REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey of Methods, Challenges and Perspectives in Causality
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep Learning models have shown success in a large variety of tasks by extracting correlation patterns from high-dimensional data but still struggle when generalizing out of their initial distribution. As causal engines aim to learn mechanisms independent from a data distribution, combining Deep Learning with Causality can have a great impact on the two fields. In this paper, we further motivate this assumption. We perform an extensive overview of the theories and methods for Causality from different perspectives, with an emphasis on Deep Learning and the challenges met by the two domains. We show early attempts to bring the fields together and the possible perspectives for the future. We finish by providing a large variety of applications for techniques from Causality.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Causal Cartographer: From Mapping to Reasoning Over Counterfactual Worlds
An LLM agent extracts a 975-variable causal graph from 2020 oil-price news and a second agent answers counterfactual queries by step-by-step causal reasoning.
-
Causal Analysis of ASR Errors for Children: Quantifying the Impact of Physiological, Cognitive, and Extrinsic Factors
For children's ASR, word error rates are driven most by utterance length and child age, then noise and pronunciation, and fine-tuning lowers age sensitivity but not length sensitivity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.