Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Polarization and reliability of news sources in Wikipedia

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.16065 v2 pith:VEYK7V44 submitted 2022-10-28 cs.DL

Polarization and reliability of news sources in Wikipedia

classification cs.DL
keywords wikipedianewsmediasourcescitationscontentsfactualfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia: its open contribution policy allows everyone to edit and share their knowledge. A challenge of radical openness is that it facilitates introducing biased contents or perspectives in Wikipedia. Wikipedia relies on numerous external sources such as journal articles, books, news media, and more. News media sources, in particular, take up nearly third of all citations from Wikipedia. However, despite their importance for providing up-to-date and factual contents, there is still a limited understanding on which news media sources are cited from Wikipedia. Relying on a large-scale open dataset of nearly 30M citations from English Wikipedia, we find a moderate yet systematic liberal polarization in the selection of news media sources. We also show that this effect is not mitigated by controlling for news media factual reliability. Our results contribute to Wikipedia's knowledge integrity agenda in suggesting that a systematic effort would help to better map potential biases in Wikipedia and find means to strengthen its neutral point of view policy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.