Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Quantum States Imaging of Magnetic Field Contours based on Autler-Townes Effect in Yb Atoms

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that dark stripes in the green fluorescence of a Yb atomic beam driven by a modulated 556 nm laser are contours of constant |B|, making magnetic field magnitude and direction readable directly from an image.

desk verdict A genuinely new imaging magnetometer with a calibration-free scalar field mapping that mostly delivers, held back by an overclaimed abstract, a placeholder supplementary link, and an untested assumption about power-independence. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14426 v2 pith:VFUYJOCH submitted 2024-11-21 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Tanaporn Na Narong , Hongquan Li , Joshua Tong , Mario Dueñas , Leo Hollberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords Autler-TownessplittingspatialHanleeffectYbintercombinationtransitionmagneticfieldimagingatomicmagnetometerdarkfluorescencestripesvectormagnetometryLindbladmasterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that the dark stripes that appear in the green fluorescence of a Yb atomic beam are not an artifact but a readable map of the magnetic field: each stripe is a contour of constant |B|, with field magnitude set by $g\mu_B |B|/\hbar = n\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}/2$, where $\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}$ is the laser modulation frequency and $n$ is an integer. The claim is established with a closed four-level V-system model of the $^1S_0$–$^3P_1$ transition driven by a carrier plus modulation sidebands, solved with the Lindblad master equation, and with the spatial Hanle effect describing how the emitted light reaches the camera. If the claim is correct, magnetic field magnitude is extracted directly from an image with no calibration, and the same image carries vector information through the distinguishable effects of $B_x$ and $B_y$ on the fluorescence. The result would make wide-field magnetic field tomography routine at video frame rates, 0.1 mm resolution, and fields from microtesla to many tesla, using a simple laser, thermal beam, and camera.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the closed, 4-level Zeeman-shifted V-system formed by the $^1S_0$ ground state and the three $m_J = -1, 0, +1$ states of the $^3P_1$ level in even Yb isotopes, driven by a 556 nm carrier plus its amplitude-modulation sidebands. The load-bearing identity is the dark-resonance condition $g\mu_B |B|/\hbar = n\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}/2$, which turns every integer $n$ into a fluorescence dip at a known field magnitude. The second essential mechanism is the spatial Hanle effect, adapted to the camera's collection cone: it makes the fluorescence emitted along $y$ vanish where $B_z = 0$, and makes the effects of $B_x$ and $B_y$ distinguishable, since $B_x$ precesses the dipoles away from the axis and lifts the zero while $B_y$ only broadens and shifts the minima. The model computes time-averaged fluorescence from the density matrix, Doppler-averages over a Gaussian transverse velocity distribution with standard deviation 4.5 m/s, and performs forward grid searches to estimate the field components.

What would settle it

Compare a 2 MHz-modulation fluorescence image with a 1 mm-grid Hall probe map of the same 10 mm by 30 mm region: if the independently measured |B| at each dark stripe does not match $n\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}\hbar/(2g\mu_B)$ to within the claimed uncertainty near 1 microtesla, the scalar central claim is wrong. For the vector claim, rotate the laser polarization from $\theta = \pi/2$ to $\theta = 0$ and require the two forward-model fits to return the same $|B_x|$ and $|B_y|$; because a single image cannot fix the signs, agreement under rotation is a direct test of the Hanle-based vector interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that fluorescence dark lines in this Yb system are quantized level contours of the magnetic field. For the $^1S_0$–$^3P_1$ transition in even isotopes driven by a strong carrier with AM sidebands, Autler-Townes splitting suppresses fluorescence wherever the Zeeman shift between the $m_J = \pm 1$ states matches an integer multiple of the modulation spacing, giving the dark-resonance condition $g\mu_B |B|/\hbar = n\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}/2$. The paper supports this with a 4-level Zeeman-shifted V-system solved in the Lindblad master equation, with Doppler averaging over a Gaussian velocity distribution and the spatial Hanle effect included to compute the fluorescence collected along the camera axis. The model reproduces the measured line scans for 1, 2, and 4 MHz modulation, yields |B| at each stripe, and a grid search over constant stray fields gives $|B_x| = 0.12(2)$ G and $|B_y| = 0.36(2)$ G that match independent Hall probe readings. The paper concludes that the method gives calibration-free scalar magnetometry over a wide dynamic range and vector information from the same images, with response times near one microsecond.

Load-bearing premise

The vector reconstruction assumes that $B_x$ and $B_y$ are uniform constants over the whole 10 mm by 30 mm imaging region while $B_z$ varies, so if the stray field or coil gradient changes appreciably across the image, the fitted transverse components and the revised $|B_z|$ curve are biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 3 ms fluorescence frame yields over ten thousand spatially resolved |B| values, each dark stripe giving $n\delta_{\mathrm{mod}}\hbar/(2g\mu_B)$ directly from known constants.
  • The vector capability means one fixed linear polarization can estimate $|B_x|$ and $|B_y|$ as well as $|B_z|$ from the same image, as demonstrated by the model fit to the line scan.
  • Because the atomic response is near one microsecond and the dark-line linewidth is power-broadened to 360 kHz–2 MHz, the technique can follow magnetic field dynamics from DC to roughly 500 kHz with no dead time.
  • The method is not limited to Yb: any spin-zero atom with an intercombination transition, such as Ca, Sr, or Mg, should support the same dark-stripe imaging.
  • Video-rate, wide-field operation means that with a few cameras the approach scales to meter-scale regions with 0.1 mm resolution, enabling real-time field tomography.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not develop stroboscopic readout, but the near-microsecond atomic response suggests a natural extension: modulating the laser at a subharmonic of a periodic field source would freeze the dark contours at chosen phases, producing time-resolved field movies beyond the camera frame rate.
  • Because the model cannot determine the signs of $B_x$ and $B_y$ from a single image, a concrete next step is to record two images with orthogonal laser polarizations; the sign ambiguity should then resolve, since the fluorescence pattern depends on the angle between the polarization and the field.
  • The calibration-free stripe spacing also implies a self-checking diagnostic for magnet coils: the distance between adjacent dark stripes directly measures the local field gradient, so the same camera frame can validate the coil calibration while imaging the field.
  • Outside precision magnetometry, the visible-by-eye dark contours make a striking demonstration of Zeeman shifts, Autler-Townes splitting, and the Hanle effect, potentially useful in teaching laboratories with a 556 nm laser and a simple vacuum cell.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports an atomic imaging magnetometer based on the 1S0-3P1 intercombination transition in an Yb atomic beam. A single 556 nm laser, amplitude-modulated at 1-4 MHz, drives a four-level Zeeman-shifted V-system; the observed fluorescence exhibits dark stripes that the authors identify as contours of constant magnetic-field magnitude. The central relation is Eq. (4), gµB/ℏ |B| = (n/2) δmod, from which the field magnitude at each stripe is claimed to follow directly from the known g-factor and modulation frequency, without calibration. The authors support this with a QuTiP-based density-matrix model that includes carrier and sidebands, compare model line-scans with experimental images, and extract transverse components Bx and By by a grid search, with values said to be consistent with independent Hall-probe measurements. The claimed capabilities include scalar and vector field imaging over a 10 mm × 30 mm region at video frame rates.

Significance. If the central mapping of Eq. (4) is robust, the technique would offer a simple, camera-based, calibration-free scalar magnetometer with wide dynamic range and applicability to other atoms with similar level structures (Ca, Sr, Mg). The paper benefits from openly available code, a clear physical mechanism (Autler-Townes splitting combined with the spatial Hanle effect), and an explicit experimental check across three modulation frequencies. The vector decomposition, while more model-dependent, is a useful demonstration of how polarization-dependent Hanle physics can constrain transverse field components. However, the significance hinges on whether the dark-stripe positions are indeed independent of laser power and of the unequal amplitudes of the square-wave AM sidebands, which the manuscript does not yet establish.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model, Eq. (4) and Experiment, Fig. 3] Equation (4) is the load-bearing calibration-free claim, but the manuscript does not demonstrate that the dark-resonance condition is independent of the Rabi-frequency amplitudes of the AM sidebands. The derivation and Fig. 2(b) assume equal Rabi frequencies (Ω1 = Ω2 = Ω), while the experiment uses square-wave AM at 10% duty cycle, whose Fourier amplitudes are unequal (e.g., the first sidebands are roughly twice the carrier amplitude). The 7-field model mentioned in the text and the contour plots in Figs. 4 and 5 do not state the Rabi amplitudes used. Differential AC Stark shifts from unequal sidebands could displace the fluorescence minima as a function of laser power, which would bias the |B| values extracted from stripe positions via Eq. (4) and invalidate the claim that the field is computed directly from known g-factors and δmod. Please provide either a measurement of stripe position versus laser power or a calculation with the actual AM spectrum showing that the minima positions are unchanged within the quoted 1 µT uncertainty.
  2. [Experiment, Fig. 3(b) and End Matter] The vector extraction treats Bx and By as uniform constants (0.12 G and 0.36 G) over the entire 10 mm × 30 mm imaging region and fits them to a single line-scan in Fig. 3(c). The revised |Bz| curve in Fig. 3(b) uses these uniform values, but the text does not quantify how sensitive that curve is to spatial variation of Bx and By, nor does it propagate any such gradient into the reported 1 µT uncertainty in |B|. Without a spatial-resolution estimate for the transverse components (e.g., from the known coil geometry or from multiple line-scans), the vector result remains a demonstration in a particular region rather than a validated vector imaging capability. Please add an uncertainty budget for the influence of Bx/By spatial variation on the scalar and vector products.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References and Supplementary Material] The supplementary material link (Ref. [17]) is given as the placeholder "https://linktosupplementarymaterial.com"; a working link or DOI is needed.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a typographical error: "|By = |0.36(2) G" should read "|By| = 0.36(2) G".
  3. [References] References [36] and [38] are duplicate entries for the same paper (Lu et al., Measurement 221, 113423 (2023)); one should be removed and the citation renumbered.
  4. [Discussion and End Matter] The contour plots in Figs. 4 and 5 would be more reproducible if the figure captions stated the Rabi frequencies and the AM sideband amplitudes used in the calculation, since the text only says "carrier and higher-harmonic sidebands included" without specifying the relative weights.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4) is derived from the model with known g-factor and sideband spacing, and the transverse-field fit is explicit and independently checked.

full rationale

The central contour condition, Eq. (4), is not fitted to the dark-stripe locations. It follows from the Zeeman-shifted 4-level V-system Hamiltonian and the Lindblad master equation using the independently known 174Yb g-factor (g = 1.49282(5)) and the modulation sideband spacing δmod. The dark-stripe positions are extracted from images, rather than used as free parameters, and the extracted |B| values from 1, 2, and 4 MHz modulation are checked for mutual consistency, which tests the n/2 δmod scaling law rather than assuming it. The transverse components Bx and By are explicitly fitted to one line-scan by an iterative grid search, and the resulting values (|Bx| = 0.12(2) G, |By| = 0.36(2) G) are cross-checked against independent Hall probe measurements; this is an openly described model fit, not a renamed prediction. The directional Hanle correction is adapted from external literature (Jackson & Durfee [37]; Avan & Cohen-Tannoudji [53]), not from an unverified self-citation. Self-citations to the thesis [60] and supplementary material [17] are for code documentation, additional figures, and derivation details; none of these citations carries the load-bearing derivation. The green-curve forward simulation in Fig. 3(c) is generated from the already-inverted |B|, so its minima coincide with the input stripe positions by construction; however, this closure check is not the basis of the scalar calibration claim, which rests on the analytic resonance condition and the multi-modulation consistency test. No circular step in the claimed derivation chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The scalar field extraction depends only on known g-factor and sideband spacing, but the vector extraction and the theoretical line shapes depend on several model inputs: fitted transverse fields, an unstated Rabi frequency for the experimental curves, an estimated velocity distribution, and an adapted Hanle calculation. None of these are invented entities; they are parameter choices and domain assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • Transverse magnetic field magnitude Bx = 0.12(2) G (magnitude only)
    Determined by iterative grid search matching the modeled fluorescence to the experimental line-scan in Fig. 3(c); sign not discernible. Checked against Hall probe, but still a fitted model parameter.
  • Transverse magnetic field magnitude By = 0.36(2) G (magnitude only)
    Determined by the same grid search; sign not discernible. The stated uncertainty is given without a described error-propagation procedure.
  • Effective Rabi frequency (laser intensity) for experimental fluorescence curves = Not stated in the text
    The computed fluorescence curves in Fig. 3(c) require Rabi frequencies for the carrier and sidebands; the paper does not specify the values used for the experimental comparison.
  • Gaussian transverse velocity standard deviation = 4.5 m/s (FWHM 10.6 m/s)
    Estimated from atomic beam divergence and used in Monte Carlo Doppler averaging; not fitted to fluorescence data but an input assumption.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The even-isotope Yb 1S0-3P1 transition is a closed 4-level system with zero nuclear spin, no hyperfine structure, and no optical pumping.
    Invoked in the Model section to write the 4-level Hamiltonian and justify the absence of CPT/EIT; well-established for 174Yb, but is an idealization.
  • standard math The rotating-wave approximation is valid for modulation frequencies (100 kHz to 10 MHz) and Zeeman shifts ~2.1 MHz/G small relative to the optical frequency.
    Stated in the Model; standard and safe for these scales.
  • domain assumption The spatial Hanle fluorescence calculation adapted from Jackson and Durfee for the Sr 1S0-1P1 transition applies to the Yb 1S0-3P1 transition in the strong-field regime.
    The paper adapts the directional fluorescence calculation from ref. 37 without re-deriving it; the validity for the narrow Yb transition at strong fields is assumed.
  • domain assumption The atomic velocity distribution transverse to the laser is Gaussian with zero mean and standard deviation 4.5 m/s.
    Used for Doppler averaging in Fig. 2(c) and the model; estimated from beam divergence, not measured in situ.
  • standard math At low fields, the Zeeman shifts are linear mJ g µB |B|/ℏ.
    Used throughout for the Hamiltonian; valid in the low-field regime and stated as such.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum States Imaging of Magnetic Field Contours based on Autler-Townes Effect in Yb Atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VFUYJOCH

@misc{pith2026241114426,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum States Imaging of Magnetic Field Contours based on Autler-Townes Effect in Yb Atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VFUYJOCH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14426}
}
abstract

An inter-combination transition in Yb enables a novel approach for rapidly imaging magnetic field variations with excellent spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy. This quantum imaging magnetometer reveals "dark stripes" that are contours of constant magnetic field visible by eye or capturable by standard cameras. These dark lines result from a combination of Autler-Townes splitting and the spatial Hanle effect in the $^{1}S_{0} - ^{3}P_{1}$ transition of Yb when driven by multiple strong coherent laser fields (carrier and AM/FM modulation sidebands of a single-mode 556 nm laser). We show good agreement between experimental data and our theoretical model for the closed, 4-level Zeeman shifted V-system and demonstrate scalar and vector magnetic fields measurements at video frame rates over spatial dimensions of 5 cm with 0.1 mm resolution. Additionally, the $^{1}S_{0} - ^{3}P_{1}$ transition allows for $\sim\mu$s response time and a large dynamic range (from microtesla to many tesla).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.14426 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental system: a thermal atomic beam travel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Energy levels of the Yb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. B-field tomography from (a) the fluorescence im [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Computed fluorescence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Computed fluorescence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Na Narong, T

    T. Na Narong, T. Liu, N. Raghuram, and L. Hollberg, Stimulated slowing of yb atoms on the narrow 1 s 0 → 3 p 1 transition, Physical Review A 104, 053117 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Arimondo, V Coherent Population Trapping in Laser Spectroscopy, in Progress in Optics , Vol

    E. Arimondo, V Coherent Population Trapping in Laser Spectroscopy, in Progress in Optics , Vol. 35, edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, 1996) pp. 257–354

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    Alzetta, A

    G. Alzetta, A. Gozzini, L. Moi, G. Orriols, et al. , An experimental method for the observation of rf transitions and laser beat resonances in oriented na vapour, Nuovo Cimento B 36 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Tam and W

    A. Tam and W. Happer, Optically pumped cell for novel visible decay of inhomogeneous magnetic field or of rf frequency spectrum, Applied Physics Letters 30, 580 (1977)

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes, Stark Effect in Rapidly Varying Fields, Physical Review 100, 703 (1955)

    work page 1955

  6. [6]

    Hanle, ¨Uber magnetische beeinflussung der polarisa- tion der resonanzfluoreszenz, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 30, 93 (1924)

    W. Hanle, ¨Uber magnetische beeinflussung der polarisa- tion der resonanzfluoreszenz, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 30, 93 (1924)

    work page 1924

  7. [7]

    Novikov, G

    L. Novikov, G. Skrotski ˘ ı, and G. I. Solomakho, The Hanle effect, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 17, 542 (1975). 6

    work page 1975

  8. [8]

    S. E. Harris, Electromagnetically induced transparency, Physics Today 50, 36 (1997)

    work page 1997

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Reviews of Modern Physics 77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    T. Y. Abi-Salloum, Electromagnetically induced trans- parency and Autler-Townes splitting: Two similar but distinct phenomena in two categories of three-level atomic systems, Physical Review A 81, 053836 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    P. M. Anisimov, J. P. Dowling, and B. C. Sanders, Ob- jectively Discerning Autler-Townes Splitting from Elec- tromagnetically Induced Transparency, Physical Review Letters 107, 163604 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Y. Zhou, L. Chu, Q. Liu, C.-K. Wang, and C. Tan, Analysis of quantum interference properties in λ-and V- type schemes in rare-earth-ion-doped crystal with inho- mogeneous broadening, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 36, 2534 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Vafafard, M

    A. Vafafard, M. Mahmoudi, and G. S. Agarwal, Coher- ent population oscillation produced by saturating probe and pump fields on the intercombination line, Physical Review A 93, 033848 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    K. D. Rathod and V. Natarajan, Magnetometry using Ramsey interferometry in a Yb atomic beam, CURRENT SCIENCE 109, 4 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Mompart, R

    J. Mompart, R. Corbalan, and L. Roso, Coherent popu- lation trapping in two-electron three-level systems with aligned spins, Physical Review Letters88, 023603 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    A. K. Singh and V. Natarajan, Observation of coherent population trapping in a v-type two-electron system, New Journal of Physics 17, 033044 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Na Narong, H

    T. Na Narong, H. Li, J. Tong, M. Due˜ nas, and L. Hollberg, Supplementary material for ”quantum states imaging of magnetic field contours based on autler-townes effect in yb atoms”, Available at https: //linktosupplementarymaterial.com (2024), includes videos, additional figur...

    2024

  10. [18]

    K. Cox, V. I. Yudin, A. V. Taichenachev, I. Novikova, and E. E. Mikhailov, Measurements of the magnetic field vector using multiple electromagnetically induced trans- parency resonances in Rb vapor, Physical Review A 83, 015801 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    J. A. McKelvy, I. Novikova, E. E. Mikhailov, M. A. Mal- donado, I. Fan, Y. Li, Y.-J. Wang, J. Kitching, and A. B. Matsko, Application of kernel principal component anal- ysis for optical vector atomic magnetometry, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 4, 045048 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Pradhan, R

    S. Pradhan, R. Behera, and A. K. Das, Polarization rota- tion under two-photon Raman resonance for magnetom- etry, Applied Physics Letters 100, 173502 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Budker, W

    D. Budker, W. Gawlik, D. F. Kimball, S. M. Rochester, V. V. Yashchuk, and A. Weis, Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 1153 (2002)

    2002

  14. [22]

    Budker and D

    D. Budker and D. F. J. Kimball, Optical magnetometry (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Grosz, M

    A. Grosz, M. J. Haji-Sheikh, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay, High sensitivity magnetometers (SPRINGER, 2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    R. L. Fagaly, Superconducting quantum interference de- vice instruments and applications, Review of Scientific Instruments 77, 101101 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Jensen, P

    K. Jensen, P. Kehayias, and D. Budker, Magnetome- try with Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, in High Sensitivity Magnetometers , Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, edited by A. Grosz, M. J. Haji- Sheikh, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay (Springer International Publishing...

    2017

  18. [26]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Na- ture Physics 3, 227 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    M. W. Mitchell and S. Palacios Alvarez, Colloquium: Quantum limits to the energy resolution of magnetic field sensors, Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 021001 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Y. Lu, T. Zhao, W. Zhu, L. Liu, X. Zhuang, G. Fang, and X. Zhang, Recent Progress of Atomic Magnetometers for Geomagnetic Applications, Sensors 23, 5318 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Brajon, E

    B. Brajon, E. Gasparin, and G. Close, A benchmark of integrated magnetometers and magnetic gradiometers, IEEE Access (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Castellucci, T

    F. Castellucci, T. W. Clark, A. Selyem, J. Wang, and S. Franke-Arnold, Atomic Compass: Detecting 3D Mag- netic Field Alignment with Vector Vortex Light, Physical Review Letters 127, 233202 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Vengalattore, J

    M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate, Physical Review Letters 98, 200801 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    F. Yang, A. J. Koll´ ar, S. F. Taylor, R. W. Turner, and B. L. Lev, Scanning Quantum Cryogenic Atom Micro- scope, Physical Review Applied 7, 034026 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    P. W. Courteille, S. R. Muniz, K. Magalh˜ aes, R. Kaiser, L. G. Marcassa, and V. S. Bagnato, Magnetic field tomog- raphy, The European Physical Journal D-Atomic, Molec- ular, Optical and Plasma Physics 15, 173 (2001)

    2001

  26. [35]

    S. Qiu, J. Wang, J. Wang, F. Castellucci, M. Cao, M. Cao, S. Zhang, T. W. Clark, S. Franke-Arnold, H. Gao, and F. Li, Visualization of magnetic fields with cylindrical vector beams in a warm atomic vapor, Pho- tonics Research 9, 2325 (2021)

    2021

  27. [37]

    J. S. Jackson and D. S. Durfee, Magneto-Optical Trap Field Characterization with the Directional Hanle Effect, Scientific Reports 9, 8896 (2019)

    2019

  28. [38]

    F. Lu, B. Li, S. Wang, Z. Hu, M. Ye, J. Lu, and B. Han, Two-dimensional biaxial magnetic field imaging with mil- lisecond resolution, Measurement 221, 113423 (2023)

    2023

  29. [39]

    Hunter, C

    D. Hunter, C. Perrella, A. McWilliam, J. P. McGilligan, M. Mrozowski, S. J. Ingleby, P. F. Griffin, D. Burt, A. N. Luiten, and E. Riis, Free-induction-decay magnetic field imaging with a microfabricated Cs vapor cell, Optics Ex- press 31, 33582 (2023)

    2023

  30. [40]

    E. E. Mikhailov, I. Novikova, M. Havey, and F. Narducci, Magnetic field imaging with atomic Rb vapor, Optics let- ters 34, 3529 (2009)

    2009

  31. [41]

    O. Alem, R. Mhaskar, R. Jim´ enez-Mart ´ ınez, D. Sheng, J. LeBlanc, L. Trahms, T. Sander, J. Kitching, and S. Knappe, Magnetic field imaging with microfabricated optically-pumped magnetometers, Optics Express 25, 7849 (2017)

    2017

  32. [42]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, S. Groth, P. Kr¨ uger, J. Schmiedmayer, and I. Bar-Joseph, Sensing 7 electric and magnetic fields with Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Applied physics letters 88 (2006)

    2006

  33. [43]

    C. V. Nielsen, J. Lyngsø, A. Thorseth, M. Galouzis, K. Therkildsen, E. van Ooijen, and J. Thomsen, Charac- terization of a magnetic trap by polarization dependent zeeman spectroscopy, The European Physical Journal D 48, 111 (2008)

    2008

  34. [44]

    El ´ ıasson, R

    O. El ´ ıasson, R. Heck, J. S. Laustsen, M. Napolitano, R. M¨ uller, M. G. Bason, J. J. Arlt, and J. F. Sher- son, Spatially-selective in situ magnetometry of ultracold atomic clouds, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52, 075003 (2019)

    2019

  35. [45]

    Sheng, A

    D. Sheng, A. R. Perry, S. P. Krzyzewski, S. Geller, J. Kitching, and S. Knappe, A microfabricated optically- pumped magnetic gradiometer, Applied Physics Letters 110, 031106 (2017)

    2017

  36. [46]

    Lucivero, W

    V. Lucivero, W. Lee, M. Limes, E. Foley, T. Kor- nack, and M. Romalis, Femtotesla nearly-quantum-noise- limited pulsed gradiometer at earth-scale fields, Physical Review Applied 18, L021001 (2022)

    2022

  37. [47]

    Deans, Y

    C. Deans, Y. Cohen, H. Yao, B. Maddox, A. Vigilante, and F. Renzoni, Electromagnetic induction imaging with a scanning radio frequency atomic magnetometer, Ap- plied Physics Letters 119 (2021)

    2021

  38. [48]

    Campbell, Y.-J

    K. Campbell, Y.-J. Wang, I. Savukov, P. D. Schwindt, Y.-Y. Jau, and V. Shah, Gradient field detection using interference of stimulated microwave optical sidebands, Physical Review Letters 128, 163602 (2022)

    2022

  39. [49]

    E. Boto, S. S. Meyer, V. Shah, O. Alem, S. Knappe, P. Kruger, T. M. Fromhold, M. Lim, P. M. Glover, P. G. Morris, et al., A new generation of magnetoencephalogra- phy: Room temperature measurements using optically- pumped magnetometers, NeuroImage 149, 404 (2017)

    2017

  40. [50]

    Borna, T

    A. Borna, T. R. Carter, J. D. Goldberg, A. P. Colombo, Y.-Y. Jau, C. Berry, J. McKay, J. Stephen, M. Weisend, and P. D. Schwindt, A 20-channel magnetoencephalogra- phy system based on optically pumped magnetometers, Physics in Medicine & Biology 62, 8909 (2017)

    2017

  41. [51]

    Coussens, A

    T. Coussens, A. Gialopsou, C. Abel, M. G. Bason, T. M. James, W. Evans, M. Woodley, D. Nightingale, D. Nico- lau, L. Page, et al. , A modular optically pumped mag- netometer system, Quantum Science and Technology 9, 035045 (2024)

    2024

  42. [52]

    Fescenko and A

    I. Fescenko and A. Weis, Imaging magnetic scalar poten- tials by laser-induced fluorescence from bright and dark atoms, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 47, 235001 (2014)

    2014

  43. [53]

    Avan and C

    P. Avan and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Hanle effect for monochromatic excitation. non perturbative calculation for a j= 0 to j= 1 transition, Journal de Physique Lettres 36, 85 (1975)

    1975

  44. [54]

    Martin, R

    W. Martin, R. Zalubas, and L. Hagan, Atomic en- ergy levels-the rare earth elements.(the spectra of lan- thanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, prome- thium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dys- prosium, holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, and lutetium).[66 atoms a...

    1978

  45. [55]

    Budick and J

    B. Budick and J. Snir, gj values of excited states of the ytterbium atom, Physics Letters A 24, 689 (1967)

    1967

  46. [56]

    Baumann and G

    M. Baumann and G. Wandel, gj factors of the 6s6p 3p1 and 6s6p 1p1 states of ytterbium, Physics Letters A 28, 200 (1968)

    1968

  47. [57]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 1760 (2012)

    2012

  48. [58]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 184, 1234 (2013)

    2013

  49. [59]

    Na Narong, Github repository: Yb-magnetometer (2024), https://github.com/tinatn29/Yb-magnetometer, accessed: 2024-11-11

    T. Na Narong, Github repository: Yb-magnetometer (2024), https://github.com/tinatn29/Yb-magnetometer, accessed: 2024-11-11

    2024

  50. [60]

    Na Narong, Slow and fast atoms : modeling strong field effects on Yb for slowing and quantum imaging of magnetic fields, Ph.D

    T. Na Narong, Slow and fast atoms : modeling strong field effects on Yb for slowing and quantum imaging of magnetic fields, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2023)

    2023

  51. [61]

    Lowe and P

    R. Lowe and P. Hannaford, Zeeman quantum beats in atomic vapours produced by cathodic sputtering: appli- cation to yb and zr, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics 22, 407 (1989)

    1989

  52. [62]

    Y. Bai, T. W. Mossberg, N. Lu, and P. R. Berman, Tran- sient suppression of the autler-townes doublet, Physical Review Letters 57, 1692 (1986). End Matter Appendix: Bx and By field components alter the ob- served fluorescence differently– Our model enables direct computation o...

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.