Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Safe Legged Locomotion using Collision Cone Control Barrier Functions (C3BFs)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.01898 v3 pith:V3IJ7GKA submitted 2023-09-05 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords robotscollisionleggedbarrierc3bfconecontroldynamic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Legged robots exhibit significant potential across diverse applications, including but not limited to hazardous environment search and rescue missions and the exploration of unexplored regions both on Earth and in outer space. However, the successful navigation of these robots in dynamic environments heavily hinges on the implementation of efficient collision avoidance techniques. In this research paper, we employ Collision Cone Control Barrier Functions (C3BF) to ensure the secure movement of legged robots within environments featuring a wide array of static and dynamic obstacles. We introduce the Quadratic Program (QP) formulation of C3BF, referred to as C3BF-QP, which serves as a protective filter layer atop a reference controller to ensure the robots' safety during operation. The effectiveness of this approach is illustrated through simulations conducted on PyBullet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CPED-NCBFs: A Conformal Prediction for Expert Demonstration-based Neural Control Barrier Functions

    cs.RO 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    CPED-NCBF uses split-conformal prediction to set safety margins in neural CBFs learned from expert demonstrations, improving simulated safety rates, but the guarantee is weakened by retraining after calibration.

Pith tools