Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Complexity of Primal-Dual Fixed Point Methods for Ridge Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1801.06354 v1 pith:VJQXT7DU submitted 2018-01-19 math.NA cs.NA

The Complexity of Primal-Dual Fixed Point Methods for Ridge Regression

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords fixedmethodpointdualeigenvaluesregressionridgeachieves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the ridge regression (L2 regularized least squares) problem and its dual, which is also a ridge regression problem. We observe that the optimality conditions describing the primal and dual optimal solutions can be formulated in several different but equivalent ways. The optimality conditions we identify form a linear system involving a structured matrix depending on a single relaxation parameter which we introduce for regularization purposes. This leads to the idea of studying and comparing, in theory and practice, the performance of the fixed point method applied to these reformulations. We compute the optimal relaxation parameters and uncover interesting connections between the complexity bounds of the variants of the fixed point scheme we consider. These connections follow from a close link between the spectral properties of the associated matrices. For instance, some reformulations involve purely imaginary eigenvalues; some involve real eigenvalues and others have all eigenvalues on the complex circle. We show that the deterministic Quartz method---which is a special case of the randomized dual coordinate ascent method with arbitrary sampling recently developed by Qu, Richt\'{a}rik and Zhang---can be cast in our framework, and achieves the best rate in theory and in numerical experiments among the fixed point methods we study. Remarkably, the method achieves an accelerated convergence rate. Numerical experiments indicate that our main algorithm is competitive with the conjugate gradient method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.