Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

MuseControlLite: Multifunctional Music Generation with Lightweight Conditioners

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rotary positional embeddings, added to a decoupled cross-attention adapter, are what allow MuseControlLite to follow time-varying music conditions.

desk verdict Useful RoPE finding with a clean core ablation, but the abstract muddles the numbers and the key ablation never runs at the final training recipe; still deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18729 v2 pith:VM5YU2FG submitted 2025-06-23 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

Fang-Duo Tsai , Shih-Lun Wu , Weijaw Lee , Sheng-Ping Yang , Bo-Rui Chen , Hao-Chung Cheng , Yi-Hsuan Yang This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords text-to-musicgenerationdiffusionTransformerdecoupledcross-attentionrotarypositionalembeddingstime-varyingmusicalattributesmelodycontrolaudioinpaintingclassifier-freeguidance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

MuseControlLite is a lightweight fine-tuning mechanism for text-to-music diffusion Transformers that adds time-varying conditions such as melody, rhythm, dynamics, and reference audio. The paper's central claim is that rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) inside decoupled cross-attention layers are critical when the condition is a function of time: a paired ablation shows melody accuracy leaping from 10.7% without RoPE to 58.6% with RoPE, and the full model reaches 61.1% melody accuracy with only 85M trainable parameters. This matters because it makes precise, local music control feasible at a fraction of the parameter cost of ControlNet-style adapters, and it unifies attribute control with audio inpainting and outpainting in one fine-tuning framework.

What carries the argument

The central object is decoupled cross-attention augmented with rotary positional embeddings (RoPE), where RoPE rotates query, key, and value vectors by position-dependent angles so that attention between audio tokens and condition tokens encodes their temporal alignment. The adapter trains only duplicated key and value projections and a zero-initialized 1D convolution that sums the text and attribute attention outputs, preventing training noise at start. This mechanism carries the argument because it isolates the role of positional encoding in the conditioner itself, showing that without it the adapter fails to learn temporal conditions entirely.

What would settle it

Re-run the melody control experiment without RoPE under the final training recipe (40,000 steps, batch size 128) and measure melody accuracy; if the no-RoPE model reaches roughly 60% instead of 10.7%, then RoPE is not necessary for the final result. Alternatively, independently re-compute Stable Audio Open ControlNet's 56.6% melody accuracy under the same protocol to verify the baseline is not inflated by evaluation differences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that positional information in the conditioner, not just in the backbone, is the decisive ingredient for time-varying musical control. Using Stable Audio Open's diffusion Transformer as the frozen backbone, the authors attach a decoupled cross-attention adapter that trains only duplicated key and value projections plus lightweight condition extractors. Applying RoPE to the query, key, and value vectors in those decoupled layers lets the model associate each condition frame with the correct moment of the generated audio; without RoPE, melody accuracy collapses to 10.7%. The final MuseControlLite-Melody model reaches 61.1% melody accuracy, surpassing Stable Audio Open ControlNet's 56.6% while using 6.75 times fewer trainable parameters, and it also demonstrates control over rhythm, dynamics, audio inpainting, and audio outpainting.

Load-bearing premise

The headline comparison to Stable Audio Open ControlNet assumes the authors reproduced that model's evaluation protocol exactly, even though Stable Audio Open ControlNet is not open source.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Time-varying musical attribute control can be added to a pretrained text-to-music diffusion Transformer with about 8% additional trainable parameters, roughly 85M versus 572M for ControlNet-based adapters.
  • The same adapter architecture supports melody, rhythm, and dynamics conditions either individually or in combination, and these conditions can be masked to allow the model to improvise in unspecified segments.
  • The audio-conditioning variant can perform inpainting and outpainting while still accepting musical attribute controls in the complementary masked regions.
  • Separate classifier-free guidance scales for text, attributes, and audio let users trade off condition strength without retraining.
  • Style-transfer generation, where the melody comes from a different source than the text prompt, works but carries timbre or genre information from the melody condition into the output.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because RoPE is architecture-agnostic, the same decoupled cross-attention recipe may transfer to other latent audio diffusion Transformers, offering a cheap path to temporal control without ControlNet's parameter duplication.
  • The ablation suggests a testable prediction: without RoPE, any time-varying condition whose length differs from the audio length should fail similarly, whereas static conditions should not require positional encoding.
  • The complementary masking strategy between attribute and audio conditions might generalize to other dominant condition types, allowing future adapters to combine, say, global style cues with precise local edits.
  • One could directly test whether RoPE's benefit comes from aligning condition frames to audio frames by interpolating the position angles and measuring melody accuracy as a function of the frequency base.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MuseControlLite, a lightweight fine-tuning mechanism for Stable Audio Open, a diffusion-transformer text-to-music model. The method adds decoupled cross-attention layers with rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) to condition on time-varying musical attributes (melody, rhythm, dynamics) and on reference audio for inpainting and outpainting. The authors report 85M trainable parameters, melody accuracy of 61.1% versus 56.6% for Stable Audio Open ControlNet, and an ablation (Table 1) in which adding RoPE improves melody accuracy from 10.7% to 58.6%. They also report subjective listening scores comparable to the ControlNet baseline, and state that code, checkpoints, and demos will be released.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper makes a useful design contribution: RoPE in decoupled cross-attention is important for time-varying conditioning in diffusion transformers, and the proposed adapter is substantially more parameter-efficient than ControlNet-style approaches. The joint support for attribute and audio conditioning is also a genuine extension over prior work. The paper is weakened, however, by a mismatch between the headline comparison and the causal ablation, and by the absence of a same-recipe no-RoPE run for the final model. These issues are addressable, and the strengths of the paper—clean paired ablation evidence, open evaluation code for metrics, and concrete reproducibility plans—go some way toward justifying the claims, but the empirical chain needs repair before publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5.1, Table 3] The abstract states that 'simply adding rotary positional embeddings ... increases control accuracy from 56.6% to 61.1%.' This conflates two different comparisons: 56.6% is the Stable Audio Open ControlNet baseline, while 61.1% is the final MuseControlLite-Melody model. The actual ablation for RoPE, shown in Table 1 and Appendix B, Table 9, is 10.7% to 58.6% under a different training recipe. The abstract should either report the paired ablation numbers or explicitly distinguish the ablation from the cross-model comparison.
  2. [Section 4.2, Section 5.1, Table 1] The load-bearing claim that RoPE is necessary for melody control is supported only by Table 1, where both models were trained for 70,000 steps with batch size 32. The final MuseControlLite-Melody model is trained for 40,000 steps with batch size 128 and additionally uses text dropout (30%), per-condition dropout (50%), and random masking, as described in Section 4.2. Effective sample count differs by more than a factor of two. A w/o-RoPE run under the final training recipe is needed to establish that the effect transfers; without it, the causal role of RoPE in the headline 61.1% result remains untested.
  3. [Section 5.3, Tables 6 and 7] The introduction and abstract claim improved controllability over Stable Audio Open ControlNet for audio inpainting and outpainting, but Tables 6 and 7 contain no Stable Audio Open ControlNet results; the baselines shown are MusicGen-Stereo-Large-Melody and naïve masking. Either add the ControlNet comparison for these tasks or narrow the claims to the baselines actually evaluated.
  4. [Section 4.3 and Section 5.1] Because Stable Audio Open ControlNet is closed-source, the 56.6% melody-accuracy baseline and its evaluation protocol are taken on trust. The authors report that they contacted the authors and used the same metrics and dataset, which is commendable, but the manuscript should state explicitly which parts were verified (e.g., melody extraction code, evaluation script, demo outputs) and should make the authors' reproduction materials available so readers can audit the comparison.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: '85M trainble parameters' should read '85M trainable parameters.'
  2. [Section 4.3] JASCO is cited as '(Li et al., 2024)' in Section 4.3, but the Related Work section cites JASCO as '(Tal et al., 2024)'. Please align the citation.
  3. [Section 5.1] The sentence 'both MuseControlLite-Melody and MuseControlLite-Attr outperform other baselines in terms of FD and melody accuracy' overstates the results: Table 3 shows that KL and CLAP scores are worse than Stable Audio Open ControlNet. The later paragraph acknowledges this, but the earlier sentence should be qualified.
  4. [Section 4.4, Tables 6 and 7] The definition of Smoothness Value as the second finite difference of the novelty curve is confusing, especially since lower values are said to imply non-smooth transitions while the text later describes higher values as better. Please clarify the direction of the metric and state it explicitly in the table captions.
  5. [Section 4.1 and Tables 4, 5] The style-transfer evaluation setup is underspecified: the text says the 586 audio clips are split into two disjoint subsets, but the subset sizes and the procedure for pairing text prompts from one subset with attributes from the other are not given. Please report these details.
  6. [Table 1] The w/ RoPE model has slightly lower CLAP score (0.38) than the w/o RoPE model (0.41). The paper does not discuss this trade-off; a brief explanation would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the RoPE claim rests on a paired ablation against an external metric; self-citations are lineage, not derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim—that rotary positional embeddings (RoPE) in decoupled cross-attention are critical for time-varying conditions—is supported by a paired ablation (Table 1) in which the only stated architectural difference is RoPE, trained under a shared recipe and evaluated with the external melody-accuracy code from Stable Audio Open ControlNet. No equation in the paper defines the RoPE effect in terms of the reported metric, and the separated-guidance derivation in Appendix A is a standard Bayes factorization rather than a fitted result. The guidance scales in Table 2 (lambda_text=7, lambda_attr=2, lambda_audio=1) are hand-set inference hyperparameters, not fitted to the melody-accuracy numbers, so the headline comparisons are not statistically forced by construction. The paper cites the authors' own prior work—Audio Prompt Adapter (Tsai et al., 2024) and MusiConGen (Lan et al., 2024)—for conditioning pipelines, but the RoPE claim is not inherited from those citations; it is tested directly in the ablation. A legitimate robustness concern, distinct from circularity, is that the Table 1 ablation uses 70,000 steps with batch size 32 while the final Table 3 model uses 40,000 steps with batch size 128, so the transfer of the w/o-RoPE failure to the final training recipe is assumed rather than demonstrated. Similarly, the abstract's '56.6% to 61.1%' phrasing compares the external Stable Audio Open ControlNet baseline to the final model rather than to the paired no-RoPE ablation. These issues affect experimental rigor and generalizability, not circularity, because the paper's own equations and citations do not reduce the reported predictions to their inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard building blocks: RoPE, decoupled cross-attention, and CFG. The main hand-chosen elements are guidance scales, training mask schedules, and condition extraction hyperparameters, none of which are fitted to the evaluation benchmark. The most fragile assumption is the closed-source baseline comparison.

free parameters (3)
  • Guidance scales (lambda_text, lambda_attr, lambda_audio) = 7.0, 2.0, 1.0
    Chosen by hand and fixed at inference (Table 2); they trade off text adherence, attribute strength, and audio fidelity, and could be tuned per task.
  • Training masking ratios and drop probabilities = mask 10-90%, drop 50% per condition, text drop 30%
    Set manually in Section 4.2 to encourage disentanglement; results depend on these choices.
  • Condition extraction hyperparameters = CQT 128 bins, high-pass cutoff 261.2 Hz, Savitzky-Golay smoothing
    Domain choices in Section 3.4 that define the conditioning signal; melody accuracy is measured against the same extraction pipeline.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bayes factorization for separated guidance (Eq. 14-16 in Appendix A)
    The CFG scaling expansion follows directly from Bayes' rule and is standard practice (Ho & Salimans 2022; Brooks et al. 2023).
  • standard math RoPE rotation matrices preserve attention geometry (Eq. 1-2)
    RoPE is taken as given from Su et al. 2024 and applied to queries, keys, and values.
  • domain assumption Melody is adequately represented by chromagram argmax of four prominent pitches with high-pass filtering
    Section 3.4: this extraction defines what the model learns to follow and what the melody accuracy metric measures; if the representation is lossy, reported accuracy may not reflect perceived melody.
  • domain assumption Training on MTG-Jamendo transfers to the Song Describer evaluation set
    Section 4.1: the model is trained on MTG-Jamendo only; results on Song Describer assume the condition-control patterns generalize across genres.
  • ad hoc to paper Complementary masking of audio and attribute conditions at inference does not degrade coherence
    Section 3.4: audio and attribute adapters are trained separately and combined with complementary masks; the paper provides no analysis proving this combination is equivalent to joint conditioning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MuseControlLite: Multifunctional Music Generation with Lightweight Conditioners." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VM5YU2FG

@misc{pith2026250618729,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MuseControlLite: Multifunctional Music Generation with Lightweight Conditioners},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VM5YU2FG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18729}
}
read the original abstract

We propose MuseControlLite, a lightweight mechanism designed to fine-tune text-to-music generation models for precise conditioning using various time-varying musical attributes and reference audio signals. The key finding is that positional embeddings, which have been seldom used by text-to-music generation models in the conditioner for text conditions, are critical when the condition of interest is a function of time. Using melody control as an example, our experiments show that simply adding rotary positional embeddings to the decoupled cross-attention layers increases control accuracy from 56.6% to 61.1%, while requiring 6.75 times fewer trainable parameters than state-of-the-art fine-tuning mechanisms, using the same pre-trained diffusion Transformer model of Stable Audio Open. We evaluate various forms of musical attribute control, audio inpainting, and audio outpainting, demonstrating improved controllability over MusicGen-Large and Stable Audio Open ControlNet at a significantly lower fine-tuning cost, with only 85M trainble parameters. Source code, model checkpoints, and demo examples are available at: https://musecontrollite.github.io/web/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18729 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MuseControlLite uses multiple condition extractors to handle all time-varying controls. The musical attribute offers control over elements such as melody, rhythm, and dynamics, whereas the audio condition enables audio inpainting and outpainting. We train the two pipelines separately with two sets of adapters, but users can choose to use either one or both at the inference time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. This figure consists of four attention maps: i) untrained, ii) trained, given full audio condition, iii) trained, inpainting 5th-25th seconds, and iv) trained, outpainting 10th seconds onward. After training, a portion of the attention maps exhibits a perfectly diagonal pattern when given the full audio condition. When performing inpainting or outpainting (i.e., only partial audio condition is given), the model tend… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MPEcho: A Melody and Phoneme-Aware Generative Framework for Controllable Cover Song Generation

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding SVS-style phoneme conditioning and a length regulator to melody-guided cover generation cuts phoneme error rate from 45.6% to 18.7% while holding melody metrics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [3]

    L., Wu, H.-H., Salamon, J., and Bello, J

    Cramer, A. L., Wu, H.-H., Salamon, J., and Bello, J. P. Look, listen, and learn more: Design choices for deep audio embeddings. InICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 3852–3856. IEEE,

    work page 2019

  2. [6]

    H., and Pons, J

    Evans, Z., Carr, C., Taylor, J., Hawley, S. H., and Pons, J. Fast timing-conditioned latent audio diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04825, 2024a. Evans, Z., Parker, J. D., Carr, C., Zukowski, Z., Taylor, J., and Pons, J. Long-form music generation with latent diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10301, 2024b. Evans, Z., Parker, J. D., Carr, C., Zukowski,...

    arXiv

  3. [10]

    Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout

    Koutini, K., Schl ¨uter, J., Eghbal-Zadeh, H., and Widmer, G. Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05069,

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Controllable music production with dif- fusion models and guidance gradients.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00613,

    Levy, M., Di Giorgi, B., Weers, F., Katharopoulos, A., and Nickson, T. Controllable music production with dif- fusion models and guidance gradients.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00613,

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Content-based con- trols for music large language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17162,

    Lin, L., Xia, G., Jiang, J., and Zhang, Y . Content-based con- trols for music large language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17162,

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Mustango: Toward controllable text-to-music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08355,

    Melechovsky, J., Guo, Z., Ghosal, D., Majumder, N., Herremans, D., and Poria, S. Mustango: Toward controllable text-to-music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08355,

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    DITTO-2: Distilled Diffusion Inference-Time T-Optimization for Music Generation

    Novack, Z., McAuley, J., Berg-Kirkpatrick, T., and Bryan, N. DITTO-2: Distilled diffusion inference-time t- optimization for music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20289, 2024a. Novack, Z., McAuley, J., Berg-Kirkpatrick, T., and Bryan, N. J. DITTO: Diffusion inference-time t-optimization for music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12179, 2024b. Pee...

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [16]

    Investigating personalization methods in text to music generation

    Plitsis, M., Kouzelis, T., Paraskevopoulos, G., Katsouros, V ., and Panagakis, Y . Investigating personalization methods in text to music generation. InICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sig- nal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1081–1085. IEEE,

    work page 2024

Show all 28 references
  1. [19]

    and Ho, J

    Salimans, T. and Ho, J. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512,

    arXiv

  2. [20]

    Self-attention with relative position representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155,

    Shaw, P., Uszkoreit, J., and Vaswani, A. Self-attention with relative position representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155,

    arXiv

  3. [22]

    Joint audio and symbolic conditioning for temporally controlled text- to-music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10970,

    Tal, O., Ziv, A., Gat, I., Kreuk, F., and Adi, Y . Joint audio and symbolic conditioning for temporally controlled text- to-music generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10970,

    arXiv

  4. [23]

    Audio Prompt Adapter: Unleashing music editing abilities for text-to-music with lightweight finetuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16564,

    Tsai, F.-D., Wu, S.-L., Kim, H., Chen, B.-Y ., Cheng, H.-C., and Yang, Y .-H. Audio Prompt Adapter: Unleashing music editing abilities for text-to-music with lightweight finetuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.16564,

    arXiv

  5. [24]

    SANA: Ef- ficient high-resolution image synthesis with linear dif- fusion Transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10629,

    Xie, E., Chen, J., Chen, J., Cai, H., Tang, H., Lin, Y ., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Zhu, L., Lu, Y ., and Han, S. SANA: Ef- ficient high-resolution image synthesis with linear dif- fusion Transformers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10629,

    arXiv

  6. [25]

    IP-Adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    Ye, H., Zhang, J., Liu, S., Han, X., and Yang, W. IP-Adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  7. [26]

    A., Lin, L., Xia, G., Liao, W.-H., Mitsufuji, Y ., and Dixon, S

    Zhang, Y ., Ikemiya, Y ., Choi, W., Murata, N., Mart´ınez- Ram´ırez, M. A., Lin, L., Xia, G., Liao, W.-H., Mitsufuji, Y ., and Dixon, S. Instruct-musicgen: Unlocking text-to- music editing for music language models via instruction tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18386,

    arXiv

  8. [27]

    Separated guidance scale formulation To expand the classifier-free guidance from a single condition to a general form, we start from: p(x, c1,

    12 MuseControlLite: Multifunctional Music Generation with Lightweight Conditioners A. Separated guidance scale formulation To expand the classifier-free guidance from a single condition to a general form, we start from: p(x, c1, . . . , cn) =p(x) nY i=1 p ci|x, c1, . . . , ci−...

    2024

  9. [28]

    score. Removing the 1D-CNN condition extractor causes all metrics to drop, and omitting the zero-initialized 1D-CNN layers used to sum cross-attention outputs similarly degrades performance. Finally, doubling the number of attention heads by scalingW ′k andW ′v yields no impro...

    2023

  10. [2009]

    Fma: A dataset for music analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01840,

    Defferrard, M., Benzi, K., Vandergheynst, P., and Bresson, X. Fma: A dataset for music analysis.arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01840,

    arXiv

  11. [2015]

    Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion

    Kumari, N., Zhang, B., Zhang, R., Shechtman, E., and Zhu, J.-Y . Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1931– 1941,

    1931

  12. [2016]

    Clap learning audio concepts from natural language su- pervision

    Elizalde, B., Deshmukh, S., Al Ismail, M., and Wang, H. Clap learning audio concepts from natural language su- pervision. InICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1–5. IEEE,

    2023

  13. [2017]

    and Salimans, T

    Ho, J. and Salimans, T. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598,

    arXiv

  14. [2018]

    P., Kumar, A., Er- mon, S., and Poole, B

    Song, Y ., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Er- mon, S., and Poole, B. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456,

    2011 arXiv

  15. [2019]

    J., Salamon, J., Nieto, O., Liang, D., Ellis, D

    Raffel, C., McFee, B., Humphrey, E. J., Salamon, J., Nieto, O., Liang, D., Ellis, D. P., and Raffel, C. C. Mir eval: A transparent implementation of common mir metrics. In ISMIR, volume 10, pp. 2014,

    2014

  16. [2020]

    Editing music with melody and text: Us- ing ControlNet for diffusion Transformer

    Hou, S., Liu, S., Yuan, R., Xue, W., Shan, Y ., Zhao, M., and Zhang, C. Editing music with melody and text: Us- ing ControlNet for diffusion Transformer. InICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE,

    2025

  17. [2022]

    Audio conditioning for music generation via discrete bottleneck features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12563,

    Rouard, S., Adi, Y ., Copet, J., Roebel, A., and D ´efossez, A. Audio conditioning for music generation via discrete bottleneck features.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12563,

    arXiv

  18. [2023]

    Qwen2-audio technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10759,

    Chu, Y ., Xu, J., Yang, Q., Wei, H., Wei, X., Guo, Z., Leng, Y ., Lv, Y ., He, J., Lin, J., et al. Qwen2-audio technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10759,

    arXiv

  19. [2024]

    Electra: Pre-training text encoders as dis- criminators rather than generators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10555,

    Clark, K. Electra: Pre-training text encoders as dis- criminators rather than generators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10555,

    2003 arXiv

  20. [2025]

    A training-free approach for music style transfer with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15913,

    Kim, S., Kwon, J., Wang, H., Yoo, S., Lin, Y ., and Cha, J. A training-free approach for music style transfer with latent diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15913,

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.