Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Line-solitons, line-shocks, and conservation laws of a universal KP-like equation in 2+1 dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper classifies all low-order conservation laws and all line-soliton and line-shock solutions of a universal KP-like equation in 2+1 dimensions, with line-shocks existing only in the defocusing case.

desk verdict Line-soliton and line-shock results are solid and checkable; the conservation-law classification is plausible but the q=-2 case and missing Maple audit leave the completeness claim unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03962 v3 pith:VCX2JUXR submitted 2019-08-11 math-ph math.MPnlin.SI

Stephen C. Anco , M.L. Gandarias , Elena Recio This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 35Q5335C0835A3035L67
keywords modifiedgKPequationKadomtsev-Petviashvililine-solitonsline-shocksconservationlawsmultipliermethodtopologicalchargesp-powernonlinearity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a 2+1-dimensional wave equation that generalizes the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation to arbitrary power nonlinearity while adding two transverse terms, one local and one nonlocal. It claims to enumerate, up to equivalence, every low-order local conservation law of this equation, and to write down every line-soliton and line-shock traveling wave it admits, with the waves parameterized by speed and direction angle. If correct, the paper settles which conserved quantities exist for each power $p$ and predicts a kinematic region in which line waves can travel; it also predicts a defocusing case in which line-shocks, absent for KP, appear. This matters because the conserved quantities are exactly the tools used to study stability and well-posedness of such wave models.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through two mechanisms. Conservation laws are classified by the multiplier method: every non-trivial low-order conservation law corresponds to a multiplier $Q$ of differential order less than four, and solving the Euler-operator determining equation by a computer-algebra case analysis yields the complete case list. Line solutions are obtained by symmetry multi-reduction: the two traveling-wave symmetries reduce the PDE to a third-order ODE whose first integrals are supplied by the momentum and mass conservation laws, giving the separable ODE $U'^2+V(U)=0$ with $V(U)=-AU^2+BU^{2q+2}+2CU^{q+2}$. The zero set of $V$ decides the solution type: a simple root gives a line-soliton, while a double root at which $V=V'=0$ gives a line-shock.

What would settle it

A concrete check: take $q=2$, $\sigma_1=\sigma_2=1$, set $a=1$, $b=3$ so that none of the special cases apply, and solve the multiplier determining system for multipliers of order less than four; if any non-trivial multiplier beyond $w_x$ and $f(t)$ appears, Theorem 3.1 is false. Re-running the same computation at $q=-2$ would show whether case (vii) is a genuine limit or an artifact of the case-merging step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is twofold. First, for the scaled potential equation with $q=p/2>0$, the only low-order conservation laws are, up to equivalence, the momentum density $\tfrac12 w_x^2$ and the mass density $w_x f(t)$, plus up to thirteen additional families that exist only for special values of $q$ and of the coefficients. Second, the paper gives all line-soliton and line-shock solutions of the form $u=U(x+\mu y-\nu t)$ in explicit closed form: symmetric bright/dark pairs for even $q$, non-symmetric bright/dark pairs for odd $q$ in the focusing case, single bright waves in the half-integer case, and line-shocks only when $\sigma_1=-1$. These results are stated as Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.1.

Load-bearing premise

The completeness of the conservation-law list rests on a computer-algebra case analysis that the paper does not make fully reproducible, and the list itself contains a case with $q=-2$ that falls outside the equation's stated $q>0$ domain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For each admissible power and coefficient set, the line-soliton family is finite-dimensional and explicitly parameterized, so stability and collision properties can be studied without re-solving the PDE.
  • The kinematic condition $c>\sigma_2\sin^2\theta/\cos\theta$ forces line-solitons to have a transverse velocity component whenever $\alpha/\beta<0$; no purely $x$-directed traveling wave exists there.
  • Line-shocks exist only in the defocusing case $\sigma_1=-1$ and satisfy a one-dimensional speed-angle curve, so a shock is determined by its height and width; at $k^2=1$ with sign-changing dispersion the shock is stationary.
  • For the $q=1$ equation, momentum and $y$-momentum are boundary line integrals, which yields constraints on initial data; for $b\neq a$ the momentum constraint forces $u=0$ in $L^2$, implying ill-posedness of the Cauchy problem in $L^2$.
  • The scaling weights of the conserved integrals put the critical powers at $q=2/3$ for the $L^2$ norm and $q=2$ for the energy, giving subcritical ranges where global existence can be expected.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the classification is complete, then $p=1$ and $p=2$ are the only powers carrying extra low-order conservation laws, suggesting that the universal modified KP equation is the unique member of the family with a rich conserved structure and that perturbing $p$ destroys it.
  • The stationary line-shock at $k^2=1$, $\sigma_2=-1$ is unusual enough to warrant a dedicated numerical stability study, which the paper does not attempt.
  • The topological-charge constraints imply that standard $L^2$-based well-posedness for the $q=1$ equation holds only under coefficient restrictions; a natural testable extension is whether a weighted or anisotropic Sobolev space restores well-posedness without those restrictions.
  • The explicit speed-angle-height-width formulas could be used to fit measured solitary-wave data in shallow-water or ultracold-atom experiments to determine the effective power $p$ and the combination $a+b$; this is not explored in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the potential form (2.10) of a modified generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with power nonlinearity p=2q, deriving two main results. First, it classifies all low-order conservation laws by the multiplier method, presenting a list of conserved densities and fluxes, and it derives integral constraints and well-posedness conditions from topological charges. Second, it derives all line-soliton and line-shock travelling wave solutions for the equation, parameterizes them by height, width, speed, and direction angle, and delineates the kinematically allowed regions in the four focussing/defocussing and normal/sign-changing dispersion cases. The line-soliton derivation uses a symmetry multi-reduction method to obtain a separable ODE, whose solutions are then classified via a potential V(U).

Significance. If the completeness claims are correct, the paper gives a useful inventory of conservation laws and travelling wave solutions for a broad family of KP-like equations, with explicit formulas that are readily testable by substitution. The physical parameterization in terms of speed and angle and the identification of line-shock solutions are valuable contributions, and the topological-charge interpretation of the f(t)-dependent conservation laws is an interesting extension of recent work. Explicit solution formulas, the careful split into even/odd/half-integer q cases, and the detailed kinematic conditions are strengths. However, the completeness of the conservation-law classification rests on an unshipped Maple computation, and one listed case contradicts the stated domain q>0, so the central 'all' claims are not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.1, case (vii)] Case (vii) lists multipliers and conservation laws for q=-2 with a=-b, but the equation (2.10) is posed with q>0 and q being a positive integer or half-integer. For q=-2 the terms w_x^{2q}, w_x^{q-1}, and w_x^q in (2.10) involve negative powers of w_x, so the listed quantity is not a local conservation law of the stated PDE. This indicates that the computer case tree admitted a branch outside the domain and that the case-merging step did not enforce q>0. Since the 'all low-order conservation laws' claim in Theorem 3.1 is the load-bearing classification, this internal contradiction must be resolved by rerunning the computation with q>0 imposed and verifying that no other inadmissible branches remain.
  2. [Abstract and Section 4 (Theorem 4.1)] The abstract and introduction claim line-soliton results for all p>0, but Theorem 4.1 is stated only for p=2q a positive integer, and the derivation in Section 4.1 assumes q is a positive integer or half-integer. The remark after Theorem 4.1 extends the formulas to rational q, but no proof is given for arbitrary real p>0. If the intended claim is only for positive integer p, the abstract and Section 1 should be revised; if the claim covers all p>0, a derivation for general q is needed, since the quadrature ODE (4.7) contains fractional powers for non-half-integer q and requires additional justification.
  3. [Appendix, Maple computation] The completeness of Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.1 depends on an unshipped Maple computation (rifsimp, pdsolve, dsolve, and case merging following Ref. [29]). Because no worksheet, code, or detailed audit trail is provided, the reader cannot independently verify that all cases of the 3356-equation determining system were solved correctly and that overlapping cases were merged without loss or spurious inclusion. The q=-2 error reinforces this concern. The authors should either supply the computation as supplementary material or provide an independent verification of the completeness of the listed cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, equation (2.10)] The text says 'q>0' and also 'q is either a positive integer or a positive half-integer', but the two statements are not equivalent; please state explicitly whether the analysis covers all real q>0 or only positive integers and half-integers, since this affects the scope of both main theorems.
  2. [Section 3.2, equation (3.51)] The conserved integral labeled Cvar.[u] for q=-2 in display (3.51) inherits the inadmissible q=-2 case; if case (vii) is removed or corrected, this displayed integral and the subsequent discussion in (3.53) must be updated accordingly.
  3. [Section 5.1, parameterization formulas] Several formulas in Section 5 use the symbol k both as the coefficient combination defined in (5.6) and as a generic index; please rename one of them to avoid confusion in displays (5.10)-(5.24).
  4. [Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 4.3] The profile formulas (4.37) and (4.43) are stated for h>0, w>0 with certain restrictions, but the relation between the sign of U (bright/dark) and the parameters s, tilde{s} is only given later in Tables 2-4; a short clarifying sentence in the theorems would improve readability.
  5. [Throughout] There are minor typographical issues in the displayed conservation laws, for example in (3.27b) the term '1/2 b w^{1/2}_x w_y w + w w_t' appears with inconsistent ordering; a careful proofreading of the long flux expressions is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the conservation-law and line-soliton derivations are self-contained, with only methodological self-citations that are not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The conservation laws are obtained by solving the multiplier determining equation (3.5) directly; Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.1 list explicit multipliers and densities/fluxes, and the appendix describes the Maple case-tree computation rather than importing the result from a prior paper. The line-soliton derivation begins with direct substitution of u=U(x+mu y-nu t) into (2.11), yielding ODE (4.6), and then uses the paper's own conservation laws (3.23)-(3.24) only as an integration device to reach the separable ODE (4.7); the final formulas are explicit and can be checked by substitution. Refs [7], [8], and [29] are self-citations, but they supply methods (symmetry multi-reduction, topological-charge equivalence, case merging) whose assumptions do not include the paper's target classification, so they are not circular reductions. The appendix's admission that the classification rests on an unshipped Maple run, and the appearance of case (vii) q=-2 outside the stated q>0 domain of (2.10), are verification/correctness concerns, not circularity. Overall score 1 reflects minor self-citation without load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants. It rests on standard symmetry/multiplier theory, on a specific choice of nonlocal-operator boundary conditions for line waves, and on two author-side computational or analytic tools (the Maple classification and the topological-charge theorem of Ref [8]) that are not fully reproduced here.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The multiplier method: all nontrivial conservation laws in characteristic form correspond to multipliers Q satisfying the determining equation (3.5), with equivalence up to locally trivial conservation laws (Olver's theory, Refs [26,9,2]).
    Invoked in Section 3 to justify that solving the multiplier determining equation gives all low-order conservation laws.
  • domain assumption The line-soliton ansatz u=U(x+μy-νt) with the nonlocal term evaluated as ∂_x^{-1}u_y = μU under the choice x2=x1=-∞ (equation 4.5).
    Used in Section 4.1 to reduce the PDE to the ODE (4.6); a different asymptotic convention for the nonlocal operator would give a different ODE family.
  • domain assumption Solutions are smooth with exponential decay in ξ as |ξ|→∞ for solitons, and decay to a nonzero constant on one side for shocks, so that the first-integral constants vanish (Section 4.1, eq. 4.7).
    Needed to pass from the third-order ODE to the separable first-order ODE; shocks are not explicitly covered by the stated asymptotic condition U→0.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the Maple solution of the 3356-equation determining system and of the case-merging procedure of Ref [29].
    Underlies Proposition 3.1's claim to classify all multipliers of differential order less than four; no artifact is provided for audit.
  • domain assumption Theorem 2 of Ref [8] (Anco-Recio), which converts conservation laws involving an arbitrary function of time into topological-charge integral constraints on the Cauchy problem.
    Used in Section 3.3 to derive the integral constraints (3.61)-(3.63) and Proposition 3.2; the theorem is cited without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Line-solitons, line-shocks, and conservation laws of a universal KP-like equation in 2+1 dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VCX2JUXR

@misc{pith2026190803962,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Line-solitons, line-shocks, and conservation laws of a universal KP-like equation in 2+1 dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VCX2JUXR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03962}
}
read the original abstract

A universal KP-like equation in 2+1 dimensions, which models general nonlinear wave phenomena exhibiting p-power nonlinearity, dispersion, and small transversality, is studied. Special cases include the integrable KP (Kadomtsev-Petviashvili) equation and it is modified version, as well as their p-power generalizations. Two main results are obtained. First, all low-order conservation laws are derived, including ones that arise for special powers p. The conservation laws comprise momenta, energy, and Galilean-type quantities, as well as topological charges. Their physical meaning and properties are discussed. Second, all line-soliton solutions are obtained in an explicit form. A parameterization is given using the speed and the direction angle of the line-soliton, and the allowed kinematic region is determined in terms of these parameters. Basic kinematical properties of the line-solitons are also discussed. These properties differ significantly compared to those for KP line-solitons and their p-power generalizations. A line-shock solution is shown to emerge when a special limiting case of the kinematic region is considered.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03962 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Line-soliton profile in the defocussing case. q = 1; h = 1 (left), 2.5 (middle), 4 (right); w = 1 10 (dots), 1 5 (dashes), 1 2 (dot-dashes), 1 (long-dashes), w ≈ 0.90wmax (solid). 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Line-soliton profile in the focussing case. q = 1; h = 1 (left), 2.5 (middle), 4 (right); w = 1 10 (dots), 1 5 (dashes), 1 2 (dot-dashes), 1 (long-dashes), 2 (solid). 4.4. Line-shock profiles. We will use the height and the width to parameterize the line￾shock profile, as well as their speed and the direction angle. In contrast to line-solitons, there is no restriction on h and w for line-shocks. Theorem 4.3. In ter… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Line-shock profile. q = 1; h = 2 (left), 4 (middle), 6 (right); w = 1 10 (dots), 1 4 (dashes), 1 2 (dot-dashes), 1 (long-dashes), 2 (solid). 5. Kinematics features in terms of the speed and the angle We will examine in detail the properties of the modified gKP line solutions in Theorem 4.1 by using a physical parameterization given by their speed c and direction angle θ. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of focussing with normal dispersion. The modified gKP line-solitons for θ 6= 0 can be expressed in terms of c and θ as u = s((q + 1)(2q + 1)) 1 2q ((c/cmin(θ) − 1) tan |θ|) 1 q  sk˜ + p k 2 − 1 + c/c…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of defocussing with normal dispersion. k 2 = 1 8 (black), 1 3 (dark grey), 2 (grey), 10 (light grey); lighter regions overlap with all darker regions. The modified gKP line-solitons for θ 6= 0 can be …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of focussing with sign-changing dispersion. The modified gKP line-solitons for θ 6= 0 can be expressed as u = s((q + 1)(2q + 1)) 1 2q ((1 + c/|cmin(θ)|) tan |θ|) 1 q  sk˜ + p k 2 + 1 + c/|cmin| cosh …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of defocussing with sign-changing dispersion. k 2 = 1 5 (black), 1 2 (dark grey), 2 3 (grey), 5 6 (light grey); lighter regions overlap with all darker regions. The modified gKP line-solitons for θ 6=…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of defocussing with sign-changing dispersion. k 2 = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Kinematically allowed region in (c, θ) for line-solitons in the case of defocussing with sign-changing dispersion. k 2 = 3 2 (dark grey), 5 (grey), 10 (light grey); lighter regions overlap with all darker regions. where the sign s is given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Kinematically allowed curve in (c, θ) for line-shocks in the case of defocussing with normal dispersion. k 2 = 0 (solid), 1 6 (dashed), 1 3 (dot-dashes), 2 (dots), 10 (dot-spaces). As the speed c increases and as the nonlinearity power q increases, the width decreases…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Kinematically allowed curve in (c, θ) for line-shocks in the case of defocussing with sign-changing dispersion. k 2 = 1 5 (dot-spaces), 1 2 (dots), 2 3 (dot-dashes), 5 6 (dashes), 0.98 (solid) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Kinematically allowed curve in (c, θ) for line-shocks in the case of defocussing with sign-changing dispersion. k 2 = 1.05 (solid), 3 2 (dashes), 2 (dot-dashes), 5 (dots), 10 (dot-spaces). gKP equation. The general modified KP-like equation arises as the governing equ…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Recio, S.C

    E. Recio, S.C. Anco, Conservation laws and symmetries of radial generalized nonlinear p-Laplacian evolution equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 452 (2017) 1229–1261

    work page 2017

  2. [8]

    S.C. Anco, E. Recio, Topological charges and conservation laws involving an arbitrary function of time for dynamical PDEs, Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 477 (2021), 20200442

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Ablowitz and H

    M.J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, On the evolution of packets of water waves, J. Fluid Mech. 92 (1979), 691–715

    work page 1979

  4. [2]

    Anco, Generalization of Noether’s theorem in modern form to non-variational partial differential equations

    S.C. Anco, Generalization of Noether’s theorem in modern form to non-variational partial differential equations. In: Recent progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Compu- tational Science, 119–182, Fields Institute Communications, Volume 79 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [3]

    Anco, Conservation laws of scaling-invariant field equations, J

    S.C. Anco, Conservation laws of scaling-invariant field equations, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen. 36 (2003), 8623–8638

    work page 2003

  6. [4]

    Anco and G

    S.C. Anco and G. Bluman, Direct construction method for conservation laws of partial differential equa- tions Part II: General treatment, Euro. J. Appl. Math. 41 (2002), 567–585

    work page 2002

  7. [5]

    S.C. Anco, M. Gandarias, E. Recio, Conservation laws, symmetries, and line soliton solutions of gener- alized KP and Boussinesq equations with p-power nonlinearities in two dimensions, Theor. Math. Phys. 197(1) (2018), 1393–1411

    work page 2018

  8. [6]

    S.C. Anco, M. Gandarias, E. Recio, Conservation laws and line soliton solutions of a family of modified KP equations, DCDS S (2019). 10.3934/dcdss.2020225

    work page doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020225 2019

Show all 35 references
  1. [7]

    S.C. Anco, M. Gandarias, Symmetry multi-reduction method for partial differential equations with con- servation laws, Commun. Nonlin. Sci. Num. Simul. 91 (2020), 105349

    2020

  2. [9]

    Bluman, A Cheviakov, S.C

    G.W. Bluman, A Cheviakov, S.C. Anco, Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations. New York: Springer (2009)

    2009

  3. [10]

    Bokhari, F.D

    A.H. Bokhari, F.D. Zaman, K. Fakhar, A.H. Kara, A note on the invariance properties and conservation Laws of the Kadomstev-Petviashvili equation with power law nonlinearity, Chin. Phys. Lett. 289(9) (2011), 090204

    2011

  4. [11]

    de Bouard, J.-C

    A. de Bouard, J.-C. Saut, Solitary waves of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations, Annales de l’Inst. Hen. Poin., section C, 14(2) (1997), 211–236

    1997

  5. [12]

    Y. Chen, P. L.-F. Liu, A generalized modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation for interfacial wave propagation near the critical depth level, Wave Motion 27 (1998), 321–339. 36

    1998

  6. [13]

    Z. Dai, Y. Huang, X. Sun, D. Li, Z. Hu, Exact singular and non-singular solitary-wave solutions for Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation with p-power of nonlinearity, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 40 (2006), 946– 951

    2006

  7. [14]

    G.C. Das, J. Sarma, Evolution of solitary wave in multicomponent plasmas, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 9 (1998), 901–911

    1998

  8. [15]

    Gesztesy, H

    F. Gesztesy, H. Holden, E. Saab, B. Simon, Explicit construction of solutions of the modified Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation, J. Funct. Anal. 98(1) (1991), 211–228

    1991

  9. [16]

    Huang, V.A

    G. Huang, V.A. Makarov, M.G. Velarde, Two-dimensional solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates with a disk-shaped trap, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003), 023604 (12pp)

    2003

  10. [17]

    Infeld, G

    E. Infeld, G. Rowlands, Nonlinear Waves, Solitons and Chaos, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001

    2001

  11. [18]

    Kadomstev and V.I

    B.B. Kadomstev and V.I. Petviashvili, On the stability of waves in weakly dispersive media, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15 (1970), 539–541

    1970

  12. [19]

    Karpman, V.Y

    V.I. Karpman, V.Y. Belashov, Dynamics of two-dimensional solitons in weakly dispersive media, Phys. Lett. A 154 (1991), 131–139; ibid., Evolution of three-dimensional nonlinear pulses in weakly dispersive media, Phys. Lett. A 154 (1991), 140–144

    1991

  13. [20]

    Kenig, Y

    C.E. Kenig, Y. Martel, Global well-posedness in the energy space for a modified KP II equation via the Miura transform, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2006), 2447–2488

    2006

  14. [21]

    Konopelchenko, V.G

    B.G. Konopelchenko, V.G. Dubrovsky, Some new integrable nonlinear evolution equations in 2+1 di- mensions, Phys. Lett. A 102 (1984), 15–17

    1984

  15. [22]

    Konopelchenko and V.G

    B.G. Konopelchenko and V.G. Dubrovsky, Inverse spectral transform for the modified Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation, Studies in Applied Math. 86(3) (1992), 219–268

    1992

  16. [23]

    Leblond, KP lumps in ferromagnets: a three-dimensional KdV-Burgers model, J

    H. Leblond, KP lumps in ferromagnets: a three-dimensional KdV-Burgers model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35(47) (2002), 10149

    2002

  17. [24]

    Molinet, J.-C

    L. Molinet, J.-C. Saut, N. Tzvetkov, Remarks on the mass constraint for KP type equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2007), 627–641

    2007

  18. [25]

    R. Naz, Z. Ali, and I. Naeem, Reductions and New Exact Solutions of ZK, Gardner KP, and Modified KP Equations via Generalized Double Reduction Theorem. Abstract and Applied Analysis (2013), 340564– 340575

    2013

  19. [26]

    Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993

    P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993

    1993

  20. [27]

    Pelinovsky, Y.A

    D.E. Pelinovsky, Y.A. Stepanyants, Y.A. Kivshar, Self-focusing of plane dark solitons in nonlinear defocusing media, Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995), 5016–5026

    1995

  21. [28]

    Ratliff, T.J

    D.J. Ratliff, T.J. Bridges, Reduction to modified KdV and its KP-like generalization via phase modu- lation, Nonlinearity 31 (2018), 3794–3813

    2018

  22. [30]

    Tsuji, M

    H. Tsuji, M. Oikawa, Two-dimensional interaction of internal solitary waves in a two-layer fluid, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62(11) (1993), 3881–3892

    1993

  23. [31]

    Veerakumar and M

    V. Veerakumar and M. Daniel, Modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (MKP) equation and electromagnetic soliton, Math. Comput. Simulat. 62 (2003), 163–169

    2003

  24. [32]

    Wang, M.J

    X.P. Wang, M.J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Wave collapse and instability of solitary waves of a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Physica D 78 (1994), 241–265

    1994

  25. [33]

    Wolf, A comparison of four approaches to the calculation of conservation laws, Euro

    T. Wolf, A comparison of four approaches to the calculation of conservation laws, Euro. J. Appl. Math. 13 (2002), 129–152

    2002

  26. [34]

    T. Xu, H.Q. Zhang, Y.X. Zhang, J. Li, Q. Feng, B. Tian, Two types of generalized integrable decompo- sitions and new solitary-wave solutions for the modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with symbolic computation, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008) 013501

    2008

  27. [35]

    X. Zhao, W. Xu, H. Jia, and H. Zhou, Solitary wave solutions for the modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 34(2) (2007), 465–475. 37

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.