REVIEW 4 cited by
A Paradox and its Resolution Illustrate Principles of de Sitter Holography
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Semiclassical gravity and the holographic description of the static patch of de Sitter space appear to disagree about properties of correlation functions. Certain holographic correlation functions are necessarily real whereas their semiclassical counterparts have both real and imaginary parts. The resolution of this apparent contradiction involves the fact that time-reversal is a gauge symmetry in de Sitter space -- a point made by Harlow and Ooguri -- and the need for an observer (or quantum reference frame) as advocated by Chandrasekaran, Longo, Penington, and Witten.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon
Finite-mass observers in dS2 have non-commuting type I algebras, and their OTOC shows a Lyapunov exponent 4π/β_dS, twice the de Sitter bound.
-
On the relation between perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective quantum reference frames
For ideal quantum reference frames with a single constraint, the perspective-neutral, algebraic, and effective semiclassical approaches describe the same physics and the same frame-switching rules.
-
Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy
Gravitational subregion entropy is observer-dependent: different quantum clocks produce different von Neumann algebras and different entropy functionals for the same global state.
-
CRT gauge symmetry in two-sheet de Sitter universes
In this construction, CRT symmetry is a gauge symmetry in two-sheet de Sitter universes, and the presence of an observer is the gauge-fixing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.