pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16778 · v1 · pith:VMK77YLCnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Emergent impedance due to antiferromagnetic domain wall dynamics

Yuta Yamane , Jotaro J. Nakane , Yasufumi Araki , Jun'ichi Ieda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 20:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords antiferromagnetic domain wallsemergent impedancespin-transfer torquespinmotive forcedomain wall dynamicsantiferromagnetsspintronics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Antiferromagnetic domain walls generate emergent impedance through competing contributions from translational motion and internal spin canting.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a formalism for the electrical response of an antiferromagnetic domain wall driven by AC currents. It derives analytical expressions showing that the emergent impedance arises from the combined action of spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force. One term scales directly with the velocity of the domain-wall center, mirroring behavior in spiral magnets. A second term, unique to antiferromagnets, arises from time-dependent canting of the two sublattice magnetizations inside the wall and scales inversely with the exchange coupling strength. Their competition fixes the sign and size of the imaginary impedance component at frequencies below resonance.

Core claim

We find that two dynamical modes play separate roles in the emergent impedance: Translational motion of the domain-wall center generates a contribution proportional to its velocity, analogous to that arising from the corresponding motion of a spiral magnet. Another contribution, unique to antiferromagnetic domain walls, originates from the time-dependent canting of the sublattice magnetizations localized within the moving domain wall, whose magnitude is inversely proportional to the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling constant. The competition between these two distinct contributions determines the sign and magnitude of the imaginary part of the emergent impedance at sub-resonant frequencies

What carries the argument

Analytical expressions for emergent impedance obtained by applying spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force to the equations of motion for an antiferromagnetic domain wall, separating the center-velocity term from the sublattice-canting term.

If this is right

  • The imaginary impedance can be made positive or negative by choosing materials with different exchange strengths.
  • Antiferromagnetic domain walls can function as electrically readable circuit elements whose response depends on drive frequency.
  • The model predicts a distinct frequency dependence that differs from both ferromagnetic domain walls and spiral magnetic textures.
  • Electrical detection of domain-wall motion becomes possible without net magnetization.
  • Device concepts can exploit the inverse dependence on exchange coupling to engineer impedance sign.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the mechanism suggests antiferromagnets could replace ferromagnets in certain impedance-based spintronic sensors.
  • Extending the calculation to include Gilbert damping would test how robust the analytical expressions remain in realistic materials.
  • Similar canting contributions might appear in other compensated magnetic textures such as ferrimagnetic domain walls near compensation points.
  • The velocity and canting terms could be separated experimentally by varying current frequency across the resonance.

Load-bearing premise

The combined action of spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force remains the dominant mechanism for generating emergent impedance when applied to antiferromagnetic domain walls, without additional damping or disorder terms altering the derived expressions.

What would settle it

Measurement showing that the imaginary part of the impedance changes sign or magnitude when the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling constant is varied while keeping other parameters fixed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16778 by Jotaro J. Nakane, Jun'ichi Ieda, Yasufumi Araki, Yuta Yamane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of our model system, where the DW dynamics driven by the time-varying electric current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic illustrations of the two dynamical mode of a DW: (a) translational motion and (b) time-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the emergent impedance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate emergent impedance induced by domain-wall dynamics in antiferromagnets. Emergent impedance, arising from a combined action of spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force, was previously predicted and observed in spiral magnets. Here we develop a formalism for the electrical response of an antiferromagnetic domain wall under ac currents, and obtain analytical expressions for the resulting emergent impedance. We find that two dynamical modes play separate roles in the emergent impedance: Translational motion of the domain-wall center generates a contribution proportional to its velocity, analogous to that arising from the corresponding motion of a spiral magnet. Another contribution, unique to antiferromagnetic domain walls, originates from the time-dependent canting of the sublattice magnetizations localized within the moving domain wall, whose magnitude is inversely proportional to the antiferromagnetic exchange coupling constant. The competition between these two distinct contributions determines the sign and magnitude of the imaginary part of the emergent impedance at sub-resonant frequencies. Our results provide a fundamental insight into electron transport in antiferromagnets, and open avenues for novel antiferromagnet-based spintronics devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical formalism for emergent impedance in antiferromagnetic domain walls under AC currents, extending the combined spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force approach previously applied to spiral magnets. It derives analytical expressions separating two dynamical modes: a velocity-proportional contribution from translational motion of the domain-wall center, and a contribution from time-dependent sublattice canting localized in the wall whose magnitude scales as 1/J_af. Their competition is shown to control the sign and magnitude of the imaginary part of the impedance at sub-resonant frequencies.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete, mode-separated account of emergent impedance that is specific to antiferromagnets and absent from the spiral-magnet literature. The explicit inverse dependence on the antiferromagnetic exchange constant and the clean separation of translational versus canting channels constitute a falsifiable prediction that could guide both transport measurements and device design in antiferromagnetic spintronics.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that analytical expressions are obtained, yet the main text should explicitly flag the rigid-wall profile and small-canting approximations at the outset of the derivation so that readers can immediately assess their range of validity.
  2. A brief comparison table or plot contrasting the present AFM expressions with the corresponding spiral-magnet results would help quantify how the new canting term alters the impedance spectrum.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript. The provided summary accurately reflects our main findings on the separation of translational and canting contributions to emergent impedance in antiferromagnetic domain walls, as well as the role of their competition in the sub-resonant imaginary part. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper extends the spin-transfer torque plus spinmotive-force mechanism (previously applied to spiral magnets) to antiferromagnetic domain walls and derives fresh analytical expressions for emergent impedance. The two-mode separation—velocity-proportional term from domain-wall translation and 1/J_af term from localized sublattice canting—is obtained directly from the coupled equations of motion under the stated rigid-wall and small-canting approximations. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no load-bearing step collapses to a self-citation, and the central result (sign and magnitude of Im(Z) at sub-resonant frequencies) follows from the explicit competition between the two derived contributions rather than from any input by construction. The model remains internally consistent and falsifiable against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Ledger inferred from abstract description only; full manuscript may introduce additional modeling assumptions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin-transfer torque and spinmotive force act in combination to produce emergent impedance in magnetic structures.
    Stated as the basis for extending the formalism from spiral magnets to antiferromagnetic domain walls.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1310 out tokens · 41305 ms · 2026-05-19T20:42:07.204722+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Néel, Ann

    L. Néel, Ann. de physique17, 5 (1932); F. Bitter, Phys. Rev.54, 79 (1938); J. H. Van Vleck, J. Chem. Phys.9, 85 (1941)

    work page 1932

  2. [2]

    C. G. Shull and J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev.76, 1256 (1949); C. G. Shull, W. A. Strauser, E. O. Wollan,ibid.83, 333 (1951)

    work page 1949

  3. [3]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 231 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Baltz, A

    V . Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Železný, P

    J. Železný, P. Wadley, K. Olejník, A. Hoffmann, and H. Ohno, Spin transport and spin torque in antiferromag- netic devices, Nat. Phys.14, 220 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    A. S. Núñez, R. A. Duine, P. Haney, and A. H. MacDonald, Theory of spin torques and giant magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic metals, Phys. Rev. B73, 214426 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Urazhdin and N

    S. Urazhdin and N. Anthony, Effect of Polarized Current on the Magnetic State of an Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 046602 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Y . Xu, S. Wang, and K. Xia, Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnetic Metals from First Principles, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 226602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    H. V . Gomonay and V . M. Loktev, Spin transfer and current-induced switching in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B81, 144427 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    K. M. D. Hals, Y . Tserkovnyak, and A. Brataas, Phenomenology of Current-Induced Dynamics in Antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 107206 (2011). 11

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    A. C. Swaving and R. A. Duine, Current-induced torques in continuous antiferromagnetic textures, Phys. Rev. B83, 054428 (2011); Influence of a transport current on a domain wall in an antiferromagnetic metal, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter24, 024223 (2012)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Linder, Controllable spin-transfer torque on an antiferromagnet in a dual spin-valve, Phys

    J. Linder, Controllable spin-transfer torque on an antiferromagnet in a dual spin-valve, Phys. Rev. B84, 094404 (2011)

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    E. G. Tveten, A. Qaiumzadeh, O. A. Tretiakov, and A. Brataas, Staggered Dynamics in Antiferromagnets by Collective Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 127208 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Cheng and Q

    R. Cheng and Q. Niu, Dynamics of antiferromagnets driven by spin current, Phys. Rev. B89, 081105(R) (2014); R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 057601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Yamane, J

    Y . Yamane, J. Ieda, and J. Sinova, Spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnetic textures: Efficiency and quantifi- cation method, Phys. Rev. B94, 054409 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Barker and O

    J. Barker and O. A. Tretiakov, Static and Dynamical Properties of Antiferromagnetic Skyrmions in the Presence of Applied Current and Temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 147203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    J. J. Nakane and H. Kohno, Microscopic calculation of spin torques in textured antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B103, L180405 (2021); Current-Induced Spin-Wave Doppler Shift in Antiferromagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.90, 103705 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Železný, H

    J. Železný, H. Gao, K. Výborný, J. Zemen, J. Mašek, A. Manchon, J. Wunderlich, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Relativistic Néel-Order Fields Induced by Electrical Current in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 157201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Wadley, B

    P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. Železný C. Andrews, V . Hills, R. P. Campion, V . Novák, K. Olejník, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi,et al., Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet, Science351, 587 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Gomonay, T

    O. Gomonay, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, High Antiferromagnetic Domain Wall Velocity Induced by Néel Spin-Orbit Torques, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 017202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Shiino, S.-H

    T. Shiino, S.-H. Oh, P. M. Haney, S.-W. Lee, G. Go, B.-G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Antiferromagnetic Domain Wall Motion Driven by Spin-Orbit Torques, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 087203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Moriyama, K

    T. Moriyama, K. Oda, T. Ohkochi, M. Kimata, and T. Ono, Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic moments in NiO, Sci. Rep.8, 14167 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    X. Z. Chen, R. Zarzuela, J. Zhang, C. Song, X. F. Zhou, G. Y . Shi, F. Li, H. A. Zhou, W. J. Jiang, F. Pan, and Y . Tserkovnyak, Antidamping-Torque-Induced Switching in Biaxial Antiferromagnetic Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 207204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    H. Tsai, T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, A. Sakai, A. Kobayashi, T. Nakano, K. Yakushiji, R. Arita, S. Miwa et al., Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state, Nature580, 608-613 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Takeuchi, Y

    Y . Takeuchi, Y . Yamane, J.-Y . Yoon, R. Itoh, B. Jinnai, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, S. Fukami, and H. Ohno, Chiral-spin rotation of non-collinear antiferromagnet by spin-orbit torque, Nat. Mater.20, 1364-1370 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    T. Higo, K. Kondou, T. Nomoto, M. Shiga, S. Sakamoto, X. Chen, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, Y . Otani, S. Miwa, and S. Nakatsuji, Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current, Nature,607, 12 474 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Zhang ,C.-T

    P. Zhang ,C.-T. Chou, H. Yun, B. C. McGoldrick, J. T. Hou, K. A. Mkhoyan, and L. Liu, Control of Néel Vector with Spin-Orbit Torques in an Antiferromagnetic Insulator with Tilted Easy Plane, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 017203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    B. Pal, B. K. Hazra, B. Göbel, J.-C. Jeon, A. K. Pandeya, A. Chakraborty, O. Busch, A. K. Srivastava, H. Deniz, J. M. Tayloret al., Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin-orbit torque, Sci. Adv.8, eabo5930 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Takeuchi, Y

    Y . Takeuchi, Y . Sato, Y . Yamane, J.-Y . Yoon, Y . Kanno, T. Uchimura, K. V . D. Zoysa, J. Han, S. Kanai, J. Ieda, et al., Electrical coherent driving of chiral antiferromagnet, Science389, 830-834 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Cheng and Q

    R. Cheng and Q. Niu, Electron dynamics in slowly varying antiferromagnetic texture, Phys. Rev. B86, 245118 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Gomonay, Berry-phase effects and electronic dynamics in a noncollinear antiferromagnetic texture, Phys

    O. Gomonay, Berry-phase effects and electronic dynamics in a noncollinear antiferromagnetic texture, Phys. Rev. B91, 144421 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Okabayashi and T

    A. Okabayashi and T. Morinari, Theory of Spin Motive Force in One-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Domain Wall, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.84, 033706 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Yamane, J

    Y . Yamane, J. Ieda, and J. Sinova, Electric voltage generation by antiferromagnetic dynamics, Phys. Rev. B93, 180408(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Berger, Possible existence of a Josephson effect in ferromagnets, Phys

    L. Berger, Possible existence of a Josephson effect in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B33, 1572 (1986)

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    G. E. V olovik, Linear momentum in ferromagnets, J. Phys. C20, L83 (1987); Spin-motive force and orbital- motive force: from magnon Bose-Einstein condensation to chiral Weyl superfluids, JETP Lett.98, 480 (2013)

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Stern, Berry’s phase, motive forces, and mesoscopic conductivity, Phys

    A. Stern, Berry’s phase, motive forces, and mesoscopic conductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1022 (1992)

    work page 1992

  37. [37]

    S. E. Barnes and S. Maekawa, Generalization of Faraday’s Law to Include Nonconservative Spin Forces, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 246601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    S. A. Yang, G. S. D. Beach, C. Knutson, D. Xiao, Q. Niu, M. Tsoi, and J. L. Erskine, Universal Electromotive Force Induced by Domain Wall Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 067201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    K. M. D. Hals and A. Brataas, Spin-motive forces and current-induced torques in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    V . G. Bar’yakhtar, B. A. Ivanov, and M. V . Chetkin, Dynamics of domain walls in weak ferromagnets, Sov. Phys. Usp.28, 563 (1985)

    work page 1985

  41. [41]

    Papanicolaou, Antiferromagnetic domain walls, Phys

    N. Papanicolaou, Antiferromagnetic domain walls, Phys. Rev. B51, 15062 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    M. Bode, E. Y . Vedmedenko, K. V on Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, P. Ferriani, S. Heinze, and R. Wiesendanger, Atomic spin structure of antiferromagnetic domain walls, Nat. Mater.5, 477 (2006)

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    A. N. Bogdanov, U. K. Röβler, M. Wolf, and K.-H. Müller, Magnetic structures and reorientation transitions in noncentrosymmetric uniaxial antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B66, 214410 (2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    Yokouchi, Y

    T. Yokouchi, Y . Yamane, Y . Araki, J. Ieda, and Y . Shiomi, Emergent electric field induced by current-driven domain wall motion in a room-temperature antiferromagnet FeSn2, arXiv:2312.01553

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Nagaosa, Emergent inductor by spiral magnets, Jpn

    N. Nagaosa, Emergent inductor by spiral magnets, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.58, 120909 (2019). 13

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Yokouchi, F

    T. Yokouchi, F. Kagawa, M. Hirschberger, Y . Otani, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induction in a helical-spin magnet, Nature (London)586, 232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Kitaori, N

    A. Kitaori, N. Kanazawa, T. Yokouchi, F. Kagawa, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induction beyond room temperature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2105422118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Kitaori, J

    A. Kitaori, J. S. White, N. Kanazawa, V . Ukleev, D. Singh, Y . Furukawa, T. H. Arima, N. Nagaosa, and Y . Tokura, Doping control of magnetism and emergent electromagnetic induction in high-temperature helimagnets, Phys. Rev. B107, 024406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Kitaori, J

    A. Kitaori, J. S. White, V . Ukleev, L. Peng, K. Nakajima, N. Kanazawa, X. Yu, Y . Onuki, and Y . Tokura, Enhanced emergent electromagnetic inductance in Tb 5Sb3 due to highly disordered helimagnetism, Commun. Phys.7, 159 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Matsushima, Z

    Y . Matsushima, Z. Zhang, Y . Ohashi, T. Hatakeyama, G. Xiao, T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and H. Kaiju, Emergent magneto-inductance effect in permalloy thin films on flexible polycarbonate substrates at room temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 022404 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Kurebayashi and N

    D. Kurebayashi and N. Nagaosa, Electromagnetic response in spiral magnets and emergent inductance, Com- mun. Phys.4, 260 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Anan and T

    T. Anan and T. Morimoto, Emergent inductors in nonhelical magnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 184424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Oh and N

    T. Oh and N. Nagaosa, Emergent inductance from spin fluctuations in strongly correlated magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 116501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Furuta, W

    S. Furuta, W. Koshibae, and F. Kagawa, Symmetry of the emergent inductance tensor exhibited by magnetic textures, npj Spintronics1, 3 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Furuta, W

    S. Furuta, W. Koshibae, K. Matsuura, N. Abe, F. Wang, S. Zhou, T. H. Arima, and F. Kagawa, Reconsidering nonlinear emergent inductance: Time-varying Joule heating and its impact on ac electrical response, Phys. Rev. B110, 174402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Ieda and Y

    J. Ieda and Y . Yamane, Intrinsic and extrinsic tunability of Rashba spin-orbit coupled emergent inductors, Phys. Rev. B103, L100402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Yamane, S

    Y . Yamane, S. Fukami, and J. Ieda, Theory of Emergent Inductance with Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 147201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Araki and J

    Y . Araki and J. Ieda, Emergence of Inductance and Capacitance from Topological Electromagnetism, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 074705 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics Pt. 2, Course of Theoretical Physics V ol. 9 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980)

    work page 1980

  60. [60]

    Tatara and H

    G. Tatara and H. Kohono, Theory of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion: Spin Transfer versus Momentum Transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 086601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  61. [61]

    Zhang and Z

    S. Zhang and Z. Li, Roles of Nonequilibrium Conduction Electrons on the Magnetization Dynamics of Ferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 127204 (2004)

    work page 2004

  62. [62]

    S. E. Barnes and S. Maekawa, Current-Spin Coupling for Ferromagnetic Domain Walls in Fine Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 107204 (2005). 14

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    Tserkovnyak, A

    Y . Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, and G. E. W. Bauer, Theory of current-driven magnetization dynamics in inhomo- geneous ferromagnets, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.320, 1282-1292 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Garate, K

    I. Garate, K. Gilmore, M. D. Stiles, and A. H. MacDonald, Nonadiabatic spin-transfer torque in real materials, Phys. Rev. B79, 104416 (2009)

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    A. F. Andreev and V . I. Marchenko, Symmetry and the macroscopic dynamics of magnetic materials, Sov. Phys. Usp.23, 21 (1980)

    work page 1980

  66. [66]

    Zhang and S

    S. Zhang and S. S.-L. Zhang, Generalization of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert Equation for Conducting Ferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 086601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    N. L. Schryer and L. R. Walker, The motion of 180 ◦ domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 5406 (1974)

    work page 1974

  68. [68]

    J. Ohe, S. E. Barnes, H.-W. Lee, and S. Maekawa, Electrical measurements of the polarization in a moving magnetic vortex, Appl. Phys. Lett.95, 123110 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    R. A. Duine, Effects of nonadiabaticity on the voltage generated by a moving domain wall, Phys. Rev. B79, 014407 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    K. M. D. Hals and A. Brataas, Spin-transfer torques in helimagnets, Phys. Rev. B87, 174409 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    A. G. Gurevich and G. A. Melkov, Magnetization Oscillations and Waves (Chemical Rubber Corp., New York, 1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    Hayashi, L

    M. Hayashi, L. Thomas, C. Rettner, R. Moriya, X. Jiang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Dependence of Current and Field Driven Depinning of Domain Walls on Their Structure and Chirality in Permalloy Nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 207205 (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Grünberg, R

    P. Grünberg, R. Schreiber, Y . Pang, M. B. Brodsky, and H. Sowers, Layered Magnetic Structures: Evidence for Antiferromagnetic Coupling of Fe Layers across Cr Interlayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 2442 (1986)

    work page 1986