Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Charge Exchange Dynamics in Cold Collisions of $^{40}$CaH$^+$ and $^{39}$K

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Trapped calcium monohydride ions and ultracold potassium atoms exchange charge at a rate about five times below the Langevin collision limit, and the paper argues the mechanism is radiative or mediated by intermediate complexes rather than

desk verdict First measurement of CaH+ + K charge exchange in a hybrid trap, rate well below Langevin; the data look solid, the theory is honest about not explaining it, but the abstract oversells the radiative mechanism. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.09142 v2 pith:V5RKHJVZ submitted 2026-02-09 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-ph

Swapnil Patel , Dibyendu Sardar , Jyothi Saraladevi , Micha{l} Tomza , Kenneth R. Brown This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords chargeexchangecoldcollisionshybridion-atomtrapmolecularioncalciummonohydridepotassiumLangevinratepotentialenergysurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports observations of charge-exchange collisions between trapped 40CaH+ molecular ions and ultracold 39K atoms in a hybrid ion-atom trap. The measured rate coefficient is about 0.72(5)×10−9 cm3 s−1, roughly five times below the Langevin collision limit, and it depends only weakly on the electronic state of the potassium atom. Combined with electronic-structure calculations, the slow rate indicates that a direct single-surface charge transfer does not occur: the entrance and exit potential-energy surfaces are energetically separated and show no crossings in the searched geometries. The authors argue that the observed process is instead best explained by radiative mechanisms or by dynamics involving intermediate complex formation, and they call for a full-dimensional quantum treatment. The result matters because cold collisions between molecular ions and atoms are a largely unexplored frontier, and this measurement gives a concrete benchmark for theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the set of potential energy surfaces for the (CaH–K)+ triatomic complex, calculated with high-level electronic-structure methods (MRCISD and CCSD(T)) over 1D and 2D cuts and 3D equilibrium-geometry optimizations. The key observation is the energy separation between the CaH+(X1Σ+)+K(2S) entrance channel and the CaH(X2Σ+)+K+(1S) exit channel: no crossing appears in any searched geometry, which rules out a direct single-surface mechanism. The quantitative argument then leans on the Langevin collision rate as the classical upper bound and on a Fermi-golden-rule/rigid-rotor/infinite-order-sudden estimate of spontaneous radiative charge exchange, whose rate is orders of magni

What would settle it

Perform the same charge-exchange measurement with the potassium atoms held in a dark-spot MOT, so the cooling lasers no longer illuminate the collision region. The paper's interpretation predicts the rate stays near 0.7×10−9 cm3 s−1; a substantially lower rate would mean light-assisted charge transfer, not spontaneous radiative or complex-mediated dynamics, is the dominant channel.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the (CaH–K)+ complex, the reactive entrance channel CaH+(X1Σ+)+K(2S) lies energetically far from the charge-exchange exit channel CaH(X2Σ+)+K+(1S). Extensive one- and two-dimensional scans of the potential energy surfaces found no crossing between these two channels and no avoided crossing, so direct non-radiative charge exchange is classified as improbable. The measured charge-exchange rate coefficient, 0.72(5)×10−9 cm3 s−1 from a constant fit, is a factor of about five below the Langevin rate; the ground-state and excited-state contributions are consistent with weak internal-state dependence. Radiative charge-exchange calculations within the rigid-rotor and infinite-order-sudden approx

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that direct non-radiative charge exchange is improbable rests on the absence of any crossing between the entrance and exit potential-energy surfaces in the finite set of one- and two-dimensional cuts the authors searched; a crossing at an unsearched geometry, or an avoided crossing with significant non-adiabatic coupling, would invalidate the radiative-or-complex-mechanism conclusion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sympathetic rotational cooling of 40CaH+ by ultracold 39K remains viable: the charge-exchange loss channel is present but only about one-fifth the Langevin rate.
  • The measured rate provides an experimental benchmark that any full-dimensional quantum scattering calculation must reproduce.
  • The weak dependence on potassium excited-state population indicates that laser-stimulated charge transfer contributes negligibly, so the observed process is intrinsic to the collision.
  • Explaining the factor-of-five suppression will require going beyond the rigid-rotor single-surface model, most likely by including vibrational motion and intermediate complex formation.
  • The large gap between the calculated radiative rate and the measured rate implies that an additional, unidentified pathway is responsible for the bulk of the charge exchange.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If intermediate-complex formation is the source of the enhanced rate, the measured rate may depend on the trap's kinetic-energy distribution and on the ion's internal rotational state; a single-ion experiment with controlled collision energy could test whether the rate changes as the rotational temperature is lowered.
  • Because the entrance and exit channels are separated by a large energy gap in this particular atom–molecule pair, a systematic comparison with other alkali atoms (for example rubidium, whose excitation energy and polarizability differ) could reveal whether the rate tracks the radiative-coupling strength or the complex-formation probability.
  • A full-dimensional quantum scattering calculation that includes all vibrational modes would settle whether the missing mechanism is a real non-adiabatic pathway at an unsearched geometry or a statistical complex-mediated process; the paper's own scans cannot distinguish these, and its discussion already leaves the question open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and theoretical study of charge-exchange collisions between trapped 40CaH+ molecular ions and ultracold 39K atoms in a hybrid ion-atom trap. Time-of-flight mass spectra show CaH+ decay and K+ growth, and the authors extract a rate coefficient that is roughly a factor of five below the Langevin rate. Using high-level ab initio calculations, they examine potential energy surfaces and radiative charge-exchange rates. They conclude that direct non-radiative charge transfer is improbable and suggest that the measured rate points to a radiative or complex-mediated mechanism, while acknowledging that their computed radiative rate is more than two orders of magnitude below the measured value. The paper also frames the results as a step toward sympathetic rotational cooling of molecular ions and as a benchmark for cold molecular ion-atom reaction theory.

Significance. If the observation and the inferred suppression factor hold, this is a valuable new data point for cold molecular ion-neutral atom collisions: it extends charge-exchange studies from atomic ions to a heteronuclear molecular ion, and it provides a rate coefficient that can challenge quantum-dynamics calculations beyond the rigid-rotor approximation. The ab initio calculations are carried out at a high level (MRCISD/CCSD(T) with large basis sets), the radiative rate is computed from first principles rather than fitted, and the authors are explicit about several limitations of their model. These strengths make the paper a useful contribution to the hybrid trap and cold chemistry community. However, the paper's central mechanistic claim — that the calculations rule out direct non-radiative charge exchange and point to a radiative mechanism — is not supported by the manuscript's own quantitative results, and the experimental fit quality raises questions about the precision of the extracted rates.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion (radiative rate vs. measured rate)] The paper's own calculated spontaneous radiative charge-exchange rate is stated as 'of order 10−3 kL' and 'more than two orders of magnitude below the measured value' (Discussion). This is a >100-fold discrepancy. The abstract's conclusion that the calculations 'point to a radiative mechanism' is therefore not supported by the manuscript's own quantitative results: a mechanism that underpredicts the measured rate by two orders of magnitude cannot be identified as dominant. The authors should either (a) present a mechanism that quantitatively accounts for the measured rate, or (b) reframe the conclusion as 'standard non-radiative and radiative mechanisms are both insufficient; the mechanism is unidentified.' This is load-bearing because it changes the central claim of the paper.
  2. [Discussion (PES scans underlying the non-radiative exclusion)] The exclusion of direct non-radiative charge exchange rests on 'representative 1D and 2D cuts' and the statement 'we have not found any direct crossing' (Discussion, Fig. 4). These scans use the rigid-rotor approximation for CaH and do not include spin-orbit coupling. In a triatomic system, non-adiabatic transfer can be mediated by conical intersections or seams of codimension 2 that are invisible in low-dimensional cuts, and vibrational coupling — later invoked as important — is frozen in these scans. The conclusion that no direct non-radiative path exists is therefore an inductive null result, not a proof. Since this exclusion is load-bearing for the 'not a simple single-surface process' claim, the authors should either perform a systematic search over the full nuclear coordinate space, including nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements and spin-orbit couplings, or explicitly label this a
  3. [Results / Fig. 2 (fit quality and internal-state dependence)] Both fits in Fig. 2 have reduced chi-squared values of 5.61 (constant) and 5.20 (linear), indicating scatter well beyond the quoted 1σ uncertainties. The extracted ground-state rate kS = 0.29(27)×10−9 cm3 s−1 is consistent with zero at the 1σ level, and the excited-state rate kP = 1.99(81)×10−9 has a 40% relative uncertainty. The data therefore provide only weak constraints on internal-state dependence, and the Outlook statement that 'the reaction rate is independent of the potassium electronic state' overstates the evidence. A reanalysis that includes systematic uncertainties (e.g., MOT density measurements, laser intensity drifts, possible background losses) or a more conservative statement of the fitted rates is needed before the claimed suppression factor and state independence can be taken at face value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results (pseudo-first-order fits)] The text states that all three species are fit to ln[N_x(t)/N_x(0)] = -k_x t. For K+ growth, this logarithmic form is inappropriate unless k_x is allowed to be negative or the growth is fit through a different functional form. Please clarify which species are used for the rate extraction and treat the K+ growth as a qualitative cross-check unless the fitting procedure is described consistently.
  2. [Abstract vs. full text] The abstract in the reader's version says the calculations 'point to a radiative mechanism,' while the full-text abstract says 'Our calculations do not fully explain the measured rate.' These two statements are not equivalent; please align the abstract with the quantitative conclusion actually supported by the calculations.
  3. [Discussion (laser-stimulated processes)] The statement that 'the observed weak dependence of the loss rate coefficient on laser intensity' excludes laser-stimulated processes is qualitative. Fig. 2 plots the rate versus the excited-state population p, not directly versus laser intensity; please specify the relationship and quantify the constraint.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption notes that the dashed gray curve uses a different x-axis definition, creating an artificial crossing. This is potentially confusing; consider plotting this curve on the same axis or clearly marking the artificial crossing as an artifact.
  5. [General notation] The units 'cm3 s-1' should be typeset as cm^3 s^-1. Also, the symbol k is used both for the pseudo-first-order loss rate and the bimolecular rate coefficient; please make the distinction explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: measurement and ab initio theory are independent; the mechanistic exclusion is an inductive PES-scan null result, a completeness limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central experimental result is a measured charge-exchange rate obtained by fitting TOF-MS ion-number time traces to a pseudo-first-order rate equation; the fitted coefficients (k, k_S, k_P) are empirical descriptors of the data, not inputs to the theoretical derivation. The theoretical radiative rate is computed from ab initio PESs using Fermi's golden rule and the IOS approximation and is explicitly not adjusted to the measured value: the paper states the calculation yields a rate of order 10^-3 k_L, 'more than two orders of magnitude below the measured value.' This mismatch is the opposite of fitting and shows the calculation is not a re-description of the data. The Langevin comparison is a standard textbook formula, not a fitted quantity. The exclusion of direct non-radiative charge exchange rests on the statement that 'we have not found any direct crossing' in representative 1D and 2D PES cuts; the paper itself flags the limitations of this approach and calls for a full-dimensional treatment including vibrational motion and intermediate complex formation. That is an inductive null-result limitation, bearing on correctness/completeness, but it is not a circular step: absence of evidence in a finite scan is not equivalent to the conclusion by construction. Self-citations are present (e.g., Refs. [21], [33], [34], [36], [43], [46], [47]) and some share authors with the current paper, but they are used for experimental apparatus, methodological implementation, background characterization, or analogy. None is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the core claim. The observation, the PES calculation, and the rate calculation are self-contained enough that no 'prediction' reduces to a fitted input or to a self-citation. Therefore no significant circularity is found; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's theoretical predictions are not fitted to the measured rate, so there is no circular fitting. The interpretation relies on several assumptions: a thermal internal-state distribution, representative PES scan coverage, the validity of rigid-rotor/IOS approximations, and the relevance of the Langevin benchmark. These assumptions are reasonable but not independently verified within the paper.

free parameters (3)
  • effective charge-exchange rate coefficient (constant fit) = 0.72(5)e-9 cm3/s
    Obtained by fitting CaH+ decay in Fig. 1(c) to pseudo-first-order kinetics and dividing by measured K density; used to claim the rate is roughly one-fifth of the Langevin value.
  • ground-state rate k_S (linear fit) = 0.29(27)e-9 cm3/s
    Linear-fit parameter for S-state population; near zero within 1σ, so the 'order of magnitude below Langevin' claim is statistically weak.
  • excited-state rate k_P (linear fit) = 1.99(81)e-9 cm3/s
    Linear-fit parameter for P-state population; roughly 2.5 times below the Langevin rate for the P state.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CaH+ internal state distribution thermalizes at room temperature (electronic/vibrational ground state, rotational Boltzmann distribution).
    Statement in Experimental Methods: 'We assume that the vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom thermalize with room temperature BBR...' The measured rate is an average over the rotational distribution and underpins the comparison to Langevin.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite PES scans are representative enough to conclude that no direct non-radiative charge-transfer path exists.
    Discussion: 'we have not found any direct crossing...' — absence of crossings in scanned geometries is extrapolated to all geometries, which is a load-bearing assumption in ruling out direct non-radiative CE.
  • domain assumption The infinite-order sudden and rigid-rotor approximations are adequate for estimating the spontaneous radiative CE rate.
    Theoretical methods: rate coefficients computed with IOS and rigid-rotor; authors acknowledge this may miss complex formation, and the estimate is two orders of magnitude below the measured value.
  • domain assumption Langevin capture is the appropriate benchmark for the ultracold molecular-ion/neutral-atom collision.
    The relative suppression is defined against k_L; for molecular ions with internal structure, the Langevin model is a classical long-range capture estimate, not an exact quantum limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge Exchange Dynamics in Cold Collisions of $^{40}$CaH$^+$ and $^{39}$K." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5RKHJVZ

@misc{pith2026260209142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge Exchange Dynamics in Cold Collisions of $^40$CaH$^+$ and $^39$K},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5RKHJVZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.09142}
}
abstract

We report the observation of charge-exchange collisions between trapped calcium monohydride molecular ions ($^{40}$CaH$^+$) and ultracold potassium atoms ($^{39}$K) in a hybrid ion-atom trap. The measured charge-exchange rate coefficient is significantly suppressed relative to the Langevin rate constant for the system. We use $\mathit{ab\ initio}$ quantum-chemical calculations to model the (CaH-K)$^+$ complex in the ground and excited electronic states and to identify possible charge-exchange mechanisms. Our calculations rule out a direct non-radiative charge-exchange reaction and instead point to a radiative mechanism, but do not quantitatively reproduce the measured rate, highlighting the need for a full-dimensional quantum dynamics treatment that includes vibrational motion and intermediate complex formation. Our work demonstrates that cold hybrid ion-atom platforms with molecular ions enable access to richer chemical complexity and collisional dynamics inaccessible in purely atomic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.09142 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Experimental sequence for interactions between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Measured charge exchange rate coefficients as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. One-dimensional cut through the potential energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Tomza, K

    M. Tomza, K. Jachymski, R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, T. Calarco, Z. Idziaszek, and P. S. Julienne, Cold hybrid ion-atom systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035001 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    M. Deiß, S. Willitsch, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Cold trapped molecular ions and hybrid platforms for ions and neutral particles, Nat. Phys.20, 713 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Sinhal and S

    M. Sinhal and S. Willitsch, Molecular-ion quantum tech- nologies, Photonic Quantum Technologies: Science and Applications1, 305 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    C.-w. Chou, C. Kurz, D. B. Hume, P. N. Plessow, D. R. Leibrandt, and D. Leibfried, Preparation and coherent manipulation of pure quantum states of a single molecu- lar ion, Nature545, 203 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    F. Wolf, Y. Wan, J. C. Heip, F. Gebert, C. Shi, and P. O. Schmidt, Non-destructive state detection for quan- tum logic spectroscopy of molecular ions, Nature530, 457 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Sinhal, Z

    M. Sinhal, Z. Meir, K. Najafian, G. Hegi, and S. Willitsch, Quantum-nondemolition state detection and spectroscopy of single trapped molecules, Science367, 1213 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Y. Lin, D. R. Leibrandt, D. Leibfried, and C.-w. Chou, Quantum entanglement between an atom and a molecule, Nature581, 273 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    C.-w. Chou, A. L. Collopy, C. Kurz, Y. Lin, M. E. Hard- ing, P. N. Plessow, T. Fortier, S. Diddams, D. Leibfried, and D. R. Leibrandt, Frequency-comb spectroscopy on pure quantum states of a single molecular ion, Science 367, 1458 (2020)

    2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Liu, J. Schmidt, Z. Liu, D. R. Leibrandt, D. Leibfried, and C.-w. Chou, Quantum state tracking and control of a single molecular ion in a thermal environment, Science 385, 790 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Holzapfel, F

    D. Holzapfel, F. Schmid, N. Schwegler, O. Stadler, M. Stadler, A. Ferk, J. P. Home, and D. Kienzler, Quan- tum Control of a Single H + 2 Molecular Ion, Phys. Rev. X 15, 031009 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Mohammadi, A

    A. Mohammadi, A. Kr¨ ukow, A. Mahdian, M. Deiß, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, H. da Silva Jr, M. Raoult, O. Dulieu, and J. Hecker Denschlag, Life and death of a cold BaRb + molecule inside an ultracold cloud of Rb atoms, Phys. Rev. Research3, 013196 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    E. R. Hudson, Method for producing ultracold molecular ions, Phys. Rev. A79, 032716 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    W. G. Rellergert, S. T. Sullivan, S. J. Schowalter, S. Ko- tochigova, K. Chen, and E. R. Hudson, Evidence for sympathetic vibrational cooling of translationally cold molecules, Nature495, 490 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Deiglmayr, A

    J. Deiglmayr, A. G¨ oritz, T. Best, M. Weidem¨ uller, and R. Wester, Reactive collisions of trapped anions with ul- tracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A86, 043438 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    P. Puri, M. Mills, C. Schneider, I. Simbotin, J. A. Mont- gomery Jr, R. Cˆ ot´ e, A. G. Suits, and E. R. Hudson, Syn- thesis of mixed hypermetallic oxide BaOCa + from laser- 5 cooled reagents in an atom-ion hybrid trap, Science357, 1370 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    F. H. Hall and S. Willitsch, Millikelvin reactive collisions between sympathetically cooled molecular ions and laser- cooled atoms in an ion-atom hybrid trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 233202 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    P. Puri, M. Mills, I. Simbotin, J. A. Montgomery Jr, R. Cˆ ot´ e, C. Schneider, A. G. Suits, and E. R. Hudson, Reaction blockading in a reaction between an excited atom and a charged molecule at low collision energy, Nat. Chem.11, 615 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    A. D. D¨ orfler, P. Eberle, D. Koner, M. Tomza, M. Meuwly, and S. Willitsch, Long-range versus short- range effects in cold molecular ion-neutral collisions, Nat. Commun.10, 5429 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Voute, A

    A. Voute, A. D¨ orfler, L. Wiesenfeld, O. Dulieu, F. Gatti, D. Pel´ aez, and S. Willitsch, Charge transfer of polyatomic molecules in ion-atom hybrid traps: Stereodynamics in the millikelvin regime, Phys. Rev. Research5, L032021 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Karman, M

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, Ultracold chemistry as a testbed for few-body physics, Nat. Phys. 20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Jyothi, K

    S. Jyothi, K. N. Egodapitiya, B. Bondurant, Z. Jia, E. Pretzsch, P. Chiappina, G. Shu, and K. R. Brown, A hybrid ion-atom trap with integrated high resolution mass spectrometer, Rev. Sci. Instrum.90, 10 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Rugango, J

    R. Rugango, J. E. Goeders, T. H. Dixon, J. M. Gray, N. Khanyile, G. Shu, R. J. Clark, and K. R. Brown, Sym- pathetic cooling of molecular ion motion to the ground state, New J. Phys.17, 035009 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Bertelsen, S

    A. Bertelsen, S. Jørgensen, and M. Drewsen, The rota- tional temperature of polar molecular ions in coulomb crystals, J. Phys. B39, L83 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Patel and K

    S. Patel and K. R. Brown, Precise determination of ex- cited state rotational constants and black-body ther- mometry in coulomb crystals of Ca+ and CaH+, J. Phys. Chem. A129, 3624 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Werner and P

    H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, An efficient internally contracted multiconfiguration–reference configuration in- teraction method, J. Chem. Phys.89, 5803 (1988)

    1988

  18. [26]

    P. J. Knowles, C. Hampel, and H.-J. Werner, Coupled cluster theory for high spin, open shell reference wave functions, J. Chem. Phys.99, 5219 (1993)

    1993

  19. [27]

    J. G. Hill and K. A. Peterson, Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. XI. pseudopotential- based and all-electron relativistic basis sets for alkali metal (K–Fr) and alkaline earth (Ca–Ra) elements, J. Chem. Phys.147, 244106 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Dunning, Thom H., Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations

    J. Dunning, Thom H., Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen, J. Chem. Phys.90, 1007 (1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    I. S. Lim, P. Schwerdtfeger, B. Metz, and H. Stoll, All- electron and relativistic pseudopotential studies for the group 1 element polarizabilities from K to element 119, J. Chem. Phys.122, 104103 (2005)

    2005

  22. [30]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, F. R. Manby, J. A. Black, K. Doll, A. Heßelmann, D. Kats, A. K¨ ohn, T. Ko- rona, D. A. Kreplin, Q. Ma, I. Miller, Thomas F., A. Mitrushchenkov, K. A. Peterson, I. Polyak, G. Rauhut, and M. Sibaev, The molpro quantum chem- istry package, J. Chem. P...

    2020

  23. [31]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles,et al.,MOLPRO, version 2024.1, a package of ab initio programs, Stuttgart, Ger- many (2024), see http://www.molpro.net

    2024

  24. [32]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby, and M. Sch¨ utz, Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chem- istry program package, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.2, 242 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Tomza, C

    M. Tomza, C. P. Koch, and R. Moszynski, Cold interac- tions between an Yb + ion and a Li atom: Prospects for sympathetic cooling, radiative association, and Feshbach resonances, Phys. Rev. A91, 042706 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Zrafi, H

    W. Zrafi, H. Ladjimi, H. Said, H. Berriche, and M. Tomza, Ab initio electronic structure and prospects for the formation of ultracold calcium–alkali-metal-atom molecular ions, New J. Phys.22, 073015 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    T. P. Tsien, G. A. Parker, and R. T. Pack, Rotation- ally inelastic molecular scattering. computational tests of some simple solutions of the strong coupling problem, J. Chem. Phys.59, 5373 (1973)

    1973

  28. [36]

    H. Li, S. Jyothi, M. Li, J. K los, A. Petrov, K. R. Brown, and S. Kotochigova, Photon-mediated charge exchange reactions between 39K atoms and 40Ca+ ions in a hybrid trap, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 10870 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Langevin, A fundamental formula of kinetic theory, Ann Chim Phys5, 245 (1905)

    P. Langevin, A fundamental formula of kinetic theory, Ann Chim Phys5, 245 (1905)

    1905

  30. [38]

    F. H. J. Hall, M. Aymar, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, and S. Willitsch, Light-assisted ion-neutral reactive pro- cesses in the cold regime: Radiative molecule formation versus charge exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 243202 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Ratschbacher, C

    L. Ratschbacher, C. Zipkes, C. Sias, and M. K¨ ohl, Con- trolling chemical reactions of a single particle, Nat. Phys. 8, 649 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Joger, H

    J. Joger, H. F¨ urst, N. Ewald, T. Feldker, M. Tomza, and R. Gerritsma, Observation of collisions between cold Li atoms and Yb + ions, Phys. Rev. A96, 030703 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Saito, S

    R. Saito, S. Haze, M. Sasakawa, R. Nakai, M. Raoult, H. Da Silva, O. Dulieu, and T. Mukaiyama, Characteri- zation of charge-exchange collisions between ultracold6Li atoms and 40Ca + ions, Phys. Rev. A95, 032709 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    Sikorsky, Z

    T. Sikorsky, Z. Meir, R. Ben-shlomi, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri, Spin-controlled atom–ion chemistry, Nat. Com- mun.9, 920 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    F. A. Gianturco, A. D. D¨ orfler, S. Willitsch, E. Yurt- sever, T. Gonz´ alez-Lezana, and P. Villarreal, N + 2 (2Σg) and Rb( 2S) in a hybrid trap: modeling ion losses from radiative association paths, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 8342 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    M. A. Nichols, Y.-X. Liu, L. Zhu, M.-G. Hu, Y. Liu, and K.-K. Ni, Detection of long-lived complexes in ultra- cold atom-molecule collisions, Phys. Rev. X12, 011049 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Christianen, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Ultracold sticky collisions: Theoretical and experimental status, J. Phys. Chem. A127, 729 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Jachymski, M

    K. Jachymski, M. Gronowski, and M. Tomza, Collisional losses of ultracold molecules due to intermediate complex formation, Phys. Rev. A106, L041301 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Y.-X. Liu, L. Zhu, J. Luke, M. C. Babin, M. Gronowski, H. Ladjimi, M. Tomza, J. L. Bohn, T. V. Tscherbul, and K.-K. Ni, Hyperfine-to-rotational energy transfer in ultracold atom–molecule collisions of Rb and KRb, Nat. Chem.17, 688 (2025). 6

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.