Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Ordering phenomena of spin trimers accompanied by large geometrical Hall effect

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The large Hall conductivity in Dy3Ru4Al12 is a geometrical Hall effect from non-coplanar spin trimers.

desk verdict Solid new experiment on field-tunable spin-trimer chirality and Hall effect, but the normal Hall subtraction—the load-bearing assumption—is weaker than the main text admits. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07728 v1 pith:V2KTWZQW submitted 2019-08-21 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shang Gao , Max Hirschberger , Oksana Zaharko , Taro Nakajima , Takashi Kurumaji , Akiko Kikkawa , Junichi Shiogai , Atsushi Tsukazaki
show 5 more authors
Shojiro Kimura Satoshi Awaji Yasujiro Taguchi Taka-hisa Arima Yoshinori Tokura
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords scalarspinchiralitygeometricalHalleffectBerryphasetrimersbreathingkagomelatticeDy3Ru4Al12neutrondiffractionanomalousconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the large anomalous Hall conductivity observed in the field-induced phases II and III of the metallic magnet Dy3Ru4Al12 is a "geometrical Hall effect": conduction electrons pick up a real-space Berry phase as they hop around non-coplanar spin trimers, so the transverse voltage tracks the net scalar spin chirality of the crystal rather than its magnetization alone. Using single-crystal neutron diffraction, the authors determine the magnetic structures of three phases and show that a magnetic field switches between an antiferroic stacking of trimers with zero net chirality (phase I) and ferroic or twisted arrangements with nonzero net chirality (phases II and III). Magneto-transport measurements show the Hall conductivity is zero in phase I, rises sharply at the onset of the chiral phases, and changes in step-like jumps at the phase boundaries. A semi-quantitative estimate $\sigma^A_{xy}\propto p\chi_{\mathrm{tot}}$ with $p\propto M$ predicts a phase-III-to-II Hall-conductivity ratio near 3.8, matching the measured ratio. If correct, the work is a clear experimental demonstration that tunable spin trimers on a breathing kagome lattice can produce large emergent electromagnetic responses of real-space Berry-phase origin.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scalar spin chirality $\chi_{ijk}=\mathbf{S}_i\cdot(\mathbf{S}_j\times\mathbf{S}_k)$, the signed solid angle subtended by three neighboring spins; when electrons hop around such a triangle they acquire a Berry phase equivalent to that from a fictitious magnetic flux. The paper combines this with the spin-trimer picture: strongly coupled Dy$^{3+}$ triangles act as rigid units whose in-plane all-in/all-out or twisted configurations carry a well-defined local chirality, so the crystal's net chirality is set entirely by how the trimers stack. The quantitative bridge between magnetism and transport is the proportionality $\sigma^A_{xy}\propto p\,\chi_{\mathrm{tot}}$ with $p\propto M$, justified in the weak-coupling regime; it converts the neutron-diffraction chirality values $\chi_0\approx 0.17$ and $\chi_0'\approx 0.23$ into a predicted Hall-conductivity ratio of about 3.8 between phases III and II.

What would settle it

Measure the Hall resistivity at 2 K in the high-field regime above about 9 T, where the trimer chirality is suppressed and moments align with the $c$ axis; if the signal obtained after subtracting the 300 K normal slope does not drop to zero, or if a two-band Drude fit to the high-field normal Hall reproduces the step-like features assigned to chirality, the mechanism assignment would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the local scalar spin chirality of the Dy$^{3+}$ spin trimers can be ordered and switched by magnetic field, and that the resulting net chirality directly produces a large geometrical Hall effect. In zero-field phase I the trimers are all-in/all-out with local chirality $\chi_0\approx 0.17$, but the signs alternate between neighboring unit cells, so the net chirality of the crystal is zero and $\sigma^A_{xy}=0$. Field-induced phase II with $q_2=(1/3\,1/3\,0)$ arranges the trimer chirality in a $+/+/-$ sequence along $a$ and $b$, giving an average chirality of $\chi_0/3$ on nearest-neighbor trimers and an equal contribution on second-neighbor triangles; here the anomalous Hall conductivity becomes nonzero. In phase III the in-plane moments twist so that nearest-neighbor trimers carry negative chirality $-\chi_0'/3$ while the second-neighbor triangles carry a positive net chirality $\chi_0'$, and the Hall conductivity grows further. The authors rule out skew scattering by the $\tau$-independence of the step-like $\sigma^A_{xy}(H)$ and rule out Karplus-Luttinger and side-jump mechanisms by the sharp rise of $\sigma^A_{xy}(T)$ at constant magnetization, attributing the signal to the real-space Berry phase of the non-coplanar spin texture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ordinary Hall resistivity measured at 300 K remains a valid background at 2 K, so after subtracting that linear slope the residual anomalous Hall conductivity is entirely due to spin chirality and not to a field- or temperature-dependent change in the normal Hall coefficient.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any phase of Dy3Ru4Al12 where the spin-trimer stacking cancels all chirality, the anomalous Hall conductivity vanishes, so the Hall signal can be used as a bulk probe of net scalar spin chirality.
  • The magnitude and sign of the Hall response are set by the stacking pattern of trimers, meaning magnetic field can act as a switch between zero, moderate, and large geometrical Hall states.
  • Because $\sigma^A_{xy}$ is independent of the scattering time and does not follow magnetization, the observation separates real-space Berry-phase transport from the spin-orbit-coupling mechanisms that dominate conventional ferromagnets.
  • Compound families with breathing kagome lattices and tunable Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya or single-ion anisotropy should show analogous field-tunable geometrical Hall responses wherever rigid non-coplanar trimers form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the geometrical-Hall assignment is correct, the same subtraction scheme applied in a field-aligned, chirality-free state should give $\sigma^A_{xy}=0$; a direct measurement of the 2 K normal Hall coefficient, rather than the 300 K value, would settle whether part of the step is an ordinary Hall artifact.
  • The equivalence between real-space and momentum-space Berry phases invoked for short-period lattices suggests that other members of the R$_3$Ru$_4$Al$_{12}$ family with different rare-earth anisotropy could show chirality-controlled Hall responses with sign and magnitude predictable from the trimer stacking.
  • A natural testable extension is to rotate the magnetic field away from the $c$ axis: the predicted Hall response should track the chirality components selected by the field, not merely the projected magnetization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports neutron diffraction and magnetotransport measurements on the breathing kagome compound Dy3Ru4Al12. It identifies three field-induced magnetic phases: phase I with a vanishing global scalar spin chirality, and phases II and III with non-coplanar spin trimers carrying nonzero net chirality. Using single-crystal neutron refinements, the authors determine the magnetic structures and extract local chirality values χ0 ≈ 0.17 and χ'0 ≈ 0.23. Hall measurements show a large anomalous Hall conductivity that becomes nonzero in phases II and III and vanishes in phase I, with a step-like field dependence and a sharp rise in temperature at the phase-II/III boundary. The authors attribute this to a real-space Berry-phase (geometrical) Hall effect and support this with a semi-quantitative comparison: since σ_A_xy ∝ p χ_tot and p ∝ M, the ratio between phases III and II is predicted to be ~3.8, close to the observed ratio.

Significance. If the chirality attribution holds, this is a compelling demonstration of a geometrical Hall effect arising from tunable spin trimers, with the unusual feature that the local chirality can be switched by an external magnetic field and is determined independently by neutron diffraction. The main strengths are the direct neutron refinement of the chirality-bearing structures, the clean internal check that σ_A_xy = 0 in phase I, and the fact that the transport and neutron results are compared through a theoretical scaling relation rather than fitted to each other. The paper also discusses and partially rules out extrinsic and momentum-space mechanisms using the temperature dependence of σ_A_xy relative to M(T). The quantitative comparison is, however, sensitive to the normal Hall background subtraction and to the quality of the phase-III refinement, which are the points addressed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplement VI, Eq. (3)] The isolation of the anomalous Hall conductivity rests on subtracting the normal Hall resistivity measured at 300 K from the low-temperature data, ρA_yx = ρ_yx − ρ_N_yx(300 K). The authors themselves state in Supplement VI that a small carrier pocket with μ ≈ 300–800 cm^2/(V s) causes σ_N_xy to bend already at T ≥ 10 K, and that 'it cannot be excluded that μ increases in magnitude below the transition to long-range order (~5 K). The strong bending of σ_xy(T = 2.5 K, H) may be at least partially due to σ_N_xy.' Because the same background is subtracted for both phases II and III, the step-like features in σ_A_xy(H) and the sharp rise in σ_A_xy(T) at 9 T could be partly normal-Hall artifacts rather than pure chirality signals. The phase-I null of σ_A_xy is a useful consistency check, but it only constrains the combined subtraction in one low-field regime; it does not establish that the normal Hall coefficient is field- and temperature-independent across phases II and III. The quantitative ratio ~3.8 therefore inherits this uncertainty. I request a quantitative estimate of the normal Hall contribution in phases II and III, e.g., by fitting the two-band model to the low-temperature data or by propagating the uncertainty in μ through the subtraction, and a discussion of how the conclusions would change under a field-dependent normal Hall term.
  2. [Main text, Fig. 2 and semi-quantitative comparison] The predicted ratio σ_A_xy(III)/σ_A_xy(II) ≈ 3.8 rests on the refined chirality values χ_0 ≈ 0.17 and χ'_0 ≈ 0.23 together with the assumption that the geometrical weights of the nearest-neighbor trimers and the second-neighbor triangles are 'dominant and comparable.' The phase-II refinement is good (R_f2 = 15.6%), but the phase-III refinement has R_f2 = 25.9% (Supplement III), and no error bars are given for χ_0 or χ'_0. Since the chirality in phase III is derived from the in-plane spin components that are reoriented from all-in-all-out to tangential, a 26% R-factor leaves substantial room for alternative structures with different χ'_0. In addition, the 'dominant and comparable' weighting is an ad-hoc assumption that is not derived from the band structure or the coupling strength. Please provide the refined moment directions with uncertainties, propagate them to χ_tot for both phases, and test the sensitivity of the predicted ratio to the assumed geometrical weights.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'wavefuntion' in the abstract should be 'wavefunction'.
  2. [Main text, concluding paragraph] 'Our works provide' should be 'Our work provides'.
  3. [Supplement V] 'Anistropic couplings' should be 'anisotropic couplings', and 'the magntic properties' should be 'the magnetic properties'.
  4. [Fig. 1c] The tick labels '73 50' on the vertical axis are unclear; please add explicit axis labels and units.
  5. [Main text, concluding paragraph] Given the subtraction uncertainty discussed in Supplement VI, the phrase 'unambiguous illustration' is too strong; consider softening it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chirality-Hall comparison uses independent neutron, magnetization, and transport inputs with an external theoretical scaling relation.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claim is the semi-quantitative comparison of the anomalous Hall conductivity ratio between phases III and II (about 3.8) with the product of the magnetization ratio (2.7) and the ratio of total scalar spin chirality (chi'_0/chi_0 ~ 1.4) obtained from independent neutron refinements. No parameter is fitted to the Hall ratio; the scaling sigma_A_xy proportional to p chi_tot is taken from the independent theoretical references [10,11]. The magnetic structures, with their local and global chirality values, are refined from neutron diffraction data; the Hall signal comes from magnetotransport. The normal-Hall background subtraction (Supplement Eq. 3) uses the 300 K linear slope, and the phase-I sigma_A = 0 result is presented as a sanity check rather than as an input that defines the anomalous signal. Supplement VI does contain a genuine limitation statement: 'From our data, it cannot be excluded that mu increases in magnitude below the transition to long-range order (~5 K). The strong bending of sigma_xy(T = 2.5 K, H) may be at least partially due to sigma_N_xy.' This is a robustness/correctness caveat about isolating the anomalous Hall term, not a circular reduction of the chirality claim to its own inputs. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 14, 33, 34, S7) are contextual or comparative and are not load-bearing for the central derivation. Therefore no circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on refined magnetic structure parameters, a weak-coupling scaling law from prior theory, and a normal Hall subtraction convention. No new particles, forces, or geometric entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Refined ordered Dy moment magnitudes and canting angles = 6.5(5), 9.3(5), 8.9(3) mu_B and tilts 26(1), 28(1), 35(1) degrees for phases I, II, III
    Determined by FullProf refinement of neutron intensities; these values set the spin configurations used to compute chi_0 and chi'_0.
  • Local chirality magnitudes chi_0 and chi'_0 = chi_0 about 0.17, chi'_0 about 0.23 per unit spin
    Derived from the refined spin configurations, not independently measured; they enter the predicted Hall ratio between phases II and III.
  • Composite Ising couplings J'_1 and J'_2 = J'_1 = 0.38 K, J'_2 = J'_1/10 = 0.038 K
    Used in the Supplemental Monte Carlo simulation to reproduce the phase sequence; not central to the Hall effect claim.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The anomalous Hall conductivity from scalar spin chirality obeys sigma_A_xy proportional to p times chi_tot in the weak-coupling regime.
    Based on Tatara-Kawamura and Onoda et al. references [10,11]; assumed throughout the semi-quantitative comparison.
  • domain assumption The conduction electron spin polarization p is proportional to the net magnetization M.
    Used to convert the measured magnetization ratio into the predicted Hall conductivity ratio.
  • ad hoc to paper The geometrical weights of nearest-neighbor trimers and second-neighbor triangles are dominant and comparable.
    Introduced specifically to estimate chi_tot in phases II and III; the paper states this as an assumption, not a derived result.
  • domain assumption The normal Hall resistivity at low temperature is the same as the 300 K linear slope.
    Entered in Supplemental Eq. (3) as rho_A_yx = rho_yx - rho_N_yx(300 K); needed to isolate the anomalous Hall conductivity.
  • domain assumption Spin trimers remain rigid and can be treated as composite Ising spins in the phase diagram modeling.
    Used in Supplemental Section IV to explain the metamagnetic transitions; supports the phase interpretation but is not central to the Hall measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ordering phenomena of spin trimers accompanied by large geometrical Hall effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V2KTWZQW

@misc{pith2026190807728,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ordering phenomena of spin trimers accompanied by large geometrical Hall effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V2KTWZQW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07728}
}
abstract

The wavefuntion of conduction electrons moving in the background of a non-coplanar spin structure can gain a quantal phase - Berry phase - as if the electrons were moving in a strong fictitious magnetic field. Such an emergent magnetic field effect is approximately proportional to the solid angle subtended by the spin moments on three neighbouring spin sites, termed the scalar spin chirality. The entire spin chirality of the crystal, unless macroscopically canceled, causes the geometrical Hall effect of real-space Berry-phase origin, whereas the intrinsic anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in a conventional metallic ferromagnet is of the momentum-space Berry-phase origin induced by relativistic spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Here, we report the ordering phenomena of the spin-trimer scalar spin chirality and the consequent large geometrical Hall effect in the breathing kagom\'e lattice compound Dy$_3$Ru$_4$Al$_{12}$, where the Dy$^{3+}$ moments form non-coplanar spin trimers with local spin chirality. Using neutron diffraction, we show that the local spin chirality of the spin trimers as well as its ferroic/antiferroic orders can be switched by an external magnetic field, accompanying large changes in the geometrical Hall effect. Our finding reveals that systems composed of tunable spin trimers can be a fertile field to explore large emergent electromagnetic responses arising from real-space topological magnetic orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07728 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (color online). (a) Crystal structure of Dy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (color online). (a) Magnetic structure of phase I with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (color online). (a,b) Anomalous Hall conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    Tokura, M

    Y. Tokura, M. Kawasaki, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent functions of quantum materials, Nat. Phys. 13, 1056 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Z. Fang, N. Nagaosa, K. S. Takahashi, A. Asamitsu, R. Mathieu, T. Ogasawara, H. Yamada, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, and K. Terakura, The anomalous Hall effect and magnetic monopoles in momentum space, Science 302, 92 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-s. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First principles calculation of anomalous Hall conductivity in ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 037204 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    J. Ye, Y. B. Kim, A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, P. Majum- dar, and Z. Teˇ sanovi´ c, Berry phase theory of the anoma- lous Hall effect: Application to colossal magnetoresis- tance manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3737 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Ohgushi, S

    K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Spin anisotropy and quantum Hall effect in the kagom lattice: Chiral spin state based on a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 62, R6065 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Shindou and N

    R. Shindou and N. Nagaosa, Orbital ferromagnetism and anomalous hall effect in antiferromagnets on the dis- torted fcc lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 116801 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Tatara and H

    G. Tatara and H. Kawamura, Chirality-driven anomalous Hall effect in weak coupling regime, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 71, 2613 (2002)

    2002

  3. [11]

    Onoda, G

    M. Onoda, G. Tatara, and N. Nagaosa, Anomalous Hall effect and skyrmion number in real and momentum spaces, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 73, 2624 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    See Supplemental Materials for details on the sam- ple preparation and characterizations, refinements of the neutron diffraction datasets, magneto-transport experi- ments, and discussions on the phase transition and the spin-trimer stability

  5. [13]

    P. Matl, N. P. Ong, Y. F. Yan, Y. Q. Li, D. Studebaker, T. Baum, and G. Doubinina, Hall effect of the colos- sal magnetoresistance manganite La1−xCaxMnO3, Phys. Rev. B 57, 10248 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Taguchi, Y

    Y. Taguchi, Y. Oohara, H. Yoshizawa, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet, Science 291, 2573 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Grohol, K

    D. Grohol, K. Matan, J.-H. Cho, S.-H. Lee, J. W. Lynn, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Spin chirality on a two- dimensional frustrated lattice, Nat. Mater. 4, 323 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Takatsu, S

    H. Takatsu, S. Yonezawa, S. Fujimoto, and Y. Maeno, Unconventional anomalous Hall effect in the metallic triangular-lattice magnet PdCrO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 137201 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Machida, S

    Y. Machida, S. Nakatsuji, S. Onoda, T. Tayama, and T. Sakakibara, Time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect without magnetic dipole order, Nature 463, 210 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Shiomi, M

    Y. Shiomi, M. Mochizuki, Y. Kaneko, and Y. Tokura, Hall effect of spin-chirality origin in a triangular-lattice helimagnet Fe1.3Sn, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 056601 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Ueland, C

    B. Ueland, C. Miclea, Y. Kato, O. AyalaValenzuela, R. McDonald, R. Okazaki, P. Tobash, M. Torrez, F. Ron- ning, R. Movshovich, Z. Fisk, E. Bauer, I. Martin, and J. Thompson, Controllable chirality-induced geometrical Hall effect in a frustrated highly correlated metal, Nat. Com...

    2012

  12. [20]

    Srgers, G

    C. Srgers, G. Fischer, P. Winkel, and H. v. Lhneysen, Large topological Hall effect in the non-collinear phase of an antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 5, 3400 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    J. N. Reimers and A. J. Berlinsky, Order by disorder in the classical Heisenberg kagom´ e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 48, 9539 (1993)

    1993

  14. [22]

    Elhajal, B

    M. Elhajal, B. Canals, and C. Lacroix, Symmetry break- ing due to Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interactions in the kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 014422 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    Essafi, O

    K. Essafi, O. Benton, and L. D. C. Jaubert, Generic nearest-neighbor kagome model: XYZ and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya couplings with comparison to the pyrochlore-lattice case, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205126 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky, Field-induced transitions in a kagom´ e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057204 (2002)

    2002

  17. [25]

    D. I. Gorbunov, M. S. Henriques, A. V. Andreev, A. Gukasov, V. Petˇ r´ ıˇ cek, N. V. Baranov, Y. Skourski, V. Eigner, M. Paukov, J. Prokleˇ ska, and A. P. Gon¸ calves, Electronic properties of a distorted kagome lattice an- tiferromagnet Dy 3Ru4Al12, Phys. Rev. B 90, 094405 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Ishii, T

    I. Ishii, T. Mizuno, K. Takezawa, S. Kumano, Y. Kawamoto, T. Suzuki, D. I. Gorbunov, M. S. Henriques, and A. V. Andreev, Magnetic-field-induced quadrupolar ordering and the crystal electric field ef- fect in the distorted kagome lattice antiferromagnet Dy3Ru4Al12, Phys. Rev. B 9...

    2018

  19. [27]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum trans- port theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165103 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Manyala, Y

    N. Manyala, Y. Sidis, J. F. DiTusa, G. Aeppli, D. P. Young, and Z. Fisk, Large anomalous Hall effect in a silicon-based magnetic semiconductor, Nat. Mater.3, 255 (2004)

    2004

  21. [29]

    Miyasato, N

    T. Miyasato, N. Abe, T. Fujii, A. Asamitsu, S. Onoda, Y. Onose, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Crossover behav- ior of the anomalous Hall effect and anomalous Nernst effect in itinerant ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 086602 (2007). 6

    2007

  22. [30]

    M. Lee, W. Kang, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, and N. P. Ong, Unusual Hall effect anomaly in MnSi under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186601 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    R. Ritz, M. Halder, M. Wagner, C. Franz, A. Bauer, and C. Pfleiderer, Formation of a topological non-Fermi liquid in MnSi, Nature 497, 231 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nat Nano 8, 899 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Kurumaji, T

    T. Kurumaji, T. Nakajima, M. Hirschberger, A. Kikkawa, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, Y. Taguchi, T.-h. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological hall effect in a frus- trated triangular-lattice magnet, Science 10.1126/sci- ence.aau0968 (2019)

    2019 doi

  26. [35]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  27. [36]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  28. [37]

    A. K. Nayak, J. E. Fischer, Y. Sun, B. Yan, J. Karel, A. C. Komarek, C. Shekhar, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, J. K¨ ubler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Large anoma- lous Hal effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn 3Ge, Sci. Adv. 2, e15...

    2016

  29. [38]

    Liu and L

    J. Liu and L. Balents, Anomalous Hall effect and topo- logical defects in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetals: Mn3Sn/Ge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 087202 (2017) . 7 Ordering phenomena of spin trimers accompanied by large geometrical Hall effect Supplementary Information I. CRYSTAL GRO...

    2017

  30. [39]

    Specifically, as is shown in Fig. S6, when J′ 2/J′ 1 < 0.2, an intermediate phase with q′ =(1/3 1/3) emerges as we observed in phase II of Dy 3Ru4Al12, after which the system crosses a double- q phase with q′ =(1/2 0) and (0 1/2), before finally settling in the fully polarized p...

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.