM basis benefiting most from correction.

desk verdict A solid, directly measured comparison of AO across bases for high-dimensional QKD; the central ordering is trustworthy, but the turbulence model is lab-fitted and the security-threshold claims are conditional on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21015 v1 pith:UZIHRBX7 submitted 2025-08-28 quant-ph

Rojan Abolhassani , Lukas Scarfe , Francesco Di Colandrea , Alessio D'Errico , Khabat Heshami , Ebrahim Karimi This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords adaptiveopticsquantumkeydistributionorbitalangularmomentummutuallyunbiasedbasesSIC-POVMatmosphericturbulencehigh-dimensionalcommunicationspatialmodesoflight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks which spatial-mode basis a fast adaptive-optics (AO) system can best rescue from atmospheric turbulence for high-dimensional quantum key distribution (QKD). The authors send orbital-angular-momentum (OAM) modes, mutually unbiased bases (MUB), angular modes, and symmetric informationally complete POVM (SIC-POVM) states through a lab turbulence cell in dimensions 2 to 8, measuring cross-talk with and without a 1 kHz closed-loop AO system. They find a symmetry trade-off: OAM states suffer the most distortion from turbulence, yet their cylindrical symmetry makes them the most precisely corrected, while MUB and SIC-POVM states are intrinsically more robust but improve less under AO. With AO active, the measured quantum-dit error rates fall below the security thresholds for the BB84, six-state, and Singapore protocols across the tested dimensions. The conclusion is practical: AO can enable secure high-dimensional QKD over turbulent free space, and the optimal strategy is to let OAM carry most of the key while using MUBs for security checks.

What carries the argument

Two components carry the argument. First, the closed-loop AO system: a continuous 97-actuator deformable mirror and a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor running at 1 kHz, driven by a reference beam that co-propagates with the signal, so the corrected wavefront is the one the signal experienced. Second, the comparison metric: the quantum-dit error rate (QDER) extracted from measured cross-talk matrices in each basis. The explanatory mechanism is geometric—turbulence corrupts the beam's azimuthal phase; OAM modes, being cylindrically symmetric, align with the low-order Zernike aberrations the deformable mirror is designed to cancel, whereas MUB and SIC-POVM states localize into angular lobes that

What would settle it

Re-run the same AO loop and basis set on an outdoor link (or a multi-layer turbulence simulation with screens distributed along the path) at comparable C_n^2 and compare corrected QDER. If at any dimension the best-corrected basis exceeds the BB84 or six-state threshold, or a lobe-localized MUB beats OAM after AO, the claimed symmetry-based hierarchy and OAM optimality are refuted. Cheaper partial check: measure the tank's C_n^2 independently instead of fitting it, and see whether the AO gain matches prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

With a 1 kHz closed-loop AO system active, measured quantum-dit error rates (QDER) for OAM modes, all known MUBs, angular modes, and SIC-POVMs (d = 2–8) fall below their protocols' security thresholds. The core finding is a correction trade-off: OAM eigenstates are among the most strongly distorted by turbulence, yet the AO loop corrects them most effectively—their cylindrical symmetry matches the aberrations the deformable mirror removes—leaving the corrected OAM basis with the lowest QDER at most dimensions (at d = 2 the angular basis is marginally better). MUB and SIC-POVM states are intrinsically more robust uncorrected but improve less under AO. The authors conclude that under AO, OAM i

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the lab turbulence—a hotplate in a 30-cm glass tank, modelled as a single Zernike phase screen with a fitted refractive-index structure constant C_n^2—faithfully represents real atmospheric turbulence; if distributed turbulence, scintillation, beam wander, or anisoplanatism dominate outdoors, the demonstrated below-threshold margins will not transfer directly, especially at d = 8 where corrected error rates already approach the threshold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A QKD protocol can deliberately use the OAM basis for the majority of key bits and reserve MUBs for security monitoring—the unbalanced-basis design the authors propose, citing Fourier-qubit QKD.
  • AO brings corrected error rates below BB84 and six-state thresholds in every tested dimension (d = 2 to 8), so turbulence-induced cross-talk no longer rules out high-dimensional QKD over free-space links.
  • SIC-POVM encodings (the Singapore protocol) become viable in turbulent channels for d = 2, 3, 4, and 6 when AO is applied.
  • Because AO performance is mode-dependent, the encoding basis and the AO correction basis must be co-designed: the same mirror that nearly restores OAM only partially corrects angularly localized states.
  • At the lowest dimensions the angular (first MUB) basis is the strongest candidate, so the optimal basis is not universal but depends on the operating dimension and turbulence level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry-matching explanation predicts a testable consequence the authors do not run: replacing the circularly symmetric deformable mirror with a segmented or rectangular one should erode OAM's correction advantage and may favour lobe-localized bases.
  • A real atmosphere distributes turbulence along the whole path, adding scintillation, beam wander, and anisoplanatic errors that a single reference-beam AO loop cannot fully remove; the d = 8 margins (corrected QDER already near threshold) are where those effects would first show.
  • The experiment encodes classical coherent light and measures projective overlaps; the same wavefront correction should carry over to weak-coherent or entangled-photon sources because the correction is linear, but quantifying the secure key rate for those sources is a step the paper leaves implicit.
  • The same symmetry argument extends to non-QKD uses of spatial modes—vortex coronagraphy and Fourier-conjugate microscopy—so AO should show a larger contrast or resolution gain for cylindrically symmetric OAM probes than for localized-lobe probes, which is a measurable prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a laboratory comparison of high-speed adaptive-optics (AO) correction for three families of spatial-mode encodings—OAM eigenstates, mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), and SIC-POVMs—in dimensions d = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8. A 30-cm hotplate turbulence cell is used as the channel. The central measurements are crosstalk matrices with AO enabled and disabled, from which the quantum dit error rate (QDER) is computed. The authors report that AO reduces QDER for every basis and dimension, that OAM modes are the most strongly corrected, and that with AO enabled the QDERs lie below BB84 and six-state protocol thresholds for the MUB/OAM cases and below the Singapore-protocol threshold for SIC-POVMs. They conclude that AO is a key enabler of high-dimensional free-space QKD and that the OAM basis is the optimal channel.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a systematic experimental comparison of AO correction across all known MUBs and SIC-POVMs up to d = 8, with practical value for basis selection in high-dimensional QKD. The main strength is that the AO-on versus AO-off comparison is a direct measurement: the QDER reductions are extracted from recorded crosstalk matrices, with no fitted parameter inside that comparison. The qualitative statement that AO always reduces QDER and that OAM is among the best-corrected bases at higher dimensions is robust across Table S1. The limitations are that the quantitative conclusions are obtained in a tabletop hotplate channel, the turbulence strength is calibrated rather than independently characterized, and some of the headline claims are broader than the data support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III and Table S1] The unqualified conclusion that the OAM basis "emerges as the optimal channel" is not supported by the data in Table S1. For d = 2, with AO on, the OAM basis (MUB0) has QDER 0.45±0.19 while MUB1 has 0.30±0.12, and the text itself says the first MUB/ANG basis is optimal at d = 2. Furthermore, if "benefits most from AO" is interpreted as the largest absolute QDER reduction, Table S1 shows larger reductions for MUB2 at d = 3 (38.28→7.70 versus OAM 33.51→3.68) and for several d = 8 MUBs (e.g., MUB5 52.30→14.16, MUB8 76.08→20.00 versus OAM 46.64→6.67). Please state the precise optimality criterion and restrict the claim to the dimensions and metric that actually support it.
  2. [Section II.B and Supplementary Eqs. S1-S6] The turbulence strength is calibrated by fitting the simulation to the measured crosstalk: "Agreement between simulation and experiment allowed us to estimate the effective C_n^2 ≈ 10^{-14.7}". Therefore the subsequent agreement between simulation and experiment is not an independent validation of the single-Zernike-screen Kolmogorov model. The direct AO-on/off measurement is unaffected, but the paper's claims about "moderate atmospheric turbulence" and the satellite-QKD framing require either an independent channel characterization (e.g., r0 or Cn^2L measurement, scintillation index) or an explicit scope limitation. Real atmospheric links involve distributed turbulence, beam wander, scintillation, and anisoplanatism, all of which can alter both the absolute QDER margins and the basis ranking.
  3. [Fig. 4 and Table S1] The claim that SIC-POVM QDER values "fall below the theoretical security threshold of the Singapore protocol" is not supported by the presented data. Figure 4 shows no threshold lines for the Singapore protocol, and Table S1 does not list SIC-POVM thresholds. Since this is a load-bearing conclusion for one of the three basis families, please provide the numerical thresholds used, the QDER values with uncertainties, and the resulting margins below threshold. Also specify how the QDER from Eqs. (7)-(8) maps onto the error rate used in the Singapore protocol security analysis.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states that error bars represent "statistical uncertainties" and then says they indicate "the standard deviation of the diagonal elements of each crosstalk matrix." These are not the same: the standard deviation of diagonal elements describes mode-to-mode spread, not the uncertainty of the mean QDER. Please relabel the error bars and, where threshold margins are discussed, provide actual statistical uncertainties.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The definition of the logical basis index |j⟩ is garbled and should be rewritten. As printed, "|j⟩ = d/2 + (l − 1)Θ(ℓ) + ℓΘ(−ℓ)" is not a clear mapping from ℓ to j. A precise indexing convention is needed because the MUB construction depends on it.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states that "MUB and SIC-POVM exhibit greater intrinsic robustness to turbulence," but Table S1 shows that this is not true for all MUBs: e.g., d = 3 MUB2 has AO-off QDER 38.28% versus OAM 33.51%, and d = 4 MUB4 has 45.34% versus OAM 40.33%. Please qualify this statement to avoid overgeneralization.
  4. [Table S1] The column heading "A VG AO On Turb Off" is not defined in the main text. Please clarify the meaning of the no-turbulence AO-on baseline and how it was measured, and consider using standard notation for all conditions.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Auxiliary turbulence calibration is internally fitted; central AO-on/off QDER is a direct measurement, so no load-bearing circularity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section II.B (Experiment), paragraph on turbulence characterization and Fig. 2 caption; Supplementary Eqs. S5-S6]
    "Agreement between simulation and experiment allowed us to estimate the effective refractive-index structure constant, C 2 n ≈ 10−14.7 [30], which is typical of moderate atmospheric turbulence. ... the third presents numerical simulations of turbulence without correction (Sim). The comparison highlights ... in close agreement with the simulated predictions."

    The only free turbulence-strength parameter, C_n^2, is estimated by demanding that the simulation match the measured crosstalk matrices. The same simulated matrices are then displayed as 'Sim' and described as 'simulated predictions' with which the experiment is in close agreement. Thus the agreement is a calibration identity, not an independent test of the turbulence model. However, this calibration loop is not used to produce the AO-on/AO-off QDER values that support the central claims; those are directly measured from the recorded crosstalk matrices. The circularity is therefore auxiliary and does not force the headline result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims compare QDER with AO on and AO off, extracted directly from experimentally recorded crosstalk matrices and compared with standard protocol security thresholds. No fitted parameter enters the QDER numbers themselves. The only internal loop is the estimation of C_n^2 from the same measured crosstalk that the 'Sim' panels then reproduce; this is calibration rather than independent prediction, and it is not load-bearing for the headline conclusions. Self-citations such as [19], [41], and [34] are methodological or illustrative and do not carry the argument: the simulation equations are restated in the Supplementary, and the MUB/SIC-POVM constructions and security thresholds are standard external results. Thus no significant circularity is present in the derivation chain; at most, the auxiliary turbulence validation is partly self-referential.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the 'unbalanced usage of bases' protocol proposal in the Conclusions is a scheme suggestion, not an entity. The main ledger items are the fitted turbulence parameter C_n^2, the single-phase-screen model, the classical-to-quantum error-rate correspondence, and standard basis constructions. The paper's actual contribution is measurement-based, so its effective parameter count is low.

free parameters (2)
  • C_n^2 (refractive-index structure constant) = ~10^{-14.7} m^{-2/3}
    Estimated by matching simulated crosstalk to measured crosstalk (Section II.B, Supplementary Eqs. S5-S6). The claimed simulation-experiment 'agreement' inherits this fit.
  • Zernike phase-screen order and coefficient statistics = Truncation order unspecified; Gaussian coefficients with Noll variances (Eq. S5)
    The phase-screen model (Supplementary Eqs. S1-S4) requires choosing how many Zernike modes to include; the truncation order is not stated. Averaging over 100 realizations is also a simulation choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hotplate-generated turbulence is representable as a single Zernike phase screen at the sender plane with Kolmogorov statistics
    Supplementary Eqs. S1-S5. Load-bearing for the simulation-experiment agreement and for transferring conclusions to real atmospheric channels.
  • domain assumption Measured crosstalk on a bright 633 nm laser beam equals the QDER a single-photon QKD implementation would experience
    The experiment uses a CW laser and classical detection; no weak coherent state, heralding, or single-photon detection is described. The paper then compares QDER to QKD security thresholds.
  • standard math Full sets of d+1 MUBs exist in the tested prime-power dimensions via standard constructions
    Section II.A, citing Refs. 20 and 22. Standard result; not derived in this paper.
  • standard math SIC-POVMs in d = 2, 3, 4, 6 exist and are generated by group-covariant (Weyl-Heisenberg) operators
    Section II.A, Eq. (4). Standard in the literature, although Eq. (4) as typeset is garbled (free index k, missing summation).
  • domain assumption LG_{l,0} modes form the logical OAM basis and propagate unitarily so overlaps can be evaluated at z = 0
    Section II.A and Supplementary Eq. S9. Standard paraxial-optics assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigating the Performance of Adaptive Optics on Different Bases of Spatial Modes in Turbulent Channels." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UZIHRBX7

@misc{pith2026250821015,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigating the Performance of Adaptive Optics on Different Bases of Spatial Modes in Turbulent Channels},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UZIHRBX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21015}
}
abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) allows secure key exchange based on the principles of quantum mechanics, with higher-dimensional photonic states offering enhanced channel capacity and resilience to noise. Free-space QKD is crucial for global networks where fibres are impractical, but atmospheric turbulence introduces severe states distortions, particularly for spatial modes. Adaptive optics (AO) provides a pathway to correct these errors, though its effectiveness depends on the encoding basis. Here, we experimentally evaluate a high-speed AO system for orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes, mutually unbiased bases (MUB), and symmetric, informationally complete, positive operator-valued measures (SIC-POVM) up to dimension $d=8$ in a turbulent free-space channel. While OAM states are strongly distorted, their cylindrical symmetry makes them optimally corrected by AO, yielding error rates below QKD security thresholds. MUB and SIC-POVM exhibit greater intrinsic robustness to turbulence but are less precisely corrected, though their performance remains within protocol tolerances. These results establish AO as a key enabler of secure, high-dimensional QKD and highlight the role of basis choice in optimizing resilience and correction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21015 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup for transmitting quantum states of light and testing MUB, SIC-POVM, and Angular states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cross-talk matrices of the first MUB for dimensions a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantum dit error rate (QDER) measured for different basis sets and Hilbert-space dimensions under turbulent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross-talk matrices and QDER for SIC-POVM modes under turbulence with and without AO correction. (a) Measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature, 299:802–803, October 1982

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Bennett and Gilles Brassard

    Charles H. Bennett and Gilles Brassard. Quantum cryp- tography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing , pages 175– 179, Bangalore, India, 1984. IEEE

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    D. Bruß. Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryp- tography with six states. Physical Review Letters , 81(14):3018–3021, October 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Efficient and robust quantum key distribution with minimal state tomography, 2004

    Berthold-Georg Englert, Christian Kurtsiefer, Kai Wen Moh, and Marek ˙Zukowski. Efficient and robust quantum key distribution with minimal state tomography, 2004. Preprint

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Eng- land, Robert Fickler, Robert W

    Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Khabat Heshami, Duncan G. Eng- land, Robert Fickler, Robert W. Boyd, Berthold-Georg Englert, Luis L. S´ anchez-Soto, and Ebrahim Karimi. Ex- perimental investigation of quantum key distribution pro- tocols with twisted photons. Quantum, 2:111, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Cerf, Mohamed Bourennane, Anders Karls- son, and Nicolas Gisin

    Nicolas J. Cerf, Mohamed Bourennane, Anders Karls- son, and Nicolas Gisin. Security of quantum key distri- bution using d-level systems. Physical Review Letters , 88(12):127902, March 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution

    Sebastian Ecker, Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Lukas Bulla, Flo- rian Brandt, Oskar Kohout, Fabian Steinlechner, Robert Fickler, Mehul Malik, Yelena Guryanova, Rupert Ursin, and Marcus Huber. Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution. PRX Quantum , 4(1):010304, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Torres, and Lluis Torner

    Gabriel Molina-Terriza, Juan P. Torres, and Lluis Torner. Management of the angular momentum of light: Prepa- ration of photons in multidimensional vector states of an- gular momentum. Physical Review Letters, 88(1):013601, December 2001

    work page 2001

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger. Entangle- ment of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature, 412:313–316, July 2001

    2001

  2. [10]

    Molina-Terriza, A

    G. Molina-Terriza, A. Vaziri, J. Reh´ aˇ cek, Z. Hradil, and A. Zeilinger. Triggered qutrits for quantum communica- tion protocols. Physical Review Letters , 92(16):167903, Apr 2004

    2004

  3. [11]

    Maga˜ na-Loaiza, Mal- colm N

    Mohammad Mirhosseini, Omar S. Maga˜ na-Loaiza, Mal- colm N. O’Sullivan, Brandon Rodenburg, Mehul Malik, Martin P. J. Lavery, Miles J. Padgett, Daniel J. Gau- thier, and Robert W. Boyd. High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light. New Journal of Physics, 17(3):0330...

    2015

  4. [12]

    Sit et al

    A. Sit et al. Quantum cryptography with structured pho- tons through a vortex fiber. Optics Letters, 43:4108–4111, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Cozzolino, B

    D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe. Orbital angular momentum states enabling fiber-based high-dimensional quantum communication. Physical Re- view Applied, 11(6):064058, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Wang et al

    Q.-K. Wang et al. High-dimensional quantum cryp- tography with hybrid orbital-angular-momentum states through 25 km of ring-core fiber: A proof-of-concept demonstration. Physical Review Applied , 15(6):064034, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Sit et al

    A. Sit et al. High-dimensional intracity quantum cryp- tography with structured photons. Optica, 4:1006–1010, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Bouchard et al

    F. Bouchard et al. Quantum cryptography with twisted photons through an outdoor underwater channel. Optics Express, 26:22563–22573, 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Hufnagel et al

    F. Hufnagel et al. Characterization of an underwater channel for quantum communications in the ottawa river. Optics Express, 27:26346–26354, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Padgett, Mikhail Vasnetsov, Valeriy Pas’ko, Stephen M

    Graham Gibson, Johannes Courtial, Miles J. Padgett, Mikhail Vasnetsov, Valeriy Pas’ko, Stephen M. Barnett, and Sonja Franke-Arnold. Free-space information trans- fer using light beams carrying orbital angular momen- tum. Optics Express, 12(22):5448–5456, 2004

    2004

  11. [19]

    Ferrer-Garcia, Alessio D’Errico, Khabat Heshami, and Ebrahim Karimi

    Lukas Scarfe, Felix Hufnagel, Manuel F. Ferrer-Garcia, Alessio D’Errico, Khabat Heshami, and Ebrahim Karimi. Fast adaptive optics for high-dimensional quantum com- munications in turbulent channels. Communications Physics, 8, 2025. Accessed: 2025-08-12

    2025

  12. [20]

    On mutually unbiased bases

    Thomas Durt, Berthold-Georg Englert, Ingemar Bengts- son, and Karol ˙Zyczkowski. On mutually unbiased bases. International Journal of Quantum Information , 8(4):535–640, 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes. Physical Review A , 45(11):8185–8189, 1992

    1992

  14. [22]

    Optimal state- determination by mutually unbiased measurements

    William K Wootters and Brian D Fields. Optimal state- determination by mutually unbiased measurements. An- nals of Physics , 191(2):363–381, 1989

    1989

  15. [23]

    Mutually unbiased bases in six dimensions: The four most distant bases

    Philippe Raynal, Xin L¨ u, and Berthold-Georg Englert. Mutually unbiased bases in six dimensions: The four most distant bases. Phys. Rev. A , 83:062303, Jun 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Renes, Robin Blume-Kohout, A

    Joseph M. Renes, Robin Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and Carlton M. Caves. Symmetric informationally com- plete quantum measurements. Journal of Mathematical 9 Physics, 45(6):2171–2180, 2004

    2004

  17. [25]

    Renes, Robin Blume-Kohout, A

    Joseph M. Renes, Robin Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and Carlton M. Caves. Symmetric informationally com- plete quantum measurements. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 45(6):2171–2180, 06 2004

    2004

  18. [26]

    White, and Jacquiline Romero

    Markus Rambach, Mahdi Qaryan, Michael Kewming, Christopher Ferrie, Andrew G. White, and Jacquiline Romero. Robust and efficient high-dimensional quan- tum state tomography. Phys. Rev. Lett., 126:100402, Mar 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Etienne Bolduc, Nathaniel Bent, Enrico Santamato, Ebrahim Karimi, and Robert W. Boyd. Exact solution to simultaneous intensity and phase encryption with a single phase-only hologram. Optics Letters, 38(18):3546– 3549, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    J. P. Kirk and A. L. Jones. Phase-only complex-valued spatial filter. Journal of the Optical Society of America , 61(8):1023–1028, 1971

    1971

  21. [29]

    Measuring azimuthal and radial modes of photons

    Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Natalia Herrera Valencia, Florian Brandt, Robert Fickler, Marcus Huber, and Mehul Ma- lik. Measuring azimuthal and radial modes of photons. Optics Express, 26(24):31925–31941, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Wave propagation in a turbulent medium

    Valerian Ilich Tatarski. Wave propagation in a turbulent medium. Courier Dover Publications, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Robert K. Tyson. Principles of Adaptive Optics . CRC Press, Boca Raton, 4th edition, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    Maximal sets of mutually unbiased quantum states in dimension 6

    Stephen Brierley and Stefan Weigert. Maximal sets of mutually unbiased quantum states in dimension 6. Phys. Rev. A, 78:042312, Oct 2008

    2008

  25. [33]

    Constructing mu- tually unbiased bases in dimension six

    Stephen Brierley and Stefan Weigert. Constructing mu- tually unbiased bases in dimension six. Phys. Rev. A , 79:052316, May 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    High-dimensional quantum key distribution with qubit-like states

    Lukas Scarfe, Rojan Abolhassani, Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Aaron Goldberg, Khabat Heshami, Francesco Di Colan- drea, and Ebrahim Karimi. High-dimensional quantum key distribution with qubit-like states. arXiv preprint ,

  27. [35]

    Quantum-enhanced optical microscopy for subnanometer resolution imaging of protein complexes

    Zixuan Wu, Qi Liu, Yue Zhang, Hao Li, Wei Chen, Jian- wei Xu, Jun Zhang, Wei Peng, Sheng Tang, and Guang- can Guo. Quantum-enhanced optical microscopy for subnanometer resolution imaging of protein complexes. Light: Science & Applications , 14:97, May 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    Double spiral resonant mems scanning for ultra-high-speed miniaturized optical microscopy

    Linyang Li, Xiao Liang, Wei Qin, Heng Guo, Weizhi Qi, Tian Jin, Jianbo Tang, and Lei Xi. Double spiral resonant mems scanning for ultra-high-speed miniaturized optical microscopy. Optica, 10(9):1195–1202, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    A. A. Pushkina, G. Maltese, J. I. Costa-Filho, P. Patel, and A. I. Lvovsky. Superresolution linear optical imaging in the far field. Physical Review Letters, 127(25):253602, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Palacios, and Grover A

    Gregory Foo, David M. Palacios, and Grover A. Swart- zlander. Optical vortex coronagraph. Optics Letters , 30(24):3308–3310, 2005

    2005

  31. [39]

    Palacios and Sarah L

    David M. Palacios and Sarah L. Hunyadi. Low-order aberration sensitivity of an optical vortex coronagraph. Optics Letters, 31(19):2981–2983, 2006

    2006

  32. [40]

    Mawet, P

    D. Mawet, P. Riaud, O. Absil, and J. Surdej. Annu- lar groove phase mask coronagraph. The Astrophysical Journal, 633(2):1191–1200, 2005

    2005

  33. [41]

    Predicting atmospheric turbulence for secure quantum communications in free space

    Tareq Jaouni, Lukas Scarfe, Fr´ ed´ eric Bouchard, Mario Krenn, Khabat Heshami, Francesco Di Colandrea, and Ebrahim Karimi. Predicting atmospheric turbulence for secure quantum communications in free space. Opt. Ex- press, 33(5):10759–10776, Mar 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Principles of Optics: Elec- tromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light

    Max Born and Emil Wolf. Principles of Optics: Elec- tromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light . Cambridge University, 7 edition, 1999

    1999

  35. [43]

    Robert J. Noll. Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence. J. Opt. Soc. Am. , 66(3):207–211, Mar 1976. 10 Supplementary Material for: Investigating the Performance of Adaptive Optics on Different Bases of Spatial Modes in Turbulent Channels A. Details on numerical simulat...

    1976

  36. [2025]

    Preprint posted on April 4, 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.