Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 127 references

Dynamical analysis of cosmological models in non-minimal scalar non-metricity gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper aims to establish that a single scalar non-metricity cosmology can pass through early inflation, a matter-dominated era, the present acceleration, and a future return to deceleration as one connected phase-space chain.

desk verdict The paper's headline cosmic history is built on spurious x=0 fixed points created by multiplying the system by x^2 without a time reparametrization, so the main claim collapses. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02396 v1 pith:V3M6ITBD submitted 2025-08-04 gr-qc

Bikash Chandra Roy , Bikash Chandra Paul This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83F0583D0585A40 PACS 98.80.-k04.50.Kd95.36.+x
keywords scalarnon-metricitygravitydynamicalsystemanalysisdarkenergymatterinteractionexponentialpotentialnonminimalcouplinglate-timeaccelerationfuturedeceleration
topics Dark EnergyDark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a single cosmological model in scalar non-metricity gravity—a modified gravity in which the geometry is described by non-metricity rather than curvature, with a scalar field coupled directly to it—can account for the full observed expansion history: early inflation, a matter-dominated era, the present accelerated expansion, and a future decelerating phase. The authors study a flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker universe with pressureless dark matter and a scalar field acting as dark energy, with and without an interaction $Q=\eta H\rho_m$, and reduce the field equations to an autonomous system. Stability analysis of the critical points produces a chain $F_1\to F_4\to F_m\to F_c\to F_7$ for $\alpha=0.251$, $\beta=3.442$, $\eta=0.01$, running from a de Sitter point through a stiff-fluid-like decelerating point, a matter-dominated saddle, an accelerating critical surface, and finally a decelerating late-time point. If the chain is real, the model explains the observed timeline of cosmic epochs and predicts that the universe's acceleration need not be eternal, in line with recent baryon-acoustic-oscillation results cited in the paper.

What carries the argument

The engine is the three-dimensional autonomous system built from dimensionless variables $x=\dot{\varphi}/(\sqrt{6}H)$, $y=\sqrt{V}/(\sqrt{3}H)$, and $u=-F(\varphi)$, with parameters $\alpha=-F'/F$ and $\beta=-V'/V$. Because both the potential $V(\varphi)$ and the nonminimal coupling $F(\varphi)$ are taken exponential, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are constants and the system is genuinely autonomous. In the interacting case the original equations contain a term proportional to $\eta\Omega_m/(2x)$; the paper multiplies the whole system by $x^2$ to remove the singularity at $x=0$, then finds the critical points of the multiplied system and classifies them through the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix. The matter-dominated era is associated with the point $F_m$ on the critical surface $F_c$, and the claimed full history is read off as a trajectory through these fixed points.

What would settle it

Recompute the fixed points of the original interacting system (4.5)–(4.7) after an explicit time reparametrization such as $d/d\tau = x^2\, d/dN$; if $(0,0,0)$ is not a saddle fixed point with $\Omega_m=1$, the claimed matter-dominated phase and the chain built on it fail. A complementary check is to fit the model's $q(z)$ and $\omega_{\rm eff}(z)$ to baryon-acoustic-oscillation and supernova data at low redshift; data excluding a transition from acceleration back to deceleration would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the interacting autonomous system admits a new sequence of cosmological epochs that the non-interacting case does not produce. Concretely, with $Q=\eta H\rho_m$ and the parameter choice $\alpha=0.251$, $\beta=3.442$, $\eta=0.01$, the phase flow connects the potential-dominated de Sitter point $F_1$ (early inflation) to the kinetic-dominated point $F_4$ (a decelerating, stiff-fluid-like stage), then to the matter-dominated saddle $F_m$ with $\Omega_m=1$, then along the critical surface $F_c$, and finally to the scaling point $F_7$, which is a near-future decelerating phase with deceleration parameter $q=1/2-\eta/2$ and effective equation-of-state parameter $\omega_{\rm eff}=-\eta/3$. The same analysis also yields late-time accelerating attractors $F_5$ and $F_6$ in the interacting model and a standard $C_1\to C_2\to C_4$ matter-to-dark-energy sequence without interaction. The claimed result is therefore a unified cosmic history produced by one gravitational theory, not a stitching together of separate models.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that multiplying the interacting evolution equations by $x^2$ to remove the $1/x$ term at $x=0$ is a legitimate way to study the fixed points; if that multiplication is not equivalent to a proper reparametrization of the time variable, the matter-dominated point $F_m$—and with it the chain $F_1\to F_4\to F_m\to F_c\to F_7$—may be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the chain is correct, the same exponential scalar non-metricity action with a linear dark-matter–dark-energy interaction describes the full cosmic history without adding a separate mechanism for inflation or for late acceleration.
  • The matter-dominated epoch is a saddle rather than an attractor, so the model naturally makes the matter era a transient stage between an earlier scalar-dominated stage and a later dark-energy-dominated stage.
  • At the late-time point $F_7$ the deceleration parameter is $q=1/2-\eta/2$ and the effective equation-of-state parameter is $\omega_{\rm eff}=-\eta/3$, so for the chosen $\eta=0.01$ the universe ends in a mild deceleration rather than eternal acceleration or a rip.
  • The non-interacting case already gives the standard sequence $C_1\to C_2\to C_4$ (stiff-fluid early state, matter saddle, late accelerating attractor), which shows that the interaction is what adds the early-inflation endpoint and the future-deceleration endpoint.
  • The model's predicted future slowdown is offered as support for recent baryon-acoustic-oscillation data suggesting that dark energy is not a constant vacuum energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • (Editorial inference) The same autonomous-system construction could be repeated for other interaction forms, such as $Q\propto\rho_{\rm DE}$ or $Q\propto(\rho_m+\rho_{\rm DE})$; if those also end in a decelerating point, the future slowdown is a generic feature of interacting scalar non-metricity dark energy rather than a special case.
  • (Editorial inference) The chain makes explicit low-redshift predictions for $q(z)$ and $\omega_{\rm eff}(z)$ that can be fitted to baryon-acoustic-oscillation, supernova, and cosmic-microwave-background data; one combined fit would decide whether the $F_1\to F_4\to F_m\to F_c\to F_7$ route is the one the universe takes.
  • (Editorial inference) Because the interacting system is built by multiplying the equations by $x^2$, the existence of $F_m$ should be rechecked under an explicit time reparametrization; this is a mathematical consistency test rather than an observational one.
  • (Editorial inference) If future deceleration is confirmed, the attractor relation $\omega_{\rm eff}=-\eta/3$ offers a simple, falsifiable alternative to a cosmological constant that low-redshift dark-energy surveys could distinguish.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology in scalar non-metricity gravity with an exponential scalar potential and an exponential nonminimal coupling function. Dimensionless variables x, y, and u are introduced, and the cosmological field equations are recast as an autonomous system. The authors determine critical points, analyze their linear stability, and integrate the system numerically for both a noninteracting dark sector and an interacting sector with Q = eta H rho_m. The headline result is a claimed cosmic sequence F1 -> F4 -> Fm -> Fc -> F7, reported to realize early inflation, a matter-dominated era, late acceleration, and a future decelerating phase that the authors connect to DESI observations. The noninteracting analysis is standard and mostly self-consistent, but the interacting analysis contains the central technical problems discussed below.

Significance. If the claimed sequence F1 -> F4 -> Fm -> Fc -> F7 were correct, the paper would report an interesting phenomenological feature: a single scalar non-metricity model with a linear interaction that passes through early de Sitter, matter domination, late acceleration, and future deceleration. Such a result would be genuinely noteworthy and could motivate further study of nonmetricity theories in light of recent DESI results. The noninteracting sector in Sec. 4.1 is a competent and transparent dynamical-system analysis of a quintessence-type model, with clear definitions of dimensionless variables and cosmological parameters. The main limitation is that the interacting sector, which carries the novel claims, is built on a singular transformation and on critical points whose physical status is not established. The paper provides no machine-checked proofs or code, but the derivations are mostly easy to follow, and the phase portraits are helpful. As it stands, the headline result is unsupported, so the significance of the paper is substantially reduced.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.5)-(4.10), Table 4] The passage from Eqs. (4.5)-(4.7) to Eqs. (4.8)-(4.10) is not a valid transformation unless a new time variable tau is introduced with d tau = x^2 dN and all derivatives in (4.8)-(4.10) are taken with respect to tau. The paper multiplies the right-hand sides by x^2 but continues to interpret the equations as derivatives with respect to N. Consequently, every critical point with x = 0 in Table 4 is suspect. For example, at Fm = (0,0,0) the original Eq. (4.5) contains -eta(1 - x^2 - y^2 - u)/(2x) = -eta/(2x), which diverges as x -> 0^+ when Omega_m = 1. Thus Fm is not a fixed point of the original physical system, and points on the Fc surface with Omega_m > 0 are likewise singular in the original equations. The claimed chain F1 -> F4 -> Fm -> Fc -> F7 is therefore unsupported by the analysis as written.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Table 4, points F1 and F2] The status of F1 = (0,1,0) and F2 = (0,-1,0) is not established. At these points the interaction term in Eq. (4.5) is formally 0/0, so whether they are equilibria depends on the limiting path; the paper does not specify one. In addition, the text states that the eigenvalues at F1 and F2 vanish, so linear stability theory cannot classify these points, and the statement that stability is shown numerically in the phase diagram is not a rigorous substitute. Because F1 is the starting point of the headline sequence, this gap is load-bearing.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Table 5, points F7 and F8; Sec. 5] The claimed future decelerating phase at F7 and F8 has q = 1/2 - eta/2 and omega_eff = -eta/3, expressions that are determined entirely by the interaction parameter eta in the ad hoc choice Q = eta H rho_m. For eta = 0.01 the deceleration is approximately 0.495, which is an input of the model rather than a generic prediction of scalar non-metricity gravity. To support the DESI-related claim, the authors would need to show that eta is fixed by the theory or by observations, or at least to demonstrate explicitly that the qualitative future deceleration is robust to variations of eta within the allowed range.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, critical points F5 and F6] The stability condition stated for F5 and F6, namely 'alpha > 0, |beta| < sqrt(6), beta^2 + eta < 3', is not correct because the first eigenvalue is lambda_1 = -alpha beta^3 / 6, whose sign depends on the sign of beta. For beta < 0 and alpha > 0 the point is unstable, contradicting the stated condition. The correct stability condition should involve alpha beta > 0. Since F5 and F6 are presented as the late-time attractors in one of the interacting scenarios, this error weakens the reliability of the stability classification in that part of the paper.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'which is flowed by a decelerating phase' should read 'which is followed by a decelerating phase.'
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The caption labels both curves as Omega_m; the blue curve should be labeled Omega_DE (or Omega_phi), and 'curvr' is a typo for 'curve.'
  3. [Sec. 4.2, after Eq. (4.7)] The sentence 'one has to multiplied by the positive defined term x^2' is grammatically awkward and should say 'positive definite'; more importantly, the sentence should state explicitly that this multiplication requires a time reparametrization.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Table 4 and surrounding text] The notation Fm is introduced in the text but does not appear in Table 4; the relation between the generic surface Fc and the special point Fm should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Sec. 4.2, discussion of Fc and Sec. 5] The text refers to 'the surface Fs' in the conclusions and in the discussion of Figure 6, while the table and earlier text use 'Fc'; this inconsistency should be corrected.
  6. [Sec. 4.2, critical points F5 and F6] In the same paragraph, the condition for an unstable point is written as 'alpha < 0, or |beta| > sqrt(6), or beta^2 + eta < 3', but beta^2 + eta < 3 corresponds to the stable sign of lambda_3; this appears to be a typo for beta^2 + eta > 3.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed F1→F4→Fm→Fc→F7 cosmic sequence is built on x=0 critical points manufactured by multiplying the interacting dynamical system by x²; the headline 'new class' of cosmological histories therefore reduces to the constructed system rather than to the original equations.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.2, between Eqs. (4.5)-(4.7) and (4.8)-(4.10); Table 4; Fm/Fc discussion.]
    "The autonomous system (equations (4.5)-(4.7)) has a singularity at x = 0 and to remove this, one has to multiplied by the positive defined term x2. Hence, the above system reduces to ... A decelerating matter-dominated saddle point is found to exist at the critical points Fm which lies on the surface Fc."

    Multiplying the right-hand sides by x² is not a time reparametrization, so the zero set of the new vector field differs from that of Eqs. (4.5)-(4.7) on x=0. For Fm=(0,0,0), the original dx/dN contains -η(1-x²-y²-u)/(2x) = -η/(2x), which diverges as x→0⁺ when Ωm=1; Fm is not a critical point of the original system. It becomes a zero only because every term of Eq. (4.8) carries x or x². The same construction creates the entire Fc surface for Ωm≠0 and the point F1. The claimed F1→F4→Fm→Fc→F7 chain and the 'new class' of cosmic histories are therefore properties of the multiplied system, so the headline prediction reduces to the construction used to remove the singularity.

full rationale

The paper contains no load-bearing self-citation: the action, exponential ansatz, and the linear interaction Q=ηHρ_m are all stated in the paper, and the non-interacting system and the x≠0 critical points are standard dynamical-system consequences. The future-deceleration formula q=1/2-η/2 is a direct algebraic consequence of choosing Q=ηHρ_m with η>0; this is an overinterpretation of a model input but not, by itself, a circular derivation. The central new claim, however, is not a genuine prediction of the original field equations because the matter-dominated point Fm and the Fc surface exist as fixed points only after multiplying Eqs. (4.5)-(4.7) by x², without introducing the required time reparametrization. In the original system at x=0 with Ωm≠0, the right-hand side diverges. Thus the claimed sequence from early inflation through matter domination to future deceleration is an artifact of a self-created dynamical system, making the central result circular in the sense of being equivalent to the construction inserted to remove the singularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central evolutionary claims depend on the exponential potential and coupling ansatz, the linear interaction, and the x^2 multiplication in the interacting system. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • beta (exponential potential slope lambda) = 0.44 and 3.442 in numerical runs
    Free slope of V=V0 e^{-beta phi}; controls fixed-point existence, omega_eff, and stability; not fitted to observations.
  • alpha (nonminimal coupling exponent xi) = 0.25 and 0.251 in numerical runs
    Free slope of F=F0 e^{-xi phi}; appears in stability eigenvalues and the Friedmann correction; no data fit.
  • eta (interaction strength) = 0.01 in numerical runs
    Interaction strength in Q=eta H rho_m; fixed points F7 and F8 yield q=1/2-eta/2 and omega_eff=-eta/3, so the claimed future deceleration is set by choosing eta>0.
  • y_c* and u_c* on the Fc surface = arbitrary; Fm limit y_c*=u_c*=0
    Parameters of the spurious x=0 critical surface introduced by the x^2 multiplication; not physical fixed points.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Flat FRW metric and coincidence gauge with Q=6H^2
    Used in Section 2 to write the Friedmann equations; standard in symmetric teleparallel cosmology.
  • domain assumption Matter is pressureless dust with no radiation component
    Equations (2.11)-(2.13) and the omega_eff classification include only dust plus scalar; no radiation fixed point is analyzed.
  • domain assumption Exponential forms V=V0 e^{-lambda phi} and F=F0 e^{-xi phi}
    Section 3 below equation (3.16); makes Gamma=Theta=1 so alpha and beta are constants and the system is autonomous; restricts generality.
  • domain assumption Linear interaction Q=eta H rho_m
    Section 4.2; a phenomenological choice, not derived; it directly determines the scaling fixed points F7 and F8.
  • ad hoc to paper Multiplying the dynamical system by x^2 removes the singularity at x=0 without a stated time reparametrization
    Equations (4.8)-(4.10); the validity of this step is assumed, and it creates spurious critical points on x=0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical analysis of cosmological models in non-minimal scalar non-metricity gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V3M6ITBD

@misc{pith2026250802396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical analysis of cosmological models in non-minimal scalar non-metricity gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V3M6ITBD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02396}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the evolution of a spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) universe in the framework of scalar non-metricity theory of gravity. In the model, we consider dark matter (DM) and dark energy (DE) described by the scalar field. In the paper, we examine the asymptotic behavior of the evolution of the observed universe. We probe the universe with and without an interaction between DM and the effective energy density including scalar field in the non-metricity theory that describes the DE. The critical points of the autonomous system and their stability are determined to understand the behaviour of the universe. The cosmological models accommodate the late accelerating phase of the universe for a given set of parameters, a matter-dominated saddle point is also found to exist which is flowed by a decelerating phase dominated by stiff fluid like DE. We obtain a new class of cosmological model accommodating early inflation, matter-dominated era, and a future decelerating phase followed by late acceleration of the universe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Riess et al., Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Acceleratin g Universe and a Cosmological Constant, AJ 116 (1998) 1009

    A.G. Riess et al., Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Acceleratin g Universe and a Cosmological Constant, AJ 116 (1998) 1009

    1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , ApJ 517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]

    S. Perlmutter et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae , ApJ 517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133]

    arXiv 1999

  3. [3]

    Riess et al., Type Ia supernova discoveries at z >1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark ener gy evolution , ApJ 607 (2004) 665

    A.G. Riess et al., Type Ia supernova discoveries at z >1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark ener gy evolution , ApJ 607 (2004) 665. – 20 –

    2004

  4. [4]

    D.N. Spergel et al., First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)* Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 148 (2003) 175

    2003

  5. [5]

    Spergel et al., Three-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probe(wmap) ob servations: Implications for cosmology , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 170 (2007) 377–408

    D.N. Spergel et al., Three-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probe(wmap) ob servations: Implications for cosmology , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 170 (2007) 377–408

    2007

  6. [6]

    Komatsu et al., Five-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probeobservati ons: Cosmological interpretation, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 180 (2009) 330–376

    E. Komatsu et al., Five-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probeobservati ons: Cosmological interpretation, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 180 (2009) 330–376

    2009

  7. [7]

    Komatsu and others., Seven-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probe(wmap) observations: Cosmological interpretation , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 192 (2011) 18

    E. Komatsu and others., Seven-yearwilkinson microwave anisotropy probe(wmap) observations: Cosmological interpretation , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 192 (2011) 18

    2011

  8. [8]

    Aghanim et al., Planck2018 results: Vi

    N. Aghanim et al., Planck2018 results: Vi. cosmological parameters , Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020) A6

    2020

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    Eisenstein et al., Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale cor relation function of sdss luminous red galaxies , The Astrophysical Journal 633 (2005) 560

    D.J. Eisenstein et al., Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale cor relation function of sdss luminous red galaxies , The Astrophysical Journal 633 (2005) 560

    2005

  2. [10]

    Tegmark et al., Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP , Phys

    M. Tegmark et al., Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP , Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 103501

    2004

  3. [11]

    Tegmark et al., Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxi es, Phys

    M. Tegmark et al., Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxi es, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 123507

    2006

  4. [12]

    U. Seljak et al., Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly α forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neu trino mass, and dark energy , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103515

    2005

  5. [13]

    Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon an d flatness problems , Phys

    A.H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon an d flatness problems , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

    1981

  6. [14]

    Abazajian et al., Inflation physics from the cosmic microwave background and l arge scale structure, Astroparticle Physics 63 (2015) 55–65

    K. Abazajian et al., Inflation physics from the cosmic microwave background and l arge scale structure, Astroparticle Physics 63 (2015) 55–65

    2015

  7. [15]

    Ratra and P.J.E

    B. Ratra and P.J.E. Peebles, Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3406

    1988

  8. [16]

    Chiba, Quintessence, the gravitational constant, and gravity , Phys

    T. Chiba, Quintessence, the gravitational constant, and gravity , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 083508

    1999

  9. [17]

    Padmanabhan, Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic m atter, Physical Review D 66 (2002)

    T. Padmanabhan, Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic m atter, Physical Review D 66 (2002)

    2002

  10. [18]

    Bagla, H.K

    J.S. Bagla, H.K. Jassal and T. Padmanabhan, Cosmology with tachyon field as dark energy , Physical Review D 67 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    Srivastava, Tachyon as a dark energy source , gr-qc/0409074

    S.K. Srivastava, Tachyon as a dark energy source , gr-qc/0409074

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Armendariz-Picon, V

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov and P.J. Steinhardt, Essentials of k-essence , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 103510

    2001

  13. [21]

    Caldwell, A phantom menace? cosmological consequences of a dark energ y component with super-negative equation of state , Physics Letters B 545 (2002) 23–29

    R. Caldwell, A phantom menace? cosmological consequences of a dark energ y component with super-negative equation of state , Physics Letters B 545 (2002) 23–29

    2002

  14. [22]

    Caldwell, M

    R.R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski and N.N. Weinberg, Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday, Physical Review Letters 91 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    Kamenshchik, U

    A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella and V. Pasquier, An alternative to quintessence , Phys. Lett. B 511 (2001) 265

    2001

  16. [24]

    Sotiriou and V

    T.P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f (R) theories of gravity , Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (2010) 451 . – 21 –

    2010

  17. [25]

    Felice and S

    A.D. Felice and S. Tsujikawa, f (R) theories, Living Rev. Relativ. 13 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimen sional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 10 (1974) 363

    G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimen sional space, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 10 (1974) 363

    1974

  19. [27]

    Harko, F.S.N

    T. Harko, F.S.N. Lobo, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, f (R,T ) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 024020

    2011

  20. [28]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Modified Gauss–Bonnet theory as gravitational alternative for dark energy , Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 1

    2005

  21. [29]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Construction of cosmologically viable gravity models , Physics Letters B 675 (2009) 1–8

    2009

  22. [30]

    Wang, Hoˇ rava gravity at a Lifshitz point: A progress report , Int

    A. Wang, Hoˇ rava gravity at a Lifshitz point: A progress report , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017) 1730014

    2017

  23. [31]

    Dvali, G

    G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4d gravity on a brane in 5d minkowski space , Physics Letters B 485 (2000) 208

    2000

  24. [32]

    Maartens and K

    R. Maartens and K. Koyama, Brane-World Gravity, Living Rev. Relativ. 13 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Modifiedf (R) gravity consistent with realistic cosmology: From a matter dominated epoch to a dark energy universe , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 086005

    2006

  26. [34]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F (R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models , Phys. Rep. 505 (2011) 59

    2011

  27. [35]

    and Scudellaro, P., Cosmological models in scalar tensor theories of gravity and observations: a class of general solutions , A&A 481 (2008) 279

    Demianski, M., Piedipalumbo, E., Rubano, C. and Scudellaro, P., Cosmological models in scalar tensor theories of gravity and observations: a class of general solutions , A&A 481 (2008) 279

    2008

  28. [36]

    Rudra and K

    P. Rudra and K. Giri, Observational constraint in f (R,T ) gravity from the cosmic chronometers and some standard distance measurement param eters, Nuclear Physics B 967 (2021) 115428

    2021

  29. [37]

    Suranjoy Singh and K

    P. Suranjoy Singh and K. Priyokumar Singh, f(r,t)gravity model behaving as a dark energy source, New Astronomy 84 (2021) 101542

    2021

  30. [38]

    J. J. A. S. Fortunato, P. H. R. S. Moraes and E. Brito, Search for the f (r,t ) gravity functional form via gaussian processes , The European Physical Journal C 84 (2024) 198

    2024

  31. [39]

    B. Li, J.D. Barrow and D.F. Mota, Cosmology of modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 044027

    2007

  32. [40]

    Odintsov, V

    S. Odintsov, V. Oikonomou and S. Banerjee, Dynamics of inflation and dark energy from f(r,g) gravity , Nuclear Physics B 938 (2019) 935

    2019

  33. [41]

    Chanda, A

    A. Chanda, A. Halder, A. Majumdar and B. Paul, Late time cosmology in f (R, }) gravity with exponential interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Chakrabarti, K

    S.K. Chakrabarti, K. Dutta and A.A. Sen, Ccosmology of horava-lifshitz f (r) gravity, Physics Letters B 711 (2012) 147–152

    2012

  35. [43]

    Maity, H

    S. Maity, H. Chaudhary, U. Debnath, S. Maurya and G. Mustaf a, Constraining cosmological parameters with viscous modified chaplygin gas and generali zed cosmic chaplygin gas models in horava–lifshitz gravity: Utilizing late-time datasets , Astroparticle Physics 164 (2025) 103026

    2025

  36. [44]

    Zonunmawia, W

    H. Zonunmawia, W. Khyllep, J. Dutta and L. J¨ arv, Cosmological dynamics of brane gravity: A global dynamical system perspective , Physical Review D 98 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Pellegrini and J

    C. Pellegrini and J. Plebanski, Tetrad fields and gravitational fields , Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab, Mat. Fys. Skrifter 2 (1963)

    1963

  38. [46]

    F.W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G.D. Kerlick and J.M. Nester, General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects , Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 (1976) 393 . – 22 –

    1976

  39. [47]

    Hayashi and T

    K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, New general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 3524

    1979

  40. [48]

    Fontanini, E

    M. Fontanini, E. Huguet and M. Le Delliou, Teleparallel gravity equivalent of general relativity as a gauge theory: Translation or cartan connection? , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 064006

    2019

  41. [49]

    Bengochea and R

    G.R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro, Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 124019

    2009

  42. [50]

    Linder, Einstein’s other gravity and the acceleration of the Univer se, Phys

    E.V. Linder, Einstein’s other gravity and the acceleration of the Univer se, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Maluf, The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity , Ann

    J.W. Maluf, The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity , Ann. der Phys. 525 (2013) 339

    2013

  44. [52]

    Ferraro and F

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without an inflaton , Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 084031

    2007

  45. [53]

    Awad, W.E

    A. Awad, W.E. Hanafy, G. Nashed, S. Odintsov and V. Oikonomou , Constant-roll inflation in f (T ) teleparallel gravity, JCAP 2018 (2018) 026–026

    2018

  46. [54]

    Wu and H

    P. Wu and H. Yu, Observational constraints on f (t) theory, Physics Letters B 693 (2010) 415–420

    2010

  47. [55]

    Yang, New types of f (t) gravity, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011)

    R.-J. Yang, New types of f (t) gravity, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Bamba, C.-Q

    K. Bamba, C.-Q. Geng, C.-C. Lee and L.-W. Luo, Equation of state for dark energy in f (t) gravity, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2011 (2011) 021–021

    2011

  49. [57]

    Capozziello, V.F

    S. Capozziello, V.F. Cardone, H. Farajollahi and A. Ravanpak, Cosmography in f (T ) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Myrzakulov, Accelerating universe from f (t) gravity, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011)

    R. Myrzakulov, Accelerating universe from f (t) gravity, The European Physical Journal C 71 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Bamba, R

    K. Bamba, R. Myrzakulov, S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov, Reconstruction of f (t) gravity: Rip cosmology, finite-time future singularities, and thermody namics, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104036

    2012

  52. [60]

    Capozziello, G

    S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase and E. Saridakis, Constrainingf (T ) teleparallel gravity by big bang nucleosynthesis: f (T ) cosmology and BBN , Euro. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 1

    2017

  53. [61]

    Chakrabarti, J.L

    S. Chakrabarti, J.L. Said and G. Farrugia, Some aspects of reconstruction using a scalar field in f (t) gravity, The European Physical Journal C 77 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Y.-F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M.D. Laurentis and E.N. Saridakis, f (T ) teleparallel gravity and cosmology, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 106901

    2016

  55. [63]

    teleparallel

    C.-Q. Geng, C.-C. Lee, E.N. Saridakis and Y.-P. Wu, “teleparallel” dark energy , Physics Letters B 704 (2011) 384–387

    2011

  56. [64]

    Izumi, J.-A

    K. Izumi, J.-A. Gu and Y.C. Ong, Acausality and nonunique evolution in generalized teleparallel gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 084025

    2014

  57. [65]

    Harko, F.S

    T. Harko, F.S. Lobo, G. Otalora and E.N. Saridakis, f (T, T ) gravity and cosmology , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (2014) 021–021

    2014

  58. [66]

    Rodriguez-Benites, M

    C. Rodriguez-Benites, M. Gonzalez-Espinoza, G. Otalora and M . Alva-Morales, Cosmological dynamics in interacting scalar-torsion f (t,φ ) gravity: Investigating energy and momentum couplings, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 043506

    2025

  59. [67]

    Duchaniya, S.V

    L. Duchaniya, S.V. Lohakare and B. Mishra, Cosmological models in f(t,t) gravity and the dynamical system analysis , Physics of the Dark Universe 43 (2024) 101402

    2024

  60. [68]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, Cosmological reconstruction of f(t, t) gravity , International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physi cs 11 (2014) 1450077

    2014

  61. [69]

    Farrugia and J.L

    G. Farrugia and J.L. Said, Growth factor in f (t, T ) gravity, Physical Review D 94 (2016) . – 23 –

    2016

  62. [70]

    Junior, M.E

    E.L.B. Junior, M.E. Rodrigues, I.G. Salako and M.J.S. Houndjo, Reconstruction, thermodynamics and stability of the λcdm model in f (t, ⊔) gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33 (2016) 125006

    2016

  63. [71]

    Nester and H.-J

    J.M. Nester and H.-J. Yo, Symmetric teleparallel general relativity , 1999

    1999

  64. [72]

    Adak and O

    M. Adak and O. Sert, A Solution to Symmetric Teleparallel Gravity , 2004

    2004

  65. [73]

    M. Adak, M. Kalay and O. Sert, LAGRANGE FORMULATION OF THE SYMMETRIC TELEPARALLEL GRAVITY, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15 (2006) 619

    2006

  66. [74]

    M. Adak, O. Sert, M. Kalay and M. Sari, SYMMETRIC TELEPARALLEL GRAVITY: SOME EXACT SOLUTIONS AND SPINOR COUPLINGS , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1350167

    2013

  67. [75]

    Adak, The symmetric teleparallel gravity , 2006

    M. Adak, The symmetric teleparallel gravity , 2006

    2006

  68. [76]

    Jim´ enez, L

    J.B. Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg and T. Koivisto, Coincident general relativity , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    Mandal, P

    S. Mandal, P. Sahoo and J. Santos, Energy conditions in f (Q) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 024057

    2020

  70. [78]

    Bajardi, D

    F. Bajardi, D. Vernieri and S. Capozziello, Bouncing cosmology in f (Q) symmetric teleparallel gravity, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2020) 1

    2020

  71. [79]

    Mandal, D

    S. Mandal, D. Wang and P.K. Sahoo, Cosmography in f (Q) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 124029

    2020

  72. [80]

    Dimakis, A

    N. Dimakis, A. Paliathanasis and T. Christodoulakis, Quantum cosmology in f (Q) theory, Class. Quantum Grav. 38 (2021) 225003

    2021

  73. [81]

    Zhao, Covariant formulation of f(q) theory , The European Physical Journal C 82 (2022)

    D. Zhao, Covariant formulation of f(q) theory , The European Physical Journal C 82 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    J. Lu, X. Zhao and G. Chee, Cosmology in symmetric teleparallel gravity and its dynami cal system, 1906.08920

    1906 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lazkoz, F.S

    R. Lazkoz, F.S. Lobo, M. Ortiz-Ba˜ nos and V. Salzano, Observational constraints of f (Q) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 104027

    2019

  76. [84]

    Jim´ enez, L

    J.B. Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, T. Koivisto and S. Pekar, Cosmology in f (Q) geometry, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103507

    2020

  77. [85]

    Frusciante, Signatures of f (Q) gravity in cosmology , Phys

    N. Frusciante, Signatures of f (Q) gravity in cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 044021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Anagnostopoulos, S

    F.K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos and E.N. Saridakis, First evidence that non-metricity f (Q) gravity could challenge ΛCDM, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136634

    2021

  79. [87]

    Atayde and N

    L. Atayde and N. Frusciante, Can f (Q) gravity challenge ΛCDM?, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Ayuso, R

    I. Ayuso, R. Lazkoz and V. Salzano, Observational constraints on cosmological solutions of f (Q) theories, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063505

    2021

  81. [89]

    Khyllep, A

    W. Khyllep, A. Paliathanasis and J. Dutta, Cosmological solutions and growth index of matter perturbations in f (Q) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 103521

    2021

  82. [90]

    Koussour, K

    M. Koussour, K. El Bourakadi, S. Shekh, S. Pacif and M. Benna i, Late-time acceleration in f (Q) gravity: Analysis and constraints in an anisotropic backgr ound, Ann. Phys. 445 (2022) 169092

    2022

  83. [91]

    Arora and P.K

    S. Arora and P.K. Sahoo, Crossing Phantom Divide in f (Q) Gravity, Ann. der Phys. 534 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    Solanki, A

    R. Solanki, A. De and P. Sahoo, Complete dark energy scenario in f (Q) gravity, Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022) 100996 . – 24 –

    2022

  85. [93]

    Narawade and B

    S.A. Narawade and B. Mishra, Phantom Cosmological Model with Observational Constraint s in f (Q) Gravity, Ann. der Phys. 535 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Narawade, S.P

    S. Narawade, S.P. Singh and B. Mishra, Accelerating cosmological models in f (Q) gravity and the phase space analysis , Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101282

    2023

  87. [95]

    De and T.-H

    A. De and T.-H. Loo, On the viability of f (Q) gravity models, Class. Quantum Grav. 40 (2023) 115007

    2023

  88. [96]

    Rana and P.K

    D.S. Rana and P.K. Sahoo, Cosmological constraints in symmetric teleparallel gravi ty with bulk viscosity, Gen. Relativ. Grav. 56 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    Anagnostopoulos, V

    F.K. Anagnostopoulos, V. Gakis, E.N. Saridakis and S. Basilakos, New models and big bang nucleosynthesis constraints in f (Q) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 58

    2023

  90. [98]

    Heisenberg, Review on f(q) gravity , Physics Reports 1066 (2024) 1

    L. Heisenberg, Review on f(q) gravity , Physics Reports 1066 (2024) 1

    2024

  91. [99]

    Gomes, J.B

    D.A. Gomes, J.B. Jim´ enez, A.J. Cano and T.S. Koivisto, Pathological character of modifications to coincident general relativity: Cosmologi cal strong coupling and ghosts in f (q) theories, 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    Heisenberg, M

    L. Heisenberg, M. Hohmann and S. Kuhn, Cosmological teleparallel perturbations, 2023

    2023

  93. [101]

    Harko, T.S

    T. Harko, T.S. Koivisto, F.S.N. Lobo, G.J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Ga rcia, Coupling matter in modifiedq gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 084043

    2018

  94. [102]

    Y. Xu, G. Li, T. Harko and S.-D. Liang, f (Q,T ) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 1

    2019

  95. [103]

    Y. Xu, T. Harko, S. Shahidi and S.-D. Liang, Weyl type f (Q,T ) gravity, and its cosmological implications, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1

    2020

  96. [104]

    Myrzakulov, O

    Y. Myrzakulov, O. Donmez, M. Koussour, D. Alizhanov, S. Bek chanov and J. Rayimbaev, Late-time cosmology in f(q,lm) gravity: Analytical soluti ons and observational fits , Physics of the Dark Universe 46 (2024) 101614

    2024

  97. [105]

    Myrzakulov, O

    Y. Myrzakulov, O. Donmez, M. Koussour, S. Muminov, I. Davle tov and J. Rayimbaev, Constrainingf (q,l m) gravity with bulk viscosity , Physics of the Dark Universe 48 (2025) 101829

    2025

  98. [106]

    Hazarika, S

    A. Hazarika, S. Arora, P.K. Sahoo and T. Harko, f (q,l m) gravity, and its cosmological implications, 2025

    2025

  99. [107]

    Arora, S

    S. Arora, S. Pacif, S. Bhattacharjee and P. Sahoo, f (q,t ) gravity models with observational constraints, Phys. Dark Univ. 30 (2020) 100664

    2020

  100. [108]

    Koussour, N

    M. Koussour, N. Myrzakulov, S.H. Shekh and M. Bennai, Quintessence universe and cosmic acceleration in f (q, t) gravity , International Journal of Modern Physics D 31 (2022)

    2022

  101. [109]

    Das and S

    S. Das and S. Mandal, f(q,t) gravity: from early to late-time cosmic acceleratio n, Indian Journal of Physics 99 (2024) 1953–1968

    2024

  102. [110]

    Arora and P

    S. Arora and P. Sahoo, Energy conditions in f (q,t ) gravity, Phys. Scripta 95 (2020) 095003

    2020

  103. [111]

    Arora, J

    S. Arora, J. Santos and P. Sahoo, Constraining f(q,t) gravity from energy conditions , Physics of the Dark Universe 31 (2021) 100790

    2021

  104. [112]

    N´ ajera and A

    A. N´ ajera and A. Fajardo, Cosmological perturbation theory in f(q,t) gravity , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (2022) 020

    2022

  105. [113]

    Shiravand, S

    M. Shiravand, S. Fakhry and M. Farhoudi, Cosmological inflation in f(q, t) gravity , Physics of the Dark Universe 37 (2022) 101106

    2022

  106. [114]

    Mandal, A

    S. Mandal, A. Singh and R. Chaubey, Cosmic evolution of holographic dark energy in f(q,t) gravity, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physi cs 20 (2023) 2350084 [https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887823500846]. – 25 –

    2023 doi

  107. [115]

    J¨ arv, M

    L. J¨ arv, M. R¨ unkla, M. Saal and O. Vilson, Nonmetricity formulation of general relativity and its scalar-tensor extension , Physical Review D 97 (2018)

    2018

  108. [116]

    Copeland, A.R

    E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle and D. Wands, Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4686

    1998

  109. [117]

    COPELAND, M

    E.J. COPELAND, M. SAMI and S. TSUJIKA W A, DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGY , International Journal of Modern Physics D 15 (2006) 1753

    2006

  110. [118]

    Amendola, R

    L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Conditions for the cosmological viability of f (r) dark energy models , Physical Review D 75 (2007)

    2007

  111. [119]

    Koivisto, Cosmology of modified (but second order) gravity , in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, 2010, DOI

    T.S. Koivisto, Cosmology of modified (but second order) gravity , in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, 2010, DOI

    2010

  112. [120]

    Uddin, J.E

    K. Uddin, J.E. Lidsey and R. Tavakol, Cosmological scaling solutions in generalised gauss–bonnet gravity theories , General Relativity and Gravitation 41 (2009) 2725–2736

    2009

  113. [121]

    Amendola, G.C

    L. Amendola, G.C. Campos and R. Rosenfeld, Consequences of dark matter-dark energy interaction on cosmological parameters derived¡? format? ¿ from type ia supernova data , Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos mology 75 (2007) 083506

    2007

  114. [122]

    V¨ aliviita, E

    J. V¨ aliviita, E. Majerotto and R. Maartens, Large-scale instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids , JCAP 2008 (2008) 020

    2008

  115. [123]

    Clemson, K

    T. Clemson, K. Koyama, G.-B. Zhao, R. Maartens and J. V¨ aliviit a, Interacting dark energy: Constraints and degeneracies , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043007

    2012

  116. [124]

    Yang and L

    W. Yang and L. Xu, Cosmological constraints on interacting dark energy with r edshift-space distortion after planck data , Physical Review D 89 (2014)

    2014

  117. [125]

    Collaboration, M

    D. Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim et al., Data release 1 of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument, 2025

    2025

  118. [126]

    Collaboration, M

    D. Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim et al., Desi dr2 results i: Baryon acoustic oscillations from the lyman alpha forest , 2025

    2025

  119. [127]

    Collaboration, M

    D. Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim et al., Desi dr2 results ii: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints , 2025. – 26 –

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.