Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 110 references

Long-time asymptotics for the $N_{\infty}$-soliton solution to the KdV equation with two types of generalized reflection coefficients

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that KdV soliton gases with singular or step-like reflection coefficients approach a cnoidal wave as $t\to+\infty$, up to an error of order $1/t$, and that the reflection coefficient survives only through a phase…

desk verdict A solid, checkable extension of the KdV soliton gas asymptotics to power-law and jump singularities; the main theorem is plausible, but the local parametrix matching near the interior singularity deserves careful refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02273 v1 pith:VBPQUJOK submitted 2025-02-04 nlin.SI math-phmath.APmath.MPnlin.PS

Guoqiang Zhang , Zhenya Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.APmath.MPnlin.PS MSC 35Q5135Q1537K4037K1037K15
keywords KdVequationsolitongasRiemann-HilbertproblemgeneralizedreflectioncoefficientsDeift-Zhousteepestdescentlong-timeasymptoticsconfluenthypergeometricfunctionsmodifiedBessel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the long-time behavior of an infinite-soliton limit, called a soliton gas, of the Korteweg-de Vries equation when the underlying reflection coefficient is generalized in two ways: a product of power-law factors at the endpoints and at an interior point, or power-law factors times a step-like jump at the interior point. The central result is that in the oscillatory sectors of the $(x,t)$-plane the solution converges as $t\to+\infty$ to a genus-one cnoidal wave, given by a Jacobi elliptic function, with an error of order $1/t$. The only memory of the reflection coefficient in the leading term is a phase shift computed by a logarithmic integral over the spectral interval. In the leftmost sector the solution tends to a constant with the same $O(1/t)$ error, while to the right it is exponentially small. The paper matters because it extends rigorous soliton-gas asymptotics to reflection coefficients with zeros, singularities, and jumps, showing that these features do not alter the leading wave shape.

What carries the argument

The engine is a Riemann-Hilbert problem for a $1\times2$ vector-valued function, transformed through a $g$-function whose boundary values encode the Whitham evolution equation $\xi=\eta_2^2 W(\alpha/\eta_2)$, and an $f$-function that makes the jump matrices constant. After opening lenses, the exact solution is compared with a global outer parametrix built from $\theta$ functions and with local parametrices placed at the endpoints and at the singularity. The local parametrices are the load-bearing objects: at $\eta_1$ and $\eta_2$ they use modified Bessel functions of order $\beta_j$; at $\eta_0$ they use modified Bessel functions of order $(\beta_0\pm1)/2$ for $r_0$ and confluent hypergeometric (Kummer) functions for $r_c$. The error matrix $E=SP^{-1}$ is then controlled by a small-norm argument, yielding the uniform $O(1/t)$ rate.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the parametrix ratio $P_{\eta_0}(P^{\infty})^{-1}$ on the boundary $\partial B(\eta_0)$ using the displayed Bessel and confluent-hypergeometric formulas and track its sup-norm as $t$ increases: if it does not behave as $I_2+O(1/t)$, the local matching asserted in the paper is wrong and the $O(1/t)$ claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for the two generalized reflection coefficients $r_0(\lambda)=(\lambda-\eta_1)^{\beta_1}(\eta_2-\lambda)^{\beta_2}|\lambda-\eta_0|^{\beta_0}\gamma(\lambda)$ and $r_c(\lambda)=(\lambda-\eta_1)^{\beta_1}(\eta_2-\lambda)^{\beta_2}\chi_c(\lambda,\eta_0)\gamma(\lambda)$, the $N_\infty$-soliton solution of the KdV equation satisfies $u(x,t)=u_{0,c}(x,t;\alpha)+O(1/t)$ in the regions $\xi\in(\xi_0,\eta_2^2)$ and $\xi\in(\xi_{\rm crit},\xi_0)$, where $u_{0,c}$ is the elliptic cnoidal wave with phase $\varphi_{0,c}(\alpha)=-\frac{1}{\pi}\int_\alpha^{\eta_2}\frac{\log r_{0,c}(s)}{\sqrt{(s^2-\alpha^2)(\eta_2^2-s^2)}}\,ds$. For $\xi<\xi_{\rm crit}$ the solution approaches the constant $u_{0,c}(\eta_1)$ with error $O(1/t)$, and for $\xi>\eta_2^2$ it decays as $O(e^{-\mu t})$. The proof extends the Deift-Zhou steepest descent analysis of the associated Riemann-Hilbert problem, with the new technical work concentrated in local parametrices at the endpoints and at the interior singularity $\eta_0$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the small local approximations built at the endpoints and at the interior point really match the exact solution on the boundary of those small neighborhoods, with an error of size $1/t$; if that matching is off by a larger amount, the whole $O(1/t)$ result has no foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any fixed velocity $\xi$ in the oscillatory sectors, the soliton gas becomes, up to $O(1/t)$, a periodic train of cnoidal waves whose shape parameter $\alpha$ is selected by the Whitham equation $\xi=\eta_2^2 W(\alpha/\eta_2)$.
  • The phase $\varphi_{0,c}(\alpha)=-\frac{1}{\pi}\int_\alpha^{\eta_2}\frac{\log r_{0,c}(s)}{\sqrt{(s^2-\alpha^2)(\eta_2^2-s^2)}}\,ds$ sets the spatial position of the wave train, so at leading order the reflection coefficient only translates the pattern in $x$.
  • For $\xi<\xi_{\rm crit}$ the solution approaches the constant $u_{0,c}(\eta_1)$ with error $O(1/t)$, while for $\xi>\eta_2^2$ it decays faster than any power, as $O(e^{-\mu t})$.
  • The same framework extends to any finite number of interior singularities $\{\eta_{0,j}\}$, with a local parametrix added at each one, so the $O(1/t)$ asymptotics persist for products of such generalized factors.
  • The initial data inherit the same cnoidal structure as $x\to-\infty$, with phase $\varphi_{0,c}(\eta_1)$ and error $O(1/|x|)$, matching the long-time picture at the leftmost boundary.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the step coefficient $c$ enters the phase through the logarithm of $r_c$, one expects the phase shift to vary continuously with $\log c$, giving a tunable knob on the position of the wave train that is not written out explicitly in the paper.
  • For multiple interior singularities the phase formula should become a sum of single-singularity contributions, one per factor of the generalized reflection coefficient, a superposition rule that the paper suggests but does not state.
  • A direct numerical test would be to truncate the $N_\infty$-soliton construction to large $N$ with spectra drawn from these generalized weights and measure the phase of the resulting cnoidal oscillation; agreement with $\varphi_{0,c}(\alpha)$ at the predicted $1/t$ rate would confirm that the local parametrices match the true solution.
  • The result points toward a universality statement for KdV soliton gases: the late-time wave shape depends on the spectral interval and the selected point $\alpha$, while the reflection coefficient, however singular or discontinuous, affects only the phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies long-time asymptotics of KdV soliton gases obtained as N→∞ limits of N-soliton solutions, using Riemann–Hilbert problems whose jump data are the generalized reflection coefficients r0 = (λ−η1)^β1 (η2−λ)^β2 |λ−η0|^β0 γ(λ) and rc = (λ−η1)^β1 (η2−λ)^β2 χc(λ)γ(λ). The main result, Theorem 2.1, asserts that as t→∞ the solution is, in the regions (ξcrit,ξ0) and (ξ0,η2^2), a genus-one cnoidal wave (2.17) up to O(1/t), with a phase φ0,c(α) determined by a logarithmic integral of the reflection coefficient; on (−∞,ξcrit) it tends to u0,c(η1)+O(1/t), and on (η2^2,∞) it is exponentially small. The proof follows the Deift–Zhou steepest descent scheme: a g-function/f-function conjugation, lens opening, a theta-function outer parametrix, and local parametrices built from modified Bessel functions at η1 and η2, from modified Bessel functions of index (β0±1)/2 at η0 for r0, and from confluent hypergeometric functions at η0 for rc, plus Airy parametrices at the moving point α. The announced contribution is the treatment of zeros and singularities and of a jump discontinuity in the interior of the spectral interval.

Significance. If the asserted parametrix matching estimates hold, the paper is a substantive extension of [58] to generalized Jacobi-type reflection coefficients with an interior singularity or jump, and it provides concrete falsifiable formulas for the phase shift of a KdV soliton gas in terms of the reflection coefficient. The paper is written in the standard steepest-descent paradigm, with explicit model solutions, no fitted parameters, and a leading-order term determined by independent g-function data rather than by the target asymptotic. The main risk is not the overall strategy but the lack of a detailed verification of the sectorwise matching of the new interior parametrices; since that verification is load-bearing for the O(1/t) error, the manuscript needs a major revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2–4.4, Eqs. (4.91), (4.102), (4.103), (4.123)] The O(1/t) error in Theorem 2.1 rests on the uniform estimate Pη0(P∞)^−1 = I2 + O(1/t) on ∂B(η0). For r0, the functions d_l and d_r in (4.91) contain the fractional powers (λ−η0)^β0/2 and (η0−λ)^β0/2, while M_mb has sector-dependent leading entries O(|ζ|^β0/2) or O(|ζ|^−|β0|/2) according to (4.102); the prefactors e^{±β0πiσ3/4} in (4.87)–(4.90) are supposed to cancel the branch jumps over the eight sectors of B(η0), but no sector-by-sector computation is shown. For rc, the analogous cancellation involving κ0 = (i/π) log c and the χ_c^{1/2} jump in d is likewise asserted, not proved. If any sign or factor is wrong, the jump for E on ∂B(η0) would contain an O(1) term and the small-norm argument would collapse. Please provide the missing expansion on each boundary sector or an equivalent product-form argument.
  2. [Introduction, after Eq. (1.10); Section 2] The passage from the discrete-soliton RH problem (1.7) to the integrated problem (1.9) is the foundation of the whole analysis, but for βj ∈ (−1,0) the convergence of the special Riemann sums to the improper integrals is only justified by the sentence that the proof 'only involves calculus' and can be obtained 'with the help of monotonicity and uniform continuity.' No lemma, estimate, or uniformity statement is supplied. Because the integrands are unbounded at η1, η0, and η2, uniform Riemann-integrability is not automatic; a precise statement on the difference between the Riemann sum and the improper integral, uniform where needed for the contour deformation, is required.
  3. [§4.2–4.4, Eqs. (4.100)–(4.119)] The local behavior estimates (4.102) for M_mb and (4.118) for M_CH near ζ = 0 are stated as sector-dependent O(·) bounds, but the paper does not derive them from the explicit modified Bessel or confluent hypergeometric formulas. These estimates are exactly what is needed to match S's local behavior (4.84)–(4.86), so they should be proved or referenced to the standard expansions with constants uniform over the parameter ranges β0 ∈ (−1,0) ∪ (0,∞) and the relevant range of κ0. Without such a derivation, the asserted matching of Pη0 to S at the singularity is not verifiable from the text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.123), §4.4] The text says that Pη0(P∞)^−1 = I2 + O(1/t) holds uniformly for λ ∈ ∂B(η2); it should be λ ∈ ∂B(η0).
  2. [§3.5, Eq. (3.73)] Equation (3.73) and the sentence after it refer to P_η2, but the formula is for the parametrix P_α at λ = α; the local behavior in (3.74) should also be attributed to P_α.
  3. [§5.2, Eqs. (5.131)–(5.132)] The variable in the parametrix near η1 is written as ζη2 = t^2(p ± Ω/2)^2; it should be ζη1.
  4. [References] The reference list contains a duplicate: [22] and [23] are the same Buckingham–Venakides paper.
  5. [Abstract and §5.1] There are typos in the abstract and keywords ('asympotics', 'funtion'), and in §5.1 the notation λ ∈ (η2,η2) appears where an interval such as (−η2,η2) is intended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the long-time asymptotics are a forward Deift–Zhou steepest-descent analysis of a prescribed Riemann–Hilbert problem, with no fitted parameters or self-citation chain forcing the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 2.1, gives the long-time leading term u0,c(x,t;α) = -2α²cn²(...) + α² - η2² with phase φ0,c(α) = -(1/π)∫_α^{η2} log r0,c(s)/√((s²-α²)(η2²-s²)) ds. This is a forward input-output relation: the reflection coefficient r0,c is the prescribed jump data of the Riemann–Hilbert problem for M∞, and the phase is an explicit functional of that same data, not a parameter fitted to the predicted output. The g-function, f-function, outer parametrix P∞, and local parametrices (modified Bessel of index βj at endpoints, modified Bessel with index (β0±1)/2 or confluent hypergeometric at η0) are all constructed from the given r0,c and standard model RH problems; none of them is chosen after the fact to reproduce the cnoidal wave u0,c. The error E is analyzed by the standard small-norm argument, and the O(1/t) rate follows from the claimed uniform parametrix matching estimates (3.59), (3.72), (4.103)/(4.123), (5.133). Those estimates are assertions with explicit formulas; if they fail, the result would be incorrect, but that is a correctness/rigor issue, not circularity. The paper relies on Refs. [34,35,37,38,58,59,66,73,96] for the Deift–Zhou framework and for model parametrices; these are external benchmarks, not self-citations by the present authors, and the cited results do not smuggle in the KdV soliton-gas asymptotic formula itself. No step was found in which a quantity defined in terms of the target result is used to derive that same result, nor any fitted input renamed as a prediction. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the exponents beta_j and the constant c are part of the input model for the reflection coefficient. The axioms are the standard tools of the Deift-Zhou method and the prior soliton gas framework. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The limiting Riemann-Hilbert problem for M_infty has a unique solution via Zhou's vanishing lemma.
    Invoked in Section 1 (paragraph after Eq. 1.9) to assert the existence and uniqueness of the soliton gas RH problem, following Ref. [59] and Zhou's lemma [111].
  • domain assumption The g-function and f-function constructed for the KdV soliton gas in Refs. [58, 59] extend to the generalized reflection coefficients with the stated jump conditions and analyticity properties.
    Sections 3.2, 4.1, and 5.1 state the properties of g and f (e.g., Eqs. 3.36, 3.37) and use them directly; the derivation of these properties is not repeated and is imported from prior work.
  • domain assumption The function W(m) in Eq. (2.13) and the Whitham evolution equation (2.15) uniquely determine the critical velocities xi_crit, xi_0, and the phase point alpha.
    Used in Section 2 to define the regions and the position alpha; this is a standard result from Whitham theory and Ref. [58], not re-derived in this paper.
  • standard math The local behavior estimates for Y, T, and S near the endpoints +/- eta_j and the singularity +/- eta_0 (Eqs. 3.31-3.34, 3.40, 3.44-3.45, 4.82-4.86, 5.126-5.129) are correct.
    These estimates are asserted throughout the paper and are essential for matching the local parametrices. They follow from the jump conditions via standard singular integral estimates, but the paper does not provide complete proofs.
  • domain assumption The reflection coefficient satisfies the symmetry r(-lambda) = r(lambda), inherited from Ref. [58].
    This symmetry is used to extend the jump conditions from the positive interval to the negative interval (e.g., Eq. 3.30). It is stated in the introduction and used throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-time asymptotics for the $N_{\infty}$-soliton solution to the KdV equation with two types of generalized reflection coefficients." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBPQUJOK

@misc{pith2026250202273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-time asymptotics for the $N_\infty$-soliton solution to the KdV equation with two types of generalized reflection coefficients},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBPQUJOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02273}
}
abstract

We systematically investigate the long-time asymptotics for the $N_{\infty}$-soliton solution to the KdV equation in the different regions with the aid of the Riemann-Hilbert (RH) problems with two types of generalized reflection coefficients on the interval $\left[\eta_1, \eta_2\right]\in \mathbb{R}^+$: $r_0(\lambda,\eta_0; \beta_0, \beta_1,\beta_2)=\left(\lambda-\eta_1\right)^{\beta_1}\left(\eta_2-\lambda\right)^{\beta_2}\left|\lambda-\eta_0\right|^{\beta_0}\gamma\left(\lambda\right)$, $r_c(\lambda,\eta_0; \beta_1,\beta_2)=\left(\lambda-\eta_1\right)^{\beta_1}\left(\eta_2-\lambda\right)^{\beta_2}\chi_c\left(\lambda, \eta_0\right)\gamma \left(\lambda\right)$, where the singularity $\eta_0\in (\eta_1, \eta_2)$ and $\beta_j>-1$ ($j=0, 1, 2$), $\gamma: \left[\eta_1, \eta_2\right] \to\mathbb{R}^+$ is continuous and positive on $\left[\eta_1, \eta_2\right]$, with an analytic extension to a neighborhood of this interval, and the step-like function $\chi_c$ is defined as $\chi_c\left(\lambda,\eta_0\right)=1$ for $\lambda\in\left[\eta_1, \eta_0\right)$ and $\chi_c\left(\lambda,\eta_0\right)=c^2$ for $\lambda\in\left(\eta_0, \eta_2\right]$ with $c>0, \, c\ne1$. A critical step in the analysis of RH problems via the Deift-Zhou steepest descent technique is how to construct local parametrices around the endpoints $\eta_j$'s and the singularity $\eta_0$. Specifically, the modified Bessel functions of indexes $\beta_j$'s are utilized for the endpoints $\eta_j$'s, and the modified Bessel functions of index $\left(\beta_0\pm 1\right)\left/\right.2$ and confluent hypergeometric functions are employed around the singularity $\eta_0$ if the reflection coefficients are $r_0$ and $r_c$, respectively. This comprehensive study extends the understanding of generalized reflection coefficients and provides valuable insights into the asymptotics of soliton gases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02273 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Contour deformation by opening lenses in the regio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Jump contours for modified Bessel parametrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Contour deformation by opening lenses in the regio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Jump contour for modified Bessel parametrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Jump contours of the error vector E in the region ξcrit < ξ < ξ0. Then E+ and E− have the following jump conditions E+ = E−    P ∞ U tp f [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contour deformation by opening lenses in the regio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Jump contours of the error vector E in the region ξ < ξcrit. λ ∈  D + 1,l ∪ D+ o  ∩ B(η1), the local parametrix, denoted as P η1 , is P η1 = P ∞  e πi/4−Ωt/2 f d σ3 σ2Cζ−σ3/4 η1 MmB(ζη1 , β1)e− √ζη1 σ3 σ2  e πi/4−Ωt/2 f d −σ3 , (5.131) with ζη2 = t 2 (p + Ω/2)2 ;…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [58]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, Rigorou s asymptotics of a KdV soliton gas, Commun. Math. Phys. 384 (2021) 733–784

    work page 2021

  2. [1]

    Ablowitz, G

    M.J. Ablowitz, G. Biondini, B. Prinari, Inverse scattering transfo rm for the integrable discrete nonlin- ear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonvanishing boundary conditions, Inverse Prob. 23 (2007) 1711–1758

    2007

  3. [2]

    M. J. Ablowitz, P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scatt ering (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991)

    1991

  4. [3]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, H. Segur, Method for solv ing the sine-Gordon equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1262–1264

    1973

  5. [4]

    Akhmediev, A

    N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, Solitons: Nonlinear Pulses and Beams (Chapman and Hall, London, 1997)

    1997

  6. [5]

    Akhmediev, A

    N. Akhmediev, A. Ankiewicz, J. M. Soto-Crespo, Rogue waves an d rational solutions of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. E 80 (2009) 026601

    2009

  7. [6]

    J. Baik, P. Deift, K. Johansson, On the distribution of the length of the longest increasing subsequence of random permutations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999) 1119–11 78

    1999

  8. [7]

    Balogh, M

    F. Balogh, M. Bertola, S.-Y. Lee, K. D. T.-R. Mclaughlin, Strong as ymptotics of the orthogonal polynomials with respect to a measure supported on the plane, Comm . Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015) 112–172

    2015

Show all 110 references
  1. [8]

    Bertola, T

    M. Bertola, T. Grava, G. Orsatti, Soliton shielding of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 127201

    2023

  2. [9]

    Bilman, R

    D. Bilman, R. Buckingham, Large-order asymptotics for multiple- pole solitons of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Nonlinear Sci. 29 (2019) 2185–2229

    2019

  3. [10]

    Bilman, L

    D. Bilman, L. Ling, P. D. Miller, Extreme superposition: Rogue wav es of infinite order and the Painlev´ e-III hierarchy, Duke Math. J. 169 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    Bilman, P

    D. Bilman, P. D. Miller, A robust inverse scattering transform fo r the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019) 1722–1805

    2019

  5. [12]

    Biondini, G

    G. Biondini, G. Kovaˇciˇc, Inverse scattering transform for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014) 0315 06

    2014

  6. [13]

    Biondini, S

    G. Biondini, S. Li, D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for th e focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions in the presence of a disc rete spectrum, Commun. Math. Phys. 382 (2021) 1495–1577

    2021

  7. [14]

    Biondini, D

    G. Biondini, D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for the foc using nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions at infinity and asymptotic stage o f modulational instability, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 70 (2017) 2300–2365

    2017

  8. [15]

    A. I. Bobenko, A. Its, The asymptotic behavior of the discret e holomorphic map Z a via the Rie- mann–Hilbert method, Duke Math. J. 165 (2016) 2607–2682

    2016

  9. [16]

    Bogatskiy, T

    A. Bogatskiy, T. Claeys, A. Its, Hankel determinant and orth ogonal polynomials for a Gaussian weight with a discontinuity at the edge, Commun. Math. Phys. 347 (2016) 1 27–162

    2016

  10. [17]

    Borghese, R

    M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, K.T.-R. McLaughlin, Long time asympto tic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´eaire 35 (2018) 887-920

    2018

  11. [18]

    Boutet de Monvel, J

    A. Boutet de Monvel, J. Lenells, D. Shepelsky, The focusing NLS equation with step-like oscillating background: scenarios of long-time asymptotics, Comm. Math. Ph ys. 383 (2021) 893–952. 32

    2021

  12. [19]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. Its, V. Kotlyarov, Long-time asympto tics for the focusing NLS equation with time-periodic boundary condition on the half-line, Commun. Math. Ph ys. 290 (2009) 479–522

    2009

  13. [20]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. Its, D. Shepelsky, Painlev´ e-type asy mptotics for the Camassa–Holm equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 42 (2010) 1854-1873

    2010

  14. [21]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Shepelsky, L. Zielinski, The short pulse e quation by a Riemann-Hilbert approach, Lett. Math. Phys. 107 (2017) 1345-1373

    2017

  15. [23]

    Buckingham, S

    R. Buckingham, S. Venakides, Long-time asymptotics of the no nlinear Schr¨ odinger equation shock problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 60 (2007) 1349–1414

    2007

  16. [24]

    V. B. Bulchandani, On classical integrability of the hydrodynamic s of quantum integrable systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 435203

    2017

  17. [25]

    Cheng, S

    P. Cheng, S. Venakides, X. Zhou, Long-time asymptotics for t he pure radiation solution of the sine- Gordon equation, Commun. Partial Differential Equations 24 (1999 ) 1195-1262

    1999

  18. [26]

    Congy, G

    T. Congy, G. A. El, G. Roberti, Soliton gas in bidirectional dispers ive hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 103 (2021) 042201

    2021

  19. [27]

    Constantin, On the scattering problem for the Camassa-Ho lm equation, Proc

    A. Constantin, On the scattering problem for the Camassa-Ho lm equation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457 (2001) 953-970

    2001

  20. [28]

    Constantin, R

    A. Constantin, R. I. Ivanov, J. Lenells, Inverse scattering t ransform for the Degasperis-Procesi equa- tion, Nonlinearity 23 (2010) 2559-2575

    2010

  21. [29]

    T. O. Conway, P. Deift, Asymptotics of polynomials orthogonal with respect to a logarithmic weight, SIGMA 14 (2018) 056

    2018

  22. [30]

    Dauxois, M

    T. Dauxois, M. Peyrard, Physics of Solitons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Dea˜no, A

    A. Dea˜no, A. B. J. Kuijlaars, P. Rom´ an, Asymptotics of matrix valued orth ogonal polynomials on [-1, 1], Adv. Math. 423 (2023) 109043

    2023

  24. [32]

    Deift, D

    P. Deift, D. Gioev, T. Kriecherbauer, M. Vanlessen, Universalit y for orthogonal and symplectic Laguerre-type ensembles, J. Stat. Phys. 129 (2007) 949–1053

    2007

  25. [33]

    Deift, S

    P. Deift, S. Kamvissis, T. Kriecherbauer, X. Zhou, The Toda ra refaction problem, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 49 (1996) 35–83

    1996

  26. [34]

    Deift, T

    P. Deift, T. Kriecherbauer, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, S. Venakide s, X. Zhou, Uniform asymptotics for polynomials orthogonal with respect to varying exponential weight s and applications to universality questions in random matrix theory, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52 (199 9) 1335–1425

  27. [35]

    Deift, T

    P. Deift, T. Kriecherbauer, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, S. Venakide s, X. Zhou, Strong asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials with respect to exponential weights, Co mm. Pure Appl. Math. 52 (1999) 1491–1552

    1999

  28. [36]

    Deift, M

    P. Deift, M. Piorkowski, Recurrence coefficients for orthogon al polynomials with a logarithmic weight function, SIGMA 20 (2024) 004

    2024

  29. [37]

    Deift, S

    P. Deift, S. Venakides, X. Zhou, New results in small dispersion K dV by an extension of the steepest descent method for Riemann-Hilbert problems, Int. Math. Res. No tices 1997 (1997) 285–299

    1997

  30. [38]

    Deift, X

    P. Deift, X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscillatory R iemann–Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the MKdV equation, Ann. Math. 137 (1993) 295–368

    1993

  31. [39]

    Deift, X

    P. Deift, X. Zhou, Asymptotics for the Painlev´ e II equation, C omm. Pure Appl. Math. 48 (1995) 277–337. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160480304

    1995 doi

  32. [40]

    Dieng, K

    M. Dieng, K. McLaughlin, Long-time asymptotics for the NLS equ ation via dbar methods, arXiv: 0805.2807, 2008

    2008 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Dyachenko, D

    S. Dyachenko, D. Zakharov, V. Zakharov, Primitive potentials and bounded solutions of the KdV equation, Physica D 333 (2016) 148–156. 33

    2016

  34. [42]

    Egorova, Z

    I. Egorova, Z. Gladka, V. Kotlyarov, G. Teschl, Long-time asy mptotics for the Korteweg–de Vries equation with step-like initial data, Nonlinearity 26 (2013) 1839–186 4

    2013

  35. [43]

    G. A. El, The thermodynamic limit of the Whitham equations, Phys. Lett. A 311 (2003) 374–383

    2003

  36. [44]

    G. A. El, Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics, J. St at. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2021 (2021) 114001

    2021

  37. [45]

    G. A. El, A. M. Kamchatnov, Kinetic equation for a dense soliton g as, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 204101

    2005

  38. [46]

    G. A. El, A. M. Kamchatnov, M. V. Pavlov, S. A. Zykov, Kinetic eq uation for a soliton gas and its hydrodynamic reductions, J. Nonlinear Sci. 21 (2010) 151–191

    2010

  39. [47]

    G. A. El, A. Tovbis, Spectral theory of soliton and breather ga ses for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 052207

    2020

  40. [48]

    Ferapontov, M

    E. Ferapontov, M. V. Pavlov, Kinetic equation for soliton gas: I ntegrable reductions, J. Nonlinear Sci. 32 (2022) 26

    2022

  41. [49]

    Filipuk, W

    G. Filipuk, W. Van Assche, L. Zhang, The recurrence coefficient s of semi-classical Laguerre polynomials and the fourth Painlev´ e equation, J. Phys. Math. Theor. 45 (201 2) 205201

  42. [50]

    A. S. Fokas, A unified transform method for solving linear and ce rtain nonlinear PDE’s, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 453 (1997) 1411-1443

    1997

  43. [51]

    A. S. Fokas, J. Lenells, The unified method: I. nonlinearizable pr oblem on the half-line, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 195201

    2012

  44. [52]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. Its, A. V. Kitaev, Discrete Painlev´ e equatio ns and their appearance in quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 142 (1991) 313–344

    1991

  45. [53]

    A. S. Fokas, A. R. Its, A. V. Kitaev, The isomonodromy approa ch to matric models in 2D quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 147 (1992) 395–430

    1992

  46. [54]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, R. M. Miura, Metho d for solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1095–1097

    1967

  47. [55]

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, R. M. Miura, Korte weg-de Vries equation and general- izations. VI. methods for exact solution, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2 7 (1974) 97–133

    1974

  48. [56]

    A. A. Gelash, D. S. Agafontsev, Strongly interacting soliton ga s and formation of rogue waves, Phys. Rev. E 98 (2018) 042210

    2018

  49. [57]

    Gelash, D

    A. Gelash, D. Agafontsev, V. Zakharov, G. A. El, S. Randoux, P. Suret, Bound state soliton gas dynamics underlying the spontaneous modulational instability, Phys . Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 234102

    2019

  50. [59]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, A. Minak ov, Soliton versus the gas: Fredholm determinants, analysis, and the rapid oscillations behind th e kinetic equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023) 3233-3299

    2023

  51. [60]

    Grava, A

    T. Grava, A. Minakov, On the long-time asymptotic behavior of t he modified Korteweg–de Vries equation with step-like initial data, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020) 58 92–5993

    2020

  52. [61]

    Grunert, G

    K. Grunert, G. Teschl, Long-time asymptotics for the Kortew eg–de Vries equation via nonlinear steep- est descent, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 12 (2009) 287–324

    2009

  53. [62]

    B. Guo, L. Ling, Q. P. Liu, Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: Gen eralized Darboux transformation and rogue wave solutions, Phys. Rev. E 85 (2012) 026607

    2012

  54. [63]

    A. V. Gurevich, L. P. Pitaevskii, Decay of initial discontinuity in th e Korteweg-de Vries equation, JETP Lett. 17 (1973) 193

    1973

  55. [64]

    Hasegawa, Y

    A. Hasegawa, Y. Kodama, Solitons in Optical Communications (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995). 34

    1995

  56. [65]

    Hirota, Exact solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation fo r multiple collisions of solitons, Phys

    R. Hirota, Exact solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation fo r multiple collisions of solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1971) 1192–1194

    1971

  57. [66]

    A. Its, I. Krasovsky, Hankel determinant and orthogonal p olynomials for the Gaussian weight with a jump. In: Integrable systems and random matrices. Vol. 458, Co ntemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2008) pp. 215–247

    2008

  58. [67]

    Jenkins, J

    R. Jenkins, J. Liu, P. Perry, C. Sulem, Soliton resolution for the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 363 (2018) 1003-1049

    2018

  59. [68]

    Y. V. Kartashov, B. A. Malomed, L. Torner, Solitons in nonlinear lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 247

    2011

  60. [69]

    Kotlyarov, A

    V. Kotlyarov, A. Minakov, Riemann–Hilbert problem to the modifie d Korteveg–de Vries equation: Long-time dynamics of the steplike initial data, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2 010) 093506

  61. [70]

    Kriecherbauer, K

    T. Kriecherbauer, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, Strong asymptotics of polynomials orthogonal with respect to Freud weights, Int. Math. Res. Notices 1999 (1999) 299–333

    1999

  62. [71]

    Y. S. Kivshar, G. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2003)

    2003

  63. [72]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, Asymptotic zero beha vior of Laguerre polynomials with negative parameter, Constr. Approx. 20 (2004) 497–523

    2004

  64. [73]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars, K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, W. Van Assche, M. Van lessen, The Riemann–Hilbert approach to strong asymptotics for orthogonal polynomials on [-1 , 1], Adv. Math. 188 (2004) 337–398

    2004

  65. [74]

    Kuijlaars, A

    A. Kuijlaars, A. Tovbis, On minimal energy solutions to certain cla sses of integral equations related to soliton gases for integrable systems, Nonlinearity 34 (2021) 722 7–7254

    2021

  66. [75]

    P. D. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solit ary waves, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21 (1968) 467–490

    1968

  67. [76]

    P. D. Lax, C. D. Levermore, The small dispersion limit of the Kort eweg-de Vries equation. I, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 36 (1983) 253–290

    1983

  68. [77]

    Lenells,The nonlinear steepest descent method for Riemann– Hilbert problems of low regularity, Indiana Math

    J. Lenells,The nonlinear steepest descent method for Riemann– Hilbert problems of low regularity, Indiana Math. J. 66 (2017) 1287-1332

    2017

  69. [78]

    H. Liu, X. Geng, B. Xue, The Deift-Zhou steepest descent met hod to long time asymptotics for the Sasa-Satsuma equation, J. Differential Equations 265 (2018) 598 4-6008

    2018

  70. [79]

    G. D. Lyng, P. D. Miller, The N -soliton of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation for N large, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 60 (2006) 951–1026

    2006

  71. [80]

    K. T. R. McLaughlin, P. D. Miller, The ¯∂ steepest descent method and the asymptotic behavior of polynomials orthogonal on the unit circle with fixed and exponentially v arying non-analytic weights, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006) 48673

    2006

  72. [81]

    K. T. R. McLaughlin, P. D. Miller, The ¯∂ steepest descent method for orthogonal polynomials on the real line with varying weights, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2008) 075

    2008

  73. [82]

    B. A. Malomed, Multidimensional Solitons (American Institute of Physics Publishers: Melville, NY, 2022)

    2022

  74. [83]

    B. A. Malomed, D. Mihalache, F. Wise, L. Torner, Spatiotempora l optical solitons J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 7, R53-R72 (2005)

    2005

  75. [84]

    R. M. Miura, The Korteweg–deVries equation: a survey of resu lts, SIAM Rev. 18 (1976) 412- 459

    1976

  76. [85]

    S. P. Novikov, S. V. Manakov, L. P. Pitaevskii, V. E. Zakharov, Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    1984

  77. [86]

    J. H. V. Nguyen, P. Dyke, D. Luo, B. A. Malomed, R. G. Hulet, Co llisions of matter-wave solitons, Nat. Phys. 10 (2014) 918

    2014

  78. [87]

    Y. Ohta, J. Yang, Rogue waves in the Davey-Stewartson I equ ation, Phys. Rev. E 86 (2012) 036604

    2012

  79. [88]

    L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation (Clarendon Press, New York, 2003). 35

    2003

  80. [89]

    Redor, E

    I. Redor, E. Barth´ elemy, H. Michallet, M. Onorato, N. Mordan t, Experimental evidence of a hydrody- namic soliton gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 214502

    2019

  81. [90]

    Rotschild, B

    C. Rotschild, B. Alfassi, O. Cohen, M. Segev, Long-range inter actions between optical solitons, Nat. Phys. 2 (2006) 769-774

    2006

  82. [91]

    Slunyaev, E

    A. Slunyaev, E. Pelinovsky, Role of multiple soliton interactions in t he generation of rogue waves: The modified Korteweg–de Vries framework, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (20 16) 214501

  83. [92]

    G. I. Stegeman, M. Segev, Optical spatial solitonsand their int eractions: Universality and diversity, Science 286 (1999) 1518-1523

    1999

  84. [93]

    Suret, M

    P. Suret, M. Dufour, G. Roberti, G. El, F. Copie, S. Randoux, S oliton refraction by an optical soliton gas, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (2023) L042002

    2023

  85. [94]

    Suret, S

    P. Suret, S. Randoux, A. Gelash, D. Agafontsev, B. Doyon, G . A. El, Soliton gas: Theory, numerics, and experiments, Phys. Rev. E 109 (2024) 061001

    2024

  86. [95]

    Tovbis, S

    A. Tovbis, S. Venakides, X. Zhou, On semiclassical (zero disper sion limit) solutions of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57 (2004 ) 877–985

    2004

  87. [96]

    Vanlessen, Strong asymptotics of the recurrence coefficie nts of orthogonal polynomials associated to the generalized Jacobi weight, J

    M. Vanlessen, Strong asymptotics of the recurrence coefficie nts of orthogonal polynomials associated to the generalized Jacobi weight, J. Approx. Theory 125 (2003) 1 98–237

    2003

  88. [97]

    Vanlessen, Strong asymptotics of Laguerre-type orthog onal polynomials and applications in random matrix theory, Constr

    M. Vanlessen, Strong asymptotics of Laguerre-type orthog onal polynomials and applications in random matrix theory, Constr. Approx. 25 (2007) 125–175

    2007

  89. [98]

    Z. Wang, E. Fan, Defocusing NLS equation with nonzero backgr ound: Large-time asymptotics in a solitonless region, J. Differential Equations 336 (2022) 334

    2022

  90. [99]

    G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves (Wiley, 1999)

    1999

  91. [100]

    R. Wong, W. Zhang, Uniform asymptotics for Jacobi polynomia ls with varying large negative param- eters—a Riemann-Hilbert approach, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006) 2663–2694

    2006

  92. [101]

    J. Xu, E. Fan, The unified transform method for the Sasa-Sa tsuma equation on the half-line. Proc. R. Soc. A 469 (2013) 20130068

    2013

  93. [102]

    J. Xu, E. Fan, Long-time asymptotics for the Fokas–Lenells e quation with decaying initial value prob- lem: Without solitons, J. Differential Equations 259 (2015) 1098-11 48

    2015

  94. [103]

    Yan, An initial-boundary value problem for the general thre e-component nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on a finite interval, IMA J

    Z. Yan, An initial-boundary value problem for the general thre e-component nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on a finite interval, IMA J. Appl. Math. 86 (2022) 427-489

    2022

  95. [104]

    Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-Integrable Systems (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2010)

    J. Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-Integrable Systems (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2010)

    2010

  96. [105]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, On the long-time asymptotics of the modified C amassa–Holm equation in space–time solitonic regions, Adv. Math. 402 (2022) 108340

    2022

  97. [106]

    solitons

    N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, Interaction of “solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15 (1965) 240

    1965

  98. [107]

    V. E. Zakharov, Kinetic equation for solitons, Sov. Phys. JET P 33 (1971) 538–541

    1971

  99. [108]

    V. E. Zakharov, A. Shabat, Interaction between solitons in a stable medium, Sov. Phys.-JETP 37 (1973) 823–828

    1973

  100. [109]

    V. E. Zakharov, S. V. Manakov, Construction of higher-dime nsional nonlinear integrable systems and of their solutions, Funct. Anal. Appl. 19 (1985) 89–101

    1985

  101. [110]

    Zhang, L

    G. Zhang, L. Ling, Z. Yan, Multi-component nonlinear Schr¨ od inger equations with nonzero boundary conditions: Higher-order vector Peregrine solitons and asymptot ic estimates, J. Nonlinear Sci. 31 (2021) 81

    2021

  102. [111]

    Zhou, The Riemann–Hilbert problem and inverse scattering, SIAM J

    X. Zhou, The Riemann–Hilbert problem and inverse scattering, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 20 (1989) 966–986. 36

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.