Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Energy spectra of elemental groups of cosmic rays with the KASCADE experiment data and machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.08279 v2 pith:VDFEK2LP submitted 2023-12-13 astro-ph.HE

Energy spectra of elemental groups of cosmic rays with the KASCADE experiment data and machine learning

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords kascadecomponentcosmicenergyexperimentmassresultssigma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We report the reconstruction of the mass component spectra of cosmic rays (protons, helium, carbon, silicon and iron) and their mean mass composition, at energies from 1.4 to 100 PeV. The results are derived from the archival data of the extensive air shower experiment KASCADE. We use a novel machine learning technique developed specifically for this reconstruction, and post-LHC hadronic interaction models: QGSJet-II.04, EPOS-LHC and Sibyll 2.3c. We have found an excess of the proton component and a deficit of intermediate and heavy nuclei components compared to the original KASCADE results. The spectra of protons and helium show a knee-like behavior at ~ 4.4 PeV and ~ 11 PeV, with significances 5.2${\sigma}$ and 3.9${\sigma}$, respectively. The spectrum of the iron component has a hint (2.4${\sigma}$) of a hardening at ~ 4.5 PeV, which can be interpreted as a counterpart of a hardening in the proton spectrum at 166 TeV, recently reported by the GRAPES-3 experiment. The systematic uncertainties of our analysis were found to be smaller than those of the original KASCADE, as well as those of IceTop and TALE experiments, over the most part of the energy range studied. We also estimated separately the uncertainty related to the difference between the three mentioned hadronic interaction models. We also compute a mean logarithm mass of cosmic ray flux as a function of energy. It is in agreement with the results of IceTop, TALE and LHAASO within the uncertainties.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmic-ray anisotropy: sensitivity of methods and implications for KASCADE data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Autocorrelation is more sensitive than angular power spectrum to most medium/small-scale cosmic-ray anisotropies under limited FOV; KASCADE 10% data show >2.5σ iron anisotropy at ~10° and E≳20 PeV.

  2. Searching for EeV photons with Telescope Array Surface Detector and neural networks

    astro-ph.GA 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Telescope Array reports upper limits on EeV photon flux of <2.3e-3 above 10^19 eV and <3.0e-4 above 10^20 eV using a neural network classifier fine-tuned on experimental data.