The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2305.12444 · v1 · pith:VFFINFV6 · submitted 2023-05-21 · quant-ph · cs.CC

On the Impossibility of General Parallel Fast-forwarding of Hamiltonian Simulation

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:VFFINFV6record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification quant-ph cs.CC
keywords hamiltonianssimulationhamiltoniantherelocaloracletimecannot
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Hamiltonian simulation is one of the most important problems in the field of quantum computing. There have been extended efforts on designing algorithms for faster simulation, and the evolution time $T$ for the simulation turns out to largely affect algorithm runtime. While there are some specific types of Hamiltonians that can be fast-forwarded, i.e., simulated within time $o(T)$, for large enough classes of Hamiltonians (e.g., all local/sparse Hamiltonians), existing simulation algorithms require running time at least linear in the evolution time $T$. On the other hand, while there exist lower bounds of $\Omega(T)$ circuit size for some large classes of Hamiltonian, these lower bounds do not rule out the possibilities of Hamiltonian simulation with large but "low-depth" circuits by running things in parallel. Therefore, it is intriguing whether we can achieve fast Hamiltonian simulation with the power of parallelism. In this work, we give a negative result for the above open problem, showing that sparse Hamiltonians and (geometrically) local Hamiltonians cannot be parallelly fast-forwarded. In the oracle model, we prove that there are time-independent sparse Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T)$. In the plain model, relying on the random oracle heuristic, we show that there exist time-independent local Hamiltonians and time-dependent geometrically local Hamiltonians that cannot be simulated via an oracle circuit of depth $o(T/n^c)$, where the Hamiltonians act on $n$-qubits, and $c$ is a constant.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.