Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multiple Comparisons using Composite Likelihood in Clustered Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1411.1329 v2 pith:VCRZQVZI submitted 2014-11-05 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords datalikelihoodmultiplecomparisonscompositeproceduresarisingassess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the problem of multiple hypothesis testing for multidimensional data when inter-correlations are present. The problem of multiple comparisons is common in many applications. When the data is multivariate and correlated, existing multiple comparisons procedures based on maximum likelihood estimation could be prohibitively computationally intensive. We propose to construct multiple comparisons procedures based on composite likelihood statistics. We focus on data arising in three ubiquitous cases: multivariate Gaussian, probit, and quadratic exponential models. To help practitioners assess the quality of our proposed methods, we assess their empirical performance via Monte Carlo simulations. It is shown that composite likelihood based procedures maintain good control of the familywise type I error rate in the presence of intra-cluster correlation, whereas ignoring the correlation leads to erratic performance. Using data arising from a diabetic nephropathy study, we show how our composite likelihood approach makes an otherwise intractable analysis possible.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools