Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Deriving Tsallis entropy from non-extensive Hamiltonian within a statistical mechanics framework

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the thermodynamic entropy of a canonical ensemble built on the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q is exactly the Tsallis entropy, so the parameter q measures the intrinsic non-extensivity of the system.

desk verdict The derivation collapses at Eq. (6.4): the inversion of the effective density gives ln_q(σ^{1/q}), not ln_q σ, and the key temperature relation is imported, so the Tsallis entropy is not derived from first principles. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16757 v2 pith:V3J6OULX submitted 2024-11-24 cond-mat.stat-mech

Paradon Krisut , Sikarin Yoo-Kong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B0582B3082B03 PACS 05.20.-y05.70.-a05.90.+m
keywords Tsallisentropynon-extensiveHamiltonianq-deformedstatisticalmechanicsderivationq-algebrathermodynamicsentropicindexqcanonicalensemble
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Tsallis entropy, the best-known non-additive generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy, can be derived from first principles by building a canonical ensemble on the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q = γ/(1-q)[$e^{{(1-q)H_N/γ}}$ - 1]. The derivation uses q-algebra throughout, so the non-extensivity of the entropy follows from the non-extensivity of the Hamiltonian rather than being put in by hand. The result is the identity S_q = T_q, with the parameter q reinterpreted as an intrinsic degree of non-extensivity of the thermodynamic system, not a measure of correlation. If true, this gives Tsallis statistics a first-principles statistical-mechanical foundation and makes q a physical parameter of the energy function.

What carries the argument

The central object is the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q = γ/(1-q)[$e^{{(1-q)H_N/γ}}$ - 1], which inherits the pseudo-additive composition rule $H^{{12}}$_q = $H^{1}$_q ⊕_q $H^{2}$_q, mirroring the pseudo-additivity of Tsallis entropy. The argument is carried by the q-algebra — q-sum ⊕_q, q-difference ⊖_q, q-exponential e^x_q, q-logarithm ln_q x, q-derivative and q-Dirac delta — which replaces ordinary algebra in the phase-space density, the partition function, the thermodynamic potentials, and the derivation of the entropy itself.

What would settle it

Take an ideal gas with N particles whose microscopic Hamiltonian is known to be the standard additive H_N = Σ p_i²/2m. Compute the canonical-ensemble energy distribution and heat capacity from the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q and compare with high-precision measurements. Observing Boltzmann-Gibbs weights $e^{{-βH_N}}$ and additive internal energies at the accuracy of the experiment, rather than the q-deformed distribution $e_q^{{-β_q H_q}}$ with the non-additive rule of Eq. (5.31), would falsify the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, starting only from the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q = γ/(1-q)[$e^{{(1-q)H_N/γ}}$ - 1] and the canonical-ensemble assumption, the thermodynamic entropy computed through the first and second laws is exactly the Tsallis entropy S_q = -k(1 - Σ p_i^q)/(1-q). Along the way the authors construct a phase-space density matrix for the microcanonical and canonical ensembles using q-Dirac delta functions and q-convolution, define a q-deformed inverse temperature β_q, and show that thermal equilibrium is characterized by $β_q^{1}$ = $β_q^{2}$. A consistent internal energy requires an 'effective' phase-space density obtained by q-power normalization, equivalent to the escort probability of Tsallis statistics. With that density, the entropy reduces to the Tsallis form without any prior assumption of the entropy's functional form.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the physical Hamiltonian of a real system is the q-deformed H_q = γ/(1-q)[$e^{{(1-q)H_N/γ}}$ - 1], so that energy is fundamentally non-additive; the paper offers no independent evidence that any actual system is governed by H_q rather than the standard additive Hamiltonian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Internal energy and Helmholtz free energy computed from the q-deformed Hamiltonian are non-additive and satisfy the same pseudo-additive rule as the Tsallis entropy, with γ playing the role of kT.
  • The parameter q becomes a measurable intrinsic property of the system's energy function: q=1 is the extensive (Boltzmann-Gibbs) limit, and q=0 gives maximal non-extensivity.
  • The derivation avoids the 'imperfect reservoir' restrictions that arise when Tsallis entropy is combined with a standard Hamiltonian, because the reservoir is treated as perfect in the q-sense.
  • Thermal equilibrium between two subsystems holds when their q-deformed β_q parameters are equal, generalizing the standard condition β_1 = β_2.
  • If H_q is the correct energy function, then standard thermodynamic identities hold in q-deformed form and all thermodynamic potentials inherit non-extensivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the paper's own note that the q=-1 case reproduces the relativistic energy-momentum relation written with a q-exponential suggests a testable extension asking whether systems governed by H_q with q=-1 exhibit relativistic-like energy composition.
  • Editorial inference: because the derivation reinterprets q as a property of the Hamiltonian rather than of correlations, applications that currently use q as an ad hoc correlation index in plasma or black-hole entropy contexts would need to be re-examined for consistency.
  • Editorial inference: a concrete experimental route would be to measure the energy distribution and heat capacity of a system with a known additive Hamiltonian and compare with the q-deformed predictions; deviations would indicate whether the non-extensive Hamiltonian is realized.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. Krisut and Yoo-Kong claim to derive Tsallis entropy from first principles by constructing canonical ensembles with the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q = γ/(1-q)[e^{(1-q)H_N/γ} - 1]. They build microcanonical and canonical phase-space densities using q-algebra, define internal energy and Helmholtz free energy, and propose an entropy function from the first and second laws. In Section 6 they conclude, Eq. (6.10), that the thermodynamic entropy equals the Tsallis entropy S_q, with q reinterpreted as the intrinsic degree of non-extensivity. The paper is a formal derivation using q-deformed functions and follows the strategy of Wang's incomplete statistics.

Significance. The paper is clearly organized and uses q-algebra systematically, with several q→1 limits checked. The connection to the multiplicative-Lagrangian program is interesting, and a genuine first-principles derivation of Tsallis entropy would be a notable contribution to nonextensive statistical mechanics. However, the central derivation is not sound as written: Section 6 contains an algebraic inconsistency in inverting the effective density, the key relation β_q = Z̃_q^{1-q}/kT is imported from the Tsallis literature rather than derived, and the final entropy is evaluated with an unnormalized density. The paper therefore does not establish its main claim. It also does not provide machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or independent numerical evidence that would support the formal manipulations.

major comments (5)
  1. [6, Eq. (6.4)] Eq. (6.4) is not obtained by inverting the effective density defined in Eq. (5.13). From σ_q=(e_q^{-β_q H_q}/Z̃_q)^q one has e_q^{-β_q H_q}=Z̃_q σ_q^{1/q}, and taking ln_q yields H_q=-(1/β_q)[ln_q Z̃_q+Z̃_q^{1-q} ln_q(σ_q^{1/q})], not the expression with ln_q ρ̃_q written in Eq. (6.4). If Eq. (6.4) is instead read as expressing H_q in terms of ρ̃_q of Eq. (5.17), then the substitution into the integral B̃ in Eq. (6.3), whose upper limit is ρ̃_q^q, is mismatched. The subsequent algebra leading to Eq. (6.10) is therefore invalid.
  2. [6, Eq. (6.9)] The relation β_q=Z̃_q^{1-q}/kT is imported from Ref. [50] and is not derived from the q-deformed Hamiltonian ensemble of Section 3. This relation is precisely what converts the prefactor in Eq. (6.8) into unity, and it encodes the incomplete-normalization condition ∫ρ̃_q^q dΓ=1. Because this target Tsallis-thermostatistics relation is inserted as an input, the conclusion S_q=T_q is not a first-principles result. The authors need to derive Eq. (6.9) from the canonical density (3.26) or from the definition of temperature in Section 3.
  3. [4.1, Eqs. (4.12)-(4.13); 6, Eq. (6.10)] The candidate entropy is reduced to a prefactor times the Tsallis integral by identifying that integral with T_{q'}; the prefactor is not shown to be unity. In Section 6 the residual term in Eq. (6.10) is discarded 'by choosing C', but C is the integration constant from Eqs. (4.5)/(6.2), and Q and Z̃_q are state functions of β_q. A single universal constant cannot cancel the residual for all equilibrium states. Moreover, T_q in Eq. (6.8) is evaluated with the unnormalized density ρ̃_q (∫ρ̃_q dΓ=Q≠1), so it is not the Tsallis entropy of the physical distribution σ_q=ρ̃_q^q.
  4. [3.3, Eq. (3.22)] The first-order q-Taylor expansion of ln_q Ω_q(E_{12}^q ⊖_q H_1^q) is asserted by analogy with the standard Taylor expansion and is used to derive the canonical density (3.26). No remainder bound, convergence condition, or justification for replacing the q-derivative limit with a finite difference is provided. Since this step is load-bearing for all later results, it must be proved or replaced by a rigorous expansion.
  5. [2, Eq. (2.15)] The paper treats H_q as the physical Hamiltonian of the system, but no independent argument is given that a real system is governed by H_q rather than by H_N. The fact that H_q and H_N yield the same equations of motion shows dynamical equivalence of trajectories, not identity of the physical energy function. Without a concrete system or selection criterion, the canonical ensemble of Section 3 and the entropy claim of Section 6 do not describe an identified physical system.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.1, Eq. (3.3)] The denominator contains H_{2q}/γ; this should be H_2^q/γ, the q-deformed Hamiltonian of subsystem 2.
  2. [4.1, Eq. (4.12)] The replacement q'=2-q is not applied consistently to the density ρ, and the notation ln_{2-q'} Z and β_{2-q'} is hard to follow; please define the domain of q' and use a separate symbol for the transformed density.
  3. [5.2, Eq. (5.20)] The factor (1-q)/(1-q) in Eq. (5.20) should be omitted; as printed it is a typographical artifact.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.5); Section 7] The q-Dirac delta (A.5) is defined for 1≤q<2, while the relativistic example in Section 7 uses q=-1; the range of q used in the final interpretation is not reconciled with this restriction.
  5. [Throughout] Eq. (6.10) and the abstract contain 'Tasllis'; the abstract and Section 7 contain 'inheritly'; please proofread the manuscript.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Final equality S_q=T_q is assembled from imported incomplete-statistics relations and a freely chosen integration constant, so the target entropy is an input rather than a derived output.

  1. other [Section 5.1, Eqs. (5.11)-(5.14)]
    "Consequently, a new phase space density matrix σq is given by σq = ( e −β qHq q ˜Zq ) q . (5.13) The above procedure was proposed in [ 50] for the discrete version with the idea of incomplete normalization and the effective probability condition ∑ i=1 pq i = 1 , q ∈ [0, ∞] . (5.14)"

    The effective density σ_q = (e_q^{-β_q H_q}/Z̃_q)^q = ρ̃_q^q with incomplete normalization ∫ρ̃_q^q dΓ = 1 is not derived from the q-deformed canonical ensemble; it is imported from Wang's incomplete statistics [50]. That normalization and escort structure are constitutive elements of Tsallis thermostatistics, so the later 'recovery' of Tsallis entropy is unpacking assumed input rather than deriving it.

  2. self definitional [Section 6, Eq. (6.9) and following line]
    "Employing the calculation in [ 50], we have βq = ˜Z 1−q q kT . (6.9) Thus, the first term in the candidate entropy function is again noth ing, but the Tsallis entropy."

    Equation (6.9), taken from [50], is the standard incomplete-statistics/Tsallis relation between inverse temperature and the q-partition function. Substituting it makes the prefactor Z̃_q^{1-q}/(β_q T) exactly 1, so the first term in (6.8) becomes ∫ρ̃_q ln_q(1/ρ̃_q)dΓ = T_q with no remaining dynamical content. The target Tsallis entropy is therefore encoded in the imported relation, and the claimed 'perfect match' at (6.10) is guaranteed before any ensemble average is evaluated.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self definitional [Section 6, after Eq. (6.10)]
    "Here, we can choose the constant C to eliminate the second term as we did in the previous derivation. Therefore, the candidate entropy function is perfectly the Tasllis entropy Sq = Tq."

    The remainder discarded by 'choosing C' contains Z̃_q and Q = ∫ρ̃_q dΓ, both state functions of β_q; C is the fixed integration constant from Eq. (6.2)/(4.5) and cannot cancel such terms for all equilibrium states. Eliminating the second term by flat is equivalent to defining S_q to be the first term, i.e., defining S_q = T_q by construction rather than obtaining it from the preceding derivation.

full rationale

The paper's q-deformed Hamiltonian premise is an assumption, but it is not itself circular: H_q is explicitly defined and Legendre-derived in Section 2, and the paper does not merely rename Tsallis entropy. The self-citations [38]-[40] supply the multiplicative-Lagrangian program, but the in-paper construction of H_q means the central entropy claim does not rest on an unverified self-citation. The circularity is concentrated in Section 6. The effective-density normalization (5.14) and the temperature relation (6.9) are both imported from Wang's incomplete statistics [50], a framework whose defining object is Tsallis entropy and its escort normalization. Once (6.9) is substituted, the prefactor in front of the candidate integral collapses to 1 and the first term is literally T_q; the remaining state-dependent terms are then disposed of by invoking the freedom to choose the integration constant C. A single constant cannot cancel a β-dependent remainder for all equilibrium states, so the final equality S_q = T_q is true by construction, not by derivation. This warrants a score of 7: substantial independent ensemble work exists in Sections 3-5, but the headline entropy result reduces to imported Tsallis-thermostatistics input plus a free constant, and would be circular at the level of its central claim. The paper is not scored 0-2 because the target result is not independently established; it is not scored 8-10 because the q-deformed canonical ensemble and the derived thermodynamic quantities are nontrivial and do not simply restate Tsallis entropy.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the q-deformed Hamiltonian as a physical postulate, on the q-Dirac delta and the q-Taylor expansion, and on imported relations from incomplete statistics [50]. These are the principal items the reader must accept without independent derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • q
    The deformation index entering H_q and the q-exponential/logarithm (Eq. (2.15), (A.1)-(A.2)). It is introduced by hand; the paper gives no empirical fit or measurement, only a proposed reinterpretation.
  • γ
    Energy scale in the q-deformed Hamiltonian (2.15). The paper later identifies it with kT (footnote 3) but initially treats it as a free constant; no independent determination is given.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The physical Hamiltonian of the system is the q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q = γ/(1-q)[e^{(1-q)H_N/γ} - 1] (Eq. (2.15)).
    This is the central postulate, inherited from the multiplicative-Lagrangian program [38,39,40]; the paper provides no independent physical evidence that real systems obey this non-additive energy.
  • ad hoc to paper The q-Dirac delta function (A.5) with 1 ≤ q < 2 defines the microcanonical density (3.7).
    The delta function and its restriction on q are introduced for the construction; no physical justification is given for confining q to [1,2).
  • domain assumption The reservoir is perfect: H_q^1/E_q^12 ≪ 1, and the q-derivative expansion (3.22) approximates ln_q Ω to first order.
    Assumption in Section 3.3; the q-analog of Taylor's theorem is not established, so the truncation is an uncontrolled approximation.
  • domain assumption The incomplete statistics normalization ∫ ρ̃^q dΓ = 1 and the relation β_q = ilde{Z}_q^{1-q}/kT (Eqs. (5.14), (6.9)) are valid.
    These are imported from Wang's incomplete statistics [50] and are not derived in the paper; the final entropy result depends on them.
  • domain assumption The first and second laws of thermodynamics in their standard forms hold for the q-deformed ensemble (Section 4.1).
    Used to identify δQ and to define entropy via δS=δQ/T; this is an assumption about the validity of standard thermodynamics for non-extensive systems.
invented entities (1)
  • q-deformed Hamiltonian H_q
    purpose: Serves as the microscopic energy function whose canonical ensemble is claimed to yield Tsallis entropy.
    Constructed from the q-exponential of the standard Hamiltonian (2.15); no falsifiable prediction or experimental signature distinguishes it from H_N, so it functions as an invented postulate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deriving Tsallis entropy from non-extensive Hamiltonian within a statistical mechanics framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V3J6OULX

@misc{pith2026241116757,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deriving Tsallis entropy from non-extensive Hamiltonian within a statistical mechanics framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V3J6OULX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16757}
}
abstract

The Tsallis entropy, which possesses non-extensive property, is derived from the first principle employing the non-extensive Hamiltonian or the $q$-deformed Hamiltonian with the canonical ensemble assumption in statistical mechanics. Here, the $q$-algebra and properties of $q$-deformed functions are extensively used throughout the derivation. Consequently, the thermodynamic quantities, e.g. internal energy and Helmholtz free energy, are derived and they inheritly exhibit the non-extensiveness. From this intriguing connection between Tasllis entropy and the $q$-deformed Hamiltonian, the parameter $q$ encapsulates the intrinsic degree of non-extensivity for the thermodynamic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16757 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An isolated system composed of subsystems 1 and 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [50]

    Q. A. Wang. Incomplete statistics: nonextensive generalizatio ns of statistical mechanics. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 12(8):1431–1437, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [1]

    C. Tsallis. Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics. J. Stat. Phys. , 52:479–487, 1988

    work page 1988

  3. [2]

    E. T. Jaynes. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. , 106:620–630, 1957

    work page 1957

  4. [3]

    Taruya and M

    A. Taruya and M. Sakagami. Gravothermal catastrophe and Ts allis’ generalized entropy of self- gravitating systems (iii): Quasi-equilibrium structure using normalize d q-values. Physica A , 322:285–312, 2003

    work page 2003

  5. [4]

    J. Du. Nonextensivity and the power-law distributions for the sy stems with self-gravitating long- range interactions. Astrophys. Space Sci. , 312(1):47–55, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [5]

    C. Tsallis. The nonadditive entropy Sq and its applications in physics and elsewhere: Some remarks. Entropy, 13(10):1765–1804, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [6]

    A. R. Plastino and A. Plastino. Tsallis entropy and the Vlasov-Poiss on equations. Braz. J. Phys. , 29(1):79–90, 1999

    work page 1999

  8. [7]

    J. Du. Nonextensivity in nonequilibrium plasma systems with Coulomb ian long-range interactions. Phys. Lett. A , 329(4):262–267, 2004

    work page 2004

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    Campa, P

    A. Campa, P. H. Chavanis, A. Giansanti, and G. Morelli. Dynamical p hase transitions in long- range Hamiltonian systems and Tsallis distributions with a time-depend ent index. Phys. Rev. E , 78:040102, 2008

    2008

  2. [9]

    Livadiotis and D

    G. Livadiotis and D. J. McComas. Exploring transitions of space pla smas out of equilibrium. Astrophys. J. , 714(1):971, 2010

    2010

  3. [10]

    G. P. Pavlos, A. C. Iliopoulos, G. N. Zastenker, L. M. Zelenyi, L. P. Karakatsanis, M. O. Riazant- seva, M. N. Xenakis, and E. G. Pavlos. Tsallis non-extensive statist ics and solar wind plasma complexity. Physica A , 422:113–135, 2015

    2015

  4. [11]

    P. H. Yoon. Thermodynamic, non-extensive, or turbulent qua si-equilibrium for the space plasma environment. Entropy, 21(9):820, 2019

    2019

  5. [12]

    M. P. de Almeida. Generalized entropy and the Hamiltonian struct ure of statistical mechanics. In Variational and Extremum Principles in Macroscopic System s. Elsevier, Oxford, 2005

    2005

  6. [13]

    Martinez, A.R

    S. Martinez, A.R. Plastino, and A. Plastino. Nonlinear Fokker–Pla nck equations and generalized entropies. Physica A , 259(1):183–201, 1998

    1998

  7. [14]

    Prehl, C

    J. Prehl, C. Essex, and K. H. Hoffmann. Tsallis relative entropy a nd anomalous diffusion. Entropy, 14(4):701–716, 2012

    2012

  8. [15]

    M. S. Ribeiro, F. D. Nobre, and E. M. F. Curado. Classes of n-dim ensional nonlinear Fokker- Planck equations associated to Tsallis entropy. Entropy, 13(11):1928–1944, 2011

    1928

  9. [16]

    Tsallis, S

    C. Tsallis, S. Lloyd, and M. Baranger. Peres criterion for separ ability through nonextensive entropy. Phys. Rev. A , 63:042104, 2001

    2001

  10. [17]

    S. Abe. Nonadditive conditional entropy and its significance for local realism. Physica A , 289(1):157–164, 2001

    2001

  11. [18]

    Canosa and R

    N. Canosa and R. Rossignoli. Generalized nonadditive entropies a nd quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 88:170401, 2002. 19

    2002

  12. [19]

    Canosa and R

    N. Canosa and R. Rossignoli. General non-additive entropic for ms and the inference of quantum density operators. Physica A , 348:121–130, 2005

    2005

  13. [20]

    Khordad and H

    R. Khordad and H. R. Rastegar Sedehi. Application of non-exte nsive entropy to study of de- coherence of RbCl quantum dot qubit: Tsallis entropy. Superlattices Microstruct., 101:559–566, 2017

    2017

  14. [21]

    Zhao and C

    H. Zhao and C. S. Yu. Coherence measure in terms of the Tsallis r elative α entropy. Sci. Rep. , 8(1):299, 2018

    2018

  15. [22]

    J. A. S. Lima and A. Deppman. Tsallis meets Boltzmann: q-index for a finite ideal gas and its thermodynamic limit. Phys. Rev. E , 101:040102, 2020

    2020

  16. [23]

    Tsallis and L

    C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto. Black hole thermodynamical entropy . Eur. Phys. J. C , 73(7):2487, 2013

    2013

  17. [24]

    C. Tsallis. Black hole entropy: A closer look. Entropy, 22(1):17, 2020

    2020

  18. [25]

    G. G. Luciano and A. Sheykhi. Black hole geometrothermodynam ics and critical phenomena: A look from Tsallis entropy-based perspective. Phys. Dark Universe , 42:101319, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    C. Tsallis. Thermodynamical and nonthermodynamical applicatio ns. In Introduction to Nonex- tensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex Worl d. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023

    2023

  20. [27]

    B. M. Boghosian. Thermodynamic description of the relaxation o f two-dimensional turbulence using Tsallis statistics. Phys. Rev. E , 53:4754–4763, 1996

    1996

  21. [28]

    M. O. C´ aceres. Non-Markovian processes with long-range correlations: Fractal dimension analysis. Braz. J. Phys. , 29(1):125–135, 1999

    1999

  22. [29]

    C. Tsallis. Entropic nonextensivity: a possible measure of comple xity. Chaos Solitons Fractals , 13(3):371–391, 2002

    2002

  23. [30]

    C. Castro. On non-extensive statistics, chaos and fractal s trings. Physica A , 347:184–204, 2005

    2005

  24. [31]

    Jakimowicz

    A. Jakimowicz. The role of entropy in the development of econom ics. Entropy, 22(4):452, 2020

    2020

  25. [32]

    C. Tsallis. Nonadditive entropy: The concept and its use. Eur. Phys. J. A , 40(3):257, 2009

    2009

  26. [33]

    Hanel and S

    R. Hanel and S. Thurner. Derivation of power-law distributions within standard statistical me- chanics. Physica A , 351(2):260–268, 2005

    2005

  27. [34]

    J. S. Kim. Tsallis entropy, q-expectation value, and constraints on three-party quantum co rrela- tions. Phys. Rev. A , 100:032327, 2019

    2019

  28. [35]

    R. Wang, S. Nganso Djanteng, A. Ei Kaabouchi, and Q. A. Wang . Investigation of an energy nonadditivity for nonextensive systems. Chin. Sci. Bull. , 56(34):3661–3665, 2011

    2011

  29. [36]

    C. Ou, W. Li, J. Du, F. Tsobnang, J. Chen, A. Le M´ ehaut´ e, an d Q. A. Wang. Possible canonical distributions for finite systems with nonadditive energy. Physica A , 387(23):5761–5767, 2008

    2008

  30. [37]

    Jiang, R

    J. Jiang, R. Wang, Y. Lysogorskii, D. Zvezdov, D. Tayurskii, an d Q. A. Wang. An equilibrium thermostatistics of a nonextensive finite system: Canonical distr ibution and entropy. Physica A , 391(11):3140–3150, 2012

    2012

  31. [38]

    Surawuttinack, S

    K. Surawuttinack, S. Yoo-Kong, and M. Tanasittikosol. On the multiplicative form of the La- grangian. Theor. Math. Phys. , 189:1693–1711, 2015

    2015

  32. [39]

    Supanyo, M

    S. Supanyo, M. Tanasittikosol, and S. Yoo-Kong. Natural TeV cutoff of the Higgs field from a multiplicative Lagrangian. Phys. Rev. D , 106:035020, 2022

    2022

  33. [40]

    Supanyo, C

    S. Supanyo, C. Hasuwannakit, S. Yoo-Kong, L. Tannukij, and M. Tanasittikosol. Neutrino mass mechanisms from a nonstandard Higgs Lagrangian and implicatio ns for flavor hierarchies. arXiv:2312.16587v3, 2024. 20

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Plastino and A

    A.R. Plastino and A. Plastino. From Gibbs microcanonical ensemble to Tsallis generalized canon- ical distribution. Phys. Lett. A , 193(2):140–143, 1994

    1994

  35. [42]

    A.S. Parvan. Microcanonical ensemble extensive thermodynam ics of Tsallis statistics. Phys. Lett. A, 350(5):331–338, 2006

    2006

  36. [43]

    M. Marino. A generalized thermodynamics for power-law statist ics. Physica A , 386(1):135–154, 2007

    2007

  37. [44]

    X. Gao, E. Gallicchio, and A. E. Roitberg. The generalized Boltzma nn distribution is the only distribution in which the Gibbs-Shannon entropy equals the thermod ynamic entropy. J. Chem. Phys., 151(3):034113, 2019

    2019

  38. [45]

    M. P. Almeida. Generalized entropies from first principles. Physica A , 300(3):424–432, 2001

    2001

  39. [46]

    R. H. Swendsen. Ensembles in classical statistical mechanics. I n An Introduction to Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics . Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012

    2012

  40. [47]

    F. Schwabl. Equilibrium ensembles. In Statistical Mechanics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

    2006

  41. [48]

    E. M. F. Curado and C. Tsallis. Generalized statistical mechanics : Connection with thermody- namics. J. Phys. A , 24(2):L69, 1991

    1991

  42. [49]

    E. M. F. Curado and C. Tsallis. Generalized statistical mechanics : Connection with thermody- namics. J. Phys. A , 25(4):1019, 1992

    1992

  43. [51]

    Tsallis, R

    C. Tsallis, R. S. Mendes, and A. R. Plastino. The role of constrain ts within generalized nonex- tensive statistics. Physica A , 261(3):534–554, 1998

    1998

  44. [52]

    Q. A. Wang. Power law distribution of R´ enyi entropy for equilibr ium systems having nonadditive energy. HAL Preprint , v1, 2003

    2003

  45. [53]

    C. Tsallis. Generalizing what we learnt: Nonextensive statistical mechanics. In Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Comp lex World . Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Christodoulidi, C

    H. Christodoulidi, C. Tsallis, and T. Bountis. Fermi-pasta-ulam mo del with long-range interac- tions: Dynamics and thermostatistics. Europhysics Letters, 108(4):40006, 2014

    2014

  47. [55]

    Generalized maxi- mum entropy approach to quasistationary states in long-range sy stems

    Gabriele Martelloni, Gianluca Martelloni, Pierre de Buyl, and Duccio F anelli. Generalized maxi- mum entropy approach to quasistationary states in long-range sy stems. Phys. Rev. E , 93:022107, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    Sensitivity to initial c onditions of a d-dimensional long- range-interacting quartic fermi-pasta-ulam model: Universal sca ling

    Debarshee Bagchi and Constantino Tsallis. Sensitivity to initial c onditions of a d-dimensional long- range-interacting quartic fermi-pasta-ulam model: Universal sca ling. Phys. Rev. E , 93:062213, 2016

    2016

  49. [57]

    Dynamics and statistics of the fermi–pasta–ulam β -model with different ranges of particle interactions

    Helen Christodoulidi, Tassos Bountis, Constantino Tsallis, and La mbros Drossos. Dynamics and statistics of the fermi–pasta–ulam β -model with different ranges of particle interactions. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2016(12):123206, 2016

    2016

  50. [58]

    The world of long-range intera ctions: A bird’s eye view

    Shamik Gupta and Stefano Ruffo. The world of long-range intera ctions: A bird’s eye view. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 32(09):1741018, 2017

    2017

  51. [59]

    Fermi–pasta–ulam– tsingou problems: Passage from boltzmann to q-statistics

    Debarshee Bagchi and Constantino Tsallis. Fermi–pasta–ulam– tsingou problems: Passage from boltzmann to q-statistics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 491:869–873, 2018

    2018

  52. [60]

    L. J. L. Cirto, A. Rodr ´ ıguez, F. D. Nobre, and C. Tsallis. Validity and failure of the Boltzmann weight. Europhys. Lett., 123(3):30003, 2018. 21

    2018

  53. [61]

    Nonextensive e ffects on qcd chiral phase tran- sition with a chiral chemical potential*

    Ya-Peng Zhao, Shu-Yu Zuo, and Cheng-Ming Li. Nonextensive e ffects on qcd chiral phase tran- sition with a chiral chemical potential*. Chinese Physics C , 46(10):103107, 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Nonextensive effects on qcd chiral phase diagram and baryon-number fluctuations within polyak ov-nambu-jona-lasinio model*

    Ya-Peng Zhao, Chao-Yong Wang, Shu-Yu Zuo, and Cheng-Ming Li. Nonextensive effects on qcd chiral phase diagram and baryon-number fluctuations within polyak ov-nambu-jona-lasinio model*. Chinese Physics C , 47(5):053103, 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    Nonextensive footprints in dissipative and conservative dyn amical systems

    Antonio Rodr ´ ıguez, Alessandro Pluchino, Ugur Tirnakli, Andrea Rapisarda, and Constantino Tsallis. Nonextensive footprints in dissipative and conservative dyn amical systems. Symmetry, 15(2), 2023

    2023

  56. [64]

    Nobre, and Constantino Tsallis

    Antonio Rodr ´ ıguez, Fernando D. Nobre, and Constantino Tsallis. Criticality in the duration of the quasistationary state of the d-dimensional α -heisenberg ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. E , 110:064131, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Bukaew and S

    W. Bukaew and S. Yoo-Kong. One-parameter generalised Fishe r information matrix: One random variable. Rep. Math. Phys. , 91(1):57–78, 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    Supanyo, M

    S. Supanyo, M. Tanasittikosol, and S. Yoo-Kong. Nonstandar d lagrangians for a real scalar field and a fermion field from the nonuniqueness principle. Theor. Math. Phys. , 221:1695–1710, 2024

    2024

  59. [67]

    Nivanen, A

    L. Nivanen, A. Mehaute, and Q. A. Wang. Generalized algebra wit hin a nonextensive statistics. Rep. Math. Phys. , 52:437–444, 2003

    2003

  60. [68]

    E. P. Borges. A possible deformed algebra and calculus inspired in nonextensive thermostatistics. Physica A , 340(1):95–101, 2004

    2004

  61. [69]

    Jauregui and C

    M. Jauregui and C. Tsallis. New representations of π and Dirac delta using the nonextensive- statistical-mechanics q-exponential function. J. Math. Phys. , 51(6):063304, 2010. 22

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.