Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Do Sparse Autoencoders Generalize? A Case Study of Answerability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.19964 v2 pith:VO5FYNJN submitted 2025-02-27 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords featuresanswerabilitygeneralizationinterpretabilitysparseacrossautoencodersdomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising approach in language model interpretability, offering unsupervised extraction of sparse features. For interpretability methods to succeed, they must identify abstract features across domains, and these features can often manifest differently in each context. We examine this through "answerability" - a model's ability to recognize answerable questions. We extensively evaluate SAE feature generalization across diverse, partly self-constructed answerability datasets for Gemma 2 SAEs. Our analysis reveals that residual stream probes outperform SAE features within domains, but generalization performance differs sharply. SAE features show inconsistent out-of-domain transfer, with performance varying from almost random to outperforming residual stream probes. Overall, this demonstrates the need for robust evaluation methods and quantitative approaches to predict feature generalization in SAE-based interpretability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools