Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A view on model misspecification in uncertainty quantification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.16938 v2 pith:V5IYNMQ6 submitted 2022-10-30 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords misspecificationmodeluncertaintymodelsqualityalwaysamountapproximations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Estimating uncertainty of machine learning models is essential to assess the quality of the predictions that these models provide. However, there are several factors that influence the quality of uncertainty estimates, one of which is the amount of model misspecification. Model misspecification always exists as models are mere simplifications or approximations to reality. The question arises whether the estimated uncertainty under model misspecification is reliable or not. In this paper, we argue that model misspecification should receive more attention, by providing thought experiments and contextualizing these with relevant literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Quantification for Misspecified Machine Learned Interatomic Potentials

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    POPS uncertainty bounds from misspecification-aware parameter sampling envelop DFT reference values for a broad range of tungsten properties and for MACE-MPA-0 energies.

Pith tools