REVIEW 2 cited by
Long Range Propagation on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Learning Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphs (C-TDGs) requires accurately modeling spatio-temporal information on streams of irregularly sampled events. While many methods have been proposed recently, we find that most message passing-, recurrent- or self-attention-based methods perform poorly on long-range tasks. These tasks require correlating information that occurred "far" away from the current event, either spatially (higher-order node information) or along the time dimension (events occurred in the past). To address long-range dependencies, we introduce Continuous-Time Graph Anti-Symmetric Network (CTAN). Grounded within the ordinary differential equations framework, our method is designed for efficient propagation of information. In this paper, we show how CTAN's (i) long-range modeling capabilities are substantiated by theoretical findings and how (ii) its empirical performance on synthetic long-range benchmarks and real-world benchmarks is superior to other methods. Our results motivate CTAN's ability to propagate long-range information in C-TDGs as well as the inclusion of long-range tasks as part of temporal graph models evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
T-GRAB: A Synthetic Diagnostic Benchmark for Learning on Temporal Graphs
T-GRAB, a set of three synthetic temporal-graph tasks, shows that no current TGNN reliably does counting, delayed cause-effect, or long-range spatio-temporal reasoning.
-
Are We Really Measuring Progress? Transferring Insights from Evaluating Recommender Systems to Temporal Link Prediction
Temporal link prediction benchmarks can rank models differently depending on sampling and aggregation choices, so current progress measurements are not reliable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.