Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CALF: A Conditionally Adaptive Loss Function to Mitigate Class-Imbalanced Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.04458 v1 pith:VHVYILIK submitted 2025-04-06 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords lossdatasetssegmentationtrainingadaptiveannotationapproachcalf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Imbalanced datasets pose a considerable challenge in training deep learning (DL) models for medical diagnostics, particularly for segmentation tasks. Imbalance may be associated with annotation quality limited annotated datasets, rare cases, or small-scale regions of interest (ROIs). These conditions adversely affect model training and performance, leading to segmentation boundaries which deviate from the true ROIs. Traditional loss functions, such as Binary Cross Entropy, replicate annotation biases and limit model generalization. We propose a novel, statistically driven, conditionally adaptive loss function (CALF) tailored to accommodate the conditions of imbalanced datasets in DL training. It employs a data-driven methodology by estimating imbalance severity using statistical methods of skewness and kurtosis, then applies an appropriate transformation to balance the training dataset while preserving data heterogeneity. This transformative approach integrates a multifaceted process, encompassing preprocessing, dataset filtering, and dynamic loss selection to achieve optimal outcomes. We benchmark our method against conventional loss functions using qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Experiments using large-scale open-source datasets (i.e., UPENN-GBM, UCSF, LGG, and BraTS) validate our approach, demonstrating substantial segmentation improvements. Code availability: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MICCAI-Submission-43F9/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools