REVIEW 2 cited by
A Fully Convolutional Neural Network for Cardiac Segmentation in Short-Axis MRI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automated cardiac segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging datasets is an essential step in the timely diagnosis and management of cardiac pathologies. We propose to tackle the problem of automated left and right ventricle segmentation through the application of a deep fully convolutional neural network architecture. Our model is efficiently trained end-to-end in a single learning stage from whole-image inputs and ground truths to make inference at every pixel. To our knowledge, this is the first application of a fully convolutional neural network architecture for pixel-wise labeling in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our model is robust to outperform previous fully automated methods across multiple evaluation measures on a range of cardiac datasets. Moreover, our model is fast and can leverage commodity compute resources such as the graphics processing unit to enable state-of-the-art cardiac segmentation at massive scales. The models and code are available at https://github.com/vuptran/cardiac-segmentation
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
QCResUNet: Joint Subject-level and Voxel-level Segmentation Quality Prediction
QCResUNet jointly predicts subject-level Dice and surface Dice plus voxel-level tissue-specific error maps for brain tumor and cardiac MRI segmentations, outperforming five baseline QC methods on internal and external...
-
Pixel-wise Segmentation of Right Ventricle of Heart
A U-Net with a switching loss and majority-voting ensemble reaches top Dice and Hausdorff scores on one RVSC 2012 test set, but the state-of-the-art claim does not hold on the other test set.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.