Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Periodic solutions for a pair of delay-coupled excitable theta neurons

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a pair of identical excitable theta neurons coupled by delayed pulses, this paper derives exact synchronous and alternating periodic solutions, proves that stability of each branch reduces to one parameter, and locates the…

desk verdict Solid analytic extension of the single-neuron delay-coupled theta neuron results; the firing-map-to-Floquet equivalence is unproved but likely patchable, and the abstract overstates the scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06804 v1 pith:VBOJ4JXZ submitted 2024-11-24 nlin.PS q-bio.NC

Carlo R. Laing , Bernd Krauskopf This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.PSq-bio.NC MSC 34K1334K1834C1537C27
keywords thetaneurondelayedpulsatilecouplingsynchronousperiodicsolutionsalternatingspike-timemapsymmetry-breakingbifurcationsaddle-nodenormalform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two identical excitable theta neurons that kick each other with delayed Dirac-delta pulses are shown to support exact periodic firing rhythms of two types: perfectly synchronous and alternating. The paper derives closed-form existence equations for both types, and proves that stability of every branch is controlled by one positive number: all multipliers lie inside the unit circle in one range, and the first instability is a symmetry-breaking bifurcation at the minimum of the period as a function of delay. Branches of symmetry-broken solutions created at that point are proven unstable, with one neutrally stable family at zero delay. The result matters because it turns the simplest delay-coupled excitable network into a fully analytic normal form whose branch skeleton persists when the sharp pulses are replaced by smooth ones.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the firing-time map: because the theta neuron integrates explicitly between pulses, the next firing time of each neuron is a closed-form function of earlier firing times. Linearising this map about a periodic solution gives characteristic polynomials whose roots are treated as the Floquet multipliers, and all dependence on coupling strength, delay, period, and firing count is condensed into the single parameter gamma. Factoring these polynomials separates dynamics within the symmetry subspace from transverse dynamics, which is what makes the symmetry-breaking bifurcation appear as a clean analytic condition.

What would settle it

Compute the Floquet multipliers of the full discontinuous system by direct numerical integration with small pulse perturbations for a chosen branch, and compare them with the roots of the characteristic polynomial; the analytic criterion is wrong if any multiplier exits the unit circle at a parameter value different from the stated symmetry-breaking or saddle-node values, or if stability changes when a perturbed firing time crosses the edge of the delay window without a corresponding root crossing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for coupling strength greater than 2, the delay-coupled pair has infinitely many branches of synchronous periodic solutions satisfying an exact coth equation and infinitely many branches of alternating periodic solutions satisfying the analogous half-integer equation, where the integer counts past firings inside the delay window; the primary synchronous branch has an explicit period formula. Stability of both families is governed by a single parameter: for values between 0 and 1 every Floquet multiplier is inside the unit circle, at one it crosses at the trivial multiplier, which is a symmetry-breaking bifurcation at the minimum of the period-versus-delay curve, and it exits at stated saddle-node values for higher parameter values. The alternating branch with zero firings in the delay window is stable for all positive delays and persists at zero delay, where it coexists with a one-parameter family of neutrally stable symmetry-broken solutions; all other symmetry-broken branches are unstable. Numerical continuation with smooth pulse coupling reproduces the same branch geometry, with extra stability changes appearing only when the pulse is wide.

Load-bearing premise

The stability analysis assumes that stability of the periodic orbit of the discontinuous system is exactly the stability of the linearised firing-time map, and that small perturbations never change the number of firings inside the delay window or the order in which pulses arrive; if a perturbation makes a firing cross the boundary of the delay interval, the analytic stability prediction could miss a border-collision change of stability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On any branch with at least one firing in the delay window, the stable region is exactly the part of the period-versus-delay curve to the right of its minimum, so the minimum period doubles as a symmetry-breaking boundary.
  • The synchronous and alternating families interleave: substituting a half-integer shift turns the synchronous existence equation and characteristic equation into the alternating ones, so the two rhythm types form one analytic structure.
  • In the strong-coupling limit the system becomes an infinite fan of neutrally stable rays, with synchronous periods and alternating periods scaling as fixed fractions of the delay, so all nontrivial stability in this model comes from finite coupling strength.
  • All symmetry-broken solutions that branch from the synchronous and alternating families are unstable except the zero-delay alternating family, which is neutrally stable, so the network cannot settle into a slightly desynchronised periodic state.
  • The Dirac-delta system acts as a normal form: with smooth pulse coupling of sharp width the computed branches and stability agree with the analytics, and only wider pulses introduce additional bifurcations such as Hopf points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the stability criterion predicts a robust experimental fingerprint: any realisation of two delay-coupled excitable elements with pulsatile coupling should lose its in-phase or anti-phase rhythm exactly at the turning point of the period-versus-delay curve, independent of pulse shape.
  • Extension: because the existence equations are pure coth identities, the same branch skeleton should hold for any excitable unit whose pulse-triggered phase advance approximates the tangent shift of the saddle-node-on-invariant-circle normal form, such as class-1 neurons with suitable phase-resetting curves.
  • Extension: the paper mentions more complex periodic solutions with multiple firings per neuron per period; the same spike-time-map machinery should be able to derive their existence and stability, although the event order inside the delay window is no longer fixed.
  • Extension: for wide smooth pulses, the extra stability changes invite the question of whether they are always Hopf bifurcations and whether a pulse-width perturbation expansion around the delta-function limit could predict them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies two identical excitable theta neurons mutually coupled by delayed Dirac delta pulses, system (2)-(3). It constructs synchronous periodic solutions via the single-neuron existence condition (8), and alternating solutions via the substitution tau -> tau - T/2 leading to (29). For each family the authors linearize the firing-time return map and obtain characteristic equations Ds(lambda)=0 [Eq. (19)] and Da(lambda)=0 [Eq. (45)] in terms of a single parameter gamma. They conclude that both families are stable for 0<gamma<1, lose stability in a symmetry-breaking bifurcation at gamma=1 located at the minimum of T(tau), and undergo saddle-node bifurcations at gamma=(n+1)/n or gamma=(2n+1)/(2n-1). Symmetry-broken branches are constructed explicitly (Eqs. (25) and (53)) and shown unstable except for the neutrally stable tau=0 alternating continuum. The final section verifies the qualitative picture by numerical continuation for smooth pulses.

Significance. If the spectral reduction is accepted, the paper provides a complete, explicit two-parameter bifurcation description of two central periodic solution families of a canonical two-neuron network. The formulas are derived rather than fitted, and the smooth-pulse continuation gives falsifiable predictions about persistence and additional stability changes. The n <-> n+1/2 duality between synchronous and alternating solutions is elegant, and the tau=0 reversible family is well explained. The main caveat is that the equivalence between roots of the firing-time-map characteristic equation and Floquet multipliers of the infinite-dimensional impulsive DDE is asserted rather than proved; the paper's stability conclusions are conditional on that equivalence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1.3 (Eqs. (19) and (45))] The paper states without proof that the roots of Ds(lambda) and Da(lambda) are the Floquet multipliers of the corresponding periodic solutions. System (2)-(3) is an impulsive delay differential equation whose phase space includes a history segment, so its monodromy operator is infinite-dimensional; the linearized firing-time map (13)-(16) and (38)-(39) only tracks event times. The authors need either a theorem or a precise reference showing that all multipliers except those computed from the event map are strictly inside the unit circle, and that the event count n and the order of events inside the delay window are locally rigid under small perturbations. Without this, the stability intervals, the symmetry-breaking bifurcation at gamma=1, and the saddle-node statements rest on an unproved reduction. This is the load-bearing step of the paper.
  2. [Abstract and Appendix A.2] The abstract and the discussion state that all symmetry-broken periodic solutions are unstable, but Appendix A.2 explicitly finds that the tau=0 family of symmetry-broken alternating solutions is neutrally stable: the characteristic equation (64) has lambda=1 as a double root, and Sec. 3.3 describes a one-parameter continuum. The claim should be qualified to 'all branches with tau>0' or 'all except the neutrally stable tau=0 family'; as written, the summary of results is not accurate.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.3, Proposition 2(4)] Proposition 2(4) proves only that no root of Da lies outside the unit circle for 0<gamma<1. Since Da always has the trivial root lambda=1, stability additionally requires that no nontrivial root lies on the unit circle. This can be fixed with a short argument: for |lambda|=1 and gamma>0, the modulus equation |lambda^{2n-1}||lambda-gamma|^2=(1-gamma)^2 forces |lambda-gamma|=1-gamma and hence lambda=1. As written, the proof is incomplete for the central stability claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 3.1.3] The stability criterion should read 'all nontrivial multipliers lie inside the unit circle', because Ds and Da always contain the trivial multiplier lambda=1 corresponding to time translation; the quotation of [19, Proposition 1] should carry the same caveat.
  2. [Sec. 3.1.3] The sentence 'we find it more convenient to consider Da(lambda) in (19)' should refer to Eq. (45), not Eq. (19).
  3. [Sec. 1] The phrase 'find all periodic solutions of system (2)-(3)' overstates the scope, since only synchronous and alternating families are analyzed and Sec. 5 exhibits other stable periodic solutions in Fig. 12; suggest rephrasing to 'find all solutions of the considered symmetry classes'.
  4. [Throughout] The text contains numerous broken cross-references (e.g., 'Sec. 33.13.1.1', 'Sec. 22.1', 'Sec. 33.3', 'Appendix AA.1') and typos ('symmtry-broken', 'sytem', 'additonal', 'minumum'); these should be corrected before publication.
  5. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (24)] The derivation divides by sinh(2 phi T), which implicitly assumes phi != 0; this is fine for the symmetry-broken branches but should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all claimed existence and stability results are derived from explicit firing-time maps or from an independently published, parameter-free single-neuron result.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. Existence of synchronous solutions is imported from the authors' own prior work [19] via Eq. (8), but that is a parameter-free, published analytic result for a single self-coupled theta neuron, and the reduction to that problem follows exactly from the synchronous symmetry of the two-neuron system; it is independent support rather than a self-referential derivation. The stability analysis is new: the firing-time maps (11)-(12) and (34)-(35) are derived explicitly from the theta-neuron dynamics and the delta-coupling rule, and the characteristic equations (19) and (45) are obtained by linearizing those maps, not by fitting or by renaming a known quantity. Alternating solutions are obtained from Eq. (8) by the exact substitution tau -> tau - T/2, which is a symmetry reduction (y(t)=x(t+T/2)) rather than a circular renaming: Eq. (29) is a derived consequence of the alternating ansatz, and the subsequent stability computation is independent. No free parameters are fitted, no subset of the target results is used as an input to predict itself, and no 'prediction' is statistically forced. The paper's main weakness, flagged by the skeptical reading, is that the roots of the linearized firing-time characteristic equations are asserted to be the Floquet multipliers of the discontinuous delay system (Eqs. (19) and (45) with the surrounding text), and this equivalence is not proved; in particular, the linearization assumes the firing count and event order are locally rigid, so border-collision events could invalidate it. That is a correctness or rigor concern, not a circularity: it is an unproved modeling assumption, not an equation that reduces to its own input by construction. The self-citations used (e.g., [19] for Eq. (8) and for properties of g_s, and [36] for reappearance of periodic solutions) are either parameter-free published results or standard external theorems, and they do not themselves contain the paper's stability conclusions. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained from the stated model, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard theta-neuron dynamics, the delta-kick rule, the reappearance principle for delay differential equations, and the map-to-Floquet stability equivalence. No parameters are fitted to data; kappa and tau are control parameters fixed for illustrations (kappa=5,3,2.1), and m=10,5 are pulse-shape choices in the numerical section. The central analytic results hold for kappa>2 in the excitable regime.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math The theta neuron is the SNIC normal form and for I<0 has exactly two equilibria; I is set to -1 without loss of generality.
    Sec. 1 after Eq. (1); rescaling of the quadratic integrate-and-fire form makes I=-1 and redefines kappa and tau.
  • domain assumption A Dirac-delta input acts as the instantaneous phase jump tan(theta+/2) = tan(theta-/2) + kappa (Eq. 4).
    Sec. 1, Eq. (4); this is the pulsatile coupling rule taken from [19], load-bearing for the spike-time map.
  • standard math Between kicks each neuron follows the unperturbed excitable theta dynamics with explicit solution (5)-(7).
    Sec. 2, Eqs. (5)-(7), used to convert between firing times and phase.
  • standard math The 'reappearance' principle: a T-periodic solution of a DDE with delay s persists as a solution at delays s+nT (Yanchuk and Perlikowski [36]).
    Used for secondary synchronous branches (Eq. 10) and symmetry-broken alternating branches for tau>0 (Sec. 3.3).
  • domain assumption Stability of periodic solutions is equivalent to stability of the linearized firing-time map; roots lambda of characteristic equations are Floquet multipliers.
    Sec. 2.1 (Eqs. 13-19) and Sec. 3.1.3 (Eqs. 38-45); standard technique from [14] but not proved.
  • domain assumption For tau=0 symmetry-broken alternating solutions, the system is reversible under (t,theta1,theta2) -> (-t,-theta1,-theta2) and has the stated phase portrait.
    Sec. 3.3 and Fig. 6; used to establish a one-parameter family and neutral stability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Periodic solutions for a pair of delay-coupled excitable theta neurons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBOJ4JXZ

@misc{pith2026241206804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Periodic solutions for a pair of delay-coupled excitable theta neurons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBOJ4JXZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06804}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a pair of identical theta neurons in the excitable regime, each coupled to the other via a delayed Dirac delta function with the same delay. This simple network can support different periodic solutions, and we concentrate on two important types: those for which the neurons are perfectly synchronous, and those where the neurons are exactly half a period out of phase and fire alternatingly. Owing to the specific type of pulsatile feedback, we are able to determine these solutions and their stability analytically. More specifically, (infinitely many) branches of periodic solutions of either type are created at saddle-node bifurcations, and they gain stability at symmetry-breaking bifurcations when their period as a function of delay is at its minimum. We also determine the respective branches of symmetry-broken periodic solutions and show that they are all unstable. We demonstrate by considering smoothed pulse-like coupling that the special case of the Dirac delta function can be seen as a sort of normal form: the basic structure of the different periodic solutions of the two theta neurons is preserved, but there may be additional changes of stability along the different branches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06804 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Branches of synchronous and corresponding symmetry-broken periodic solutions of sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The relationship between the phase shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Alternating periodic solution of system (2)–(3) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of firing times (circles) and times at which the neuron’s phase is instantaneously [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Branches of alternating periodic solutions of system (2)–(3) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of alternating periodic solutions of system (2)–(3) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: All solution branches found in Secs. 2 and 3 plotted together, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The pulsatile function P(θ) for m = 10 in panel (a) and m = 5 in panel (b). of solution branches in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Branches of synchronised and corresponding symmetry-broken periodic solutions of (55)– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: It features the same equilibria as system (51)–(52), but the stable and unstable manifolds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Branches of alternating and corresponding symmetry-broken periodic solutions of (55)– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Phase portrait on the square [0, 2π] × [0, 2π] of the planar ODE given by sytem (55)– (56) with τ = 0, showing: the repellor (square), the attractor (circle), the two saddle equilibria (crosses) and their invariant manifolds (blue, red, and purple curves when forming …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Two stable periodic solutions of system (2)–(3) of different types; here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Theta neuron subject to delayed feedback: a prototypical model for self-sustained pulsing

    Carlo R Laing and Bernd Krauskopf. Theta neuron subject to delayed feedback: a prototypical model for self-sustained pulsing. Proc. R. Soc. A , 478:20220292, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Time-delay-induced phase- transition to synchrony in coupled bursting neurons

    Bhim Mani Adhikari, Awadhesh Prasad, and Mukeshwar Dhamala. Time-delay-induced phase- transition to synchrony in coupled bursting neurons. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 21(2):023116, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    Effects of noisy drive on rhythms in networks of exci- tatory and inhibitory neurons

    Christoph B¨ orgers and Nancy Kopell. Effects of noisy drive on rhythms in networks of exci- tatory and inhibitory neurons. Neural computation, 17(3):557–608, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [3]

    Dynamics of fitzhugh-nagumo excitable systems with delayed coupling

    Nikola Buri´ c and Dragana Todorovi´ c. Dynamics of fitzhugh-nagumo excitable systems with delayed coupling. Phys. Rev. E , 67:066222, Jun 2003

    work page 2003

  5. [4]

    Dynamics of delay- coupled excitable neural systems

    Markus A Dahlem, G Hiller, Anastasiia Panchuk, and Eckehard Sch¨ oll. Dynamics of delay- coupled excitable neural systems. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , 19(02):745– 753, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    Johnston

    Ramana Dodla, Abhijit Sen, and George L. Johnston. Phase-locked patterns and amplitude death in a ring of delay-coupled limit cycle oscillators. Phys. Rev. E , 69:056217, May 2004

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony

    Bard Ermentrout. Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Compu- tation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [7]

    Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation

    G B Ermentrout and N Kopell. Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation. SIAM J Appl Math , 46(2):233–253, 1986

    work page 1986

Show all 37 references
  1. [8]

    Topological solitons as addressable phase bits in a driven laser

    Bruno Garbin, Julien Javaloyes, Giovanna Tissoni, and St´ ephane Barland. Topological solitons as addressable phase bits in a driven laser. Nature Communications, 6, jan 2015

    2015

  2. [9]

    Singularities and Groups in Bifurca- tion Theory: Volume II , volume 69

    Martin Golubitsky, Ian Stewart, and David G Schaeffer. Singularities and Groups in Bifurca- tion Theory: Volume II , volume 69. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. 27

    2012

  3. [10]

    Pulse-coupled chemical oscillators with time delay

    Viktor Horvath, Pier Luigi Gentili, Vladimir K Vanag, and Irving R Epstein. Pulse-coupled chemical oscillators with time delay. Angewandte Chemie, 124(28):6984–6987, 2012

    2012

  4. [11]

    Izhikevich

    E.M. Izhikevich. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Burst- ing. The MIT press, 2007

    2007

  5. [12]

    Kelleher, C

    B. Kelleher, C. Bonatto, P. Skoda, S. P. Hegarty, and G. Huyet. Excitation regeneration in delay-coupled oscillators. Physical Review E , 81(3), mar 2010

    2010

  6. [13]

    Multi-jittering instability in oscillatory systems with pulse coupling

    Vladimir Klinshov, Leonhard L¨ ucken, Serhiy Yanchuk, and Vladimir Nekorkin. Multi-jittering instability in oscillatory systems with pulse coupling. In Mark Edelman, Elbert E. N. Macau, and Miguel A. F. Sanjuan, editors, Chaotic, Fractional, and Complex Dynamics: New Insights ...

    2018

  7. [14]

    Synchronization of time-delay coupled pulse oscillators

    VV Klinshov and VI Nekorkin. Synchronization of time-delay coupled pulse oscillators. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 44(1-3):98–107, 2011

    2011

  8. [15]

    Krauskopf, K

    B. Krauskopf, K. R. Schneider, J. Sieber, S. M. Wieczorek, and M. Wolfrum. Excitability and self-pulsations near homoclinic bifurcations in semiconductor laser systems. Optics Commu- nications, 215:367–379, 2003

    2003

  9. [16]

    Krauskopf and J

    B. Krauskopf and J. J. Walker. Bifurcation study of a semiconductor laser with saturable absorber and delayed optical feedback. In Kathy L¨ udge, editor, Nonlinear Laser Dynamics , pages 161–181. Wiley-VCH, 2012

    2012

  10. [17]

    Chaos in small networks of theta neurons

    Carlo R Laing. Chaos in small networks of theta neurons. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 28(7):073101, 2018

    2018

  11. [18]

    Carlo R. Laing. Periodic solutions for a pair of delay-coupled active theta neurons. to appear in The ANZIAM Journal , 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Dynamics of deterministic and stochastic paired excitatory- inhibitory delayed feedback

    Carlo R Laing and Andr´ e Longtin. Dynamics of deterministic and stochastic paired excitatory- inhibitory delayed feedback. Neural computation, 15(12):2779–2822, 2003

    2003

  13. [21]

    P. Li, W. Lin, and K. Efstathiou. Isochronous dynamics in pulse coupled oscillator networks with delay. Chaos, 27(5):053103, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    Perlikowski, S

    P. Perlikowski, S. Yanchuk, O. V. Popovych, and P. A. Tass. Periodic patterns in a ring of delay-coupled oscillators. Phys. Rev. E , 82:036208, Sep 2010

    2010

  15. [23]

    Control of neuronal syn- chrony by nonlinear delayed feedback

    Oleksandr V Popovych, Christian Hauptmann, and Peter A Tass. Control of neuronal syn- chrony by nonlinear delayed feedback. Biological Cybernetics, 95(1):69–85, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Phase-flip bifurcation induced by time delay

    Awadhesh Prasad, J¨ urgen Kurths, Syamal Kumar Dana, and Ramakrishna Ramaswamy. Phase-flip bifurcation induced by time delay. Physical Review E , 74(3):035204, 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Chaos and time-reversal symmetry

    John AG Roberts and GR W Quispel. Chaos and time-reversal symmetry. order and chaos in reversible dynamical systems. Physics Reports, 216(2-3):63–177, 1992

    1992

  18. [26]

    Romeira, R

    B. Romeira, R. Av´ o, J. M. L. Figueiredo, S. Barland, and J. Javaloyes. Regenerative memory in time-delayed neuromorphic photonic resonators. Scientific Reports, 6, 2016. 28

    2016

  19. [27]

    Time-delayed feedback in neurosystems

    Eckehard Sch¨ oll, Gerald Hiller, Philipp H¨ ovel, and Markus A Dahlem. Time-delayed feedback in neurosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 367(1891):1079–1096, 2009

    2009

  20. [28]

    Mutual entrainment of two limit cycle oscillators with time delayed coupling

    Heinz Georg Schuster and Peter Wagner. Mutual entrainment of two limit cycle oscillators with time delayed coupling. Prog. Theor. Phys., 81(5):939–945, 1989

    1989

  21. [29]

    Sieber, K

    J. Sieber, K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, G. Samaey, and D. Roose. DDE-BIFTOOL Manual — Bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations . 2015. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.7144; available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/ddebiftool

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Inphase and antiphase synchronization in a delay-coupled system with applications to a delay-coupled FitzHugh–Nagumo system

    Yongli Song and Jian Xu. Inphase and antiphase synchronization in a delay-coupled system with applications to a delay-coupled FitzHugh–Nagumo system. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 23(10):1659–1670, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    Time delay effect in a living coupled oscillator system with the plasmodium of physarum polycephalum

    Atsuko Takamatsu, Teruo Fujii, and Isao Endo. Time delay effect in a living coupled oscillator system with the plasmodium of physarum polycephalum. Physical Review Letters, 85(9):2026, 2000

    2026

  24. [32]

    Soizic Terrien, Bernd Krauskopf, Neil G. R. Broderick, Louis Andr´ eoli, Foued Selmi, R´ emy Braive, Gr´ egoire Beaudoin, Isabelle Sagnes, and Sylvain Barbay. Asymmetric noise sensitivity of pulse trains in an excitable microlaser with delayed optical feedback. Physical Review...

    2017

  25. [33]

    Pulse train interaction and control in a microcavity laser with delayed optical feedback

    Soizic Terrien, Bernd Krauskopf, Neil GR Broderick, R´ emy Braive, Gr´ egoire Beaudoin, Isabelle Sagnes, and Sylvain Barbay. Pulse train interaction and control in a microcavity laser with delayed optical feedback. Optics Letters, 43(13):3013–3016, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Robust spike timing in an excitable cell with delayed feedback

    Kyle CA Wedgwood, Piotr S lowi´ nski, James Manson, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova, and Bernd Krauskopf. Robust spike timing in an excitable cell with delayed feedback. Journal of the Royal Society Interface , 18(177):20210029, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Analytical and experi- mental study of two delay-coupled excitable units

    Lionel Weicker, Thomas Erneux, Lars Keuninckx, and Jan Danckaert. Analytical and experi- mental study of two delay-coupled excitable units. Phys. Rev. E , 89:012908, Jan 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Delay and periodicity.Phys Rev E, 79(4):046221, 2009

    Serhiy Yanchuk and Przemyslaw Perlikowski. Delay and periodicity.Phys Rev E, 79(4):046221, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Time delay in the Kuramoto model of coupled oscillators

    MK Stephen Yeung and Steven H Strogatz. Time delay in the Kuramoto model of coupled oscillators. Phys Rev Lett , 82(3):648, 1999. 29

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.