REVIEW 3 cited by
Using Adversarial Attacks to Reveal the Statistical Bias in Machine Reading Comprehension Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Pre-trained language models have achieved human-level performance on many Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) tasks, but it remains unclear whether these models truly understand language or answer questions by exploiting statistical biases in datasets. Here, we demonstrate a simple yet effective method to attack MRC models and reveal the statistical biases in these models. We apply the method to the RACE dataset, for which the answer to each MRC question is selected from 4 options. It is found that several pre-trained language models, including BERT, ALBERT, and RoBERTa, show consistent preference to some options, even when these options are irrelevant to the question. When interfered by these irrelevant options, the performance of MRC models can be reduced from human-level performance to the chance-level performance. Human readers, however, are not clearly affected by these irrelevant options. Finally, we propose an augmented training method that can greatly reduce models' statistical biases.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Innocence in the Crossfire: Roles of Skip Connections in Jailbreaking Visual Language Models
The paper reports higher harmful-output rates in three open-source VLMs from detailed image descriptions, in-context examples, and positive openings, and from a skip connection between internal layers, with memes riva...
-
AutoEvoEval: An Automated Framework for Evolving Close-Ended LLM Evaluation Data
AutoEvoEval applies 22 atomic perturbations and multi-round chains to MCQ benchmarks, causing average accuracy drops of 7.283% and up to 52.932% for long chains.
-
Coordinated Robustness Evaluation Framework for Vision-Language Models
A coordinated image-plus-text attack built on a surrogate multimodal encoder achieves 80-94% attack success against ViLT, BLIP, and GIT on VQA and visual reasoning, surpassing cited baselines.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.