Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 27 references

Phase transitions in generalized XY models

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For generalized XY Hamiltonians of the form $-\sum J_k \cos^k(\theta_u-\theta_v)$ with some $J_k>0$, delocalisation of the dual height function model rules out exponential decay of the nematic order parameter $G_2$; combined with the…

desk verdict Genuine extension of the van Engelenburg–Lis height-duality result to generalized XY models with nematic couplings; the main mechanism is sound but Lemma 3's proof has a fixable gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04972 v1 pith:V5ZMSVFQ submitted 2026-08-05 math-ph math.MPmath.PR

Fabio Plaga This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 82B2082B26
keywords XYmodelheightfunctionsBKTtransitionphasediagramstatisticalmechanicsnematicorderparameterlooprepresentationrandomcurrentexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a bridge between two separate descriptions of a broad family of two-dimensional spin models. For any generalized XY Hamiltonian built from powers of cosines, $-\sum J_k \cos^k(\theta_u-\theta_v)$ with some $J_k>0$, the paper proves that if the associated dual height function model is delocalised, meaning height differences grow without bound, then the nematic order parameter $G_2(v)=\langle\cos(2(\theta_o-\theta_v))\rangle$ cannot decay exponentially. Since the height model can be shown to delocalise at all sufficiently low temperatures (large inverse temperature $\beta$), the result yields a rigorous phase transition in $G_2$ between exponential decay and non-exponential decay. The family includes the much-studied generalized XY model with ferromagnetic and nematic couplings, so the theorem matches the phase diagram expected from numerical simulations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is a generalized loop representation. In the random current expansion of the partition function, the ferromagnetic term $\cos(\theta_u-\theta_v)$ produces single edges and the nematic term $\cos^2(\theta_u-\theta_v)$ produces doubled edges, two parallel edges that may be oriented independently, so the Hamiltonian class $\tilde H$ is exactly the class for which the resulting directed multigraphs admit a well-defined path-switching operation: reversing a directed open path between two marked vertices leaves the weight of the loop configuration unchanged because the underlying undirected multigraph is unchanged. This weight invariance is what converts the height, computed as net loop winding, into statements about $G_2$. The identity $\cos(2\theta)=2\cos^2\theta-1$ embeds the concrete model $H_\Delta$ into the class $\tilde H$; this is why the method covers the first nematic harmonic but would need extra care for higher harmonics such as $\cos(3\theta)$.

What would settle it

Simulate the $H_\Delta$ model on a large finite torus at a temperature where the dual height variance is clearly growing with system size; the theorem predicts that $G_2(v)$ will not decay exponentially with distance. A numerical observation of exponential $G_2$ decay together with unbounded height variance in a Hamiltonian belonging to the class $\tilde H$ would contradict the central claim. Alternatively, checking the weight-invariance under path switching for a loop configuration containing a bare $\cos(3\theta)$ coupling would directly expose where the argument's restriction is essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is an implication, proved for Hamiltonians of the class $\tilde H$: delocalisation of the dual height function model, in the sense of unbounded variance of the height difference (equation (29)), rules out exponential decay of the nematic order parameter $G_2$. The proof works by representing the spin model as a loop model in which the height of a face equals the net winding of loops around that face; a path-switching identity then compares the probability of a loop connection between two vertices with $G_2$. Because the height model is delocalised for all $\beta\ge\beta_0$ for some finite $\beta_0$, a theorem the paper imports from earlier work, Theorem 1 concludes that $G_2$ undergoes a transition at finite temperature. For the concrete Hamiltonians $H_\Delta=-\sum[\Delta\cos(\theta_u-\theta_v)+(1-\Delta)\cos(2(\theta_u-\theta_v))]$, $0\le\Delta\le1$, the same conclusion holds, and a separate comparison argument shows a nematic phase: for $\beta>\beta_c^{\mathrm{XY}}$ and $\Delta$ small enough, $G_1$ decays exponentially while $G_2(v)\ge 1/(8|v|)$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the height model becoming unboundedly variable at low temperatures, a fact imported from an earlier published theorem, and on the Hamiltonian being written with powers of cosines, since the loop-switching step is only well-defined for that algebraic form.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the square lattice, the generalized XY model $H_\Delta$ has a low-temperature regime with no exponential decay of $G_2$ for every $0\le\Delta\le1$.
  • For $\beta>\beta_c^{\mathrm{XY}}$ and $\Delta$ below a threshold $\Delta_0(\beta)$, $G_1$ decays exponentially while $G_2(v)\ge\frac{1}{8|v|}$, giving a rigorous nematic phase.
  • For every Hamiltonian in the class $\tilde H$ with some $J_k>0$, height delocalisation implies failure of exponential decay of $G_2$, so the result is not specific to $H_\Delta$.
  • The new correlation inequality of Theorem 6 bounds $\langle\cos(\theta_a-\theta_c)\rangle$ by a sum over separating sets of $\langle\cos(\theta_a+\theta_c-2\theta_b)\rangle$.
  • Combined with the standard high-temperature exponential decay regime, the results establish a phase transition in $G_2$ between exponential and non-exponential decay for the whole class $\tilde H$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The restriction to powers of cosines suggests a natural test: for a Hamiltonian with a bare $\cos(3\theta)$ coupling, the path-switching symmetry is expected to break down, so a different embedding via Chebyshev polynomials would be needed to extend the result to higher nematic harmonics. This is an inference, not a claim of the paper.
  • Since the delocalisation input is imported, the paper's contribution is the transfer mechanism; if sharper delocalisation criteria become available for more general height potentials, the same loop argument would immediately yield non-exponential decay of $G_2$ for wider spin-model classes.
  • The loop representation might be pushed further to yield quantitative lower bounds on $G_2$ for subclasses where an MMS-type inequality holds, although the paper notes such inequalities are not available for the full class $\tilde H$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies generalized XY models with Hamiltonians of the form \tilde H = -\sum_{u\sim v} \sum_k \tilde J_k \cos^k(\theta_u-\theta_v) and proves a height-function duality for this class. The main result, Theorem 1, states that if the associated dual integer-height model is delocalised in the sense of unbounded height variance, then the nematic order parameter G_2(v)=<\cos(2(\theta_o-\theta_v))> does not decay exponentially. Combining this with a delocalisation theorem of van Engelenburg and Lis (Theorem 4, imported from [25]) yields, at large enough \beta, a regime of non-exponential decay of G_2, hence a finite-temperature phase transition once a high-temperature exponential-decay regime is noted. The paper also proves Theorem 2, a nematic-phase result for the Korshunov--Lee--Grinstein Hamiltonian H_\Delta on Z^2, using an Ashkin--Teller comparison and the rigorous phase diagram of the Ashkin--Teller model. The central mechanism is a loop representation with a path-switching identity (Lemma 2) and a moment bound (Lemma 3) that together convert unbounded height variance into a divergence of weighted sums of nematic correlations.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a meaningful extension of van Engelenburg and Lis's result from the ferromagnetic XY order parameter G_1 to the nematic order parameter G_2. The inclusion of the Korshunov--Lee--Grinstein model is natural because cos(2\theta)=2\cos^2\theta-1 places H_\Delta in the class \tilde H. The paper is careful and honest about its main limitation: the loop-switching argument requires Hamiltonians written as sums of powers of cosines, not as general Fourier sums; this is stated in Remark 11. The proof of Theorem 2 is a worthwhile quantitative improvement over Pfister's comparison argument, giving a power-law lower bound on G_2 in the nematic region. However, the central implication of Theorem 1 rests on Lemma 3, and the proof of Lemma 3 as written contains a genuine gap; until that is repaired, the main theorem is not established. The paper contains no machine-checked proofs or code, but the proof structure is transparent and the imported delocalisation input is a published result.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 5.2, proof of Lemma 3] The opening paragraph of Section 5 asserts that if the height model delocalises in the sense of (29), then E_{\tilde H, B_N^\dagger,\beta}(|h(o)|) \to \infty. This implication is not immediate from (29): unbounded second moment of an integer-valued random variable does not by itself imply unbounded first absolute moment. Some additional input is needed, for example a tightness argument using the characterization of localisation by existence of shift-invariant Gibbs measures, or a direct monotonicity statement for E|h(o)| in the domain. As written, this is a second gap in the proof of Theorem 7, because line (48) uses the divergence of E|h(o)| to drive the lower bound on \chi^\epsilon. The gap is likely local and fixable, but the step should be stated and justified explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, proof of Theorem 3] In the limit \lambda\to\infty the measure concentrates on the angles where cos(4\theta_u)=1, namely \{0,\pi/2,\pi,3\pi/2\}, not on \{0,\pi/4,\pi/2,3\pi/4\} as printed. With the corrected support, the mapping to (s,t)\in\{\pm1\}^2 works as claimed. Also, the formula for \sigma^{(1)} should read \sigma^{(1)}=(s+t)/2 rather than \sigma^{(1)}=s+t/2.
  2. [Section 5.2, proof of Lemma 3] In the same proof, after the change of variables m=k+l, the double sum is over k\ge0 and m\ge k; the subsequent step bounds this by the double sum over all k,m\ge0. This is a valid upper bound, but the text should say so explicitly, especially since the identification with a Touchard polynomial is currently unclear.
  3. [Section 6, proof of Theorem 2] The notation \tilde\Delta and \Delta' is introduced without much explanation; in particular, after choosing \tilde\Delta with \beta(1-\tilde\Delta)>\beta_c^{XY}, the conclusion for all \Delta'\le\tilde\Delta uses the monotonicity of the coupling (1-\Delta') in the nematic term. A sentence clarifying this would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the height-delocalisation-to-G2 implication is derived from first principles, and the imported delocalisation theorem is external and non-tautological.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 7, the central implication, proves that height delocalisation in the sense of unbounded variance (29) forces the cut-sum chi_eps to be infinite and hence rules out exponential decay of G2. This is established through the paper's own loop representation: Theorem 5 identifies the winding statistic W_o with the height h(o); Lemma 2 uses the path-switching bijection to relate the spin observable <sigma_a^2 sigma_b-bar^2> = <cos(2(theta_a - theta_b))> to the loop-connection statistic m_{a,b}; and Lemma 3 bounds E[m_{a,b}] by deg(a) P(m_{a,b} >= 1)^{1/p}. None of these identities redefines G2 as a height quantity or fits G2 to height data; they are inequalities derived from explicit weight decompositions (32)-(34) and the invariances in Definitions 6 and 7. The low-temperature delocalisation input is Theorem 4, quoted from van Engelenburg and Lis [25], a published result whose assumptions do not include the target: it concerns the dual height model, not G2, and its proof uses a change of variables, Lammers's delocalisation criterion, and edge-splitting lemmas. It is therefore independent evidence rather than a self-citation restating Theorem 1. The nematic-region result in Theorem 2 is likewise an external Ashkin-Teller comparison [2] together with Ginibre inequalities. The acknowledged restriction to the class H_tilde is a scope limitation, not circularity. As the skeptic notes, the proof of Lemma 3 as written drops the moment factor (2k+l)^q, so the displayed chain bounds a probability rather than the q-th moment; this is a genuine gap in presentation, but it is a completeness or correctness issue, not a logical reduction of the conclusion to the hypotheses. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation chain, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper relies on standard statistical mechanics results (Ginibre inequalities, Lammers' localisation criterion, the AT phase diagram, the XY delocalisation of [25]) and introduces no fitted parameters. The main input from prior literature is the van Engelenburg-Lis delocalisation theorem, which is the same research-group result but with independent published support and not a restatement of the target result. The invented entity is the technical class H_tilde, which is not an ad hoc physical postulate but a mathematical device.

free parameters (2)
  • Delta_0(beta) = not computed
    The threshold for the nematic region in Theorem 2 is shown to exist, but no explicit value is given; it is not fitted to numerical data, it is an existence parameter.
  • beta_0 = not computed
    The delocalisation threshold in Theorem 1 is shown to exist via Theorem 4 [25], but no explicit value is derived.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The infinite-volume limits of G1 and G2 are well-defined and independent of the exhaustion (Remark 6).
    This relies on Ginibre inequalities and monotonicity of correlations in the volume, a standard fact for this class of Hamiltonians.
  • domain assumption The Gibbs measure of the height function model is well-defined on the infinite lattice and the dichotomy between localisation and delocalisation is captured by the variance criterion (28)-(29).
    This follows from Lammers' theorem, cited as [13], which requires the potential to be convex, symmetric, and supergaussian. The paper verifies that the potential coming from the random-current expansion satisfies these properties.
  • domain assumption The delocalisation of the height function model at large inverse temperature (Theorem 4) holds.
    This is cited verbatim from Theorem 5.3 of [25]. The paper summarizes the proof but does not provide full details. It is a load-bearing input for establishing the low-temperature phase.
  • domain assumption The Ashkin-Teller model phase diagram of Aoun, Dober, and Glazman [2] is correct, including the critical temperature divergence (14).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 2 to obtain exponential decay of the AT two-point function for small Delta and fixed large beta. The paper does not prove this phase diagram.
  • standard math The Ginibre inequalities (Lemma 1) hold for all negative definite Hamiltonians H.
    The paper cites [6] and the class H is exactly the set of real negative definite Hamiltonians (Remark 5).
invented entities (1)
  • The class H_tilde of Hamiltonians, written as sums of powers of cosines.
    purpose: To make the loop representation and path-switching weights well-defined.
    This is a mathematical construction, not a physical entity. It is used to make the proof work; the physical Hamiltonians H_Delta are shown to be equivalent to H_tilde via the identity cos(2theta)=2cos^2(theta)-1. For general H, path switching would break.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase transitions in generalized XY models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V5ZMSVFQ

@misc{pith2026260804972,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase transitions in generalized XY models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V5ZMSVFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04972}
}
read the original abstract

We associate height function models to a range of generalized two-dimensional XY models and prove that delocalisation of the height function model rules out exponential decay of the nematic order parameter in the primal spin model. The argument is based on a generalized loop representation which relates the variance of a height difference between two faces to the nematic order parameter. This generalizes the results by van Engelenburg and Lis (2023). The range of models also includes the much-studied generalized XY model as proposed by Korshunov and independently by Lee and Grinstein, where neighbouring spins interact ferromagnetically favouring parallel alignment and nematically favouring parallel or antiparallel alignment. Moreover, we recover the existence of a nematic region by a classical comparison argument of Pfister (1982).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04972 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic ∆ − β phase diagram adapted from simulations of [4], [8], [23] The standard XY model has a dual model of integer-valued height functions φ : V † → Z defined on the respective dual graph G† = (V † , E† ). It is obtained by introducing the random current expansion of the standard XY model and observing a one-to-one correspondence between sourceless integer currents and divergence￾free antisymmetric flows. Su… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic ∆ − β phase diagram of the isotropic AT model on Z 2 with J = ∆ and U = 1 − ∆ Theorem 3. Consider the generalized XY model with H∆ and the Ashkin–Teller model with J = ∆ 2 and U = 1 − ∆. For u, v ∈ V it holds that ⟨cos(θu − θv)⟩ H∆ G,β ≤ ⟨susv⟩ AT G,β, (15) ⟨cos(2(θu − θv))⟩ H∆ G,β ≤ ⟨susvtutv⟩ AT G,β. (16) Proof. Identify θ ∈ [0, 2π) ↔ σ = (σ (1), σ(2)) ∈ S, where S is the real unit circle, via (σ (1), σ(… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Directed edge types between u and v for Hamiltonians of type (19). A tuple of currents N = (n,m1,m2) induce an undirected multigraph with doubled edges MN by setting s(MN )uv := |n|uv, (25) where s(MN )uv is the number of undirected single edges between u and v and d(MN )uv := |m1|uv + |m2|uv (26) where d(MN )uv is the number of undirected doubled edges between u and v. We say that the directed multigraph with doubl… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    An elementary proof of phase transition in the planar xy model.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 399(1):85–104, 2023

    Diederik van Engelenburg and Marcin Lis. An elementary proof of phase transition in the planar xy model.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 399(1):85–104, 2023. PHASE TRANSITIONS IN GENERALIZED XY MODELS 27

    work page 2023

  2. [25]

    On the duality between height functions and continuous spin models.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 6(4):1291–1325, 2025

    Diederik van Engelenburg and Marcin Lis. On the duality between height functions and continuous spin models.Probability and Mathematical Physics, 6(4):1291–1325, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Depinning in the integer-valued gaussian field and the bkt phase of the 2d villain model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09498, 2021

    Michael Aizenman, Matan Harel, Ron Peled, and Jacob Shapiro. Depinning in the integer-valued gaussian field and the bkt phase of the 2d villain model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09498, 2021

    arXiv 2021

  4. [2]

    Phase diagram of the ashkin– teller model.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 405(2):37, 2024

    Yacine Aoun, Moritz Dober, and Alexander Glazman. Phase diagram of the ashkin– teller model.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 405(2):37, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Competing nematic inter- actions in a generalized xy model in two and three dimensions.Physical Review E, 94(3):032140, 2016

    Gabriel A Canova, Yan Levin, and Jeferson J Arenzon. Competing nematic inter- actions in a generalized xy model in two and three dimensions.Physical Review E, 94(3):032140, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [4]

    The phase diagram of a generalised xy model.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1(30):4907, 1989

    DB Carpenter and JT Chalker. The phase diagram of a generalised xy model.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1(30):4907, 1989. 26 F ABIO PLAGA

    work page 1989

  7. [5]

    Upper bound on the decay of correlations in a general class of o (n)-symmetric models.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 332(3):1235–1255, 2014

    Maxime Gagnebin and Yvan Velenik. Upper bound on the decay of correlations in a general class of o (n)-symmetric models.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 332(3):1235–1255, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [6]

    General formulation of griffiths’ inequalities.Communications in math- ematical physics, 16:310–328, 1970

    Jean Ginibre. General formulation of griffiths’ inequalities.Communications in math- ematical physics, 16:310–328, 1970

    work page 1970

Show all 27 references
  1. [7]

    Possible vortex splitting in the cuprate superconductors.arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.2913, 2007

    R Hlubina. Possible vortex splitting in the cuprate superconductors.arXiv preprint arXiv:0707.2913, 2007

    2007 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Stiffness jump in the generalized xy model on the square lattice.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 87(6):062112, 2013

    David M H¨ ubscher and Stefan Wessel. Stiffness jump in the generalized xy model on the square lattice.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 87(6):062112, 2013

    2013

  3. [9]

    Phase diagram of the modified xy model.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 19(23):4427, 1986

    SE Korshunov. Phase diagram of the modified xy model.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 19(23):4427, 1986

    1986

  4. [10]

    Sequence of phase transitions induced in an array of josephson junc- tions by their crossover toπ-state.Europhysics Letters, 89(1):17004, 2010

    SE Korshunov. Sequence of phase transitions induced in an array of josephson junc- tions by their crossover toπ-state.Europhysics Letters, 89(1):17004, 2010

    2010

  5. [11]

    Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 6(7):1181, 1973

    John Michael Kosterlitz and David James Thouless. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 6(7):1181, 1973

    1973

  6. [12]

    Height function delocalisation on cubic planar graphs.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 182(1):531–550, 2022

    Piet Lammers. Height function delocalisation on cubic planar graphs.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 182(1):531–550, 2022

    2022

  7. [13]

    Delocalisation and absolute-value-fkg in the solid- on-solid model: P

    Piet Lammers and S´ ebastien Ott. Delocalisation and absolute-value-fkg in the solid- on-solid model: P. lammers, s. ott.Probability Theory and related fields, 188(1):63–87, 2024

    2024

  8. [14]

    Strings in two-dimensional classical xy models.Physical review letters, 55(5):541, 1985

    DH Lee and G Grinstein. Strings in two-dimensional classical xy models.Physical review letters, 55(5):541, 1985

    1985

  9. [15]

    A refinement of simon’s correlation inequality.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 77(2):127–135, 1980

    Elliott H Lieb. A refinement of simon’s correlation inequality.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 77(2):127–135, 1980

    1980

  10. [16]

    On the decay of correlations in so (n)- symmetric ferromagnets.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 53(3):299–302, 1977

    Oliver A McBryan and Thomas Spencer. On the decay of correlations in so (n)- symmetric ferromagnets.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 53(3):299–302, 1977

    1977

  11. [17]

    Correlation functions and boundary con- ditions in the ising ferromagnet.Journal of Statistical Physics, 17(4):245–262, 1977

    Alain Messager and Salvador Miracle-Sol´ e. Correlation functions and boundary con- ditions in the ising ferromagnet.Journal of Statistical Physics, 17(4):245–262, 1977

    1977

  12. [18]

    Lectures on the spin and loopo(n) models, 2019

    Ron Peled and Yinon Spinka. Lectures on the spin and loopo(n) models, 2019

    2019

  13. [19]

    Translation invariant equilibrium states of ferromagnetic abelian lattice systems.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 86(3):375–390, 1982

    Charles-Edouard Pfister. Translation invariant equilibrium states of ferromagnetic abelian lattice systems.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 86(3):375–390, 1982

    1982

  14. [20]

    New ordered phases in a class of generalized xy models.Physical review letters, 106(6):067202, 2011

    F´ abio C Poderoso, Jeferson J Arenzon, and Yan Levin. New ordered phases in a class of generalized xy models.Physical review letters, 106(6):067202, 2011

    2011

  15. [21]

    A comparison of plane rotor and ising models.Physics Letters, 1980

    Barry Simon. A comparison of plane rotor and ising models.Physics Letters, 1980

    1980

  16. [22]

    Correlation inequalities and the decay of correlations in ferromagnets

    Barry Simon. Correlation inequalities and the decay of correlations in ferromagnets. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 77(2):111–126, 1980

    1980

  17. [23]

    On quantum spin chains and liquid crystal films

    TJ Sluckin and Timothy Ziman. On quantum spin chains and liquid crystal films. Journal de Physique, 49(4):567–576, 1988

    1988

  18. [26]

    Multiple phase transitions in the xy model with nematic-like couplings

    Milan ˇZukoviˇ c. Multiple phase transitions in the xy model with nematic-like couplings. Physics Letters A, 382(37):2618–2621, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Magnetic quasi-long-range ordering in nematic systems due to competition between higher-order couplings.Physical Review E, 97(5):052101, 2018

    Milan ˇZukoviˇ c and Georgii Kalagov. Magnetic quasi-long-range ordering in nematic systems due to competition between higher-order couplings.Physical Review E, 97(5):052101, 2018. Technische Universit¨at Wien Email address:fabio.plaga@tuwien.ac.at

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.