Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Indistinguishable MHz-narrow heralded photon pairs from a whispering gallery resonator

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between two independent signal photons whose indistinguishability is produced by their idler heralds, with a four-fold coincidence dip visibility of $74 \pm 5\%$ at 50 nW pump power per…

desk verdict A credible first demonstration of four-fold HOM interference in a WGMR; the main caveats are missing raw data and an overreached conclusion about identical photons from different resonators. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15760 v1 pith:VCTXK6QH submitted 2024-12-20 quant-ph physics.optics

Sheng-Hsuan Huang , Thomas Dirmeier , Golnoush Shafiee , Kaisa Laiho , Dmitry V. Strekalov , Andrea Aiello , Gerd Leuchs , Christoph Marquardt This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords Hong-Ou-Mandelinterferenceheraldedphotonpairswhisperinggalleryresonatorspontaneousparametricdown-conversionfour-foldcoincidencemeasurementMHzbandwidthcounter-propagatingpumpingtemporalmodematching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that Hong-Ou-Mandel interference can be observed between two independent photons whose indistinguishability is created by a heralding measurement rather than by the generation process itself. In the experiment, a whispering-gallery resonator is pumped from both clockwise and counterclockwise directions with only 50 nW of 532 nm light; the two idler photons from the two pairs herald the two signal photons, which are then overlapped on a beamsplitter. This yields a Hong-Ou-Mandel dip in the four-fold coincidence rate with measured visibility $74 \pm 5\%$. The paper reports this as the first four-fold-coincidence Hong-Ou-Mandel demonstration from a whispering-gallery resonator, and it also shows that the visibility follows the theoretical dependence on the signal-idler correlation $g^{(2)}_{si}(0)$, and that the MHz-scale temporal modes of photons from two different resonators can be matched. A sympathetic reader would care because the source combines very low pump power, narrow and tunable bandwidth, and conditional indistinguishability, which are desirable for scaling photonic quantum information systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the whispering-gallery-mode resonator used as a spontaneous parametric down-conversion source: it is triply resonant, so it converts a few tens of nanowatts of pump into detectable photon pairs, and narrowband, so all involved photons have $\sim$ MHz linewidths. The counter-propagation scheme pumps the same mode from both directions, making the two signal photons and the two idler photons spectrally identical. The heralding mechanism is the two idler clicks: they select a signal pair with a well-defined temporal overlap, and the four-fold coincidence postselection converts the usual variable beamsplitter delay scan into a fixed measurement with electronic time sorting. The theoretical Hong-Ou-Mandel dip is computed from the measured signal-idler correlation $g^{(2)}_{si}(\Delta t_{si})$ and the biphoton spectrum, and this calculation is what the paper compares to the visibility data.

What would settle it

Measure the Hong-Ou-Mandel dip visibility and the four-fold coincidence rate while sweeping the in-coupled pump power from tens to hundreds of nanowatts: in the low-gain regime the visibility should rise monotonically with $g^{(2)}_{si}(0)$ as in Fig. 6 and the four-fold rate should scale as the fourth power of pump power. Seeing the visibility turn over or the rate scale more steeply would indicate that multi-pair emission or backscattering between the two directions contributes to the four-fold coincidences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is a Hong-Ou-Mandel interference dip in the four-fold coincidence rate, the signature that two photons arriving at a beamsplitter are indistinguishable and leave together. Two counter-propagating pump beams in the same whispering-gallery mode generate, through triply resonant spontaneous parametric down-conversion, two photon pairs that share identical spectra and polarization but travel in opposite directions; detecting the two idler photons selects a temporal window in which the two signal photons overlap and can be sent to a non-polarizing beamsplitter. The measured dip contrast is $74 \pm 5\%$ at 50 nW in-coupled pump power per direction, which the paper reports as the first four-fold-coincidence Hong-Ou-Mandel demonstration from a whispering-gallery resonator. The visibility follows the low-gain theoretical relation with the signal-idler correlation $g^{(2)}_{si}(0)$, and two separately fabricated resonators produce photons whose temporal modes match with similarity $99.97\%$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at 50 nW the spontaneous parametric down-conversion is in the low-gain, predominantly single-pair regime in each direction, so the two idler clicks really herald exactly two independent signal photons; if multi-pair emission from one direction or correlated backscattering between clockwise and counterclockwise modes contributes appreciably, the four-fold dip and its interpretation as pairwise indistinguishability would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At 50 nW per direction, many whispering-gallery sources could in principle run from one low-power laser, easing the power budget for scalable photonic experiments.
  • The MHz-level, continuously tunable optical bandwidth matches the linewidths of atomic and solid-state quantum memories, so the photon source can interface with qubit candidates beyond telecom photonics.
  • Matching the temporal modes of photons from two different resonators to $99.97\%$ similarity indicates that independent whispering-gallery resonators can generate effectively identical heralded photons, a prerequisite for multi-source interference.
  • The measured dependence of visibility on $g^{(2)}_{si}(0)$ provides a practical rule: higher signal-idler correlation strength yields higher Hong-Ou-Mandel dip visibility.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: since the paper identifies non-perfect spatial overlap (86% classical visibility) as a main limitation, moving the signal interference into fiber-integrated optics should raise the Hong-Ou-Mandel contrast toward the theoretical low-gain curve; this is a quantitative prediction not made in the paper.
  • Editorial extension: the fifty-nanowatt pump requirement suggests, but the paper does not quantify, that many whispering-gallery sources could be driven from a single low-power laser; measuring the visibility of two independent resonators in one setup would be the direct scalability test.
  • Editorial extension: the herald-based temporal postselection could be extended to conditional multi-photon state preparation, where idler coincidences from more than two pair sources certify larger photon-number states without mechanical delay scanning, though loss and multi-pair terms would need separate modelling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Hong-Ou-Mandel interference between heralded signal photons generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a whispering-gallery resonator pumped bidirectionally into the same mode. The authors record four-fold coincidences in which two idler-photon detections herald two signal photons that are then mixed on a non-polarizing beamsplitter, and they observe a HOM dip with visibility 74±5% at 50 nW in-coupled pump power per direction. They also study the visibility as a function of the signal-idler cross-correlation g^(2)_si(0), compare their data with the theoretical model of Ref. [17], and demonstrate that the temporal modes of heralded photons from two different WGMRs can be matched to a similarity of 99.97%.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a notable experimental step: it extends four-fold HOM interference to MHz-narrow SPDC photons from a WGMR, with extremely low pump power and continuous tunability, which is relevant for interfacing with narrowband atomic or solid-state transitions. The direct four-fold-coincidence measurement and the explicit comparison with a theoretical model are strengths. The main limitations are that the independence of the two counter-propagating pair sources is not directly verified, and the quantitative uncertainty of the central visibility is not fully established; these need to be addressed before the claim is fully convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [II. Results, Fig. 3; Figs. 5 and 6] The paper attributes the stationary OPO interference fringe in Fig. 3 to signal and idler backscattering that phase-locks the CW and CCW modes. If this backscattering couples the modes at the 50-nW operating point of Fig. 5, the two pair sources are not independent, and backscattering-mediated correlations between CW and CCW emissions could contribute four-fold coincidences that are not HOM interference between two independent photons. The theoretical curves in Figs. 5 and 6 assume independent two-mode squeezed states (Ref. [17]), but no cross-correlation between the two idler channels, such as g^(2)_{i_CW,i_CCW}(0), is reported to bound this coupling. Please add such a measurement or another quantitative bound on the CW-CCW coupling in the low-gain regime and discuss its implications for the reported visibility.
  2. [Eq. (2) and Fig. 5] The central quantitative claim is V = 74 ± 5%. The caption of Fig. 5 states that the error bars assume Poissonian photon-counting statistics, but no raw count rates, integration times, background/dark-count levels, or systematic contributions such as beamsplitter imbalance and detector jitter are provided. The 5% uncertainty therefore appears to reflect counting statistics only. Please provide a systematic-error budget and, if possible, the underlying count data so that the visibility claim can be independently evaluated.
  3. [Figs. 5 and 6, Ref. [17]] The theory comparison is not fully transparent: the path efficiencies used in the model are 'estimated based on experimental data' (Sec. II), and the model equations are not summarized in the text, so it is unclear how many parameters are free, which data determine them, and how well the curves actually fit. In particular, the outlier at g^(2)_si(0) = 10 is attributed to departure from the low-gain regime without an independent test of that assumption. Please state explicitly which parameters are fitted, which are independently measured, and provide confidence intervals or residuals for the theory curves.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] Please define C(Δt) precisely, including that Δt is the difference of the two idler detection times, and specify the bin width used for Δt = 0 and the value taken for Δt → ∞.
  2. [Fig. 5 and Fig. 4] Fig. 5 contains typos in the axis label ('experimen al da a') and in the caption ('predication'); also, the meaning of 'lead' and 'tail' in Fig. 4 should be defined relative to the sign of Δt_si.
  3. [Sec. II, after Fig. 1] The sentence 'the idler beams are coupled to other two detectors separately' should be reworded to 'the two idler beams are coupled to the two other detectors separately.'
  4. [Figs. 5 and 6] A short summary of the model assumptions of Ref. [17] should be added to the main text so that the theory curves can be understood without consulting the cited paper.
  5. [Fig. 6] If possible, include uncertainties on the horizontal-axis values of g^(2)_si(0), which are themselves derived from fits to measured correlation functions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HOM dip is a direct four-fold coincidence measurement, and the self-cited theory curve is a parameterized consistency check rather than a forced reduction.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental observation: a four-fold coincidence HOM dip with 74 ± 5% visibility, extracted directly from detector click statistics via Eq. (2), V = [C(∞) − C(0)]/C(∞). This is not defined in terms of the theory inputs, so the main result is self-contained against the measured coincidence data. The theoretical curves in Figs. 5 and 6 are computed from the self-cited model of Ref. [17] with parameters such as decay constants and path efficiencies estimated from the same experiment (Fig. 5 caption: "the theoretical predication including the parameters extracted from Fig 4"). This makes the comparison a parameterized consistency check rather than an ab initio prediction, but it does not reduce the HOM claim to its inputs: the four-fold dip is a distinct observable whose shape and visibility are not equal to the fitted g2 or decay constants by construction. The paper's OPO phase-locking observation (Fig. 3) and its attribution to backscattering is a legitimate validity concern about whether the CW and CCW sources are truly independent; the paper does not report a direct cross-correlation g2 between the two idler channels. That is a missing control and a correctness risk, not a circular derivation. Ref. [17] is a prior same-group publication, but it is a published model tested against new data rather than an invoked uniqueness theorem, so the self-citation is not load-bearing for the central observation. Overall, no circular step can be exhibited; score 2 reflects minor self-citation without load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claim does not rest on invented entities or exotic axioms. The main ledger items are the fitted temporal decay constants, the estimated path efficiencies, and the standard low-gain SPDC/HOM model. The low-gain assumption is load-bearing for interpreting four-fold coincidences as independent heralded pairs, and the self-cited model plus fitted parameters weaken the theory comparison.

free parameters (3)
  • Signal and idler decay times in cross-correlation fit = tau_s = 66 ns, tau_i = 47 ns
    Double-exponential fits to the measured g_si(2)(Delta t) in Fig. 4; these values set the shape of the theoretical HOM curve in Fig. 5.
  • Beam path efficiencies in the HOM model = not stated numerically
    The theory line following Ref. [17] uses efficiencies on each beam path 'estimated based on experimental data'; no independent measurement or error budget is given.
  • Coincidence window edge parameters = -2 tau_i to +2 tau_s and +-400 ns
    The four-fold extraction window is set manually from the fitted cross-correlation; changing the window changes the dip shape and visibility.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Quantum model of heralded two-photon interference from Ref. [17] is valid for this system.
    Used to compute the theoretical HOM curves in Figs. 5 and 6.
  • domain assumption Single round-trip power loss in the nonlinear crystal is negligible.
    Explicitly assumed in Section II when computing the theoretical prediction in Fig. 5.
  • domain assumption The non-polarizing beamsplitters have exactly 0.5 splitting ratio.
    Assumed for the theory; no measured splitting ratio or uncertainty is reported.
  • domain assumption Photon counting statistics are Poissonian and dominate the uncertainties.
    Stated in the Fig. 5 caption; no systematic uncertainty model is provided.
  • domain assumption SPDC is in the low-gain regime at 50 nW pump power.
    Invoked to justify the theory comparison, and stated to break down at higher pump powers in the discussion of Fig. 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Indistinguishable MHz-narrow heralded photon pairs from a whispering gallery resonator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VCTXK6QH

@misc{pith2026241215760,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Indistinguishable MHz-narrow heralded photon pairs from a whispering gallery resonator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VCTXK6QH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15760}
}
abstract

Hong-Ou-Mandel interference plays a vital role in many quantum optical applications where indistinguishability of two photons is important. Such photon pairs are commonly generated as the signal and idler in the frequency and polarization-degenerate spontaneous parametric down conversion~(SPDC). To scale this approach to a larger number of photons we demonstrate how two independent signal photons radiated into different spatial modes can be rendered conditionally indistinguishable by a heralding measurement performed on their respective idlers. We use the SPDC in a whispering gallery resonator, which is already proven to be versatile sources of quantum states. Its extreme conversion efficiency allowed us to perform our measurements with only \qty{50}{nW} of in-coupled pump power in each propagation direction. The Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of two counter-propagating signal photons manifested itself in the four-fold coincidence rate, where the two idler photons detection heralds a pair of signal photons with a desired temporal overlap. We achieved the Hong-Ou-Mandel dip contrast of \(74\pm 5\%\). Importantly, the optical bandwidth of all involved photons is of the order of a MHz and is continuously tunable. This, on the one hand, makes it possible to achieve the necessary temporal measurements resolution with standard electronics, and on the other hand, creates a quantum states source compatible with other candidates for qubit implementation, such as optical transitions in solid-state or vaporous systems. We also discuss the possibility of generating photon pairs with similar temporal modes from two different whispering gallery resonators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15760 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Sketch of the experimental setup. EOM: electro-optic mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Reflected pump spectra for the CW and CCW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Normalized second-order correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Normalized HOM interference measured in four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Visibility of the HOM interference in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Normalized second [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Patel, J

    M. Patel, J. B. Altepeter, Y.-P. Huang, N. N. Oza, and P. Kumar, Independent telecom-fiber sources of quantum indistinguishable single photons, New Journal of Physics 16, 043019 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    The WGMR we used in this experiment is the same as reported in Ref. [16]. It is coarsely tempera- ture stabilized at 90 ◦C by using a Peltier element and a temperature controller. We utilize a 532 nm continuous- wave laser as a pump laser and couple into the WGMR from the CW and CCW directions. The non-polarizing beamsplitters located on the left side of ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    D. J. Brod, E. F. Galv˜ ao, A. Crespi, R. Osellame, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Photonic implementa- tion of boson sampling: a review, Advanced Photonics 1, 034001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    The limiting factor comes mainly from the spatial mode dis- tortion caused by the optical components we used

    The high- est visibility we achieved in this experiment is 86%. The limiting factor comes mainly from the spatial mode dis- tortion caused by the optical components we used. The visibility can be easily improved to almost unity if we first couple the signals into fibers and then let them to interfere. 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Piezo displacement[nm] 0.0 0.2...

    work page 2000

  5. [4]

    We use dou- ble exponential decay function to fit the results and use the fitted results to calculate the similarity between two cross-correlation functions. The similarity S is defined as S = ∫ tc f (x)g(x) dx √ ∫ tc f (x)2 dx × ∫ tc g(x)2 dx , (1) 4 where tc is the coherence time that is defined as the relative time at which g(2) si (∆ tsi) decayed by 1 / e...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Instead, all data points in Fig

    In our case, mov- ing the beam splitter is not necessary and in fact would not be efficient, considering the long coherence length of the WGMR SPDC photons. Instead, all data points in Fig. 5 are recorded in a single measurement with fixed experimental setup, and then postselectively sorted into a time series. The visibility of the HOM interference is defined...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Halder, A

    M. Halder, A. Beveratos, N. Gisin, V. Scarani, C. Simon, and H. Zbinden, Entangling independent photons by time measurement, Nature physics 3, 692 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    97%, indi- cating that the temporal modes are well matched

    The similarity S between these two temporal modes are 99 . 97%, indi- cating that the temporal modes are well matched. Note that the frequency of generated photons has been shown to be continuously tunable by perturbing the evanescent field [22], or applying electric field on the resonator [23]. This paves the way for an efficient HOM interference from differe...

    work page

Show all 29 references
  1. [8]

    Hong, Z.-Y

    C.-K. Hong, Z.-Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by in- terference, Physical review letters 59, 2044 (1987)

    1987

  2. [9]

    X.-M. Hu, Y. Guo, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Progress in quantum teleportation, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 339 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, Measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution, Physical review letters 108, 130503 (2012)

    2012

  4. [11]

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits, Reviews of modern physics 79, 135 (2007)

    2007

  5. [12]

    P. Qian, Z. Gu, R. Cao, R. Wen, Z. Ou, J. Chen, and W. Zhang, Temporal purity and quantum interference of single photons from two independent cold atomic ensem- bles, Physical review letters 117, 013602 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Bruno, A

    N. Bruno, A. Martin, T. Guerreiro, B. Sanguinetti, and R. T. Thew, Pulsed source of spectrally uncorrelated and indistinguishable photons at telecom wavelengths, Optics express 22, 17246 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    I. I. Faruque, G. F. Sinclair, D. Bonneau, J. G. Rar- ity, and M. G. Thompson, On-chip quantum interference with heralded photons from two independent micro-ring resonator sources in silicon photonics, Optics express 26, 20379 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Alexander, A

    K. Alexander, A. Bahgat, A. Benyamini, D. Black, D. Bonneau, S. Burgos, B. Burridge, G. Campbell, G. Catalano, A. Ceballos, et al. , A manufacturable plat- form for photonic quantum computing, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17570 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    S¨ oller, O

    C. S¨ oller, O. Cohen, B. J. Smith, I. A. Walmsley, and C. Silberhorn, High-performance single-photon genera- tion with commercial-grade optical fiber, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 83, 031806 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    E. D. Black, An introduction to pound–drever–hall laser frequency stabilization, American journal of physics 69, 79 (2001)

    2001

  11. [19]

    Jeong, Y.-S

    T. Jeong, Y.-S. Lee, J. Park, H. Kim, and H. S. Moon, 6 Quantum interference between autonomous single- photon sources from doppler-broadened atomic ensem- bles, Optica 4, 1167 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    F¨ ortsch, J

    M. F¨ ortsch, J. U. F¨ urst, C. Wittmann, D. Strekalov, A. Aiello, M. V. Chekhova, C. Silberhorn, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, A versatile source of single photons for quantum information processing, Nature communica- tions 4, 1818 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Otterpohl, F

    A. Otterpohl, F. Sedlmeir, U. Vogl, T. Dirmeier, G. Shafiee, G. Schunk, D. V. Strekalov, H. G. Schwe- fel, T. Gehring, U. L. Andersen, et al. , Squeezed vacuum states from a whispering gallery mode resonator, Optica 6, 1375 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Huang, T

    S.-H. Huang, T. Dirmeier, G. Shafiee, K. Laiho, D. V. Strekalov, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, Polarization- entangled photons from a whispering gallery resonator, npj Quantum Information 10, 85 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Laiho, T

    K. Laiho, T. Dirmeier, G. Shafiee, and C. Marquardt, Unfolding the hong–ou–mandel interference between her- alded photons from narrowband twin beams, New Jour- nal of Physics 25, 083008 (2023)

    2023

  16. [25]

    Shafiee, D

    G. Shafiee, D. V. Strekalov, A. Otterpohl, F. Sedlmeir, G. Schunk, U. Vogl, H. G. Schwefel, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, Nonlinear power dependence of the spec- tral properties of an optical parametric oscillator below threshold in the quantum regime, New Journal of Physics 22,...

    2020

  17. [26]

    Sedlmeir, M

    F. Sedlmeir, M. R. Foreman, U. Vogl, R. Zeltner, G. Schunk, D. V. Strekalov, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs, and H. G. Schwefel, Polarization-selective out-coupling of whispering-gallery modes, Physical Review Applied 7, 024029 (2017)

    2017

  18. [27]

    Chuu and S

    C.-S. Chuu and S. Harris, Ultrabright backward-wave biphoton source, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecu- lar, and Optical Physics 83, 061803 (2011)

    2011

  19. [28]

    Schunk, U

    G. Schunk, U. Vogl, D. V. Strekalov, M. F¨ ortsch, F. Sedlmeir, H. G. Schwefel, M. G¨ obelt, S. Christiansen, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, Interfacing transitions of different alkali atoms and telecom bands using one nar- rowband photon pair source, Optica 2, 773 (2015)

    2015

  20. [29]

    Minet, S

    Y. Minet, S. J. Herr, I. Breunig, H. Zappe, and K. Buse, Electro-optically tunable single-frequency lasing from neodymium-doped lithium niobate microresonators, Op- tics Express 30, 28335 (2022)

    2022

  21. [99]

    −400 −300 −200 −100 0 100 200 300 400 t i, CCW - t i, CW [ns] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Normalized four -fold coincidence[a.u] Theory experimen al da a FIG

    99%, showing that the temporal mode of the para- metric photons between both propagating directions are well matched. −400 −300 −200 −100 0 100 200 300 400 t i, CCW - t i, CW [ns] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Normalized four -fold coincidence[a.u] Theory experimen al da a F...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.