Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Constraining Counterexamples in Hybrid System Falsification: Penalty-Based Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.05107 v2 pith:V2WZA6FD submitted 2020-01-15 eess.SY cs.SY

Constraining Counterexamples in Hybrid System Falsification: Penalty-Based Approaches

classification eess.SY cs.SY
keywords falsificationapproachesinputhybridpracticalsystemsaddressingalternative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Falsification of hybrid systems is attracting ever-growing attention in quality assurance of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) as a practical alternative to exhaustive formal verification. In falsification, one searches for a falsifying input that drives a given black-box model to output an undesired signal. In this paper, we identify input constraints---such as the constraint "the throttle and brake pedals should not pressed simultaneously" for an automotive powertrain model---as a key factor for the practical value of falsification methods. We propose three approaches for systematically addressing input constraints in optimization-based falsification, two among which come from the lexicographic method studied in the context of constrained multi-objective optimization. Our experiments show the approaches' effectiveness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.