Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Watermarking of Quantum Circuits

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.01484 v1 pith:VEP44FTQ submitted 2024-09-02 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords circuitquantumcircuitsgatetechniquesadversarycloudcombined
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum circuits constitute Intellectual Property (IP) of the quantum developers and users, which needs to be protected from theft by adversarial agents, e.g., the quantum cloud provider or a rogue adversary present in the cloud. This necessitates the exploration of low-overhead techniques applicable to near-term quantum devices, to trace the quantum circuits/algorithms\textquotesingle{} IP and their output. We present two such lightweight watermarking techniques to prove ownership in the event of an adversary cloning the circuit design. For the first technique, a rotation gate is placed on ancilla qubits combined with other gate(s) at the output of the circuit. For the second method, a set of random gates are inserted in the middle of the circuit followed by its inverse, separated from the circuit by a barrier. These models are combined and applied on benchmark circuits, and the circuit depth, 2-qubit gate count, probability of successful trials (PST), and probabilistic proof of authorship (PPA) are compared against the state-of-the-art. The PST is reduced by a minuscule 0.53\% against the non-watermarked benchmarks and is up to 22.69\% higher compared to existing techniques. The circuit depth has been reduced by up to 27.7\% as against the state-of-the-art. The PPA is astronomically smaller than existing watermarks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Does Controllability Emerge In Language Models During Pretraining?

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The document is internally mismatched: the abstract promises a study of steerability emergence in language models, while the full text is a quantum-circuit watermarking paper, so no coherent result is verifiable.

  2. Forensics of Error Rates of Quantum Hardware

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A frequency-based method ranks qubit link error rates from transpiled circuits, matching IBM's public calibration bins within two ranks for about 80% of links on two 127-qubit machines.

Pith tools